U.S. and Mexico Settle Telecom Dispute |
6/1. The Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative (USTR) announced that "The
United States and Mexico reached an agreement today to resolve their ongoing WTO
dispute over international telecommunications services." See, USTR
release [PDF].
In February of 2002 the U.S. submitted its complaint to the
World Trade Organization's (WTO). On April 2,
2004, the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body released its
panel ruling
[256 pages in PDF]. The panel ruled that Mexico's current regime for
international telecommunications violates Mexico's WTO obligations. For example,
the panel found that Mexico breached its commitment to ensure that U.S. carriers
can connect their international calls to Mexico's major supplier, Telmex, at
cost-based rates.
The USTR stated that the agreement announced on June 1 provides that
"Mexico will remove the provisions of Mexican Law relating
to the proportional return system, uniform tariff system, and the requirement
that the carrier with the greatest proportion of outgoing traffic to a country
negotiate the settlement rate on behalf of all Mexican carriers for that
country. Both countries believe that the elimination of these provisions will
allow the competitive commercial negotiations of international settlement
rates."
The USTR added that the agreement provides that
"Mexico will allow the introduction of resale-based international
telecommunications services in Mexico by 2005, in a manner consistent with
Mexican law."
|
|
|
GAO Reports on Economic Arrangements Among
Small Webcasters |
6/1. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [47 pages in
PDF] titled "Intellectual Property: Economic Arrangements among Small Webcasters
and Third Parties and Their Effect on Royalties".
This report was required by the Small Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002, which
was enacted late in the 107th Congress. This was
HR 5469.
The House passed the bill on October 8, 2002. The Senate passed it on
November 15, 2002. President Bush signed it on December 4, 2002. It is now
Public Law 107-321.
In 1995, the Congress enacted the Digital Performance Right in Sound
Recordings Act. This Act created an intellectual property right in digital sound
recordings. That is, it provided that royalties are due when copyrighted sound
recordings are digitally transmitted. In 1998, the Congress enacted the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). This Act clarified that webcasters are covered,
and provided webcasters with a compulsory license, with royalty rates to be
determined by a Copyright
Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP) at the Library of Congress.
On June 20, 2002, the Librarian of Congress issued his
final rule regarding
webcasting rates. It provides the terms for the statutory license for eligible
nonsubscription services to perform sound recordings publicly by means of digital audio
transmissions, also known as webcasting, pursuant to
17 U.S.C. § 114, and to
make ephemeral recordings of sound recordings for use of sound recordings under the
statutory license set forth in
17 U.S.C. § 112.
The Librarian also released a
summary stating that he "accepted the recommendation of the
Register of Copyrights and rejected the rates and terms recommended
by a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP) ... The most significant
difference between the CARP's determination and the Librarian's
decision is that the Librarian has abandoned the CARP's two tiered
rate structure of 0.14¢ per performance for ``Internet only´´
transmissions and 0.07¢ for each retransmission of a performance in
an AM/FM radio broadcast, and has decided that the rate of 0.07¢
will apply to both types of transmission."
The Small Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002 provided relief for small
webcasters. For example, rather than paying on a per performance formula, the
Act provide a percentage of revenue option.
The GAO report states that "During the debate on the Small Webcaster
Settlement Act, copyright owners also raised concerns about the economic
arrangements that small webcasters have with third parties, arguing that these
arrangements could produce revenues or expenses that might not be included in
the calculation of royalties that the small webcasters owed to them. To provide
more information on such arrangements, the Congress mandated that GAO, in
consultation with the Register of Copyrights, prepare a report on (1) the
economic arrangements between small webcasters and third parties and (2) the
effect of those arrangements on royalties that are based on a percentage of the
webcaster’s revenues or expenses."
Consequently, Section 6 of the Act required the GAO to prepare a report
"concerning the economic arrangements among small commercial webcasters covered
by agreements entered into pursuant to section 114(f)(5)(A) of title 17, United States
Code, as added by section 4 of this Act , and third parties, and the effect of those
arrangements on royalty fees payable on a percentage of revenue or expense basis."
The GAO report finds that "Small webcasters have a variety of economic
arrangements with third parties, such as bandwidth providers, businesses seeking or
selling advertising space, and merchandise providers. Virtually all of the webcasters
that we interviewed -- the 30 that had agreed to the royalty terms in the small webcaster
agreement and the 28 that had not -- reported having arrangements with bandwidth
providers from 1998 through 2003."
