Bush Issues Memorandum Regarding Spectrum
Management |
11/30. President George Bush released a
memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies titled
"Improving Spectrum Management for the 21st Century". It is a plan for
a planning process.
It requires various executive branch entities to prepare agency plans; it
requires a comprehensive "Spectrum Needs Plan"; it requires a "Federal
Strategic Spectrum Plan" and "National Strategic Spectrum Plan"; it
requires a "a plan for identifying and implementing incentives that promote more
efficient and effective use of the spectrum while protecting national and homeland
security, critical infrastructure, and Government services"; it requires a plan
for the implementation of previous spectrum reports and progress reports on
implementation; and, it plans the roles of the various planners, and their
timetable for writing plans.
The just released memorandum contains no new legislative or policy
recommendations. Nor does it include any appointments of personnel. It is a
management document.
It provides that "Within 6 months of the date of this memorandum, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) shall provide guidance to the agencies for
improving capital planning and investment control procedures to better identify
spectrum requirements and the costs of investments in spectrum-dependent
programs and systems. Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, agencies
shall implement methods for improving capital planning and investment control
procedures consistent with the OMB guidance, including making any modifications
to agency capital planning procedures necessary to ensure greater consideration
of more efficient and cost-effective spectrum use."
It also provides that "Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, the
heads of agencies selected by the Secretary of Commerce shall provide
agency-specific strategic spectrum plans (agency plans) to the Secretary of
Commerce that include: (1) spectrum requirements, including bandwidth and
frequency location for future technologies or services; (2) the planned uses of
new technologies or expanded services requiring spectrum over a period of time
agreed to by the selected agencies; and (3) suggested spectrum efficient
approaches to meeting identified spectrum requirements. The heads of agencies
shall update their agency plans biennially."
It requires the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), within six months, to "identify public safety spectrum needs." It
requires the DHS, within one year, to "develop a comprehensive plan, the
Spectrum Needs Plan, to address issues related to communication spectrum used by
the public safety community, as well as the continuity of Government
operations."
It requires the Department of Commerce
(DOC), within six months of receiving the above referenced OMB guidance, to
"integrate the agency plans and Spectrum Needs Plan, based upon a Department of
Commerce framework, into a Federal Strategic Spectrum Plan and shall assist in
the formulation of a National Strategic Spectrum Plan." It also requires the DOC
to update the National Strategic Spectrum Plan on a biennial basis.
President Bush issued a
memorandum titled "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies" regarding "Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century" on May 29, 2003.
The White House Press Office released
it on June 5, 2003. See, stories titled "Bush Issues Spectrum Policy Memorandum"
and "Reaction to the President's Spectrum Memorandum" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 675, June 6, 2003. The 2003 memorandum announced the creation of
the "Federal Government Spectrum Task Force".
Pursuant to the 2003 memorandum, on June 24, 2003, the DOC's
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) released two reports. See also, NTIA
release and story titled "NTIA Releases Reports on Spectrum Management" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 929, June 30, 2004.
The
first report is titled "Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century -- The
President's Spectrum Policy Initiative: Report 1". It is subtitled
"Recommendations of the Federal Government Spectrum Task Force". It contains the
views of the administration's task force.
The
second report is titled "Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century -- The
President's Spectrum Policy Initiative: Report 2". It is subtitled
"Recommendations from State and Local Governments and Private Sector
Responders".
The just released memorandum also requires that the DOC, within six months,
"shall establish a plan for the implementation of all other recommendations
included in the Reports." It also requires that the DOC, within one year, "shall
provide to the President a report describing the progress on implementing the
recommendations in the Reports. The report shall include a section prepared by
the Secretary of Homeland Security that describes the progress made with respect
to public safety spectrum issues. This report shall be updated on an annual
basis, until completion of the actions required by this memorandum."
The memorandum assigns no new tasks to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). However, it provides that certain
executive branch entities that are assigned tasks shall consult the FCC.
|
|
|
SBC Files Tariff with FCC on
Service for VOIP Providers |
11/26. SBC's Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company (SWBT) filed a tariff with the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) on Wednesday evening, November 24, 2004. The
tariff pertains to SBC's service for voice over internet protocol (VOIP) service
providers that it has named "TIPToP", a partial acronym
for "True Internet Protocol To Public Switched Telephone Network". It
is now a voluntary service. VOIP providers need not purchase it to access SBC's
customers on the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).
On Friday, November 26, the day after Thanksgiving, FCC Chairman
Michael Powell wrote in a
statement [PDF] that he is committed to ensuring that the FCC avoid "any
action that might slow the IP-services revolution".
