FCC Announces Agenda for August 4 Meeting |
7/28. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
released the agenda for its meeting of Wednesday, August 4, 2004. The agenda includes
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Declaratory Ruling (DR) regarding the Department
of Justice's (DOJ) request that the FCC administratively amend the CALEA statute to cover
information services, such as VOIP. The agenda also includes consideration of various
applications for certification of digital output protection technologies and recording
methods under the FCC's broadcast flag rule.
The agenda also includes an order regarding wireless spam, a Report and
Order (R&O) regarding network outage reporting, a R&O regarding DTV conversion,
and an item on fraud in the FCC's e-rate subsidy program.
The agenda also includes a Notice of Inquiry on the Emergency Alert System,
and an order on reconsideration regarding BellSouth's and SureWest's petition regarding
the triennial review order. In addition, the meeting will include a report presentation
by the FCC's Homeland Security Policy Council.
Expansion of CALEA to Cover Information Services. The FCC will
consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Declaratory Ruling (DR) regarding
the Department of Justice's (DOJ) March 10, 2004
petition for
rulemaking [83 pages in PDF] regarding requiring broadband service
providers, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) application providers, and
others, to design and modify their networks, hardware, software, and equipment
in a manner that enables the DOJ and other government agencies to more
conveniently intercept VOIP and other internet based communications.
The DOJ seeks the ability to access internet based communications the way it
has long been able to wiretap the old public switched telephone network (PSTN). The
DOJ has authority, which it regularly uses, to intercept internet communications. The
USA PATRIOT expanded and clarified this authority. This proceeding is about forcing
the information technology industry to design its products so that they are more
susceptible to easy government interception.
The DOJ has petitioned the FCC to interpret and implement the
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), which is codified
at 47 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The CALEA requires that a "telecommunications
carrier" must design its network to facilitate wiretapping. However, it only
applies to a "telecommunications carrier". The DOJ asks that the FCC, by
administrative fiat, expand the scope of the statute to apply to information
services, such as broadband internet access services, and VOIP applications that
use broadband internet connections. This is the FCC's RM 10865.
See also,
story
titled "Summary of DOJ Petition for Rulemaking to Expand the CALEA to Cover
Information Services" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 873, April 9, 2004.
Broadcast Flag Certifications. The FCC will consider an Order responding to
various applications for certification of digital output protection technologies
and recording methods under the FCC's broadcast flag rule. This proceeding is
titled "Digital Output Protection Technologies and Recording Method
Certifications". The proceeding numbers are MB Docket Nos. 04-55, 04-56, 04-57,
04-58, 04-59, 04-60, 04-61, 04-62, 04-63, 04-64, 04-65, 04-66, and 04-68.
On November 4, 2003, the FCC adopted and released its
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [72 pages in PDF]
in its proceeding titled "In the Matter of Digital Broadcast Content
Protection". This item is FCC 03-273 in MB Docket No. 02-230.
This item promulgated rules that include a broadcast flag mandate. A
broadcast flag is digital code embedded into a digital broadcasting stream. It
signals digital television (DTV) reception equipment to limit redistribution.
For it to be effective, DTV equipment must give effect to a broadcast flag.
Hence, this report and order contains technology mandates for equipment
manufacturers. See, story titled "FCC Releases Broadcast Flag Rule" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 772, November 5, 2003.
Subsequently, equipment makers submitted various applications to
the FCC, pursuant to the interim approval process
for digital output protection technologies and recording methods established by
the broadcast flag rule, for certification of their technologies. See,
for example,
application [45 pages in PDF] of TiVo in MB Docket No. 04-63.
CAN SPAM Act and Wireless Devices. The FCC will consider
an Order implementing the CAN-SPAM Act (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited
Pormography and Marketing Act of 2003. The Congress passed the
S 877, the
CAN-SPAM Act late last year. President Bush signed the bill on December 16,
2003. It is Public Law No. 108-187.
The CAN-SPAM Act give primary rulemaking authority to the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). However, the Act
also gives the FCC authority with respect to "unwanted mobile service commercial
messages".