The report also finds that "Forty webcasters reported arrangements for
selling advertising space either directly or through advertising firms. However,
advertising sales have remained low, according to industry analysts, in part
because of the collapse of the high technology business sector since 2000 and
the relative novelty of the Internet as an advertising medium."
Also, "Twenty-five, or
44 percent, of the small webcasters that we contacted also reported arrangements
with businesses to sell merchandise, such as T-shirts and coffee mugs, through
their Web sites. Less commonly reported arrangements included those with
companies that help small webcasters manage or obtain advertising for their Web
sites such as by inserting ads on the Web site or into the webcast itself or
selling advertising based on the aggregate audiences of multiple webcasters."
Finally, the GAO report concludes that the data "suggest that the overall
effect of economic arrangements between small webcasters and third parties on royalties
owed to copyright owners has been minimal to date."
It elaborates that "Of the 30 small webcasters we interviewed that had
agreed to the terms of the small webcaster agreement, 27 provided us with
financial data. Nineteen of the 27 reported revenue and expense estimates that
were below the levels that would result in royalty payments at an amount greater
than the minimum fee for either or both of the time periods for which payments
were to be made. The remaining 8 owed royalties that exceeded the minimum fee.
In addition, 2 of the 13 small webcasters that reported receiving free or
reduced-price goods or services did not report the free service they received as
revenue in their calculations of royalties."
However, GAO report adds that "these data may not be
reflective of conditions that may develop as the industry matures. Specifically,
revenues and expenses of small webcasters might increase as they attract more
listeners, and advertising opportunities and rates may also increase as the
webcasting industry matures and advertisers rely more on the Internet as part of
their advertising efforts, according to industry analysts."
The report was prepared for Sen. Orrin
Hatch (R-UT) and Sen. Patrick Leahy
(D-VT), the Chairman and ranking Democrat on the
Senate Judiciary Committee, and
Rep. James Sensenbrenner
(R-WI) and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI),
the Chairman and ranking Democrat on the
House Judiciary Committee.
|
|
|
GAO Reports on Spectrum Management |
6/1. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [42
pages in PDF] titled "Spectrum Management: Better Knowledge Needed to Take
Advantage of Technologies That May Improve Spectrum Efficiency".
The report was prepared for Rep.
Tom Davis (R-VA), the Chairman of the
House
Government Reform Committee, and Rep. Adam
Putnam (R-FL), the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Technology, Information
Policy, Intergovernmental Relations, and the Census. Hence, it is primarily
about spectrum management as it affects government agency users.
The report finds that federal agencies have little incentive to use spectrum
efficiently. The report also finds that current management of spectrum impedes efficient
use, such as by compartmentalized allocation of spectrum. The report dismisses market
based solutions for government users as "difficult". Rather, it contains six
recommendations for action. Basically, it recommends further study by the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA).
The GAO report finds that "The agencies that we reviewed have made
some investments in technologies that provide improved spectrum efficiency. However, these
investments have been primarily driven by the imperatives of their individual missions --
not by an underlying, systematic consideration of spectrum efficiency."
The report also finds that current management of spectrum impedes efficient
use. It states that "The current structure and management of spectrum use in the
United States may limit the development and use of some spectrum efficient
technologies. Because the spectrum allocation structure largely compartmentalizes
spectrum by types of services (such as aeronautical radio navigation) and users
(federal, nonfederal, and shared), the capability of emerging technologies that are
designed to use spectrum in different ways is often diminished." (Parentheses in
original.)
The report elaborates that, for example, "technologies like
software-defined cognitive radios can be adapted to operate in virtually any segment of
spectrum and, in the future, may be able to adapt to realtime conditions and make use
of underutilized spectrum in a given location and time. Currently the spectrum allocation
system, however, may not provide the freedom needed for these technologies to operate
across existing spectrum designations."
The report adds that "defining new rules to accommodate these emerging
technologies requires knowledge about spectrum use that is not currently available."
