Bush Signs Telecom Bill |
12/23. President Bush signed
HR 5419.
This is a composite bill put together in November. It includes the "Commercial
Spectrum Enhancement Act", the "ENHANCE 911 Act", and the "Universal
Service Antideficiency Temporary Suspension Act". Bush also issued a
signing
statement in which he asserted that some provisions of the bill are unconstitutional,
and that his administration will implement the bill accordingly.
The House approved this bill on Saturday, November 20, 2004, by unanimous consent,
without debate. The Senate approved the bill on December 8, 2004.
See, stories titled "House Approves Bill that Includes the
Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,025, November 24, 2004; "Powell Urges Senate to Approve Telecom
Bill" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,032, December 7, 2004; and, "Congress
Approves Telecom Bill" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,035, December 10, 2004.
Title I of HR 5419 is titled the "Ensuring Needed Help Arrives Near Callers
Employing 911 Act of 2004" or "ENHANCE 911 Act".
Title II of the bill is the "Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act". It changes
the process for reallocating spectrum from federal users to commercial users,
such as wireless broadband services. The bill creates a Spectrum Relocation
Fund, funded by auction proceeds, to compensate federal agencies for the cost of
relocating. The bill replaces the current role of the House and Senate
Appropriations Committees.
HR 1320
was an earlier version.
Title III of the bill is the "Universal Service Antideficiency Temporary
Suspension Act". This title provides that universal service funds collected
pursuant to
47 U.S.C. § 254, and the universal service programs established pursuant to
this section, are not subject to certain provisions of the Antideficiency Act.
President Bush's signing statement addresses Title III. He wrote that this
title "makes the Antideficiency Act temporarily inapplicable to certain
collections, receipts, expenditures and obligations relating to universal
communications service."
He then wrote that "Section 104 amends section 158(a)(2) of the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act to call for
executive branch officials to submit to congressional committees funding
profiles for a specified 5-year program. The executive branch shall construe the
provision in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the
President to recommend for the consideration of the Congress such measures,
including proposals for appropriations, as he judges necessary and expedient."
He also wrote that "Sections 202 and 204 enact sections 113(g)(5) and 118(d)
of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization
Act, which purport to condition the execution of a law upon notification to
congressional committees coupled with either approval by the committees or the
absence of disapproval by the committees within a specified time. The executive
branch shall construe the provisions to legally require only notifi-cation to
the committees, as any other construction would be inconsistent with the
principles enunciated by the Supreme Court of the United States in INS v. Chadha.
The Secretary of Commerce will continue as a matter of comity to work with the
committees on matters addressed by these provisions."
See, the Supreme Court's
opinion in INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). President Bush has on
prior occasions asserted Chadha. See, for example,
story
titled "Homeland Security Appropriations Bill Purports to Restrict Use of Funds
for CAPPS II" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 751, October 2, 2003.
Finally, President Bush wrote that "As is consistent with the principle of
statutory construction of giving effect to each of two statutes addressing the
same subject whenever they can co-exist, the executive branch shall construe
section 302 of the Act in a manner consistent with section 254 of the
Communications Act of 1934, which provides the Federal Communications Commission
with the authority to maintain funding caps for Universal Service Fund
programs."
|
|
|
FCC Sets Comment Deadlines on 2FNPRM
Regarding Secondary Markets for Spectrum |
12/27. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a
notice in the Federal Register that describes and sets comment deadlines for
the Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding reducing
barriers to secondary markets for spectrum rights.
This 2ndFNPRM seeks public comments on what additional policies could
facilitate the deployment of new technologies through secondary market
arrangements such as spectrum leasing and private commons.
FCC Chairman Michael
Powell discussed the private commons model in a
speech [5 pages in PDF] on October 26, 2004. See, story titled "Powell
Addresses Spectrum Policy and Proceedings" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,006, October 28, 2004.
He said that "I introduced an innovative approach to allow users of smart
equipment to gain access to spectrum that is underutilized by licensees -- the
private commons model. Under these rules, licensees can set aside an entire
license or a portion of a license for an arrangement in which users can access
that spectrum under technical rules and other conditions set by the licensees."
(See, page 4.)
He added that "This new option has the potential to provide spectrum for ad
hoc and mesh, peer-to-peer networks that can be used to offer wireless broadband
services. The model also may be particularly valuable to users of the unlicensed
bands, such as wireless ISPs, who may find those bands congested and may be
looking for a source of additional spectrum to supplement their existing
operations."
This 2ndFNPRM is a part of a larger item that the FCC adopted on July 8,
2004, and released on September 2, 2004. See, story titled "FCC Adopts Second
Secondary Markets Report and Order" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 934, July 9, 2004; and story titled "FCC Releases Second Secondary
Markets Report and Order" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 969, September 3, 2004.