Powell (at right)
warned that "Should we conclude that this tariff is being used to justify the
imposition of traditional tariffed access charges on VoIP providers or to
discriminate against SBC's competitors, the Commission will take appropriate
action including, but not limited to, initiating an investigation of SBC's
interstate tariff and any other tariff that proposes similar terms. Nothing in
this tariff should be interpreted to force a set of compensation relationships
on VoIP providers and their connecting carriers either at this Commission or in
other venues."
Background on Tariffs, Common Carriers, Information Services, and
Intercarrier Compensation.
Tariffs are "Schedules of rates and regulations filed by common carriers"
See, 47 CFR 61.3(rr). Tariffs are filed either with state public utilities commissions
or the FCC, depending on jurisdiction. Moreover, these common carriers are required to some
extent to adhere to their tariffs. Regulators can challenge these tariffs.
The filing of interstate tariffs is covered Part 61 of the FCC's rules. See,
GPO page
with hyperlinks to each of the sections of part 61 in PDF.
The regulatory regime based upon tariffing dates back to government efforts to
curtail certain business practices in the railroad industry in the 19th Century.
It was then transplanted to the monopoly phone industry early in the 20th
Century. It is based on the assumption that in industries with concentrated
market power, markets and negotiation of contacts
do not protect consumer welfare, and that government must therefore regulate
prices, and prevent price discrimination.
Tariff filing is a procedure that applies in the context of old regulated telecommunications
services, but not new unregulated information services, where there are no dominant
incumbents with market power.
The FCC has already issued a Declaratory Ruling that
Pulver.com's VOIP service, named
Free World Dialup, is an information
service, and not a telecommunications service. See, Declaratory Ruling and
story
titled "FCC Rules on Pulver's Free World Dialup VOIP Service" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 836, February 13, 2004.
The FCC has also released a
Memorandum
Opinion and Order [41 pages in PDF] that addresses
Vonage Holdings Corporation's Petition for
Declaratory Ruling regarding its DigitalVoice service in the state of Minnesota.
Minnesota had complained, among other things, that Vonage failed to file a tariff.
The Vonage MO&O states that "we preempt an order of the Minnesota Public Utilities
Commission (Minnesota Commission) applying its traditional “telephone company”
regulations to Vonage’s DigitalVoice service, which provides voice over Internet
protocol (VoIP) service and other communications capabilities. We conclude that
DigitalVoice cannot be separated into interstate and intrastate communications
for compliance with Minnesota’s requirements without negating valid federal policies
and rules." See, story titled "FCC Releases Vonage VOIP Order" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,018, November 15, 2004; and
story
titled "FCC Adopts Order on Vonage's VOIP
Petition" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,015, November 10, 2004.
However, the FCC released an
Order [27 pages in PDF] on AT&T's petition
for a declaratory ruling that access charges do not apply to its service in
which calls originate and terminate on circuit switched PSTN facilities, but are
routed on internet backbone. The FCC rejected AT&T's request, and ruled that the
service at issue is "telecommunications service upon which interstate access
charges may be assessed". See,
story
titled "FCC Rules on AT&T's VOIP Petition" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
882, April 22, 2004.
The FCC also has an open proceeding regarding IP enabled services generally,
that is intended to address issues such as compensation, the Universal
Service Fund, 911/E911, consumer protection, and disability access requirements.
The FCC adopted its IP enabled services
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [97 pages in PDF] on February 12, 2004,
and released it on March 10, 2004. It is FCC 04-28 in
WC Docket 04-36. See especially, paragraphs 61-62 at pages 41-43, for its
discussion of compensation.
The FCC also has an open proceeding on intercarrier compensation. Even
before the recent growth in VOIP service offerings, the compensation regime was outdated.
The FCC is in the process of developing new rules to reform this regime. The FCC
adopted it intercarrier compensation Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on
April 19, 2001. It is FCC 01-132 in Docket No. CC 01-92.
The FCC also has an open proceeding on Level
3 Communications' petition. It filed this petition with the FCC on December
23, 2003 requesting that it forebear from applying the requirements of
Section 251(g) and
FCC rules to the extent that they might be interpreted to allow local exchange
carriers (LECs) to impose interstate or intrastate access charges on internet
protocol (IP) traffic that originates or terminates on the PSTN, or on PSTN-PSTN traffic incidental thereto. The Level
3 petition is published in the FCC web site in five parts in PDF. See,
part 1,
part 2,
part 3,
part 4, and
part 5. See also, stories titled "Level 3 Files VOIP Petition With FCC" and
"Summary of Other VOIP Proceedings at the FCC" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 815, January 14, 2004.
