FTC Rules Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Does Not
Block Antitrust Action for False Representations Regarding Patents During
Standards Setting Process |
7/7. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
issued an
order [2 pages in PDF] titled "Order Reversing and Vacating the Initial
Decision and Order and Remanding for Further Proceeding" in the FTC's
proceeding titled "In the Matter of Union Oil Company of California". The full
Commission reversed an administrative law judge's decision that the Noerr-Pennington
doctrine prevents the FTC from pursing an antitrust enforcement action against
Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) in
connection with its making false representations to a government standards
setting body regarding its patent rights.
The FTC also issued an
opinion
[56 pages in PDF] explaining its order. See also, FTC
release.
This is an oil industry action. However, this will also affect the
application of antitrust laws to technology companies that engage in
misrepresentation regarding their patents and patent applications in standards
setting processes.
The FTC filed its
Administrative Complaint on March 4, 2003 alleging that Unocal subverted the
California regulatory standard setting proceedings relating to low emissions
gasoline standards, in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.
The complaint alleged that Unocal engaged in
unfair methods of competition through knowing and willful misrepresentations, to
the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and to competing gasoline refiners,
that Unocal lacked, or would not assert, patent rights concerning automobile
emissions research results. The complaint also alleged that Unocal induced the
CARB to adopt standards that overlapped its patents, and that Unocal induced
other refiners to reconfigure their refineries in ways that exposed them to Unocal
patent claims.
On November 25, 2003, an FTC Administrative Law Judge issued his
Initial Decision
[74 pages in PDF] in the proceeding captioned "In the Matter of Union Oil
Company of California". The ALJ dismissed the FTC's administrative complaint
against Union Oil Company of California
(Unocal) pursuant to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, and because the FTC "lacks
jurisdiction to decide the fundamental and substantial patent issues raised by
the allegations of the Complaint."
The FTC wrote in its July 7 opinion that "A
private business allegedly has used false and misleading statements to induce a
government body to issue regulatory standards that conferred market power upon
the firm. Respondent argues that, even taking the Complaint’s factual
allegations as established as is required at this preliminary stage, its
deliberate use of misrepresentations to secure monopoly power is protected from
antitrust challenge under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which shelters
certain petitioning for government action. We disagree."
See, Eastern R.R. Presidents
Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961) and
United Mine Workers v. Pennington,
381 U.S. 657 (1965).
See also, story titled "ALJ Dismisses FTC's Patent Ambush Complaint Against
Unocal" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 789, December 1, 2003.
The July 7 order states that "the Commission has
determined to reverse and vacate the Initial Decision and to vacate the Order
accompanying it, and to remand this matter for further proceedings."
The July 7 opinion was written by FTC Chairman Timothy Muris, and joined by
the four other Commissioners. The November 25, 2003 Initial Decision was written
by Administrative Law Judge Michael Chappell. This is Docket No. 9305. See also,
FTC's collection of pleadings
in this proceeding.
|
|
|
DC Circuit Uphold's FCC's $6 Million Fine of
SBC for Violating Unbundling Provision in SBC/Ameritech Merger Approval
Order |
7/6. The U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir)
issued its
opinion
[PDF] in SBC v. FCC, denying a petition for review of the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) $6 Million
fine of SBC Communications for violating the terms of
the order of the FCC approving of the merger of SBC and Ameritech.
The FCC released its
Forfeiture Order
on October 9, 2002. It fined SBC $6 Million for "violating a competition related
condition that the FCC imposed when it approved the 1999 merger of SBC and
Ameritech Corporation". It fined SBC for violating a provision pertaining to
unbundling requirements of incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) under
47 U.S.C. § 251.
This is EB-01-IH-0030. See also, story titled "SBC Fined $6
Million for Failing to Provide Shared Transport" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 527, October 10, 2002.
SBC argued in its petition for review that the forfeiture order violates the
Fifth Amendment due process clause because SBC was not on fair notice of the
duties under the merger agreement that the FCC accuses it of violating. SBC also
argued that the forefeiture order is arbitrary and capricious. The Court of
Appeals rejected these arguments, and denied the petition.
