House Passes Stock Option
Accounting Reform Act |
7/20. The House passed
HR 3574, the
"Stock Option Accounting Reform Act" by a vote of 312-111. See,
Roll Call No. 397.
This bill, which is supported by many technology companies, and the groups
that represent them, requires public companies to expense only those stock
options granted to the CEO and the next four highest paid officers. It also
provides an exemption for small businesses. As for the top five employees, the
bill requires companies to follow the FASB standards, but with a zero volatility
assumption.
Rep.
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) (at right), who represents a Silicon Valley district, stated that
"this is the most important technology vote we will take this year".
Background on Stock Options Accounting and FASB. On March 31, 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a
document titled "Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment, an Amendment of FASB
Statements No. 123 and 95" that proposes that companies must expense stock
option plans for all employees.
The FASB stated that "The exposure draft covers a wide range of equity-based
compensation arrangements. Under the Board's proposal, all forms of share-based
payments to employees, including employee stock options, would be treated the
same as other forms of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the
income statement. The expense of the award would generally be measured at fair
value at the grant date. Current accounting guidance requires that the expense
relating to so-called fixed plan employee stock options only be disclosed in the
footnotes to the financial statements."
The FASB's comment period for the exposure draft ended on June 30, 2004. See,
story
titled "FASB Proposes Expensing of Stock Options" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 867, April 1, 2004.
Legislative History. Rep. Richard
Baker (R-LA), the Chairman of the House
Financial Services Committee's (HFSC) Subcommittee on Capital Markets, and others
introduced the bill on November 21, 2003. The Subcommittee held a hearing on
March 3, 2003.
On May 12, 2004, the Subcommittee approved the bill by a voice vote. See,
story
titled "Capital Markets Subcommittee Approves Stock Options Bill" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 897, May 13, 2004.
On June 15, 2004, the full Committee approved the bill by a vote of 45-13. See,
story titled "House Financial Services Committee Approves Stock Options Bill"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert
No. 919, June 16, 2004.
On July 8, 2004 the House Commerce
Committee (HCC), which also sought jurisdiction, held a hearing. See, story
titled "House Commerce Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Stock Options Bill" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 934, July 9, 2004. (The HCC received a sequential
referral on July 15, that expired on July 16.)
Rep. Baker (at right) stated in the House that
"There is no dispute that the granting of
stock options to a broad base of employees has been and remains a very strong
component of job creation within our economy. Does it make sense for those who
criticize what they mistakenly call a jobless recovery to take away one of the
principal tools that does create jobs when they are still so badly needed? I
think not."
Rep. Baker added that "Forcing companies to expense these options today would
defeat the very purpose of offering them, and it’s difficult to imagine why or
how many companies would continue to do so. They either wouldn't, or else they
would simply hire fewer workers. And that is not an 'option' the people's
representatives should accept."
Rep. Lofgren stated that "the illusion that stock
options only benefit fat-cat corporate executives is just that, an illusion. 53%
of companies that offer stock option plans offer them to all employees. Within
the technology industry, 88% offer them to all employees. Stock options are even
more important in start-ups. According to the National Venture Capital
Association, more than 70% of venture-backed companies award stock options to
all employees."
Amendments Considered by the House. The House considered four
amendments. It approved one and rejected three others.
The House approved by voice vote an
amendment [3 pages in
PDF] offered by Rep. Mike Oxley (R-OH)
that clarifies that a company that wants to expense stock options is not
prevented by the bill from doing so. Although, the bill as reported by the HFSC
contained no provision that prohibited the expensing of stock options.
Rep. Paul Kanjorsky (D-PA), the
ranking Democrat on the Capital Markets Subcommittee, offered an
amendment [7 pages in PDF]
in the nature of a substitute bill.
It was rejected by a vote of 127-293. See,
Roll
Call No. 396.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) offered an
amendment [2 pages in PDF] that was
rejected by a vote of 114-308. See,
Roll
Call No. 395. It would have provided that "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to impair
or limit the authority of the Commission to establish accounting principles or
standards on its own initiative as the Commission deems necessary in the public
interest or for the protection of investors."
