RIAA Defends CD Copy
Protection |
2/28. Hillary Rosen, P/CEO of the Recording Industry Association of
America (RIAA), wrote a letter
[PDF] to Rep. Rick
Boucher (D-VA) regarding CD copy protection. She wrote
that "record companies have both a legal right and a
responsibility to utilize technology to protect their
companies' revenues and jobs, and their artist's income and
careers."
Rep. Boucher wrote a letter
to the RIAA and the International
Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI)
on January 4, 2002, in which he asked, among other things,
"What methods have been used or are planned for use by
your member companies to alter CD content or ancillary
encoding so as to constrain functions of personal computers or
other devices?" He also questioned whether CD copy
protection violates the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA). See, 17
U.S.C. Ё 1001, et seq.
CD Copy Protection Technology. Rosen provide little
information about CD copy protection methods. Rather, she
defended it use. She wrote that "the ease with which CDs
can be copied has resulted in mass distribution for which the
creators get no reward. The evidence of the problem is
everywhere. Internet piracy and file swapping services
continue to proliferate."
She added that "If technology can be used to pirate
copyrighted content, shouldn't technology likewise be used to
protect content? Isn't it incumbent on copyright owners to do
whatever they can to protect the economic value of their works
and the jobs and careers of the hundreds of thousands of
individuals who create, produce, market and distribute
music?"
She wrote little about copy protection technologies. She
stated that "There are a multitude of technologies
available that offer some form of copy protection for CDs.
Each of them has different characteristics and performs
differently."
However, she continued that "Copy protection technologies
are constantly evolving ..." She also wrote that
"Decisions on CD copy protection are being made by record
companies individually, on a company by company basis. ...
RIAA is not privy to their individual plans." Moreover,
"The particular methods by which each technology operates
are proprietary to its owner, and are confidential".
AHRA. Rep. Boucher wrote in his January 4 letter:
"I am particularly concerned that some of these
technologies may prevent or inhibit consumer home recording
using recorders and media covered by the Audio Home Recording
Act of 1992 (AHRA). As you know from your personal involvement
in its drafting, the AHRA clearly requires content owners to
code their material appropriately to implement a basic
compromise: in return for the receipt of royalties on
compliant recorders and media, copyright owners may not
preclude consumers from making a first generation, digital to
digital copy of an album on a compliant device using
royalty-paid media. Under the AHRA, any deliberate change to a
CD by a content owner that makes one generation of digital
recording from the CD on covered devices no longer possible
would appear to violate the content owner抯 obligations
under the statute."
Rosen rejected this argument in her letter of February 28. She
wrote: "Your letter suggests that the use of CD copy
protection technology might somehow violate the terms of the
Audio Home Recording Act (``AHRA创). In fact, however, this
is clearly not the case. The devices primarily used to rip CDs
are general purpose computer devices, which are explicitly
excluded from the coverage of the AHRA. Moreover, the AHRA was
a legislative compromise reached years before the development
of peer to peer systems and the resultant massive
infringements they facilitate. The AHRA primarily imposes
obligations on manufacturers of ``digital audio recording
devices,创 ..."
Rosen added that "The only requirement imposed on
distributors of recorded music is that they encode accurately
the information used by SCMS" (Serial Copy Management
System). "Nothing in the AHRA affirmatively requires that
a CD be copiable, let alone recordable in any particular
device. Certainly, there is not policy justification for ...
some kind of broad affirmative right to copy CDs," wrote
Rosen. |
|
|
Sen. Biden Addresses
Digital Divides |
2/27. Sen. Joe Biden
(D-DE) spoke in the Senate regarding digital divides. He
stated that "the widening gap between those Americans who
use or have access to telecommunications technologies, like
computers and the Internet, and those who do not.
Surprisingly, there are those naysayers who suggest that the
``digital divide创 does not exist, that it is a myth or
fabrication of consumer and civil rights advocates. ... No
matter the reason for these naysayers' doubt, the unequivocal
answer to their question ``is there really a digital divide创
is a resounding ``YES.创 "
He also stated that "I am shocked by the Bush
administration's apparent efforts to dismantle many programs
designed to eliminate the inequality of access to technology.
