Juster Addresses
Export Controls |
10/10. Kenneth
Juster, Under Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration, gave a speech
in Washington DC regarding export controls. Juster is head of
the Commerce Department's
(DOC) Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS), which was previously known as the Bureau
of Export Administration (BXA).
First, he explained why the BXA changed its name to BIS. He
stated that it is because it is now involved in far more than
export controls. For example, he said that "We have worked
with industry on the national strategies for cyber security
and homeland security. And we lead the Federal government's
outreach efforts to industry on critical infrastructure
protection and cyber security."
Juster stated that there is "a vibrant private sector working
in partnership with us to protect our security and promote our
economic well being."
He
stated both that the BIS is "the representative of industry in
the export control process", and that it "is not simply a
lobbyist for industry in the interagency process". He
elaborated that "We routinely stand up for industry on issues
where we believe that other agencies want to impose
restrictions on exports without any corresponding national
security benefit. A prime example of this is the interagency
process for determining controls on the export of high
performance computers. ... [and] We have worked together in
the same constructive manner on efforts to lift controls on
general purpose microprocessors ..."
He also stated that the BIS "played a major role in raising
awareness of critical infrastructure protection issues in the
private sector and with state and local governments, convening
two widely publicized conferences on the subject. And we
coordinated the private sector input -- including that from
the high tech industry -- for the
National
Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, which the Administration
released for public comment last month."
He also reminded his audience that "our
Critical Infrastructure Assurance
Office is slated for transfer to the new Department of
Homeland Security."
Juster also advocated passage of
S 149,
the Export Administration Act of 2001, which is sponsored by
Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY).
He stated that "the statutory authority for our dual use
export control system -- the Export Administration Act of 1979
-- has not been comprehensively revised or overhauled for 23
years. That is why an important priority remains the passage
of a new Export Administration Act."
S 149 would ease restraints on the export of most dual use
products, such as computers and software. However, it would
raise penalties for violation of remaining prohibitions. It
would also repeal provisions of the 1998 National Defense
Authorization Act which require the President to use Million
Theoretical Operations Per Second (MTOPS) to set restrictions
on the export of high performance computers.
It passed the Senate
Banking Committee on March 22, 2001 by a vote of 19-1. It
passed the full Senate on September 6, 2001, by a vote of
85-14. On August 1, 2001, the
House
International Relations Committee approved
HR 2581,
which is also titled the "Export Administration Act of 2001",
sponsored by Rep.
Benjamin Gilman (R-NY), by a vote of 26-7. However, it is
a much different bill.
While S 149 passed the Senate overwhelmingly, it passed before
the terrorists attacks of September 11, 2001. It now faces new
opposition. No action has been taken in either the House or
Senate on this bill since September 11, 2001. On the other
hand, Sen. Fred
Thompson (R-TN), one of the leading opponents of
S 149 in the Senate, is retiring. Rep. Gilman is also
retiring.
Juster stated that "The legislation that currently is pending
in Congress -- based on Senate bill 149 -- would update and
refine the dual use export control system in a way that is
good for industry. It would help exporters by providing
transparency, predictability, and time limits in the export
licensing process. It sets forth procedures for U.S. companies
to seek to decontrol mass market items and items that are
readily available from foreign sources. It thus enhances the
ability of U.S. companies to compete for legitimate
international sales on a fair and equal footing with their
foreign competitors."
He also addressed end user visits, exports to the PR China,
the transshipment countries export control
initiative.
|
|
|
FBI Memo Lists Problems with
FISA E-Mail and Cell Phone Surveillance |
10/10. The Electronic
Privacy Information Center (EPIC) published in its web
site a copy of a Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI)
memorandum
[3 pages in PDF] pertaining to problems with electronic
surveillance pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA). The EPIC obtained the April 21, 2000 memorandum of
the FBI's Counterterrorism Division as a result of a Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) request, and a related lawsuit.
The memorandum states that "different field offices have
encountered difficulties in their management of electronic
surveillance and physical searches authorized under FISA." It
lists as examples unauthorized interception of e-mail messages
and cell phone conversations.
For example, the memorandum states that "a target's E-Mail was
correctly intercepted under FISA order. When time came to
renew the FISA, the field office decided to omit E-Mail
coverage since the coverage was not productive. Thus, the FISA
renewal order did not cover E-Mail. The field office then
continued to cover the target's E-Mail even though there was
not authorization for E-Mail coverage in the FISA renewal
order."