Summary of SWBT's Tiptop Service and Tariff.
Tiptop is a service that SBC plans to sell to VOIP services providers to
enable them to complete VOIP communications to customers on SBC's PSTN network.
The tariff just filed with the FCC on Thanksgiving eve describes the service,
sets rules and requirements for purchasers of the service, and sets rates.
SBC stated in a
document in its web site that "TIPToP service is a new interstate service
that offers the providers of Internet Protocol (IP) enabled voice information
services the capability to connect traffic from IP enabled voice information
service users (IP-VIS users), to Telephone Company End Users, or Off Net End
Users using Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) based voice services via
end offices or tandems subtended by the Telephone Company Access Tandems."
SWBT wrote in its
cover
letter [2 pages in PDF] for the tariff filing that "TIPToP service consists
of switched circuit interfaces specifically designed for use by a provider of
Internet Protocol (IP) Enabled Voice Information Services (IP-VIS) to connect
traffic from its IP end users to end users of the Public Switched Telephone
Network (PSTN) via the Telephone Company's existing network." It added that this
tariff takes effect on November 25, 2004.
SWBT wrote in a second
document
[3 pages in PDF] titled "Transmittal and Justification" that it "proposes
to introduce True IP to PSTN (TIPToP) Service into the
SWBT’s Access Service Tariff F.C.C. No. 73. TIPToP service is a time division
multiplexed (TDM) telecommunications service consisting of switched circuit
interfaces specifically designed for use by a provider of Internet Protocol (IP)
Enabled Voice Information Services (IP-VIS) to connect traffic from its IP end
users to end users of the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) via the
Telephone Company's existing network. TIPToP service is not a mandatory
offering. IP-VIS providers who choose not to purchase TIPToP service may use
other services, to the extent permitted by SWBT’s tariffs and prevailing law, to
connect traffic from their IP end users to end users of the PSTN via the
Telephone Company’s existing network." (Parentheses in original.)
This "Transmittal and Justification" continues that "TIPToP
Service provides two types of switched circuit port
interfaces (one-way and two-way) designed to provide seamless functionality
between Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) based voice services and IP based Voice
Information Services. The interfaces incorporate Transport, SS7 connectivity,
choke trunks and call related data base query capability to the tandem or end
office switch in which these interfaces are installed."
A third
document
[41 pages in PDF] filed by SBC revises Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 with extensive new definitions,
rules for ordering access under the Tiptop service, description of the Tiptop service,
description of the manner of provisioning, enumeration of limitations on the Tiptop
service, new customer obligations, rate regulations, and rates and charges.
Powell's Warning.
FCC Chairman Michael
Powell released a
statement [PDF] in which he responded to SBC's tariff filling.
He wrote that "SBC's interstate tariff for TIPToP service comes at
time when VoIP services are continuing to grab consumer attention by offering more
choice, lower prices, greater value, and enhanced features. I am committed to ensuring
that this Commission avoids any action that might slow the IP-services revolution."
He continued that "Against this backdrop, the Commission, state utility
commissions, and the courts all are considering the question of whether legacy access
charges should apply to VoIP services. SBC's tariff makes clear that TIPToP is not a
mandatory offering and VoIP providers may continue to utilize alternatives to exchange
their traffic. Should we conclude that this tariff is being used to justify the imposition
of traditional tariffed access charges on VoIP providers or to discriminate against
SBC's competitors, the Commission will take appropriate action including, but not limited
to, initiating an investigation of SBC’s interstate tariff and any other tariff that
proposes similar terms. Nothing in this tariff should be interpreted to force a set of
compensation relationships on VoIP providers and their connecting carriers either at this
Commission or in other venues."
Powell concluded that "SBC’s tariff arrives at the Commission while we
have before us three proceedings that raise issues related to the charges applicable to
VoIP services -- a petition filed by Level 3, our larger intercarrier compensation proceeding
and a rulemaking on IP-enabled services. I look forward to considering these pending
proceedings."
|
|
|
|
Tom Ridge Resigns |
11/30.
Tom Ridge
(at right), the Secretary of Homeland Security, announced that "Earlier today, I
submitted a formal letter of resignation to the President, and with his
concurrence it is my desire to continue to serve as Secretary of Homeland
Security through February 1st of next year unless my successor is confirmed by
the Senate earlier." See,
transcript of
press conference.