This case is SBC Communications v. FCC and USA, respondents, and CoreComm
Communications and Z-Tel Communications, intervenors, U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia, App. Ct. No. 03-1118, a petition for review of a final order
of the FCC.
|
|
|
FCC Proposes That Broadcasters Retain
Recordings To Facilitate Enforcement of Smut Ban |
7/7. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) released a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) [11 pages in PDF] that proposes rules
that would "require that broadcasters retain recordings of their programming
for some limited period of time (e.g., 60 or 90 days)".
The purpose of this is to facilitate
investigations in enforcement proceedings against licensees that broadcast
indecent, obscene or profane material, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1464.
This statute provides that "Whoever utters any obscene, indecent, or profane
language by means of radio communication shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than two years, or both".
Broadcast of material that may violate § 1464 often comes to the
attention of the FCC via
outraged viewers and listeners, who submit complaints, but not recordings or
transcripts, to the FCC. Licensees then often offer defenses based upon there
being no recording or transcript in the proceeding record.
The NPRM states that "we seek comment on
enhancing our enforcement processes through proposed program recording retention
requirements for broadcast stations in order to improve the adjudication of
complaints." The FCC seeks comments on issues such as the duration of the
retention of recordings, whether First Amendment rights are implicated, and whether
requiring recordings would result in the infringement of any copyrights.
Commissioner Michael Copps
wrote in a separate
statement [PDF] that "The process by which the FCC has enforced the indecency
laws has for too long placed inordinate responsibility upon the complaining citizen.
When someone sends in a complaint, he or she is usually told to supply a recording of
the program or a transcript of the offending statement, or the complaint will be
dismissed. This policy ignores that it is the "Commission’s responsibility
to investigate complaints that the law has been violated, not the citizen’s responsibility
to prove the violations."
Public comments are due by July 30, 2004. Reply comments are due by August
30, 2004.
The FCC adopted this NPRM on June 21, 2004, but did not announce or release
it until July 7. This is FCC 04-145 in MB Docket No. 04-232.
|
|
|
GAO Finds Error Prone IT Environment at DOD |
7/7. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released its prepared
testimony [pages in PDF] titled "Department of Defense: Long-standing
Problems Continue to Impede Financial and Business Management Transformation".
This report states that "DOD has little or
no assurance that current business systems investments are being spent in an
economically efficient and effective manner. DOD's current systems funding
process has contributed to the evolution of an overly complex and error-prone
information technology environment containing duplicative, nonintegrated, and
stovepiped systems. Given that DOD spends billions of dollars annually on
business systems and related infrastructure, it is critical that actions be
taken to gain more effective control over such business systems funding." (See,
page 33.)
This prepared testimony also examines a range of other problems with the DOD's
business management systems. It was prepared for the House Committee on Government
Reform.
|
|
|
House Begins Consideration of CJS
Appropriations Bill |
7/7. The House began its consideration of
HR 4754, the
"Commerce, Justice, State and the Judiciary Appropriations Act, 2005"
shortly after noon. Shortly before midnight, it postponed further consideration
until Thursday, July 8.
Many of the agencies that are responsible for technology related matters are
funded by this CJS bill. These include the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Also covered are the Department of Commerce (DOC), and its National
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and Bureau of Industry
and Standards (BXA/BIS). Also covered are the Department of Justice (DOJ), and
its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Antitrust Division and Computer
Crimes and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS).