Comments are due by January 18, 2005. Reply comments are due by February 17,
2005. This item is FCC 04-167 in WT Docket No. 00-230. See, Federal Register,
December 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 247, at Pages 77560 - 77568.
|
|
|
More FCC News |
12/27. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a
notice in the Federal Register that announces, describes and sets the
effective date (February 25, 2005 for most provisions) of its Second Report and
Order and Order on Reconsideration regarding reducing barriers to secondary
markets for spectrum rights. The FCC adopted this item at its July 8, 2004
meeting, and released the
text [PDF] of this item on September 2, 2004. See, story titled "FCC Adopts
Second Secondary Markets Report and Order" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 934, July 9, 2004; and story titled "FCC Releases Second Secondary
Markets Report and Order" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 969, September 3, 2004. This second report and order is FCC 04-167
in WT Docket No. 00-230. See, Federal Register, December 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No.
247, at Pages 77521 - 77559.
12/27. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a
notice in the Federal Register announcing and setting the effective date
(December 27, 2004) of it final rule regarding its implementation of the
Controlling of the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of
2003, which is also known as the CAN-SPAM Act. See, Federal Register,
December 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 247, at Pages 77141 - 77143. The FCC released
its order back on August 12, 2004.
12/23. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) released an
Order on Review [4 pages in PDF] pertaining to Minority Television Project,
Inc., which is the licensee of noncommercial educational (NCE) television
station KMTP-TV in San Francisco, California. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 399B and
47 C.F.R. § 73.621(e), NCE stations cannot carry commercial advertisements. KMTP-TV
carried commercial advertisements. The FCC rejected the broadcaster's arguments
that the statute and regulation unconstitutionally restrain speech. The FCC
affirmed the fine of $10,000.
12/22. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a
notice in the Federal Register that announces sets the effective date of certain of its children's
television rules, that it published over eight years ago, in August of 1996.
The notice states that the rules are effective as of January 2, 1997. See,
Federal Register, December 21, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 244, at Page 76420.
|
|
|
DHS's National Infrastructure Advisory
Council Meeting to Cover Cyber Security |
12/27. The Department
of Homeland Security's (DHS) National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) will
hold a meeting on January 11, 2005, from 1:00 - 4:00 PM. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 247, at Pages 77259
- 77260.
The scheduled government speakers may include
Tom Ridge
(Secretary of Homeland Security),
Frank Libutti
(Under Secretary for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection), and
Robert Liscouski
(Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection). The scheduled government speakers
will include Nancy Wong (DHS) and Frances Townsend (Special Assistant to the President
for Critical Infrastructure).
John Chambers
(Ch/CEO of Cisco Systems) and Gilbert Gallegos (Police
Chief of the City of Albuquerque) are scheduled to give a status report on "Intelligence
Process and Work Products Regarding Critical Infrastructures".
Thomas Noonan (P/CEO of
Internet Security Systems) and Martha Marsh (P/CEO of Stanford Hospital and Clinics) will
give a status report on "Risk Management Approaches Protection".
Alfred Berkeley (e-Xchange Advantage
Corp.) and Linwood Rose (President of
James Madison University) are scheduled to give a
status report on "Assuring Adequate National Intellectual Capital to Secure
Cyber-Based Critical Infrastructures".
Patrick Morrissey (Deputy Director for Law Enforcement and Intelligence of
the DHS's National Cyber Security Division) will give a presentation on the
"DHS/DOJ Cyber Security Survey".
The meeting will be open to the public. It will be held at the
Hamilton Crowne
Plaza, 14th & K Streets, NW.
|
|
|
|
FCC Increases Nextel's Credit by $452
Million in Spectrum Swap |
12/22. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) released another
order [67 pages in PDF] addressing the problem of interference to 800 MHz
public safety communications systems from Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS)
providers operating systems on channels in close proximity. This is also know as
the Nextel spectrum swap. This latest order provides, among other things, that
Nextel's credit for 800 MHz spectrum be increased by $452 Million.
This order is titled "Supplement Order and Order on Reconsideration".
It is FCC 04-294 in WT Docket No. 02-55, ET Docket No. 00-258, RM-9498, RM-10024, and
ET Docket No. 95-18.
The FCC announced its original report and order (FCC 04-168) at its July 8,
2004 meeting. See, story titled "FCC Adopts Report and Order Regarding
Interference in the 800 MHz Band" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 936, July 13, 2004.
The original report and order provides that
Nextel will return its interference causing spectrum in the 800 MHz band,
and all of its licenses in the 700 MHz band, and in return, will be given 10
megahertz of spectrum, located at 1910-1915 MHz and 1990-1995 MHz, subject to
further conditions.
The FCC concluded back in July that "the overall value of the 1.9 GHz
spectrum rights is $4.8 billion, less the cost of relocating incumbent users".
The FCC determined "that it would credit to Nextel the value of the spectrum
rights that Nextel will relinquish and the actual costs Nextel incurs for to
relocate all incumbents in the 800 MHz band."
Nextel requested that the FCC modify its July report and order (R&O). The
present supplemental order increases the valuation of these credits by nearly
one half billion dollars.
The present supplemental order states that "We have carefully reviewed the
Nextel analysis and the comments that parties have filed in response to that
analysis. We conclude that the data submitted by Nextel provides credible
support for its contentions with respect to the amount and value of 800 MHz
spectrum that it will relinquish under the terms of the 800 MHz R&O."