The report also finds that "there are few federal regulatory requirements
and incentives for agencies to use spectrum more efficiently. While NTIA is responsible for
managing the federal government’s use of spectrum and ensuring spectrum efficiency,
NTIA primarily relies on individual agencies to ensure that the systems they develop
make as efficient use of the spectrum as possible. Agencies' guidance and policies,
however, do not require systematic consideration of spectrum efficiency in their
acquisitions. The lack of economic consequence associated with the manner in which
spectrum is used has also provided little incentive to agencies to pursue opportunities
proactively to develop and use technologies that would improve spectrum efficiency
governmentwide."
It also states that "agencies have little or no economic incentive to use
the radio-frequency spectrum more efficiently because they pay only small
administrative fees for its use. Once it is allocated and users gain access to
the spectrum, there are generally no financial incentives for them to consider
accommodating other users, or in many cases, even to move to more efficient
technologies."
The report then addresses market based approaches to spectrum management. It
finds that "creating viable economic incentives to achieve spectrum efficiency
in the U.S. federal government may be difficult. ... NTIA could face several challenges if
it decides to use such incentives. First, implementing a market-based approach may be
difficult for some agency functions that are critical and unique, such as public safety
and national defense. Second, incentives that would require greater flexibility among
license holders of spectrum may ultimately result in problems of interference. ... Third,
it is unclear whether licensees would have the right to buy and sell spectrum, and what
rights would be conferred and under what circumstances rights would be granted. Finally,
while it may be possible to impose fees on federal agencies' use of assigned spectrum,
it is far from obvious how such fees or other economic incentives could be applied to
agencies’ opportunistic use of white and gray spaces in the spectrum -- as would be
the case with software-defined cognitive radios, which adapt their use of the spectrum
in real time."
Finally, the report offers three recommendations for the NTIA and FCC, and
three for the NTIA. It recommends NTIA and FCC jointly "assess and determine
the feasibility of redefining the spectrum allocation system to build in greater
flexibility where appropriate to facilitate emerging technologies; develop and
implement plans to gain a more thorough and on-going understanding of the current
spectrum environment; and strengthen efforts to develop jointly accepted models and
methodologies to assess the impact of new technologies on overall spectrum use and
increase opportunities to permit testing of those technologies."
It also recommends that the NTIA "establish guidance
for agencies to determine and report their future spectrum requirements; strengthen NTIA’s
spectrum certification process to more directly address spectrum efficiency; and determine
approaches, where appropriate, for providing incentives to agencies to use spectrum more
efficiently and then pilot and measure the effectiveness of those approaches."
|
|
|
DC Circuit Dismisses AT&T's Petition for
Review of Public Notice of § 272 Sunset |
6/1. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(DCCir) issued its
opinion [16 pages in PDF] in AT&T v. FCC, a case regarding
Bell Operating Companies' applications to provide in region interLATA services
pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §
271, and regulatory safeguards under
47 U.S.C. § 272.
The Court held the § 272 safeguards automatically sunset under § 272(f)(1) by
operation of law, and therefore, the FCC need not engage in any reasoned
decision making before issuing a public notice of a sunset date.
The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) granted Verizon's § 271 application to
provide long distance service in the state of New York on December 22, 1999. It issued
a public notice on December 23, 2002, stating that Verizon reached the automatic sunset
date under § 272(f)(1) with respect to its long distance operations in New York.
AT&T filed a petition for review
challenging the issuance of this public notice. It argued that Verizon retains significant
market power, that this justifies the need for continued application of the § 272
safeguards, and that the FCC failed to engage in reasoned decision making by issuing this
public notice.
The Court dismissed the petition for review. The Court wrote that "As the
Commission indicated in its public notice, the § 272 safeguards sunset ``by
operation of law,´´ not by Commission action. The FCC's public notice did not purport to
be an order or rule addressing the continued need for § 272 safeguards, and the Act
does not require any decision from the Commission in order for the sunset provision
under § 272(f)(1) to take effect. Therefore, the Commission was not obligated to
engage in ``reasoned decisionmaking´´ when it issued the public notice. Finally,
AT&T’s claims regarding the need for alternative safeguards, covering BOC
provision of interLATA services after sunset of the § 272 structural and related
requirements, remain under consideration by the FCC. Therefore, those claims are
not ripe for review."
However, the Court also noted that the FCC has issued a related notice of
proposed rulemaking, and "it remains an open question as to whether the Commission
will adopt alternative safeguards covering BOCs authorized to provide in-region, interLATA
service."