As another example, the memorandum states that "a field office
secured a FISA order which authorized the coverage of a
target's cell phone. Unknown to the field office, some time
after the FISA order, the target gave up his cell phone, and
the target's cell phone number was assigned by the cell phone
carrier to a new person. The new owner of the cell phone spoke
a language other than the language spoken by the target of the
FISA. When the language specialist listened to the FISA tape,
and hear a new language, the specialist reported it to the
agent working the case. Nothing was done for a substantial
period of time, and timely reportedly was not made to FBIHQ.
The new owner of the cell phone number was therefore the
target of unauthorized electronic surveillance for a
substantial period of time."
The memorandum states that "Other examples include
unauthorized searches, incorrect addresses, incorrect
interpretation of a FISA order and overruns of
ELSUR."
|
|
|
|
Cox and Wyden Introduce
Global Internet Freedom Act |
10/10. On October 2,
Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA) and
Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA)
introduced HR 5524,
the Global Internet Freedom Act, in the House. On October 10,
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)
and Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
introduced S 3093, the companion bill in the Senate. The
bill creates, and authorizes funding for, a new Office of
Global Internet Freedom to counter Internet jamming and
blocking by repressive regimes.
The legislation states that "All people have the right to
communicate freely with others, and to have unrestricted
access to news and information, on the Internet." However, it
continues that "The governments of Burma, Cuba, Laos, North
Korea, the People's Republic of China, Saudi Arabia, Syria,
and Vietnam, among others, are taking active measures to keep
their citizens from freely accessing the Internet and
obtaining international political, religious, and economic
news and information."
The bill recites that "Intergovernmental, nongovernmental, and
media organizations have reported the widespread and
increasing pattern by authoritarian governments to block, jam,
and monitor Internet access and content, using technologies
such as firewalls, filters, and `black boxes´. Such jamming
and monitoring of individual activity on the Internet includes
surveillance of e-mail messages, message boards, and the use
of particular words; `stealth blocking´ individuals from
visiting websites; the development of `black lists´ of users
that seek to visit these websites; and the denial of access to
the Internet."
It further states that "The Voice of America and Radio Free
Asia, as well as hundreds of news sources with an Internet
presence, are routinely being jammed by repressive
governments." See also, story titled "AEI Panel Advocates
``Freeing the Chinese Internet´´" in
TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 416, April 23, 2002. A
representative of the Voice of
America (VOA) spoke about the blocking of the VOA web site
by the government of the Peoples Republic of China.
The bill would create a new office within the International
Broadcasting Bureau named the Office of Global Internet
Freedom. Its task would be to "develop and implement a
comprehensive global strategy to combat state sponsored and
state directed Internet jamming, and persecution of those who
use the Internet." The bill also authorizes the appropriation
of $50 Million for fiscal years 2003 and 2004.
The bill also states that it is the sense of the Congress that
the U.S. should "deploy, at the earliest practicable date,
technologies aimed at defeating state directed Internet
censorship and the persecution of those who use the Internet."
Rep. Cox and Sen. Wyden have collaborated many times in the
past on Internet related legislation, usually with success.
For example, the two led the effort in the 105th Congress to
pass the Internet Tax Freedom Act.
Rep. Cox stated in a release
that "Today, however, just as past governments have banned
pamphlets, jammed radios, and committed their gravest
atrocities out of the range of TV cameras, many governments
are attempting to restrict an individual’s freedom to receive
and exchange information by blocking the Internet. Our
legislation will help end that abuse. The success of U.S.
policy in support of freedom of speech, press, and association
requires new initiatives to defeat totalitarian controls over
the Internet."
Sen.
Wyden (at right) stated that "Openness, transparency, and the
unfettered flow of information have always been the allies of
freedom and democracy. Over time, nothing erodes oppression
and intolerance like the widespread dissemination of knowledge
and ideas. And technology has often played a key role in this
process. From the printing press to radio, technological
advances have revolutionized the spread information and ideas
and opened up new horizons for people everywhere. Not
surprisingly, the foes of freedom, understanding the threat
these technologies pose, have often responded with such steps
as censoring the press, jamming radio broadcasts, and putting
media outlets under state control." See, Congressional
Record, October 10, 2002, at S10369.
He continued that "governments that fear freedom are trying to
rein in the technology's potential. They block access to
websites. They censor websites and email. They interrupt
Internet search engines when users try explore the ``wrong´´
topics. They closely monitor citizens' Internet usage and make
it known that those who visit the ``wrong´´ websites will be
punished. Or they prevent Internet access altogether, by
prohibiting ownership of personal computers."