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) offered
an amendment [2 pages
in PDF] that would have removed from the bill the requirement that an assumption
of zero volatility be used when calculating the value of stock option expense
for the top-five executives. It was rejected by a vote of 126-296. See,
Roll
Call No. 394.
Representatives Kanjorsky, Maloney and Sherman are all members of the HFSC,
and had unsuccessfully advanced similar arguments and amendments during
committee consideration.
Analysis of the Vote. The vote on this bill reflected a pattern of
voting on many bills of importance to the tech sector. Republicans were more
supportive than Democrats, and Westerners were more supportive than
Representatives from other parts of the U.S.
Of all House members, 73.8% voted for passage.
While a majority of the members from both parties voted for the bill,
Republicans were more likely to vote for the bill. Republicans voted in
favor of the bill by 198-22. That is, 90% votes yes. Democrats voted for the
bill by a margin of 114-88. 56.4% voted yes. Thus, party affiliation was a
determinant of a member's vote.
Region of the country was also a determinant of a member's vote. For example,
being from one of the three west coast states (California, Washington or Oregon)
made a member more likely to vote for the bill.
While a majority of the House members are Republicans, the overwhelming
majority of the members of the west coast delegation are Democrats (43 out of
67). The regional effect of a member's vote becomes apparent when one controls
for party affiliation.
West coast Democrats voted for the bill 30-13 -- 70% in favor. Democrats from
all other states voted for the bill 84-75 -- 53% in favor. West coast
Republicans voted for the bill 22-2 --92% in favor. Republicans from all other
states voted for the bill 176-20 -- 90% in favor.
Similarly, the representatives from the other mountain states of the west
voted for the bill 25-4 -- 86% in favor. The state by state breakdown was as
follows: Utah (3-0), Nevada (3-0), Idaho (2-0), Montana (1-0), Wyoming (1-0),
New Mexico (3-0), Arizona (5-3), Colorado (6-1), and Alaska (1-0).
It may also be notable that the majority of the 19 no votes cast by
Representatives from west coast states and mountain states, a majority were cast
by members from the Los Angeles area. Members from the more technology oriented
metropolitan areas of Silicon Valley, San Francisco, Seattle, San Diego, and
Salt Lake City voted overwhelmingly for the bill.
Members of the House Commerce Committee (HCC) were less likely than other
members of the House to vote for this bill. The vote by HCC members was 36-20 --
64% in favor -- which was less than the overall support of 74%. 7 of the 22 no
votes cast in the House by Republicans were cast by HCC Republicans. The HCC
aggressively defends its jurisdiction, and sometimes infringes upon the
jurisdiction of other committees. It had sought jurisdiction over this bill. The
bill, however, was a product of the HFSC, not the HCC. The HCC held no markup.
(Readers may note that some of the above numbers do not add up to 435. This
is because of members who did not vote, and vacancies. Percentages are based on
those who cast votes. The party breakdowns and percentages are based on members
with party affiliation; the one independent was not factored in.)
Technology Sector. Representatives from districts that are home to
tech companies and workers, and groups that represent tech companies, heaped
praise upon the House for passing this bill.
Robert Holleyman, P/CEO of the Business
Software Alliance (BSA), stated in a
release that "Stock options have proven to be an invaluable instrument for
companies large and small, established and entrepreneurial, to recruit and retain the best
employees" He added that "At a time when other countries are encouraging the use
of stock options by their companies, we need to ensure that American
corporations have access to the same tools and incentives as their global
competitors. In an increasingly borderless global economy, U.S. businesses must
be able to attract talented employees who are the backbone of American
innovation and entrepreneurial spirit".
John Palafoutas, of the American Electronics
Association (AeA), stated in a
release that "Today’s House action on stock options is a wake-up call for
the US Senate ... The overwhelming bipartisan vote shows that the House understands the serious
economic implications of expensing options and the negative impact expensing
will have on American workers who are granted stock options by their companies.