President George Bush stated that "As the Nation's first
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and first Secretary of Homeland
Security, he oversaw the most extensive reorganization of the Federal Government
in 50 years. His efforts have resulted in safer skies, increased border and port
security, and enhanced measures to safeguard our critical infrastructure and the
American public." See,
statement.
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Wednesday, December 1 |
The House will not meet until Monday, December 6. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will not meet until Tuesday, December 7.
9:00 AM. Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner
Kathleen Abernathy will hold
an event titled "briefing for members of the media". She will discuss her
role in the ITU Global Symposium for Regulators (GSR) Conference, to be held in
Geneva, Switzerland on December 8-10, 2004. RSVP to Marybeth McCarrick at 202 418-0654
or Meribeth.McCarrick@fcc.gov. Location:
FCC, Room 8B115, 445 12th Street, SW.
11:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. Dan Glickman, P/CEO of
the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA),
will give a speech on technology and online infringement.
This event is free and open to the public. RSVP to
use@gwu.edu or 202 994-7706. Location:
George Washington University, Jack
Morton Auditorium, Media and Public Affairs Building, 805 21st St., NW.
12:15 PM. The Federal Communications Bar
Association's (FCBA) Mass Media Practice Committee will host a brown bag lunch.
The title of the event is "Meet the Trade Press". No RSVP is required.
Location: NAB, 1771 N St., NW.
|
|
|
Thursday, December 2 |
9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(DCCir) will hear oral argument in Rainbow Push Coalition v. FCC,
No. 01-1072. Judges Henderson, Rogers and Tatel will preside. Location: Prettyman
Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave., NW.
10:00 AM.
Bob
Liscouski, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure
Protection, will give a speech at a Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) meeting titled "Protecting the
Financial Sector: A Public and Private Partnership". Location:
George Washington University, Media and
Public Affairs Building, 805 21st St. NW.
The Federal Communications Bar Association
(FCBA) will host an event titled "18th Annual Chairman's Dinner".
The reception will begin at 6:00 PM. The dinner begins at 7:30 PM. Location:
Washington Hilton, 1919 Connecticut Ave., NW.
Day one of a two day event hosted by the Federal
Communications Bar Association (FCBA) and the
Practicing Law Institute (PLI) titled "22nd
Annual Telecommunications Policy and Regulation Conference". The price to
attend ranges from $1,165.50 to $1,295.00. See,
registration form
[PDF]. Location. Watergate Hotel, 2650 Virginia Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Friday, December 3 |
Day two of a two day event hosted by the
Federal Communications Bar Association
(FCBA) and the Practicing Law Institute (PLI)
titled "22nd Annual Telecommunications Policy and Regulation Conference".
The price to attend ranges from $1,165.50 to $1,295.00. See,
registration form
[PDF]. Location. Watergate Hotel, 2650 Virginia Ave., NW.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The
Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF) will
host a panel discussion titled "The Myths and Realities of Universal Service:
Revisiting the Justification for the Current Subsidies". The speakers will
include Randolph May and Joseph Kraemer. See,
notice and
online registration
page. Press contact: Patrick Ross at 202 289-8928 or
pross@pff.org. Lunch will be served. Location: Room
B369, Rayburn Building.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The
DC Bar Association will host a brown bag lunch
titled "Telecom Act Rewrite: Following the Money Trails". The speakers
will be Rudy Baca (Precursor Group), Jonathan Askin (General Counsel of
Pulver.com),
James Gattuso (Heritage Foundation),
Lawrence Movshin (Wilkinson Barker & Knauer),
and Carolyn Brandon (CTIA). See,
notice.
Prices to attend range from $15 to $30. For more information, call 202 626-3463. Location: CTIA, 1400 16th Street, NW.
|
|
|
Monday, December 6 |
The House will meet at 2:00 PM. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
9:30 AM. The
U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in James A. Kay v.
FCC, No. 02-1175. This is a case pertaining to the finder's preference rule,
47 C.F.R. § 90.173(k)(2)(1992). See, FCC
brief [pages in
PDF]. Judges Edwards, Sentelle and Randolph will preside. Location: Prettyman Courthouse, 333
Constitution Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel A, will hear oral argument in Designing Health v. Erasmus
(No. 03-1438), Northpoint Technology, Ltd v. MDS America, Inc.
(No. 04-1249), and Taylor v. DaimlerChrysler (No. 04-1319). The
Northpoint Technology case
is an appeal from the U.S. District Court (SDFl) involving claims infringement
of patents pertaining to use of DBS spectrum for terrestrial wireless
services.