The USPTO section provides, in part, that "For necessary expenses of
the United States Patent and
Trademark Office provided for by law, including defense of suits instituted
against the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director
of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, $1,314,653,000, which shall be
derived from offsetting collections assessed and collected pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
1113 and 35 U.S.C. 41 and 376, and shall be retained and used for necessary
expenses in this appropriation: Provided, That the sum herein
appropriated from the general fund shall be reduced as such offsetting
collections are received during fiscal year 2005, so as to result in a fiscal
year 2005 appropriation from the general fund estimated at $0: Provided
further, That during fiscal year 2005, should the total amount of
offsetting fee collections be less than $1,314,653,000, this amount shall be
reduced accordingly:"
The FTC section provides that $203,430,000 is appropriated for expenses. It
also contains language regarding the telemarketing sales rule (TSR). It states that
"Provided further,
That $21,901,000 in offsetting collections derived from fees sufficient to
implement and enforce the Telemarketing Sales Rule, promulgated under the
Telephone Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.),
shall be credited to this account, and be retained and used for necessary
expenses in this appropriation".
|
|
|
More Capitol Hill News |
7/7. The House amended and passed
HR 4218,
the "High-Performance Computing Revitalization Act of 2004",
by voice vote.
7/7. The House amended and passed
HR 4516,
"Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004",
by voice vote.
|
|
|
People and Appointments |
7/7. President Bush nominated Keith Starrett to be a Judge of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. This is the Judgeship
previously held by Judge Charles Pickering. Bush made a recess
appointment on January 16, 2004 of Judge Pickering to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
See, story titled "Bush Gives Judge Pickering a Recess Appointment" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 818, January 19, 2004. See also,
White
House release of July 7, 2004.
7/7. President Bush met with, and gave a
speech
in support of, three men nominated by him for federal judgeships in North
Carolina -- Judge Terrence Boyle,
Robert Conrad, and
Magistrate Judge
Jim Dever. Senate Democrats are blocking consideration of their nominations.
Judge Boyle, who is the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, has been nominated to be a Judge of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.
Conrad and Dever have been nominated to be U.S. District Court Judges. Bush
stated that "Their nominations are being held up, and it's not right and it's
not fair. The people of North Carolina deserve better. These judges deserve
better treatment in the United States Senate. A minority of senators apparently
don't want judges who strictly interpret and apply the law. Evidently, they want
activist judges who will rewrite the law from the bench. I disagree. Legislation
should come from the legislative branch, not from the judiciary." Bush also gave
numerous speeches, particularly in Southern states, during the 2002 midterm
elections, in which he raised the issue of judicial nominations. See also, White
House
release.
7/7. President Bush met with, and gave a
speech
in support of, six persons nominated by him to for federal judgeships in
Michigan. Judge David McKeague,
Henry Saad,
Susan Neilson, and
Richard Griffin have been
nominated to be Judges of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Judge McKeague is a Judge of the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
Thomas Ludington and
Daniel Ryan have been nominated to
be a Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Senate Democrats are blocking consideration of their nominations.
7/6. Bill Huber was named Associate Division Chief of the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's (WTB)
Auctions and Spectrum Access Division (ASAD). He went to work for the FCC in
2000. Before that, he worked for the law firm of
Wilkinson Barker & Knauer. Erik Salovaara was named Deputy Associate
Division Chief of the ASAD. He went to work for the FCC in 2001. Before that, he
worked for the law firm of Ross Dixon & Bell.
Brian Carter was named Special Counsel in the ASAD. Rita Cookmeyer
was named Financial Policy Analyst in the ASAD. See, FCC
release [PDF].
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Thursday, July 8 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM. It will continue its consideration of
HR 4754, the
"Commerce, Justice, State and the Judiciary Appropriations Act, 2005" See,
Republican Whip
notice.
The Senate will meet at 10:00 AM. It may resume consideration of
S 2062,
the "Class Action Fairness Act of 2004".