It elaborates that "Nextel has based its calculations on an analysis of all
markets, rather than a sampling of markets. Nextel has also provided more
complete information on Nextel’s interleaved spectrum holdings by including data
on interleaved non-SMR (B/ILT) channels held by Nextel, which were not taken
into account in our valuation in the 800 MHz R&O. In addition, Nextel’s
bandwidth calculations more accurately reflect the variations in Nextel’s
spectrum holdings from one market to another, and do not count spectrum that is
unavailable to Nextel because of the presence of non-Nextel incumbents.
The supplemental order concludes that "We believe it is in the
public interest to base our valuation on the granular data provided by Nextel,
rather than on the less precise information available to us at the time of the
800 MHz R&O."
It further concludes, at Paragraph 36, that "Based on this revised
information, we conclude that the “credit” that Nextel should receive for
surrender of 800 MHz spectrum should be increased by $452 million. Accordingly,
in the post-rebanding calculation used to determine whether Nextel must make a
``true-up´´ payment to the United States Treasury, Nextel will be credited the
sum of $2.059 billion for its surrendered 800 MHz spectrum." (Footnote omitted.)
FCC Commissioner
Michael Copps (at right) wrote in a
concurring statement [PDF] that "I am uncomfortable, however, with the decision
to change the valuation of Nextel's spectrum by close to half a billion dollars -- an
increase of nearly twenty percent. While I believe that Nextel has demonstrated that its
spectrum holdings are different than the assumption we made in the original order, I am
concerned that the process that the Commission has used here to determine value has become
too imprecise. Given the short time available, I do not believe that the Commission had
the capacity to independently pinpoint the exact nature of Nextel’s holdings, as we do here
but did not do in the previous order. Additionally, if we must reassess the value of
Nextel's spectrum, I would have preferred to reassess the MHz/POP multiplier that we employ
in light of changes in the marketplace and transactions that occurred after we adopted our
first order. Given the magnitude of the valuation at issue, I will therefore concur."
See also, FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein's
separate statement [PDF].
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Tuesday, December 28 |
The House will next meet on January 4, 2004 at 12:00 NOON. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will next meet on January 4, 2005 at 12:00 NOON.
The Supreme Court will next
meet on Monday, January 10, 2005. See,
Order
List [9 pages in PDF] at page 9.
|
|
|
Thursday, December 30 |
EXTENDED TO JANUARY 31. Extended deadline to
submit reply comments to Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) in response to its
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [38 pages in PDF] regarding use by
unlicensed devices of broadcast television spectrum where the spectrum is not
in use by broadcasters. See,
story
titled "FCC Adopts NPRM Regarding Unlicensed Use of Broadcast TV Spectrum" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
898, May 14, 2004, and story titled "FCC Releases NPRM Regarding Unlicensed Use
of TV Spectrum" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
905, May 26, 2004. This NPRM is FCC 04-113 in ET Docket Nos. 04-186 and
No. 02-380. See,
notice (setting original deadlines) in the Federal Register, June 18,
2004, Vol. 69, No. 117, at pages 34103-34112; and
notice [PDF] of extended deadlines, and
erratum [PDF]. See, December 22, 2004
Public Notice [PDF] (DA 04-4013) further extending the deadline for reply
comments to January 31.
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, January 3 |
Deadline to submit comments to the
National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) in response to its notice of proposed rulemaking regarding permitting the destruction
of "very short-term temporary e-mail" of federal agencies. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 3, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 212, at Pages 63980
- 63981.
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, January 6 |
10:00 AM. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and
Pensions Committee will hold a hearing on the nomination of Margaret Spelling
to be Secretary of Education. Location: Room 430, Dirksen Building.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Export-Import Bank of the United States
regarding its
notice in the Federal Register that states that it "has received an
application to finance the export of approximately $1.2 billion in U.S.
semiconductor manufacturing equipment to dedicated foundries in China." The
notice adds that "The U.S. exports will enable the dedicated 200-mm and 300-mm
foundries to produce approximately 80,000 wafers per month (200-mm equivalent)
of logic products. Available information indicates that some of this new
production will be exported from China and consumed globally." See, Federal
Register, December 23, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 246, at Page 76945.
|
|
|
|
|
More News |
12/23. The Export-Import Bank of the United
States published a brief
notice in the Federal Register that states that it "has received an
application to finance the export of approximately $1.2 billion in U.S.
semiconductor manufacturing equipment to dedicated foundries in China." The
notice adds that "The U.S. exports will enable the dedicated 200-mm and 300-mm
foundries to produce approximately 80,000 wafers per month (200-mm equivalent)
of logic products. Available information indicates that some of this new
production will be exported from China and consumed globally." Public comments
are due "within 14 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal
Register". See, Federal Register, December 23, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 246, at Page
76945. This would make comments due by January 6, 2005.
12/23. The Department of Agriculture's
Rural Utilities Service (RUS) published a
notice in the Federal Register that announces the depreciation rates for
telecommunications plant for the period ending December 31, 2003. See, Federal
Register, December 23, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 246, at Pages 76909 - 76910.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|