Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Brand X
Case |
12/3. The Supreme Court issued
an
order [1 page in PDF] in which it granted petitions for writ of certiorari
in NCTA v. Brand X Internet Services, No. 04-277, and FCC v.
Brand X Internet Services, No. 04-281. The Court also consolidated the
two cases. This decision to hear the case is a victory for
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Chairman Michael Powell,
and the majority on the FCC.
Powell (at right) stated in a
release
[PDF] that "High-speed Internet connections are not telephones, and
I'm glad the Supreme Court has agreed to review the 9th Circuit’s ruling that
they are. The 9th Circuit's decision would have grave consequences for the
future and availability of high-speed Internet connections in this country. As
the Commission is uniquely charged with the task of promoting the deployment of
such advanced services to the public, we look forward to our opportunity to
present our case before the high court."
Treating broadband internet access providers, including cable modem service,
as an information service is a critical part of Powell's strategy for promoting broadband
deployment, competition, innovation, and the digital migration. He is supported in this
by Republican Commissioners Kevin
Martin and Kathleen Abernathy.
If cable modem service were a telecommunications service, then it would be subject
to the economic regulatory regime that applies to telecommunications services.
On March 14, 2002, the FCC adopted a
Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [75 pages in PDF]. The
Declaratory Ruling (DR) component of this item states that "we conclude that
cable modem service, as it is currently offered, is properly classified as an
interstate information service, not as a cable service, and that there is no
separate offering of telecommunications service." This item is FCC 02-77 in
Docket No. 00-185 and Docket No. 02-52.
On October 6, 2003, a three judge panel of the
U.S. Court of Appeals (9thCir) issued
its
opinion [39 pages in PDF] (which is also published at 345 F.3d 1120)
vacating the FCC's declaratory ruling. See,
story
titled "9th Circuit Vacates FCC Declaratory Ruling That Cable Modem Service is
an Information Service Without a Separate Offering of a Telecommunications
Service" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 754, October 7, 2003; and story titled "Reaction to
9th Circuit Opinion in Brand X Internet Services v. FCC" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 756, October 9, 2003.
The FCC obtained the critical support of the Department of Justice's
(DOJ) Office of the Solicitor General
(OSG). The Supreme Court Justices place great weight on the recommendation of
the OSG when deciding whether or not to grant certiorari petitions. On September
1, 2004, the DOJ's OSG and the FCC filed a
Petition for Writ of Certiorari [37 pages in PDF] with the Supreme Court.
See, story
titled "Office of the Solicitor General Backs FCC in Brand X Case" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 968, September 2, 2004.
On the other hand, Powell may have paid a price for obtaining the backing of
the DOJ's OSG. That is, the DOJ may have leveraged its power in the Supreme
Court certiorari process to obtain from the FCC the NPRM pertaining to CALEA. In
this arrangement, the DOJ got the CALEA interpretation and rule making
proceeding that it wanted, while the FCC majority got the petition for writ of
certiorari in the Brand X case that it wanted.
On August 9, 2004 the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) released a
Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling (NPRM & DR) [100 pages in PDF]
regarding imposing
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) obligations upon
broadband internet access services and voice over internet protocol (VOIP)
services. See,
story
titled "Summary of the FCC's CALEA NPRM" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 960, August 17, 2004.
See also,
story
titled "Rep. Pickering Suggests Relationship Between the DOJ's Brand X Cert
Petition and the FCC's CALEA NPRM" and story titled "House Subcommittee Holds
Hearing on CALEA and the Internet" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 974, September 10, 2004.
If the DOJ gets what it seeks in the CALEA proceeding, this could undermine
Powell's strategy for promoting broadband deployment, competition, innovation,
and the digital migration.
National Cable & Telecommunications
Association (NCTA) P/CEO Robert Sachs praised the Supreme Court's decision
to take the case. He wrote in a
release
that "We are pleased by the Supreme Court's decision to review this significant
case and are optimistic that the Court will affirm the FCC's decision that cable
modem service is an interstate information service, fostering a deregulatory
environment for cable high-speed Internet access. Establishing a deregulatory
environment for cable modem service is critical to the universal deployment in
the U.S. of broadband services, including emerging services such as Voice over
Internet Protocol service."
|
|
|
DOJ Brings More DRAM Price Fixing
Charges |
12/2. The Department of Justice (DOJ)
filed a criminal complaint in U.S.