... The FASB rule was a solution in search of a problem. And this rule would have
grave consequences on a crucial incentive for high-tech companies and their
workers."
He added that "We believe that the Senate Banking Committee should conduct immediate hearings
on this bill. This is not a philosophical issue but a very practical problem
facing the US economy. FASB has refused to look at the economic implications of
expensing; Congress has the ultimate responsibility to examine the impact the
FASB standard will have on American business, the American economy, and the
American worker."
|
|
|
House Passes Junk Fax Bill |
7/20. The House passed
HR 4600,
the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004", by voice vote. This bill would
amend 47 U.S.C. § 227 to
preserve the "established business relationship" exception to the general ban on
unsolicited faxes.
Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI),
Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), and others
introduced this bill on June 16, 2004. The House Commerce Committee amended and
approved it on June 24, 2004. See, story titled "House Commerce Committee
Approves Junk Fax Bill" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 927, June 28, 2004.
The Senate has yet to pass this bill. On June 23,
Sen. Olympia Snowe
(R-ME) introduced a related bill in the Senate,
S 2569, the
"Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004", in the Senate. Also, on June 24,
Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) and others
introduced S 2603,
also titled the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004".
|
|
|
Microsoft Announces Stock Buy Back and
Dividend Plans |
7/20. Microsoft announced that it plans to "buy back up to $30 billion of the
company's stock over the next four years" and make "a special one-time
dividend of $3 per share". See, Microsoft
release.
In addition, Microsoft executives held a teleconference in which they
discussed these and other plans. See,
transcript
of teleconference held by
Steve Ballmer
(CEO), Bill Gates (Chairman and
Chief Software Architect),
John Connors
(SVP and CFO), and
Brad Smith
(SVP and General Counsel).
John Connors (at right) stated that
"taken together, these steps represent a combined total value to shareholders of up
to 75 billion over the next four years, if our regular quarterly dividend remains at this
current level."
The Microsoft release states that the stock buy back and dividend plans
"will not affect Microsoft's commitment to research and development".
Gates added that "And so you might say, what's next for us, and the answer is
record investment in innovation. One way to look at that is over the next year
we'll file for over 3,000 patents and that's up very dramatically and would put
us certainly in one of the top companies in the world in terms of innovative
activities."
Gates also said that "our online properties, including our search properties,
will be improving in a pretty dramatic way."
|
|
|
Microsoft General Counsel Discusses Legal
Actions |
7/20. Microsoft's announcements regarding stock buy back and dividends also
addressed Microsoft's handling of various legal proceedings.
Microsoft stated in its July 20
release that "In the past two years, Microsoft has made
significant progress in resolving many of the legal issues facing the company --
including the recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision reaffirming its settlement
with the Department of Justice, most of the state class-action lawsuits, and the
AOL and Sun Microsystems cases -- along with patent claims such as the InterTrust
litigation. Resolving these issues marks an important step forward in
clarifying Microsoft's legal and related business risk."
In addition, Microsoft's General Counsel,
Brad Smith,
stated in a teleconference that "over the past two years or so, we've been
focused on resolving our legal issues from the past, on developing stronger
relationships with the industry and with government, and focusing on the future.
For example, we resolved the major antitrust case here in the United States, and
the recent Court of Appeals ruling sent a clear and emphatic message that our
settlement is a fair and appropriate resolution of those issues." See,
transcript.
Smith (at right) continued that
"We've resolved three-quarters of the state class action cases in the United States,
either through settlement or by winning in the courts." He added that "We've
resolved the largest private lawsuits pending against the company, such as
AOL-Time Warner, Sun Microsystems and Intertrust."
He also said that "While we still face several legal issues and we take
them seriously, we have significantly reduced the legal risks facing the company. We
also have a much clearer understanding of the potential risks involved in the cases that
remain, such as the European Commission case, which has moved into the appeals process.