The Act directs the FCC to write rules that "provide subscribers
to commercial mobile services the ability to avoid receiving mobile service
commercial messages unless the subscriber has provided express prior
authorization to the sender", and "allow recipients of mobile service commercial
messages to indicate electronically a desire not to receive future mobile
service commercial messages from the sender".
This Order is in the proceeding titled "Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and
Marketing Act of 2003" and numbered CG Docket No. 04-53, and in the proceeding
titled "Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
of 1991" and numbered CG Docket No. 02-278.
See, story titled "FCC Announces Rulemaking on Wireless
Provisions of CAN-SPAM Act"
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 855, March 15, 2004.
Network Outage Reporting RO. The FCC will consider a
Report and Order regarding the reporting of service disruptions by
telecommunications services providers. On February 12, 2004, the FCC adopted
a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding network outage reporting. This
item is FCC 04-30 in ET Docket No. 04-35. The FCC issued a
release [PDF] that states that it "proposes to require wireless, wireline,
cable, and satellite telecommunications providers to report information
electronically to the Commission about significant disruptions to their
communications systems."
Conversion to DTV. The FCC will consider a Report and
Order regarding the conversion to digital television. This proceeding is titled
"Second Periodic Review of the Commission’s Rules and Policies Affecting the
Conversion to Digital Television". It is MB Docket No. 03-15 and RM-9832.
The FCC adopted its
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [MS Word] on January 15, 2004, and
released it on January 27. See also, story titled "FCC Announces Digital
TV NPRM" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 592, January 28, 2003.
E-Rate Fraud. The FCC will
consider a Fifth Report and Order and Order regarding measures to protect
against waste, fraud and abuse in the administration of the schools and
libraries program, which is also known as the e-rate program. This is CC Docket
No. 02-6.
Emergency Alert System. The FCC will consider a Notice of
Inquiry (NOI) regarding the examination of the Emergency Alert System as an
effective mechanism for warning the American public during an emergency.
BellSouth/SureWest Petition.
The FCC will consider an Order on Reconsideration that addresses, in part, the
petitions filed by BellSouth and SureWest regarding the FCC's Triennial
Review Order (TRO) regarding the unbundling obligations of incumbent local
exchange carriers (ILECs).
Homeland Security Presentation. The FCC's
Homeland Security Policy Council will
present a report regarding the FCC's regulatory, outreach, and partnership
initiatives in support of homeland security.
The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, August 4, 2004 at 9:30 AM. It will be held in the FCC's Commission
Meeting Room (Room No. TW-C305), at 445 12th Street, SW. The meeting is open to
the public, and will be webcast by the FCC.
The FCC does not always commence its
meetings at the scheduled time. The FCC does not always consider all of the
items on its agenda. The above summary does not list the items in the same order
in which they will be considered by the FCC.
|
|
|
DOJ Announces Annual Awards |
7/28. The Department of Justice (DOJ) held a
ceremony at Constitution Hall in
Washington DC at which it announced its annual Attorney General's Awards. Some
of the many awards were related to information technology and communications.
The DOJ gave an award titled the "John Marshall Award for Providing Legal
Advice" to a group of lawyers in the
Antitrust Division. The DOJ wrote in a release that "These recipients,
through their leadership, dedication, and exceptionally detailed and sound
advice to the Federal Communications Commission, have played a crucial role in
helping to develop an environment conducive to the development of competition as
envisioned by Congress in passing the Telecommunications Act of 1996."
The DOJ listed the winners of this award: "From the Telecommunications and
Media Section -- Nancy M. Goodman, Chief, Laury E. Bobbish, Supervisory Trial
Attorney, Luin P. Fitch, Jr., Carl Willner, Brent E. Marshall, and Lauren J.
Fishbein, Trial Attorneys; from the Legal Policy Section -- Frances E. Marshall,
Attorney Advisor; and from the Foreign Commerce Section -- Cynthia Lewis Lagdameo,
Trial Attorney."