These programs, including the popular E-Rate Program, have a
demonstrated record of success connecting roughly 1 million
public school classrooms and 13,000 community libraries to
modern telecommunications networks." See, Cong. Rec.,
Feb. 27, 2002, at page S1244. |
|
|
Bills Introduced |
2/28. Rep. Saxby
Chambliss (R-GA), Rep.
Jane Harman (D-CA), and others introduced HR
3825 [PDF], the Homeland Security Information Sharing Act,
a bill to provide for the sharing of homeland security
information by federal intelligence and law enforcement
agencies with state and local entities. Rep. Chambliss and
Rep. Harman are the Chairman and ranking Democrat on the House
Intelligence Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security.
The bill was referred to the House Intelligence Committee, the
House Judiciary
Committee, and the House
Government Reform Committee. See also, Harman
release.
2/28. Rep. Bart Stupak
(D-MI) and Rep. John
LaFalce (D-NY) introduced HR 3829, a bill to repeal the
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA)
and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA)
that limit private securities actions. The bill was referred
to the House
Financial Services Committee and the House Judiciary
Committee.
2/28. Sen. Patrick Leahy
(D-VT) and Sen. Charles
Grassley (R-IA) introduced S 1974, the FBI Reform Act of
2002. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary
Committee. See, Leahy and Grassley's summary.
2/27. Rep. Greg Meeks
(D-NY) introduced HR
3809, the Economic Development and Technology Workforce
Enhancement Act of 2002. This bill would amend the Internal
Revenue Code with respect to small issue bonds. It was
referred to the House
Ways and Means Committee. |
|
|
|
FCC Receives Comments on
Regulatory Treatment of ILECs Provision of Broadband |
3/1. Friday, March 1, was the deadline to submit comments to
the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) in response to its notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the appropriate regulatory
requirements for incumbent local exchange carriers' (ILECs')
provision of broadband telecommunications services. The FCC
adopted this NPRM at its December 12 meeting. This is CC
Docket No. 01-337. See, notice
in the Federal Register, January 15, 2002, Vol. 67, No. 10, at
Pages 1945 - 1947.
The Information Technology
Association of America (ITAA) submitted a comment
[PDF] in which it stated that the FCC "should continue to
classify ILECs as dominant in the provision of wholesale mass
market broadband telecommunications services. Rather than
eliminating existing regulations, the Commission should take
action to promote competitive entry by Data CLECs, while
enforcing the still effective Computer II requirement that the
BOCs separate the provision of telecommunications services
(both narrowband and broadband) from the provision of
information services. If the Commission chooses to deregulate
the ILECs' broadband services, however, it should, at the very
least, require the ILECs to provide ``advanced
telecommunications services创 through an affiliate that is
structurally separate from their local exchange service
operations."
WorldCom submitted a comment
[PDF] in which argued that the FCC "should consider the
issues that arise when a carrier is dominant in an upstream
market (local exchange and exchange access), but faces some
competition in the downstream market (broadband services). The
Commission must consider what level of regulation to apply to
the downstream market, and what safeguards are necessary to
prevent a carrier from leveraging its power in the upstream
market to affect competition in the downstream market.
Consistent with FCC precedent, most recently the LEC
Classification proceeding, the Commission should not declare a
carrier with market power in the upstream market non-dominant
in the downstream market unless there is sufficient evidence
of irreversible and meaningful competition in the downstream
market."
Time Warner submitted a comment
[PDF] in which it stated that "there is no need for the
Commission to alter the current regulation of ILEC broadband
services provided to medium and large business customers,
except to require ILECs to comply with special access service
quality performance measurements, standards, reporting
requirements and penalties."
Sprint submitted a comment
[PDF] in which it argued that "The broadband services
market should be divided into two relevant product markets --
mass market and larger business. In both of these markets
there is a demonstration of existing competition that
justifies some degree of pricing flexibility and tariff filing
flexibility, but only if the ILEC Section 251 UNE,
collocation, and resale obligations continue."
Back in January, SBC filed a petition
[PDF] with the FCC seeking a ruling that it is non dominant in
its provision of advanced services, and to forbear from
dominant carrier regulation of those services. |
|
|
People and Appointments |
2/26. The Senate confirmed Robert Blackburn to be a
U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Colorado, and Cindy
Jorgenson to be a U.S. District Court Judge for the
District of Arizona.