Smith responded to a question about the EU antitrust case. "We anticipate
that the hearing will take place perhaps in September, certainly this fall, on interim
measures. That will decide whether the sanctions take effect while the case is litigated
or whether they're suspended until later. Typically a case takes two to three years to go
through the Court of First Instance. If there is an appeal, it can add another couple of
years to the process. So it could be quite a long road."
He also said that "With respect to settlement, as we've always said,
we're always open to an effort to explore a reasonable and amicable resolution. There are
no discussions going on at the moment, but over the course of a number of years, obviously
things can happen."
Finally, he stated that Microsoft "has always said that reducing our
legal and associated business risks was a prerequisite to addressing our cash management
plans. With so many of our cases resolved and the legal uncertainties so much better defined
and narrowed, we are now in a position where we can return significant resources to our
shareholders."
|
|
|
BTG Sues Microsoft and Apple Alleging Patent
Infringement |
7/20. BTG plc, Teleshuttle Corporation and
Teleshuttle Technologies LLC filed a complaint in U.S. District Court (NDCal) against
Microsoft and Apple alleging infringement of
U.S. Patent No. 6,557,054. This patent is titled "Method and system for
distributing updates by presenting directory of software available for user
installation that is not already installed on user station"
The abstract of this patent provides the following description. "A method for
distributing information to a plurality of uncoordinated user stations each of
which is configured for communications with a multiplicity of
independently-operated servers via a non-proprietary network includes steps for
providing a distribution service that distributes updates for a plurality of
different products, and providing a transporter software component to each of
the plurality of uncoordinated user stations, wherein the transporter software
component at each user station automatically effects communication sessions with
the distribution service via the non-proprietary network for the purpose of
obtaining updates for each of at least a subset of the plurality of different
products that are installed on that user station. Moreover, a user station,
which includes a storage medium, a plurality of different products installed on
the storage medium, and transporter software installed on the storage medium for
automatically effectuating communication sessions with a distribution service
via a non-proprietary network in order to obtain updates for each of the
plurality of different products, and a distribution service that distributes
updates for a plurality of different products to a plurality of uncoordinated
user stations via a non-proprietary network, are also described."
BTG stated in a
release
that "BTG asserts that Microsoft’s and Apple’s operating systems, as well as
Microsoft’s Office® products, incorporate the patented technologies."
|
|
|
|
|
More News |
7/20. President Bush gave a
speech,
and answered questions, in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. He stated that "One of the ways
we got to make sure this economy continues to grow is to make sure there is
broadband technology throughout the entire country, so people like this good
man, people like Mike, can do -- can work out of home if they want to; or can
bring educational information into their home."
7/20. The Department of Justice's Antitrust
Division published in its web site a copy of the
slides
[120 pages in PDF] that it used in its closing argument before the
U.S. District
Court (NDCal) in U.S. v. Oracle.
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Wednesday, July 21 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM. The House may
take up HR 4842,
the "United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act". See,
Republican Whip Notice.
9:00 AM. Day one of a two day meeting of the
Department of Commerce's (DOC) Bureau of
Industry and Standards (BXA/BIS) Information Systems Technical Advisory
Committee (ISTAC). Some of the meetings will be closed to the public. The
agenda includes a summary of the Wassenaar Arrangement inter-sessional meeting
on semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and a presentation on computational
capability of graphics processors. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 6,
2004, Vol. 69, No. 128, at Page 40601. Location: DOC, Room 3884, 14th Street
between Pennsylvania Ave. and Constitution Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing to mark up
several bills, including
S 1230,
a bill to provide additional responsibilities for the Chief Information Officer of
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) relating to geospatial information, and
S 2536, the
"Homeland Security Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Protection Act of 2004".
See,
notice. Location: Room 342, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM.
Alan Greenspan,
the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board,
will testify before the House Financial
Services Committee. Press contact: Peggy Peterson at 202 226-0471. Location: Room
2128, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The
House Science Committee will hold a hearing
titled "Cybersecurity Education -- Meeting the Needs of Technology Workers and
Employers". Location: Room 2318, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The
House Judiciary Committee will
meet to mark up several items, including and
HR 4586,
the "Family Movie Act of 2004". The meeting will be webcast.