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel B, will hear oral argument in ISCO International v. Concuctus,
Inc. (No. 04-1007) and Bellehumeur v. Bonnett (No.
04-1258).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council
(NRIC) will meet. See,
notice
[PDF]. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting
Room).
Deadline to submit comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking
by the Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA), and National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) regarding telecommuting by federal
contractors. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 5, 2004, Vol. 69, No.192, at Pages
59701 - 59702.
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 7 |
The Senate will meet at 9:30 AM.
Hannukah.
10:00 AM. The Supreme Court
will hear oral argument in Granholm v. Heald, No. 03-1116, Michigan
Beer & Wine Wholesalers v. Heald, No. 03-1120, and Swedenburg v. Kelly,
No. 03-1274. See,
schedule [PDF]. These cases involve constitutional challenges to state
restraints on the direct sales of alcoholic beverages, including internet
wine sales.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel C, will hear oral argument in Stambler v. RSA Security
(No. 04-1129) and AT&T v. Microsoft (No. 04-1285).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel D, will hear oral argument in Block Financial v. Yodlee, Inc.
(No. 04-1087) and McKenchnie Vehicle Components v. Lacks Industries,
Inc. (No. 04-1278).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled
"2004 Intellectual Property Law Year in Review Series: Part 1 -- Patent
Update". The speakers will be
Bradley Wright (Banner & Witcoff) and
Kevin Duncan (Hunton & Williams). See,
notice.
Prices vary from $70 to $115. For more information, call 202 626-3488. Location: D.C.
Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 21. Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to
its Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling (NPRM & DR) [100 pages in PDF] regarding
imposing Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) obligations upon broadband internet
access services and voice over internet protocol (VOIP). This NPRM is FCC 04-187 in ET
Docket No. 04-295. The FCC adopted this NPRM at its August 4, 2004 meeting, and released it
on August 9. See, story
titled "Summary of the FCC's CALEA NPRM" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 960,
August 17, 2004. See,
notice in the Federal Register, September 23, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 184, Pages
56976 - 56987. See also,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 8 |
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel E, will hear oral argument in Sunny Fresh Foods v. Michael Foods
(No. 04-1059) and Schreiber Foods v. Beatrice Cheese (No.
04-1279).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel F, will hear oral argument in Jore Corp. v. Kouvato, Inc.
(No. 04-1163) and Lisle Corp. v. AJ Manufacturing (No. 04-1275).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Department of
State's (DOS) International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet
to advise the DOS on policy and technical issues with respect to the
International Telecommunication
Union (ITU), and in particular, the December 15-17, 2004 meeting of ITU's
Telecommunications Development Advisory
Group (TDAG) in Geneva, Switzerland. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 5, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 214, at Page
64620. Location: DOS, Room 2533A.
12:00 NOON. The Federal
Communications Bar Association (FCBA) Foundation Board of Trustees will meet.
Location: Wiley Rein & Fielding, 1776 K
St., NW.
12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a luncheon program titled "Intellectual Property
Considerations in Strategic Alliances". The speakers will be
Linda Alcorn and
Marvin Guthrie
(both of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox). See,
notice.
Prices vary from $8 to $18. For more information, contact Tracy Muller
at 202 772-8697 or tmuller@skgf.com.
Location: SKGF, 8th Floor, 1100 New York Ave., NW.
3:00 PM. The U.S. Court of
Appeals (1stCir) will hear oral argument, en banc, in USA v. Councilman,
a case regarding the applicability of the Wiretap Act to e-mail in storage. See,
opinion of the three judge panel, and
story
titled "1st Circuit Holds Wiretap Act Does Not Apply to E-Mail in Storage" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 930, July 1, 2004. Location. En Banc Courtroom, John Joseph
Moakley Courthouse, Boston, MA.
|
|
|
More News |
11/30. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir)
issued its opinion [6
pages in PDF] in Kyocera Wireless v. President Electronics, a
patent case involving cell phone designs. Tony Colida holds several patents for
the design of cellular telephone handsets. He filed a complaint in U.S. District
Court (SDCal) against Kyocera Wireless alleging infringement of these patents. The
District Court granted summary judgment of non-infringement to Kyocera. The Court of
Appeals affirmed. This case is Kyocera Wireless Corporation v. President Electronics,
Ltd. and Tony Colida, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, App. Ct. No.
04-1345, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
California, D.C. No. 02-CV-2042.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|