District Court (NDCal) against Heinrich Florian, Günter Hefner, Peter
Schaefer, and T. Rudd Corwin alleging violation of Section 1 of the Sherman
Antitrust Act in connection with their alleged conspiracy to fix the prices of
dynamic random access memory (DRAM).
The four are executives of Infineon Technologies AG, and its subsidiary,
Infineon Technologies North America Corporation.
The DOJ also announced that it has entered into plea agreements with the
four defendants. These agreements provide that the four will plead guilty, pay a $250,000
criminal fine, serve prison terms ranging from four to six months, and assist
the government in its ongoing DRAM investigation.
Scott Hammond, Director of Criminal Enforcement in the DOJ's
Antitrust Division, stated in a
release
that "These four executives are the first to plead guilty to a charge of fixing
prices in what is still a very active and far-reaching investigation into
antitrust violations in the DRAM industry ... We will continue in our efforts to
bring to justice other domestic and foreign-based executives who were involved
with fixing DRAM prices."
On September 15, 2004, the DOJ filed a criminal
information in
the U.S. District Court (NDCal)
against Infineon Technologies AG, charging price fixing in violation of 15
U.S.C. § 1. Simultaneous, Infineon agreed to plead guilty and to pay a $160
Million fine. See also, DOJ
release
and Infineon
release. On October 20, 2004, Infineon plead guilty. See also,
story
titled "DOJ Charges Infineon With Felony Price Fixing; Infineon Pleads Guilty"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 978, September 16, 2004.
Also, on December 17, 2003, the DOJ announced that it charged Alfred P.
Censullo, a former employee of Micron
Technology Inc., with violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1503
in connection with his "altering and concealing documents containing competitor
pricing information, which were requested in a federal grand jury subpoena".
See, DOJ
release. The DOJ also stated that he "has agreed to plead guilty to
obstructing the grand jury investigation of a suspected conspiracy to fix the
price of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) products sold in the United
States".
Micron Ch/CEO Steve Appleton stated then in a
release
that "The charges against Mr. Censullo relate to his personal actions in the
course of the Department of Justice investigation and do not pertain to Micron.
Micron takes compliance with the law very seriously and requires all employees
to follow instructions with respect to legal proceedings. Mr. Censullo's actions
were contrary to the company's instructions. We have fully and actively
cooperated with the Department of Justice since the inception of their
investigation and will continue to do so."
On January 21, 2004, Censullo plead guilty in U.S. District Court (NDCal).
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which is codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1, now
provides, that "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise,
or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or
with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any
contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be
illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other
person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said
punishments, in the discretion of the court".
|
|
|
DOJ Charges Former McAfee Executive with
Insider Trading for Exercising Stock Options |
11/30. The Department of Justice (DOJ)
charged Evan Collins by
criminal information [4 pages in PDF] with securities fraud in violation of 15
U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78ff, and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, in connection with his alleged
trading of securities based upon non-public material information. The transactions
alleged to constitute criminal violations are his exercise and sale of stock options
in the company which employed him.
The information states that Collins was previously the controller of McAfee
Associates (until 1999), and then Chief Financial Officer of McAfee.com (until 2002).
The information states that in 2000 "Collins learned that Network Associates'
then controller and others knowingly employed a scheme to defraud Network
Associates' shareholders, its creditors, the public, and the SEC, and to deprive
Network Associates of its intangible right to honest services, by manipulating
Network Associates' financial statements, including those relating to software
license sales revenue, by among other things, improperly transferring 15 million
dollars from a Network Associates' tax reserve account to an accounts receivable
reserve account in order to improperly increase revenue."
The information does not charge him with securities fraud for a role in the
preparation, release or filing or false financial statements. Rather, it alleges
that "Based on this and other inside information Collins obtained, Collins sought
to enrich himself by trading Network Associates' stock during November 200 because
he believed that Network Associates would not meet its 4th quarter 2000 earning
estimates and that its financial books and records did not comply with GAAP."
It further alleges that "On or about November 1 and 2, 2000, defendant
Collins exercised stock options and sold 30,000 shares of Network Associates' common
stock for net proceeds of approximately $250,000. Collins made these trades on the basis
of the material non-public information that Network Associates' publicly reported
financial statements were false and misleading and materially misrepresented the
company's revenues, expenses and net income and the probability that the company
would eventually need to restate those numbers."