Press contacts: Press contact: Jeff Lungren or Terry Shawn at 202 225-2492. Location: Room
2141, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The House Commerce
Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet will hold a hearing titled
"The Digital Television Transition: What We Can Learn From Berlin?"
The witnesses will be Mark Goldstein (Government Accounting Office), Mark
Cooper (Consumer Federation of America), Greg Schmidt (LIN Television Corp.),
Michael Willner (Insight Communications), John Lawson (Association of Public
Television Stations), Eddy Hartenstein (DirecTV Group), Carl McGrath
(Motorola), and James Snider (New America Foundation). See,
notice. Press
contacts: Jon Tripp (Barton) at 202-225-5735 ant Sean Bonyun (Upton) at
202-225-3761. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
POSTPONED. 10:00 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will
hold a hearing on the nomination of
Thomas Griffith to be
a Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia. Press contact: Margarita Tapia
(Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy) at 202 224-4242. Location: Room
226, Dirksen Building.
10:30 AM. The
House Ways and Means Committee
will meet to mark up
HR 2971,
the "Social Security Number Privacy and Identity Theft Prevent Act of 2004".
See,
notice. Location: Room 1100, Longworth Building.
12:00 NOON. The
Americans for a Secure Internet (ASI)
will host a panel discussion titled "Phishing: The Next Challenge for
E-commerce". The speakers will be Howard Beales (Director of the FTC's
Bureau of Consumer Protection), Dan Caprio (Chief Privacy Officer, Department
of Commerce), Steve DelBianco (Executive Director, NetChoice), Ben Golub (VeriSign),
and Jonathan Zuck (President of the Association for Competitive Technology).
See, notice and registration
page. For more information, contact Mark Blafkin at 202 331-2130 x104.
Location: Room HC-7, Capitol Building.
12:00 NOON. The Heritage Foundation
will host a book presentation. James Rogan, a former member of the House Judiciary
Committee and a former director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), will talk about his book titled
Rough Edges: My Unlikely Road from Welfare to Washington [Amazon]. See,
notice.
Location: 214 Massachusetts Ave., NE.
1:30 PM. The
House Government Reform Committee's
Subcommittee on on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations
and the Census will hold a hearing titled "Where's the CIO? The Role,
Responsibility and Challenge for Federal Chief Information Officers in IT
Investment Oversight and Information Management". See,
notice. Location: Room 2154, Rayburn
Building.
2:00 PM. The
House Armed Services Committee's Tactical Air Land Forces Subcommittee will
hold a hearing on "Small Business Innovation and Technology". Location: Room
2118, Rayburn Building. This hearing was previously scheduled for July 15.
|
|
|
Thursday, July 22 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM. The House may
take up HR 4842,
the "United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act"
and/or HR 4600,
the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004". See,
Republican Whip Notice.
9:00 AM. The
House Armed Services Committee will
hold a hearing on the report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the
United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack. William Graham, the
Chairman of the Commission, will testify. Location: Room 2118, Rayburn
Building.
9:00 AM. The
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee
will hold the second part of its hearing titled "Buyer Beware: The Danger of
Purchasing Pharmaceuticals over the Internet". The witnesses will be Richard
Stana (GAO), Robert Bonner (Bureau of Customs & Border Protection), Karen
Tandy (Drug Enforcement Administration), John Potter (Postmaster General, USPS),
John Taylor (Food and Drug Administration), John Scheibel (Yahoo), Sheryl
Sandberg (Google), Joshua Peirez (Master Card), Steve Ruwe (Visa), Robert
Bryden (Federal Express), and Daniel Silva (United Parcel Service). See,
notice. Location: Room 342, Dirksen Building.