Sen. Wyden also said that "There are technologies that can
help defeat the firewalls and filters that these governments
choose to erect. Proxy servers, intermediaries, ``mirrors,´´
and encryption may all have useful applications in this
regard. But the U.S. Government has done little to promote
technological approaches. This country devotes considerable
resources to combat the jamming of Voice of America
broadcasting abroad. But to date, it has budgeted only about
$1 million for technologies to counter Internet jamming and
censorship."
He concluded that "This country can and should do better. The
Internet is too important a communications medium, and its
potential as a force for freedom and democracy is too great,
to make a second rate effort in this area."
|
|
|
ATP Announces Awards for
2002 |
10/8. The National
Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST)
Advanced
Technology Program (ATP) announced over $100 Million in
awards, many of which pertain to computing and communications.
The ATP is funding projects pertaining to photovoltaic silicon
wafers, fuel cells on a chip for handheld devices, printed
organic transistors on plastic for electronic displays and
circuits, optical switches for routing data traffic, image
compression, nanophotonic circuits integrated on semiconductor
wafers, XML encryption, and other storage and nano
technologies. See, ATP
release.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for entities with multiple subscribers. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for law students, journalists,
elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch, and state officials. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert and
news items are not published in the web site until one month
after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882;
E-mail.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2002 David Carney,
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|
Tuesday, October
15 |
The House will meet at 12:30 PM for morning hour and at
2:00 PM for legislative business. No votes are expected. The
House will consider a number of measures under suspension of
the rules. It may take up HJRes __, the Dot Kids
Implementation and Efficiency Act of 2002, sponsored by
Rep. John Shimkus
(R-IL). See, Whip
Notice.
The Senate will meet at 10:00 AM for morning business. At
11:00 AM it will begin consideration of the conference report
on HR 3295,
the Election Reform Act.
9:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The USPTO's
Technology
Center 2800 will hold a Semiconductor Customer Partnership
Meeting to discuss the quality and timeliness of the
examination process. (2800 pertains to semiconductors,
electrical and optical systems and components.) See,
USPTO
notice. Location: Crystal Park 1, Suite 819, 2011 Crystal
Drive, Arlington, VA.
12:00 NOON. James Rogan
(Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the USPTO) will
give an address titled "Reaffirming Intellectual Property
Rights in an Information Age". See,
notice.
Press contact: Brigid Quinn at
brigid.quinn @uspto.gov or 703 305-8341.
Location: Heritage Foundation, 214
Massachusetts Ave., NE.
6:15 PM. The House Rules
Committee will meet to adopt a rule for consideration of a
resolution for further continuing appropriations for FY 2002.
Day one of a two day conference of the
Association Internationale pour
la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (AIPPI)
titled "How to be Successful with Patent and Trademark
Litigation: Europe and the Far East". The agenda includes a
business meeting (1:00 - 1:30 PM), a CLE seminar (1:30 - 5:00
PM), and a reception (5:00 - 6:30 PM). Location: Faculty
Conference Room, Burns Building, 5th Floor,
GWU Law
School, 716 20th Street, NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the
FCC in response
to Qwest Communications'
Section
271 application to provide in region interLATA service in
the states of Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, North
Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. This is WC Docket No.
02-314. See, FCC
release [PDF].
|
|
|
Wednesday, October
16 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business.
See, Whip
Notice.
9:00 AM - 4:00 PM. The FCC will host a
day long conference on rights of way management issues.
See, FCC
notice [PDF]. For more information contact Kris Monteith
or Gene Fullano at 202 418-1400, kmonteit @fcc.gov or gfullano @fcc.gov. Audio
web cast. Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room, 445 12th
Street, SW.
10:00 AM. The Senate
Appropriations Committee's Treasury and General Government
Subcommittee will hold a hearings on U.S. companies' moving
their headquarters offshore. Location: Room 192, Dirksen
Building.
11:00 AM - 12:00 NOON.
James Rogan
(Director of the USPTO) and
Richard Russell (Associate Director for Technology of the
White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy) will lead a roundtable discussion
on the future of innovation with 37 leading inventors,
including Steve Wozniak (computers), Donald Keck and Peter
Schulz (fiber optics), and Doug Englebart (mouse). See,
list
of participants. Press contact: Brigid Quinn at
brigid.quinn @uspto.gov or
703 305-8341. Location: Room 4830,
Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution, NW.
12:00 NOON. Treasury Secretary
Paul
O'Neill will speak to the National
Association of Manufacturers (NAM) Board of Directors. Location:
International Trade Center, Reagan Building, Amphitheater
(Concourse Level).