9:30 AM. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a meeting. See,
agenda [PDF]. The event will be webcast. Location:
FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
9:30 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee will hold an executive business meeting. The agenda includes consideration
of S 1635, the "L-1 Visa (Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of
2003", and consideration of several judicial nominees, including that of
Claude Allen to be a Judge of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Press contact: Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at
202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy) at 202 224-4242. See,
notice. Location:
Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The House
Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property
will meet to mark up
HR 4586, the
"Family Movie Act of 2004". This bill would permit home viewers of DVDs
to use software that filters out certain types of content. The meeting will be webcast by the
Committee. Press contact: Jeff Lungren or Terry Shawn at 202 225-2492. Location: Room
2141, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The House Ways and Means
Committee will meet to mark up HR 4759, the "United States-Australia
Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act". Location: Room 1100, Longworth
Building.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(FedCir) will hear oral argument in Business Objects v. MicroStrategy,
No. 04-1009. Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
1:30 PM. The
House Commerce Committee's
Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection will hold a hearing titled
"FASB Proposals on Stock Option Expensing". The witnesses will be
David Walker (General Accounting Office), Robert Herz (Chairman of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board), Rick White (Technet and International Employee Stock Options
Coalition), and Steven Mayer (Human Genome Sciences). Location: Room
2123, Rayburn Building.
The Department of Commerce's (DOC) Bureau
of Industry and Security will hold a seminar titled "Essentials of Export
Controls". The price to attend is $75. For more information, contact Yvette
Springer at 202 482-6031. Location: Ronald Reagan Trade
Center, Washington DC.
Deadline to submit comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) regarding a national one call notification system. The FCC adopted this NPRM on
May 13, 2004, and released the
text
[34 pages in PDF] on May 14, 2004. See, story titled "FCC Adopts NPRM Regarding One
Call Notification System" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
899, May 17, 2004. This NPRM is FCC 04-111 in CC Docket No. 92-105. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 8, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 110, at Pages
31930 - 31939.
|
|
|
Friday, July 9 |
The House is scheduled to meet at 9:00 AM. See,
Republican Whip
notice.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(FedCir) will hear oral argument in Chamberlain Group v. Skylink
Technologies, No. 04-1118. Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
12:00 NOON. The Cato
Institute will host a panel discussion titled "Recommendations for Tort
and Class Action Reform". The speakers will be Robert Levy and Mark Moller,
both of Cato. Lunch will be served. See,
notice and registration page.
Location: Room B-339, Rayburn Building.
The Department of Commerce's (DOC)
Bureau of Industry and Security will hold a
seminar titled "Export Management Systems". The price to attend is
$100. For more information, contact Yvette Springer at 202 482-6031. Location:
Ronald Reagan Trade Center, Washington DC.
Extended deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for its June 21, 2004
workshop on the uses, efficiencies, and implications for consumers associated with
radio frequency identification (RFID) technology. See,
original notice in the Federal Register, April 15, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 73,
at Pages 20523 - 20525, and
notice [PDF] in the Federal Register
(May 24, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 100, at Pages 29540 - 29541) extending the deadline to
July 9. See also, FTC
web page for this workshop.
|
|
|
Monday, July 12 |
10:00 AM. The Heritage
Foundation will host two panel discussions titled "Scholars & Scribes
Review the Rulings: The Supreme Court's 2003-2004 Term". See,
notice and
registration page. Location: 214 Massachusetts Ave., NE.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The
DC Bar Association's Intellectual Property
Law Section, and other sections, will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program
titled "Trade Secrets: The Next Level". The speaker will be Milton
Babirak of the law firm of Babirak Vangellow & Carr. Prices vary. See,
notice.
For more information, contact 202-626-3488. Location: D.C. Bar Conference
Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H Street, NW.
6:30 PM. The U.S. Telecom Association (USTA) and the
Cellular Telecommunications and Internet
Association (CTIA) will host an event titled "Communications
Good Scout Award Dinner". The dinner will honor
Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), the Chairman
of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. The price to attend ranges
from $250 to $20,000. Proceeds will go to the National Capital Area Council of the Boy
Scouts of America. Location: Renaissance Washington Hotel, 999 9th Street, NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its further notice of proposed
rulemaking (FNPRM) regarding Aviation Radio Service. This FNPRM is FCC 03-238 in WT
Docket No. 01-289. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 12, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 70, at Pages
19140 - 19147.