9:00 AM. Day two of a two day meeting of the
Department of Commerce's (DOC) Bureau of
Industry and Standards (BXA/BIS) Information Systems Technical Advisory
Committee (ISTAC). Some of the meetings will be closed to the public. The
agenda includes a summary of the Wassenaar Arrangement inter-sessional meeting
on semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and a presentation on computational
capability of graphics processors. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 6,
2004, Vol. 69, No. 128, at Page 40601. Location: DOC, Room 3884, 14th Street
between Pennsylvania Ave. and Constitution Ave., NW.
9:30 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold an executive business meeting. The
agenda includes consideration of
S 1635,
the "L-1 Visa (Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of 2003", and
HR 1417,
the "Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004", a bill to
amend to replace copyright arbitration royalty panels with copyright royalty
judges. See,
notice.
Press contact: Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy)
at 202 224-4242. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
CANCELLED. 9:30 AM. The
Senate Commerce Committee will
hold a hearing on media ownership.
9:30 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee will hold a meeting to mark up numerous bills, and consider several
pending nominations. Several of the items on the agenda are technology related, including
S 2603,
the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004", S 2644, the "Satellite
Home Viewer Extension Act",
S 2281, the
"VOIP Regulatory Freedom Act of 2004", and the nominations of Deborah
Majoras (to be a Federal Trade Commission
Commissioner), Jonathan Liebowitz (FTC), Benjamin Wu (Assistant
Secretary for Technology Policy for the Department of Commerce), and Brett Palmer
(Assistant Secretary for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs for the Department
of Commerce). See,
notice. Press
contact: Rebecca Fisher at 202 224-2670. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
10:30 AM. The
House Commerce Committee's
Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a
hearing titled "Problems with the E-rate Program: Waste, Fraud, and Abuse
Concerns in the Wiring of Our Nation's Schools to the Internet". Location:
Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The Progress and Freedom
Foundation (PFF) will host a luncheon. The featured speaker will be
Wayne Brunetti, Ch/CEO of Xcel Energy.
His address may include many topics, including broadband internet access over
power lines (BPL). The FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on BPL on
February 12, 2004. See, story titled "FCC Adopts Broadband Over Powerline NPRM"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
836, February 13, 2004. Xcel has filed comments. See, April 5
comment [15 pages in PDF] on BPL, and July 14
comment [16 pages in PDF] in IP enabled services proceeding. This NPRM is FCC
04-29 in ET Docket Nos. 03-104 and 04-37. See,
notice
and registration page. Press contact: David Fish at 202 775-2644.
Location: Rotunda Room, Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center,
1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
1:00 PM. The
House Commerce Committee's
Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing titled "Health Information
Technology: Improving Quality and Value of Patient Care". See,
notice. Location:
Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
LOCATION CHANGE. 1:00 PM. The
House Ways and Means Committee's
Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing titled "Electronic Prescribing".
See,
notice. Location: Room B-318, Rayburn Building.
2:00 PM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on
S 2560,
the "Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act of 2004". The
witnesses will be Marybeth Peters (Register of Copyrights), Gary Shapiro
(P/CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association),
Robert Holleyman (P/CEO of the Business Software
Alliance), Andrew Greenberg (IEEE-USA), Kevin McGuiness (NetCoalition),
and Mitch Bainwol (Ch/CEO of the Recording
Industry Association of America). See,
story
titled "Senators Introduce Bill to Amend Copyright Act to Ban Inducement of
Infringement" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 925, June 24, 2004. See,
notice.
Press contact: Margarita Tapia (Hatch) at 202 224-5225 or David Carle (Leahy)
at 202 224-4242. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
EXTENDED TO SEPTEMBER 10. Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) in response to its public notice (DA 04-1690) requesting public comments
on constitutionally permissible ways for the FCC to identify and eliminate
market entry barriers for small telecommunications businesses and to further
opportunities in the allocation of spectrum-based services for small
businesses and businesses owned by women and minorities. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 22, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 119, at Pages
34672 - 34673. See also,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Friday, July 23 |
The House may meet at 9:00 AM. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
10:00 AM. The
House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee
on Commercial and Administrative Law will hold a hearing titled "Regulatory
Aspects of Voice Over the Internet Protocol (VoIP)". The hearing will be webcast.