The DOJ stated in a
release that Collins "is the third former Network Associates executive charged
with securities fraud arising out of allegedly fraudulent financial statements submitted
in 1999 and 2000. Prabhat Goyal, the former chief financial officer (CFO) of Network
Associates, was indicted on June 17, 2004, by a federal grand jury in San Francisco on 20
counts of securities fraud and conspiracy. The indictment against Mr. Goyal alleges that
between 1998 to 2000, while he was CFO of Network Associates, he conspired with others to
commit securities fraud by causing Network Associates to make millions of dollars in
payments to its distributors falsely disguised as discounts, rebates, and marketing fees
in order to convince the distributors to hold excess inventory, not return unsold products,
and purchase more products than the distributors could actually sell to customers during a
given quarter." Also, the DOJ stated that "Collins' replacement as Controller,
Terry Davis, pled guilty to securities fraud on June 11, 2003."
|
|
|
WTO Director General Mentions PR China's
Counterfeiting and Piracy |
12/2. Supachai
Panitchpakdi, Director General of the World
Trade Organization (WTO), gave a
speech in
Shanghai, People's Republic of China, titled "China and the WTO: Challenges and
Opportunies for the Future".
Panitchpakdi
(at right) discussed the WTO's
Doha Development Agenda. He said that "following the setback at our Ministerial
Conference in Cancún, the negotiations are back on track and moving forwards. In July
this year, we succeeded in making significant progress in some of the areas that had been
most divisive among Members in the past, most notably agriculture."
He then discussed the PR China. He said that "Three years ago when China
joined the WTO, it gave an important signal of its commitment and willingness to
bring its economy into harmony with the rules of the WTO. To China's credit it
did not waver in its resolve. The task was not always easy but throughout this
period we have seen China, in implementing the terms of its accession to the WTO,
progressively lower its tariffs, phase-out non-tariff measures and reduce
restrictions on trade in services. In trade in goods, China's simple average
tariff rate dropped from 42.9 per cent in 1992 to 10.4 percent at the beginning
of 2004. Overall, China's performance has been very good."
However, he continued that "China has not settled all the issues and
concerns of other WTO Members relating to bringing its trade regime into strict conformity
with its terms of accession. For instance, I have been informed that the level of
counterfeiting and piracy remains of concern to many WTO Members."
He also said that "China will have to strengthen its efforts in terms of
transparency and information on relevant laws and procedures."
Panitchpakdi also discussed agriculture, textiles and anti-dumping.
|
|
|
More News |
12/2. Microsoft announced that it filed
seven complaints in Superior Court in King County in the state of Washington against
unnamed defendants alleging violation of the federal Controlling the Assault of
Non-Solicited Pormography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act, the
Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) rules thereunder, and
Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act, in connection with their bulk unsolicited
e-mail practices. The complaint alleges that the defendants failed to label sexually
explicit messages, failed to include an unsubscribe option, and failed to provide a
physical address. See, Microsoft
release.
|
|
|
|
People and Appointments |
12/3. President Bush announced his intent to nominate Bernard Kerik to
be Secretary of Homeland Security. If confirmed by the Senate, he will replace
Tom Ridge. Kerik is a former New York City Police Commissioner. See,
transcript of White House event.
12/2. President George Bush announced his intent to nominate
Mike Johanns, the
Governor of the state of Nebraska, to be Secretary of Agriculture. See, White
House
release and
transcript of White House event. Bush stated that "We'll enforce trade laws
to make sure other countries play by the rules." Neither discussed the
Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural
Utilities Services (RUS) or rural broadband issues.
12/2. Liam Weston was elected Chairman of the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Space
Enterprise Council for 2005. He also works for Ball Aerospace on space
remote sensing radar, electro-optical systems and international business.
Matthew Jones was elected Vice Chairman of the Space Enterprise Council. He
also works for Boeing on GPS and weather programs.
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Friday, December 3 |
The House will not meet until Monday, December 6. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will not meet until Tuesday, December 7.
Day two of a two day event hosted by the
Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA)
and the Practicing Law Institute (PLI) titled
"22nd Annual Telecommunications Policy and Regulation Conference".
The price to attend ranges from $1,165.50 to $1,295.00. See,
registration form [PDF]. Location.