2/25. Texas Instruments (TI)
named Beth Bull Treasurer, and Kevin March
Controller. Both will report to TI's CFO, Bill Aylesworth.
See, TI
release.
2/28. The U.S. Telecom
Association (USTA), a group that represents the baby
Bells, gave a "Lifetime Achievement Award" to Rep. John Dingell
(D-MI) at a conference on February 28. On February 27, the
House passed the Tauzin Dingell bill, which would provide
regulatory relief for the baby Bells. See, USTA
release.
3/1. The National
Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA) board of
directors elected John Metts President, Norman
Walker Vice President, and Tom Rowland Secretary
Treasurer. Metts is CEO and General Manager of Penasco Valley
Telephone Cooperative in Artesia, New Mexico. Welker is CEO
and General Manager of McDonough Telephone Cooperative in
Colchester, Illinois. Rowland is P/CEO of North Central
Telephone Cooperative in Lafayette, Tennessee. |
|
|
More News |
3/1. The Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) extended the deadline for submitting
public comments to the FTC regarding the use of disgorgement
as a remedy for competition violations, including those
involving the Hart Scott Rodino Premerger Notification Act,
FTC Act, and Clayton Act. See, original FTC release
and Federal Register notice
setting a deadline of March 1, and FTC release
extending deadline to March 29.
3/1. The Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) approved a notice
to be published in the Federal Register regarding proposed new
Privacy Act system of records. This system, if adopted, would
include telephone numbers and other information pertaining to
individuals who have informed the Commission that they do not
wish to receive telemarketing calls. Public comments on this
proposal are due by March 29, 2002.
3/1. The Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) release a report
[41 pages in PDF] titled "Public Workshop: The Mobile
Wireless Web, Data Services and Beyond: Emerging Technologies
and Consumer Issues". This report pertains to a workshop
held by the FTC on December 11-12, 2000, on new wireless
technologies, and the consumer protection issues that they
raise.
3/1. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion in Hewlett
Packard v. Packard Press. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissed Hewlett
Packard's opposition to Packard Press's application for
registration of the mark PACKARD TECHNOLOGIES for data
processing and data transmission services. HP appealed. The
Appeals Court ruled that there is a likelihood of confusion,
and reversed. |
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for entities with multiple subscribers. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for law students, journalists,
elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch, and state officials. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert and
news items are not published in the web site until one month
after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2002 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|
|
Monday, March 4 |
The House will meet at 2:00 PM in pro forma session only.
The Senate will meet at 4:00 PM, and resume consideration of S
565, the campaign spending bill.
9:30 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in ACS
Anchorage Inc v. FCC, 01-1059. Judges Edwards, Randolph
and Williams will preside. Location: 333 Constitution Ave. NW. |
|
|
Tuesday, March 5 |
The House will meet at 12:30 PM for morning hour and 2:00 PM
for legislative business. No votes are expected before 6:00
PM. The House will consider a number of bills under suspension
of the rules.
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. The National
Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) Computer System Security
And Privacy Advisory Board (CSSPAB) will meet to discuss
computer security legislation, privacy issues, critical
infrastructure protection, the USPS's electronic postmark
products, and other matters. This is the first day of a three
day meeting. See, notice
in Federal Register, February 20, 2002, Vol. 67, No. 34, at
Page 7671. Location: General Services Administration, 7th and
D Streets, SW, Room 5700.
10:00 AM. The Senate
Appropriations Subcommittee's Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State, and the Judiciary will hold a hearing
regarding the Department of
Justice (DOJ) budget request
for Fiscal Year 2003. Location: Room 138, Dirksen
Building.
10:00 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in Marketel
International v. Priceline.com, No. 01-1279, an appeal
from the U.S. District
Court (NDCal). Marketel filed a complaint against
Priceline alleging misappropriation of trade secrets,
misappropriation of business model, conversion, false
advertising, and entitlement to a correction of inventorship
of Priceline's U.S.