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 14 |
8:30 AM - 12:00 NOON. The
DC Bar Association's Intellectual Property Law
Section will host a program titled "The ABC's Of Patent, Trademark And Copyright
Law". The speakers will be Steven Warner (Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto),
Gary Krugman (Sughrue Mion), John Hornick (Finnegan Henderson), and Aoi Nawashiro (Browdy
& Neimark). Prices vary. A breakfast buffet is included. See,
notice.
For more information, call 202 626-3463. Location: D.C. Bar Conference
Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H Street, NW.
9:00 AM - 1:30 PM. The
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) will host an event titled "Kids.us Forum:
Developing a Safe Place on the Internet for Children". See, NTIA
notice and
notice
in the Federal Register, June 4, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 108, at Pages 31590-31591. Location:
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW, Room 4830.
10:00 AM. The
House Armed Services Committee and the House International Relations
Committee will hold a joint hearing on the "Role of Arms Export Policy in the
Global War on Terror". The witnesses will be Lincoln Bloomfield (Assistant
Secretary of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs), Lisa Bronson
(Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Technology Security Policy and
Counterproliferation), and Peter Lichtenbaum (Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and Securities, Department of Commerce).
The hearing notice does not disclose the extent to which the hearing might
focus on the export of items involving information and communications
technologies. Location: Room 2118, Rayburn Building.
|
|
|
Thursday, July 15 |
10:00 AM. The
Senate Commerce Committee's
Subcommittee on Communications will hold a hearing on implementation of the
Nielsen local people meter TV rating system. Location: Room 253, Russell
Building.
Congressional Internet Caucus' Advisory Committee
will host a panel discussion titled "The DMCA Revisited: What's Fair?".
Lunch will be served.
12:15 - 2:00 PM. The
Forum on Technology & Innovation (FTI) will
host a luncheon discussion titled "The Policy Implications of Open Source
Software". The speakers will be Andrew Morton (lead maintainer for the Linux
public production kernel), Bill Guidera (Microsoft), Cheryl Bruner (IBM), and Morgan
Reed (Association for Competitive Technology). See,
notice. Lunch is available at 12:15 PM. The event will be webcast by
the FTI. The program will begin at
12:30 PM. Register by 5:00 PM on July 13 by by fax at 202 682-5150 or at
forum@compete.org; provide your name, title,
office, and e-mail address. Location: Room 902, Hart Building, Capitol Hill.
12:15 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Cable Practice Committee and Young Lawyers
Committee will host a brown bag lunch. The topic will be "The Basics of A La
Carte Cable Pricing". For more information, contact Natalie Roisman at
natalie.roisman@fcc.gov, or Jason
Freidrich at jason.friedrich@dbr.com.
Location: Willkie Farr & Gallagher, 1875 K Street, NW, 2d Floor.
2:00 PM. The
House Armed Services Committee's Tactical Air Land Forces Subcommittee will
hold a hearing on "Small Business Innovation and Technology". Location: Room
2118, Rayburn Building.
6:00 - 9:30 PM. The DC Bar Association
will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled "Antitrust
Investigations in the Era of Enron and WorldCom". The speakers will include
Ray Hartwell (Hunton & Williams), Scott Hammond (Director of Criminal Enforcement,
Antitrust Division, Department of Justice), and Donald Klawiter (Morgan Lewis &
Bockius). Prices vary. See,
notice.
For more information, call 202 626-3488. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level,
1250 H Street, NW.
Extended deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its Public Notice (DA 04-1454) regarding a la carte and themed
programming and pricing options for programming distribution on cable TV
and direct broadcast satellite systems. This is MB Docket No. 04-207. See,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Notice of Change of E-Mail
Address |
The e-mail address for Tech Law Journal has changed. The new address is
as follows:
All previous e-mail addresses no longer operate. This new address is
published as a graphic to avoid e-mail address harvesting, and the associated
spam messages and malicious code messages. If your e-mail system does not
display graphics, see notice in TLJ website.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|