Watergate Hotel, 2650 Virginia Ave., NW.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The Progress and
Freedom Foundation (PFF) will host a panel discussion titled "The Myths
and Realities of Universal Service: Revisiting the Justification for the Current
Subsidies". The speakers will be Howard Waltzman (House Commerce Committee
Senior Majority Counsel), Robert
Crandall (Brookings Institution),
Jerry Ellig (George Mason
University), Randolph May (PFF),
Joseph Kraemer (PFF), and
Richard Levine (PFF). See,
notice and
online registration
page. Press contact: Patrick Ross at 202 289-8928 or
pross@pff.org. Lunch will be served. Location: Room
B369, Rayburn Building.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a brown bag lunch titled "Telecom Act Rewrite:
Following the Money Trails". The speakers will be Rudy Baca
(Precursor Group), Jonathan Askin (General
Counsel of Pulver.com),
James Gattuso
(Heritage Foundation),
Lawrence
Movshin (Wilkinson Barker & Knauer), and Carolyn Brandon
(CTIA). See,
notice.
Prices to attend range from $15 to $30. For more information, call 202 626-3463. Location:
CTIA, 1400 16th Street, NW.
|
|
|
Monday, December 6 |
The House will meet at 2:00 PM. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
9:30 AM. The
U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in James A. Kay v.
FCC, No. 02-1175. This is a case pertaining to the finder's preference rule,
47 C.F.R. § 90.173(k)(2)(1992). See, FCC
brief [pages in
PDF]. Judges Edwards, Sentelle and Randolph will preside. Location: Prettyman Courthouse, 333
Constitution Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel A, will hear oral argument in Designing Health v. Erasmus
(No. 03-1438), Northpoint Technology, Ltd v. MDS America, Inc.
(No. 04-1249), and Taylor v. DaimlerChrysler (No. 04-1319). The
Northpoint Technology case
is an appeal from the U.S. District Court (SDFl) involving claims infringement
of patents pertaining to use of DBS spectrum for terrestrial wireless
services.
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel B, will hear oral argument in ISCO International v. Concuctus,
Inc. (No. 04-1007) and Bellehumeur v. Bonnett (No.
04-1258).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council
(NRIC) will meet. See,
notice
[PDF]. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting
Room).
Deadline to submit comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking
by the Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA), and National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) regarding telecommuting by federal
contractors. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 5, 2004, Vol. 69, No.192, at Pages
59701 - 59702.
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 7 |
The Senate will meet at 9:30 AM.
Hannukah.
10:00 AM. The Supreme Court
will hear oral argument in Granholm v. Heald, No. 03-1116, Michigan
Beer & Wine Wholesalers v. Heald, No. 03-1120, and Swedenburg v. Kelly,
No. 03-1274. See,
schedule [PDF]. These cases involve constitutional challenges to state
restraints on the direct sales of alcoholic beverages, including internet
wine sales.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel C, will hear oral argument in Stambler v. RSA Security
(No. 04-1129) and AT&T v. Microsoft (No. 04-1285).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel D, will hear oral argument in Block Financial v. Yodlee, Inc.
(No. 04-1087) and McKenchnie Vehicle Components v. Lacks Industries,
Inc. (No. 04-1278).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The DC Bar Association
will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled "2004 Intellectual
Property Law Year in Review Series: Part 1 -- Patent Update". The speakers
will be Bradley Wright
(Banner & Witcoff) and Kevin
Duncan (Hunton & Williams). See,
notice.
Prices vary from $70 to $115. For more information, call 202 626-3488. Location: D.C.
Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 21. Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to
its Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling (NPRM & DR) [100 pages in PDF] regarding
imposing Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) obligations upon broadband internet
access services and voice over internet protocol (VOIP). This NPRM is FCC 04-187 in ET
Docket No. 04-295. The FCC adopted this NPRM at its August 4, 2004 meeting, and released it
on August 9. See, story
titled "Summary of the FCC's CALEA NPRM" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 960,
August 17, 2004. See,
notice in the Federal Register, September 23, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 184, Pages
56976 - 56987. See also,
notice of extension [PDF].
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 8 |
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of
Appeals (FedCir),
Panel E, will hear oral argument in Sunny Fresh Foods v. Michael Foods
(No. 04-1059) and Schreiber Foods v. Beatrice Cheese (No.