Patent No. 5,794,207. Marketel appeals the District
Court's dismissal of some of its claims. Location: Courtroom
203, LaFayette Square, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:30 AM - 4:30 PM. The President's Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST) will hold a meeting to discuss
the science and technology of combating terrorism, federal
spending on science and technology research and development,
demand issues related to deployment of broadband
infrastructure, and other topics. See, notice
in Federal Register. Location: Board Room, American Institute
of Architects, 1735 New York Ave., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The FCBA will
host a CLE seminar titled "U.S. Spectrum Policy:
Convergence or Co-Existence?" This is Part I of a two
part series. Part II will be on April 16. See, program agenda. |
|
|
Wednesday, March 6 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business. It
is scheduled to take up the Federal Information Technology
Workforce and Acquisition Improvement Act.
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. The NIST's
Computer System
Security And Privacy Advisory Board (CSSPAB) will meet.
This is the second day of a three day of meeting. See, notice
in Federal Register. Location: GSA, 7th and D Streets, SW,
Room 5700.
10:00 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in NeoMagic
v. Trident MicroSystems, No. 01-1631, an appeal from the
U.S. District Court (DDel) in a patent infringement and
antitrust case involving embedded memory semiconductors. The
District Court granted summary judgment of non infringement to
Trident
MicroSystems. Location: Courtroom 201, LaFayette Square,
717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM - 4:00 PM. The SEC will hold
a roundtable meeting to examine proposals for better
protecting investors by reforming financial disclosure and
auditor oversight. The morning session (10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON)
will focus on financial disclosure. The afternoon session
(2:00 - 4:00 PM) will focus on auditor oversight. See, SEC notice.
Location: Douglas Room, Basement, SEC.
10:00 AM. The House
Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State, and the Judiciary will hold a hearing on the
proposed budget for FY 2003 for the State Department.
Location: Room 2359, Rayburn Building.
10:30 AM. The Senate
Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust,
Competition, and Business and Consumer Rights will hold a
hearing titled "Dominance in the Sky: Cable Competition
and the Echostar Direct TV Merger". Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI) will
preside. The scheduled witnesses include Charlie Ergen (CEO of
Echostar), Eddy Hartenstein (CEO of DirecTV), Gene Kimmelman
(Consumers Union), Robert Pitofsky (Arnold & Porter), and
Jay Nixon (Attorney General of Missouri). Location: Room 226,
Dirksen Building.
12:15 PM. The FCBA's
Online Committee will host a brown bag lunch. The speaker will
be Anthony Rutkowki, VP Internet Strategy, Verisign. He will address
"Broadband, When? -- Verisign's' View." RSVP to
Scott Harris at sharris@harriswiltshire.com.
Location: Lampert & O'Connor, 5th Floor, 1750 K Street,
NW.
2:00 PM. The House
Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State, and the Judiciary will hold a hearing on the
proposed budget for FY 2003 for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. Location: Room 2359, Rayburn Building.
2:30 PM. The Senate
Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Communications will
hold a hearing on wireless communications infrastructure.
Location: Room 253, Russell Building. |
|
|
Thursday, March 7 |
9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. The NIST's
Computer System
Security And Privacy Advisory Board (CSSPAB) will meet.
This is the third day of a three day of meeting. See, notice
in Federal Register. Location: GSA, 7th and D Streets, SW,
Room 5700.
9:30 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in USTA
v. FCC. Judges Edwards, Randolph and Williams will
preside. Location: 333 Constitution Ave. NW.
10:00 AM. The Senate
Appropriations Subcommittee's Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State, and the Judiciary will hold a hearing on the
proposed budget for FY 2003 for the SEC and the FCC. SEC
Chairmam Harvey
Pitt and FCC Chairman Michael Powell
will testify. See, CJS
release. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate
Banking Committee will hold a hearing. Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan will deliver his semi annual
report on monetary policy. Location: Room 106, Dirksen Senate
Office Building. |
|
|
Friday, March 8 |
12:15 PM. The FCBA's
Transactional Practice Committee will host a brown bag lunch
on mass media transactions. RSVP to Sue Fischer at (202)
776-2491. Location: Dow
Lohnes & Albertson, 1200 New Hampshire Ave.
Extended deadline for submitting comments to the FCC in response
to its Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the
current state of the market for local and advanced
telecommunications services in multi tenant environments. See,
FCC
notice of extension of deadline [PDF]. This is WT Docket
No. 99-217. |
|
|