This case is AT&T, petitioner v. FCC and USA, respondents, Verizon,
intervenor, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, App. Ct. No.
03-1035, a petition for review of a final order of the FCC.
|
|
|
More News |
6/1. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) announced that Accenture has been
selected to be the prime contractor for the
US-VISIT program.
See, DHS release.
5/28. The U.S. and the E.U. signed an agreement that will allow U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to collect airline passenger name record (PNR) information
relating to flights between the U.S. and E.U. See, DHS
release.
5/28. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) announced that the deadline for submitting applications for grants for
homeland security related information technology demonstration projects is June
30, 2004. See, DHS
release.
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court News |
6/1. The Supreme Court returned
from a one week recess. It issued one opinion in a criminal case (Yarborough v.
Alvarez), and released an order list in which it granted no petitions for writ
of certiorari.
6/1. The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Santa Barbara News-Press v.
Leonard Ross, No. 03-1338, a case regarding libel and public figures.
See,
Order List [8 pages in PDF] at page 7.
6/1. The Supreme Court announced that "The Court will take a recess from
today until, Monday, June 7, 2004."
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Wednesday, June 2 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for
legislative business. It will consider several non-technology related items
under suspension of the rules. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will meet at 9:45 AM for morning
business. It will then resume consideration of
S 2400,
the Department of Defense authorization bill for FY 2005.
The Supreme Court is on recess until Monday, June 7.
9:30 - 10:30 AM. The
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Media Security and Reliability Council will meet. See, FCC
notice [PDF] of May 26, 2004, and
notice in the Federal Register, April 30, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 84, at Page
23758. Location: FCC, Room TW-C305, 445 12th St., SW.
9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. The Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National
Quality Award will hold a closed meeting. See,
notice
in the Federal Register, May 4, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 86, at Page 24571.
Location: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building 222,
Red Training Room, Gaithersburg, MD.
10:00 AM. The House Commerce
Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet will hold
a hearing titled "Advancing the DTV Transition: An Examination of the FCC
Media Bureau Proposal". The witnesses will be Ken Ferree (Chief of
the FCC's Media Bureau), Edward Fritts (P/CEO of the
National Association of
Broadcasters), Robert Sachs (P/CEOfficer of the
National Cable & Telecom
Association), Richard DalBello (Satellite Broadcasting & Communications
Association), Gary Shapiro (P/CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association),
Gloria Tristani (United Church of Christ), and Thomas Lenard (Progress &
Freedom Foundation). The hearing will be webcast. Press contact: Jon Tripp (Barton)
at 202-225-5735 or Sean Bonyun (Upton) at 202-225-3761. Location: Room 2123,
Rayburn Building.
10:45 AM - 1:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) and the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) will sponsor a public forum on how "the
relationship between local media and government can be strengthened to support local
market operational readiness to cope with terrorist attacks, natural disasters or other
similar occurrences". Press contact: Meribeth McCarrick at 202 418-0654 or
Meribeth.McCarrick@fcc.gov. See,
notice
[PDF]. Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room, 445 12th Street, SW.
12:00 NOON. The Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF)
will host a luncheon program titled "The Supreme Court and the Future of the Telecom
Act of 1996". The speakers will be Kenneth
Starr (Kirkland & Ellis),
Christopher Wright (Harris Wiltshire & Grannis), and Randolph May (PFF). Lunch
will be served at 12:00 NOON. The program will begin at 12:30 PM. See,
notice and
registration
page. Press contact: David Fish at 202 289-8928 or
dfish@pff.org. Location: First Amendment Room,
National Press Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor.
1:30 PM. (or 2:00 PM?) The
House Government Reform Committee's Subcommittee on Technology,
Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census will hold an
oversight hearing titled "Who Might be Lurking at Your Cyber Front Door? Is
Your System Really Secure? Strategies and Technologies to Prevent, Detect and
Respond to the Growing Threat of Network Vulnerabilities." The witnesses will
be Karen Evans (Office of Management and Budget), Robert Dacey (General
Accounting Office),
Amit
Yoran (National Cyber Security Division, Department of Homeland Security),
Dawn Meyerriecks (Defense Information Systems Agency), Daniel Mehan (Federal
Aviation Administration), Dubhe Beinhorn (Juniper Federal Systems), Scott Culp
(Microsoft), Louis Rosenthal (ABN AMRO Services Company), Marc Maiffret (eEye
Digital Security), Steve Solomon (Citadel Security Software). Press contact:
Bob Dix at 202 225-6751. Location: Room 2154, Rayburn Building.