04-1279).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel F, will hear oral argument in Jore Corp. v. Kouvato, Inc.
(No. 04-1163) and Lisle Corp. v. AJ Manufacturing (No. 04-1275).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Department of
State's (DOS) International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet
to advise the DOS on policy and technical issues with respect to the
International Telecommunication
Union (ITU), and in particular, the December 15-17, 2004 meeting of ITU's
Telecommunications Development Advisory
Group (TDAG) in Geneva, Switzerland. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 5, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 214, at Page
64620. Location: DOS, Room 2533A.
12:00 NOON. The Federal Communications Bar
Association (FCBA) Foundation Board of Trustees will meet. Location:
Wiley Rein & Fielding, 1776 K St., NW.
12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a luncheon program titled "Intellectual Property
Considerations in Strategic Alliances". The speakers will be
Linda Alcorn and
Marvin Guthrie
(both of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox). See,
notice.
Prices vary from $8 to $18. For more information, contact Tracy Muller
at 202 772-8697 or tmuller@skgf.com.
Location: SKGF, 8th Floor, 1100 New York Ave., NW.
3:00 PM. The U.S. Court of
Appeals (1stCir) will hear oral argument, en banc, in USA v. Councilman,
a case regarding the applicability of the Wiretap Act to e-mail in storage. See,
opinion of the three judge panel, and
story
titled "1st Circuit Holds Wiretap Act Does Not Apply to E-Mail in Storage" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 930, July 1, 2004. Location. En Banc Courtroom, John Joseph
Moakley Courthouse, Boston, MA.
|
|
|
Thursday, December 9 |
8:30 - 10:30 AM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Wireless Practice Committee will host
a continuing legal education (CLE) seminar and breakfast titled "Spectrum
Management 101: Nuts and Bolts of Spectrum Management -- Engineering, Legal, and
Economic Perspectives". The speakers will include Julius Knapp (Deputy
Chief of the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology), Evan Kwerel (Senior
Economic Advisor in the FCC's Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis),
and Christopher Wright (Harris Wiltshire & Grannis). See,
registration form [PDF]. The price
to attend ranges from $50 to $125. Location: Wiley
Rein & Fielding, 1776 K St., NW.
RESCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 15. 9:30 AM.
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a meeting. The event will be webcast. Location:
FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
10:00 AM. The Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) will hold a meeting, part of which will be closed to the public. The agenda
includes oral argument in its proceeding pertaining to Rambus, Inc., Docket No.
9302, and consideration of the Rambus matter. For more information, contact Mitch Katz
at the FTC's Office of Public Affairs at 202 326-2180. Location: FTC Building, Room 532,
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel G, will hear oral argument in Israel Bio-Engineering (No.
04-1153 and 04-1301).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel H, will hear oral argument in Eolas Technologies v. Microsoft
(No. 04-1234) and Morton v. The First Years (No. 04-1308).
See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
6:00 - 8:00 PM. The DC
Bar Association's Computer and Telecommunications Law Section will host a social
event titled "A CTLS Evening Gathering And Keynote With Jeff Pulver".
The speaker will be Jeff Pulver. See,
notice.
Prices vary from $25 to $40. For more information, call 202-626-3463. Location: 21
Hundred Restaurant, Westin Embassy Row, 2100 Massachusetts Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Friday, December 10 |
9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(DCCir) will hear oral argument in Savannah College of Art and Design v.
FCC, No. 04-1024. Judges Ginsburg, Garland and Williams will preside. Location:
Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel I, will hear oral argument in Collegenet v. Applyyourself (No.
04-1202). See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir),
Panel J, will hear oral argument in Rasmusson v. SmithKline Beecham
(No. 04-1191) and Watson Industries v. Murata Electronics (No.
04-1235). See, FedCir calendar.
Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The Progress and
Freedom Foundation (PFF) will host a panel discussion titled "Grokster
and the Supreme Court: The Case For and Against Consideration". The speakers
will include James DeLong (PFF), Solveig Singleton (PFF), and
Mitch Glazier (RIAA). See,
notice and
online registration
page. The PFF filed an
amicus curiae
brief [12 pages in PDF] on November 8. Press contact: Patrick Ross at 202 289-8928 or
pross@pff.org. Lunch will be served. Location: Room
B369, Rayburn Building, Capitol Hill.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|