1:30 - 3:00 PM. Sam Bodman (Deputy Secretary of Commerce),
James Rogan
(Director of the USPTO), and 37
leading inventors will hold an awards ceremony commemorating
the bicentennial of the USPTO. Press contact: Brigid Quinn at
brigid.quinn @uspto.gov
or 703 305-8341. Location: Auditorium, Commerce
Dept., 14th & Constitution, NW.
6:00 - 8:00 PM. The FCBA's
Transactional Practice Committee will host a CLE seminar
titled "Bankruptcy Issues in FCC Practice". For more
information contact Brian Weimer at 202 371-7604 or Laura
Phillips at 202 842-8891. Registrations and cancellations due
by 5:00 PM on October 14. Location:
Skadden Arps, Conf. Rm. 11
A, 1440 New York Ave., NW.
Day two of a two day conference of the
Association Internationale pour
la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (AIPPI)
titled "How to be Successful with Patent and Trademark
Litigation: Europe and the Far East". The agenda includes a
CLE seminar (9:30 AM - 1:00 PM). Location: Faculty Conference
Room, Burns Building, 5th Floor, GWU Law
School, 716 20th Street, NW.
|
|
|
Thursday, October
17 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business.
See, Whip
Notice.
Day one of a three day annual meeting of the
American Intellectual Property
Law Association (AIPLA). See,
brochure
[38 pages in PDF]. Location: Grand Hyatt Washington, 1000 H
Street, NW.
10:30 AM. The House Commerce
Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer
Protection will hold a hearing titled "ECNs and Market
Structure: Ensuring Best Prices for Consumers". Electronic
Communications Networks (ECN) are electronic trading systems
that automatically match buy and sell orders at specified
prices. Webcast. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
3:00 PM. David
Post (Temple University School of Law), will present a
draft of a paper titled "Against Against Cyberanarchy". The
lecture is sponsored by the George
Washington University
(GWU) Law School's Dean Dinwooodey Center for Intellectual
Property Studies. For more information, contact Prof. Robert
Brauneis at 202 994-6138. Location: GWU
Law School, Burns Building, 5th Floor, Faculty Conference
Center, 720 20th St., NW.
Day one of a two day conference titled "Open Source: A Case
for e-Government". The event is hosted by infoDev, the
Cyberspace Policy Institute of The George Washington
University, and the UNDP. See, notice.
Location: The World Bank, IFC Auditorium, 2121 Pennsylvania
Ave.
|
|
|
Friday, October
18 |
9:30 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in
Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ v.
FCC, No. 01-1374. This is a petition for review of a
final
order [30 pages in PDF] of the FCC
approving the assignment of
certain licenses from Chris Craft Industries to Fox Television
Stations. The Church of Christ and others had opposed the
transfer before the FCC, and now appeal the FCC's approval of
the transfer. Location: Courtroom 20, 333 Constitution Ave.,
NW.
12:15 PM. The FCBA's
Mass Media Practice Committee will host a brown bag lunch to
conduct an organizational meeting. RSVP to Barry Umansky at
202 263-4128. Location: NAB, 1771 N St., NW.
Day two of a three day annual meeting of the
American Intellectual Property
Law Association (AIPLA). See,
brochure
[38 pages in PDF].
Day one of a two day conference titled "Open Source: A Case
for e-Government". The event is hosted by infoDev, the
Cyberspace Policy Institute of The George Washington
University, and the UNDP. See, notice.
Location: The World Bank, IFC Auditorium, 2121 Pennsylvania Ave.
Deadline to submit comments to the
FCC regarding the petition for
declaratory ruling in CC Docket No. 01-92 requesting that the
FCC determine that wireless termination tariffs are not a
proper mechanism for establishing reciprocal compensation
arrangements between local exchange carriers (LECs) and
commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers. See,
FCC
notice [PDF].
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, October
21 |
Deadline to submit comments to the
FCC regarding its request to
refresh its record regarding customer proprietary network
information (CPNI) implications when a carrier goes out of
business, sells all or part of its customer base, or seeks
bankruptcy protection. This is the FCC's Third Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket Nos. 96-115, 96-149 and
00-257. See, Notice in the Federal Register, September 20, 2002,
Vol. 67, No. 183, at Pages 59236 - 59239.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
FCC in response
to it Public
Notice [7 pages in PDF] regarding relief for the Auction
No. 35 winners. The FCC asks for public comments regarding two
possible scenarios for providing relief to the winning bidders
in the January 2001 re-auction of spectrum previously
auctioned to NextWave: full refund and option to dismiss all
pending applications, and selective opt out for pending
applications. See also, Notice in the Federal Register, October 7, 2002,
Vol. 67, No. 194, at Pages 62470 - 62472.
|
|
|