2:30 PM. The Senate
Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on several nominees, including Deborah
Majoras (to be Chairman of the Federal Trade
Commission), Jon Leibowitz (to be a Commissioner of the FTC), Brett
Palmer (to be Assistant Secretary for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
at the Department of Commerce), and Benjamin
Wu (to be Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy at the Department of Commerce).
See,
notice. Press contact: Rebecca Fisher at 202 224-2670. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
Day two of a four day conference and expo hosted by the
Wireless Communications Association International
(WCA) titled "WCA 2004". At 8:30 - 9:20 AM, Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) Commissioner
Jonathan Adelstein, and NTIA acting Director
Michael Gallagher
will participate on a panel titled "VoIP As A Frontier For Wireless Growth".
At 9:50 - 10:10 AM, FCC Commissioner
Kathleen
Abernathy will speak on "FCC Spectrum Policy
Perspective". At 11:30 AM
- 12:45 PM, Ed Thomas (Chief of the FCC's Office of
Engineering and Technology), Tom Hazlett (a former Chief Economist of the FCC), and
others will participate on a panel titled "The FCC's Interference Temperature Plan: Threat or
Opportunity?" At 3:10 - 3:50 PM, Julius Knapp (Deputy Chief of the
FCC's Office of Engineering & Technology), John Branscome (FCC's
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau) and others will
participate on a panel titled "Regulatory Impacts On License
Exempt WISP Business Plans". See, agenda.
Location: Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 660 Woodley Park Road, NW.
|
|
|
Thursday, June 3 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for
legislative business. It will consider several non-technology related items
under suspension of the rules. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
8:30 AM - 3:00 PM. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
(NIST) Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Board of Overseers will hold a
public meeting. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 14, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 94, Page 26808
- 26809.
9:00 AM - 12:30 PM. The National
Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) will hold a closed meeting to provide
a briefing on Special Publication 800-37, titled "Guide for the Security Certification
and Accreditation of Federal Information Systems". For more information,
contact Angela Ellis at 301 975-3881 or
angela.ellis@nist.gov. Location: Green Auditorium, NIST Main Campus,
Gaithersburg, MD.
9:30 AM. The House Commerce
Committee will meet to markup
HR 3266, the
"Faster and Smarter Funding for First Responders Act of 2003" and HR __,
the "Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act". The
meeting will be webcast. Press contact: Larry Neal or Jon Tripp at 202 225-5735.
Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
9:30 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold an executive business meeting. See,
notice. Press
contact: Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy) at 202
224-4242. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The
House Financial Services
Committee will meet to markup four bills. The fourth item on the agenda is
HR 3574, the
"Stock Option Accounting Reform Act". See,
story titled
"Capital Markets Subcommittee Approves Stock Options Bill" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 897, May 13, 2004. Location: Room 2128, Rayburn Building.
12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The DC Bar
Association's Intellectual Property Law Section and Trade Secrets Committee will
host a program titled "Licensing Trade Secrets And Know-How: Realizing Value
From IP's Forgotten Species". The speaker will be
Ronald Bleeker of the
law firm of Finnegan Henderson. Prices vary. See,
notice.
For more information, contact 202 626-3463. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1
Level, 1250 H Street, NW.
1:00 PM. The
House Judiciary Committee's
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property will hold an oversight
hearing titled "Oversight of the Operations of the U.S. Copyright Office".
The hearing will be webcast. Press contact: Jeff Lungren or Terry Shawn at 202 225-2492.
Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building.
6:00 - 8:00 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA)
will host an event titled "70th Anniversary of the Communications Act".
See, registration form [PDF].
Prices vary. Location: Washington Hilton, 1919 Connecticut Ave., NW.
Day three of a four day conference and expo hosted by the
Wireless Communications Association International
(WCA) titled "WCA 2004". At 8:30 AM, there will be a panel
discussion titled "Unlocking MDS & ITFS Spectrum Values With Regulatory Reform".