The DOJ also gave an award titled "Attorney General's Award for Excellence in
Information Technology" to a large group of people who work with information
technology at the DOJ. The DOJ stated in a release that this award "recognizes
achievements in applying information technology to improve operations and
productivity, reduce or avoid costs, and solve problems". The DOJ added that the
winners "upgraded technological infrastructure and business systems". The
winners includes David Zeppieri, the Chief Information Officer.
Attorney General John
Ashcroft was on hand to present awards. Also, on June 9, 2004 he testified before
the Senate Judiciary Committee. One of the
issues that he addressed in his
prepared
testimony was information technology at the DOJ.
He wrote that "Effective information technology is critical for both the
fight against terrorism and the efficient delivery of services to the public.
That is why we have revitalized our Information Technology organization. With
the appointment of a new Chief Information Officer, or CIO, the new tech team is
leveraging the leadership of experienced executives and managers to implement an
Information Technology strategy that is on the cutting edge."
For example, he wrote that the DOJ has "Published the first Department
Information Technology Strategic Plan in 2002. This means we turned fragmented,
stand-alone plans into a single, cohesive Department-wide strategy for effective
technology deployment in the future." He also wrote that the DOJ has "Begun
designing a single enterprise architecture. This means we will have a technology plan
that promotes communication interoperability, and information sharing, with core business
functions."
The DOJ also gave many awards to teams of lawyers and others who handled
complex investigations and prosecutions of terrorists, drug dealers, criminal gangs, and
assorted other bad guys. In addition, the DOJ gave an award titled the "John Marshall
Award for Trial of Litigation" to the team that handled the case McConnell v.
Federal Election Commission.
The case was a constitutional challenge to the McCain Feingold political
campaign regulation bill. The name plaintiff was
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY).
Sen. McConnell is also a member of the
Senate Appropriation Committee, and
its Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State and the Judiciary. That is, he is
involved in writing the DOJ's annual appropriation.
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Thursday, July 29 |
The House and Senate will not meet from July 26 through September 6.
The Democratic National Convention will be held in Boston, Massachusetts
on July 26 through July 30.
9:00 AM - 4:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Commission's (FCC) Media Bureau will sponsor a symposium titled
"A La Carte MVPD Pricing". Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305
(Commission Meeting Room).
9:00 AM - 4:30 PM. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
(NIST) Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award will
hold a partially closed meeting. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 28, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 123, at Pages
36063 - 36064. Location: 222, Red Training Room, Gaithersburg, MD.
Extended deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
regarding its proceeding titled "In the
Matter of Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable Equal Employment
Opportunity Rules and Policies". This is MM Docket No. 98-204. See,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Friday, July 30 |
9:30 AM - 1:00 PM. The Federal
Communications Commission's (FCC)
Internet Policy Working Group (IPWG) will host an event that it describes
as "a roundtable discussion to address international issues associated with
the migration of communications services and applications to IP-based
technologies". See, FCC
notice [PDF]. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Commission Meeting Room.
Extended deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its Public Notice (DA 04-1454) regarding a la carte and themed
programming and pricing options for programming distribution on cable TV
and direct broadcast satellite systems. This is MB Docket No. 04-207. See,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Monday, August 2 |
Deadline to submit applications to the
Department of Commerce's (DOC) Technology
Administration (TA) to join the TA's business development mission to
Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. This delegation will include
U.S. based senior executives representing the information and communications
technology sector. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 26, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 102, at Pages
29928 - 29930.
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 4 |
9:30 AM. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a meeting. The event will be webcast. Location:
FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
|
|
|
Friday, August 6 |
EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 8. Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) in response to its public notice (DA 04-1690) requesting public comments
on constitutionally permissible ways for the FCC to identify and eliminate
market entry barriers for small telecommunications businesses and to further
opportunities in the allocation of spectrum-based services for small
businesses and businesses owned by women and minorities. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 22, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 119, at Pages
34672 - 34673. See also,
notice of extension [PDF].
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the process for
designation of eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) and the FCC's rules
regarding high-cost universal service support. This NPRM is FCC 04-127 in
Docket No. 96-45. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 7, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 129, at Pages
40839 - 40843.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the
rechannelization of portions of the 17.7-19.7 GHz band. This NPRM is FCC 04-77
in WT Docket No. 04-143. See, notice in the Federal Register, July 7, 2004,
Vol. 69, No. 129, at Pages 40843 - 40850.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
regarding its Special 301 out of cycle review of Israel and other nations.
Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974, which is codified at
19 U.S.C. § 2242,
requires the USTR to identify countries that deny adequate and effective
protection of intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market
access to U.S. persons who rely on intellectual property protection. This is
also referred to as the Special 301 provision. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 13, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 133, at Pages
42077-42078.
|
|
|
Chasser to Leave USPTO |
7/28. Anne Chasser announced that she will leave the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on
September 1, 2004. She is the Commissioner for Trademarks. She went to work at
the USPTO as special advisor in September 1999. She was confirmed by the U.S.
Senate as Assistant Commissioner for Trademarks in November 1999. In March 2000
she was appointed Commissioner for Trademarks. Before working at the USPTO she
was Director of Trademarks and Licensing Services at Ohio State University. See,
USPTO release
and biography.
Before former President Clinton nominated her to be Assistant
Commissioner for Trademarks, Chasser (at right) had testified before the Senate Judiciary
Committee and House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Courts and
Intellectual Property, in her capacity as President of the International
Trademark Association, urging the Congress to pass legislation curbing the
practice of cyber squatting. The 106th Congress passed the Anticybersquatting
Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), which is now codified at
15 U.S.C. § 1125(d).
See, testimony of
July 22, 1999 and
testimony of July 28, 1999.
During her tenure, the USPTO expanded its telework program
for trademark examiners, and its Trademark
Electronic Application System (TEAS).
|
|
|
Court Opinions |
7/28. The U.S. Court of Appeals (3rdCir) issued its
opinion [PDF] in
Lolillard v. Bison Food, a case regarding the availability of ex
parte orders from the U.S. District Court directing the seizure from retailers
of allegedly counterfeit goods under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984,
which is codified in relevant part at 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d). The District Court
refused to issue ex parte seizure orders. The appeals Court affirmed. This case
is Lolillard Tobacco Company v. Bison Food Corp., et al., App. Ct. No.
03-3151, and consolidated cases, appeals from the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey.
7/28. The U.S. Court of Appeals (9thCir) issued its
opinion
[11 pages in PDF] in Cellular 101 v.
Channel Communications, a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case filed by Cellular
101. At issue in this appeal is Channel Communications' administrative
expense claim, filed pursuant to
11 U.S.C. § 503(b),
based upon Cellular 101's agency agreement with Channel Communications and John
Price that afforded it the right of first refusal if Price sold his stock or
substantially all of Channel Communications' assets. The Bankruptcy Court granted
the administrative expense claim. This District Court affirmed. In this opinion, the
Appeals Court affirmed. This case is Cellular 101, Inc. v. Channel Communications,
Inc. and John Price, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, App. Ct. No. 02-56772,
an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, D.C. No.
CV-01-00715-AHS, Judge Alicemarie Stotler presiding. Judge Melvin Brunetti wrote the
opinion of the Court of Appeals, in which Judges Betty Fletcher and Harry Pregerson joined.
7/26. The U.S. Court of Appeals (1stCir) issued its
opinion in
Flynn v. AK Peters, a dispute between a co-author of a second
edition of book and her publisher regarding the publisher's accepting revisions
from a co-author without her consent, and giving a third person co-authorship
credit. The author alleged Lanham Act, contract and state statutory claims. The
District Court granted judgment to the publisher. The Appeals Court affirmed.
The book is
Mobile Robots: Inspiration to Implementation [Amazon]. This case is Anita
Flynn v. AK Peter, Ltd., U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, App. Ct.
Nos. 03-1676, 03-2294, and 03-2348, appeals from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts.
|
|
|
Notice of Change of E-Mail
Address |
The e-mail address for Tech Law Journal has changed. The new address is
as follows:
All previous e-mail addresses no longer operate. This new address is
published as a graphic to avoid e-mail address harvesting, and the associated
spam messages and malicious code messages. If your e-mail system does not
display graphics, see notice in TLJ website.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|