Press contacts: Press contact: Jeff Lungren or Terry Shawn at 202 225-2492. Location: Room
2141, Rayburn Building.
12:30 PM. The Cato
Institute will host a panel discussion titled "The Case for CAFTA: Promoting
Freedom in our Neighborhood". The speakers will be Dan Griswold (Cato) and
Mario Canahuati (Ambassador from Honduras). See,
notice and registration page.
Lunch will be served. Location: Room B-354, Rayburn Building.
Deadline to submit comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding a national one call notification
system. The FCC adopted this NPRM on May 13, 2004, and released the
text [34 pages in PDF] on May 14, 2004. See, story titled "FCC Adopts NPRM
Regarding One Call Notification System" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
899, May 17, 2004. This NPRM is FCC 04-111 in CC Docket No. 92-105. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 8, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 110, at Pages
31930 - 31939.
Deadline to submit comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its
Notice
of Inquiry (NOI) [30 pages in PDF] regarding its annual report to the Congress on the
status of competition in the market for the delivery of video programming. See also, story
titled "FCC Adopts NOI For Annual Report to Congress on Video Programming" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 916, June 11, 2004. This NOI is FCC 04-136 in MB Docket No.
04-227. See also,
notice in the Federal Register, July 1, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 126, at Pages
39930 - 39933.
|
|
|
Monday, July 26 |
The House and Senate tentatively will not meet from July 26 through September 6.
The Democratic National Convention will be held in Boston, Massachusetts
on July 26 through July 30.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the reporting requirements for
U.S. providers of international telecommunications services. This NPRM is FCC 04-70 in
IB Docket No. 04-112. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 25, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 101, at Pages
29676 - 29681.
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 28 |
9:00 AM - 1:30 PM. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
and the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) will hold a public meeting on Internet Protocol version 6
(IPv6). Location: Room 4830, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW. See,
NTIA
notice July 20, 2004, and
notice in the Federal Register, July 15, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 135, at Page
42422.
10:00 AM - 3:00 PM. The
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Technological Advisory Council will meet. See, FCC
notice [PDF] and
notice in the Federal Register, July 6, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 128, at Pages
40638. Location: FCC, 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-C305.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. There will be a meeting of the
WRC-07 Advisory Committee, Informal Working Group 3: IMT-2000 and 2.5 GHz
Sharing Issues. See, FCC
notice [PDF]. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 7-B516 (South
Conference Room 7th Floor), Washington DC.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Auction No. 56 is scheduled to begin. This pertains to licenses in the
24 GHz Service in the 24.25-24.45 GHz and 25.05-25.25 GHz bands. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 20, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 76, at Pages
21099 - 21110.
Deadline to submit nominations to the Department of Commerce for
consideration for the 2005 Medal of Technology awards. See,
notice.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding unlicensed use of the
3650-3700 MHz band. The FCC adopted this NPRM on April 15, 2004. This item is
FCC 04-100 in ET Docket Nos. 04-151, 02-380 and 98-237. See,
notice
in the Federal Register, May 14, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 94, at Pages 26790 -
26803. See also, story titled "FCC Announces NPRM Regarding Unlicensed Use in
the 3650-3700 MHz Band" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 878, April 16, 2004.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding changes to the
FCC Form 477 local competition and broadband data gathering program. This NPRM
is FCC 04-81 in WC Docket No. 04-141. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 103, at Pages
30252 - 30277.
|
|
|
Notice of Change of E-Mail
Address |
The e-mail address for Tech Law Journal has changed. The new address is
as follows:
All previous e-mail addresses no longer operate. This new address is
published as a graphic to avoid e-mail address harvesting, and the associated
spam messages and malicious code messages. If your e-mail system does not
display graphics, see notice in TLJ website.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|