The speakers will be Paul Sinderbrand (Wilkinson Barker Knauer), Bryan Tramont
(FCC Chief of Staff), a representative of the FCC Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, Patrick Gossman (Chairman of the National ITFS Association), and Todd
Rowley (Sprint). At 9:30 AM, there will be a panel discussion titled "FCC
View From the Eighth Floor". The speakers will be Barry Ohlson (Senior Legal
Advisor to FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein), Samuel Feder (Legal Advisor
to FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin), Paul Margie (Legal Advisor to FCC
Commissioner Michael Copps), Lauren Van Wazer (Chairman of the FCC Broadband
Wireless Task Force), and Mary Greczyn (Freedom Technologies). See,
agenda.
Location: Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 660 Woodley Park Road, NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of propose rulemaking (NPRM) regarding imposing
mandatory minimum Customer Account Record Exchange (CARE) obligations on all
local and interexchange carriers. This item is FCC 04-50 in CG Docket No.
02-386. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 19, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 75, at Pages
20845 - 20851.
|
|
|
Friday, June 4 |
10:00 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on judicial nominees. See,
notice. Press contact:
Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy) at 202 224-4242.
Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Wireless Committee will host a luncheon
event. The speaker will be Ed Thomas, Chief of the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Office of Engineering and Technology (OET). The
price to attend is $15.00. RSVP by Tuesday, June 1 to
wendy@fcba.org. Location:
Sidley Austin,
1501 K Street, NW, 6th Floor.
Day four of a four day conference and expo hosted by the
Wireless Communications Association International
(WCA) titled "WCA 2004". See, agenda.
Location: Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 660 Woodley Park Road, NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in response
to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding its Hart Scott Rodino
premerger notification rules. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 8, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 68, at Pages
18685 - 18721.
Deadline to submit comments to the Executive
Office of the President's (EOP) Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) on the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act Task
Force draft report that makes recommendations concerning the improvement of
electronic dissemination of information collected under federal requirements,
and a plan to develop an interactive government wide internet program to
identify applicable collections and facilitate compliance. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 5, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 87, at Pages
25147 - 25157.
|
|
|
Monday, June 7 |
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the provision
of international telecommunications service. This NPRM is FCC 04-40 in IB Docket
No. 04-47. See,
notice in the Federal Register, March 22, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 55, at Pages
13276 - 13278.
|
|
|
Tuesday, June 8 |
8:15 AM - 5:00 PM. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
(NIST) Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology will hold a partially closed
meeting. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 24, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 100, at Page
29520. Location: NIST, Employees Lounge, Administration Building,
Gaithersburg, MD.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Advisory Committee for the 2007 World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-07) will meet. See,
notice [PDF]. Location: Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305
(Commission Meeting Room).
|
|
|
Wednesday, June 9 |
? 10:00 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold an oversight hearing "on activities
of the Department of Homeland Security, focusing on terrorism and other related
topics". Press contact: Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or
David Carle (Leahy) at 202 224-4242. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
12:15 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Young Lawyers Committee
will host a brown bag lunch. This is an election and
organizational meeting. Person interested in running for office should contact
either Ryan Wallach at
rwallach@willkie.com or 202-303-1159, or Pam Slipakoff at
Pam.Slipakoff@fcc.gov or
202-418-7705. Location: Willkie Farr &
Gallagher, 1875 K Street, NW, second floor.
12:15 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association's (FCBA)
Mass Media Practice Committee will host a brown bag lunch. The speaker will be
Ken Ferree, Chief of the Federal Communications
Commission's (FCC) Media
Bureau. The topic will be "Current Issues at the Media Bureau".
Location: National Association of Broadcasters,
1771 N Street, NW.
2:00 PM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in Neomagic v. Trident
Microsystems. Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
regarding its proposed rules changes to adjust certain patent fee amounts to
reflect fluctuations in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 10, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 90, at Pages
25861 - 25864.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Rural Utilities Service (RUS) regarding
its proposed rules changes regarding accounting policies and procedures for
RUS Telecommunications Borrowers. See,
notice in the Federal Register: May 10, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 90, at Pages
25848 - 25856.
Deadline to submit requests for grant applications
to the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) for grants under the Pan-Pacific Education and Communications
Experiments by Satellite (PEACESAT) program. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 10, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 90, at Pages
25883 - 25885.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|