4th Circuit Rules in Trademark
Infringement and Dilution Case |
1/11. The U.S. Court of Appeals (4thCir)
issued its opinion [16
pages in PDF] in CareFirst of Maryland v. First Care, a trademark infringement
and dilution case, affirming the judgment of the District Court for the alleged infringer.
CareFirst of Maryland is a large health maintenance organization associated with Blue
Cross Blue Shield. First Care is a small group of family care physicians located in
southeastern Virginia. CareFirst of Maryland's predecessor registered "CARE-FIRST"
as a trademark, service mark, and collective membership mark with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office in 1989. First Care began its use of the term "First Care" in
1995. In 2004, CareFirst of Maryland filed a complaint in U.S. District Court (DMd) against
First Care. It sought $28 Million in damages.
The District Court granted judgment to First Care, on the basis that there
is no likelihood of confusion. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Most of the opinion addresses the trademark infringement claim. The Court of
Appeals wrote that "To demonstrate trademark infringement under the Lanham Act,
a plaintiff must prove, first, that it owns a valid and protectable mark, and,
second, that the defendant’s use of a ``reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or
colorable imitation´´ of that mark creates a likelihood of confusion."
It then recited the 4th Circuit's seven part test for determining whether
there exists a likelihood of confusion: "(1) the strength or distinctiveness of
the plaintiff’s mark as actually used in the marketplace; (2) the similarity of
the two marks to consumers; (3) the similarity of the goods or services that the
marks identify; (4) the similarity of the facilities used by the markholders;
(5) the similarity of advertising used by the markholders; (6) the defendant’s
intent; and (7) actual confusion."
The Court first focused on actual confusion. It noted that CareFirst of
Maryland's only evidence of actual confusion was the results of a telephone
survey of 130 people who were CareFirst of Maryland members who lived in or near
First Care's place of business. The survey found only two persons who had both heard of
First Care and thought that it was related to or affiliated with CareFirst of
Maryland. The Court thus concluded that there is no evidence of actual confusion.
The Court held that while "proof of actual confusion is not necessary to show a
likelihood of confusion, the absence of any evidence of actual confusion over a
substantial period of time -- here, approximately nine years -- creates a strong
inference that there is no likelihood of confusion."
The Court went to evaluate the six other factors. It found that the mark is weak,
rather than strong, because the words "care", "first", "first
care", and "care first" are frequently used by others.
Next, on the question of the similarity of the marks, the Court found that
the two entities use the marks differently, and hence, this factor favors First
Care. It wrote that CareFirst of Maryland's "mark is almost always paired with
the Blue Cross Blue Shield language, while the First Care mark is always
presented by itself, or at most with the suffix ``P.C.´´"
Next, on the question of the similarity of the goods or services that the
marks identify, the Court found that this factor favors neither party. Both are
related to health care. However, the Court added that "the actual services
offered by the parties do not even overlap. First Care only offers direct
medical services to individuals. CareFirst does not; rather, it contracts with
participating providers who agree to treat CareFirst members."
The Court continued that none of the other factors work in CareFirst of
Maryland's favor. Hence, it affirmed the summary judgment of the District Court
for First Care on the trademark infringement claim.
The Court also affirmed the summary judgment on the trademark dilution claim. It
following the holding of the Supreme Court in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.,
537 U.S. 418, that evidence of actual dilution is required. See, March 4, 2003
opinion
[21 pages in PDF], and story titled "Supreme Court Rules in Trademark Dilution
Case" in TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert No. 618, March 6, 2003.
This case is CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. v. First Care, App. Ct. No. 04-2493,
an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk,
D.C. No. CA-04-191-2, Judge Robert Doumar presiding.
Perhaps it should be noted also that there is legislation pending in the
Congress the would revise the Lanham Act as a result of the Moseley case.
On April 19, 2005, the House approved
HR 683,
the "Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2005" by a vote of 411-8. See,
Roll Call No. 109.
See, story titled "House Approves Trademark Dilution Bill" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,119, April 20, 2005.
The House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and
Intellectual Property (CIIP) held a hearing on February 17, 2005. See, story
titled "CIIP Subcommittee Holds Hearing On Trademark Dilution Revision Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,081, February 23, 2005. The CIIP Subcommittee amended and
approved this bill on March 3, 2005. See, story titled "House CIIP Subcommittee
Amends and Approves Trademark Dilution Revision Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,088, March 4, 2005. The House Judiciary Committee approved HR
683 on March 9, 2005. See, story titled "House Judiciary Committee Approves
Trademark Dilution Bill" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,093, March 11, 2005.
The Senate has yet to approve this bill.
|
|
|
NAB Opposes Encryption at Source Mandate for
Digital Radio |
1/11. David Rehr, P/CEO of the National Association of
Broadcasters (NAB), sent a
letter [3 pages in PDF] to Mitch Bainwol, Ch/CEO of the
Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA), regarding "content protection issues associated
with terrestrial digital radio broadcasting".
Rehr informed Bainwol that there are already many ways
to steal copyrighted digital music, and that proposals to mandate encryption at
the source are unwarranted.
Rehr wrote that the "NAB questions the
degree to which HD Radio threatens copyright or will facilitate unauthorized,
digital distribution of sound recordings. Those desiring to obtain and listen to
pure, uninterrupted performances of sound recording in lieu of radio already
have an abundant number of means to do so. Peer-to-peer file sharing and the
hours of uninterrupted music that can be stored on CDs and discs are but a few
such means. iPod uploads and digital music on the Internet would seem to present
much larger and more immediate threats to copyright holders."
Rehr continued that the NAB opposses the RIAA's proposal to enact legislation that
would empower the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) "to mandate that all radio
broadcasters encrypt their digital content at the source".
"An encryption proposal would also likely obsolete HD Radio
units already on the market and millions more currently in the manufacturing
pipeline. By making obsolete receivers already installed in automobiles, an
encryption proposal could increase automakers' frustration and potentially
imperil the future integration of HD Radio units into automobiles."
Moreover, wrote Rehr, "mandatory encryption could set back the
hundreds of broadcasters who have already licensed and are deploying (or have
deployed) HD Radio transmission equipment. An overly broad encryption system
would risk making these stations’ broadcast transmission equipment obsolete."
|
|
|
More News |
1/15. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) began a test of its e-Passports technology, which involves chips with biographic and
biometric information, at Terminal G of the San Francisco International Airport (SFO).
See, DHS release.
1/13. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
(USTR) released a
statement by Barbara Weisel, an Assistant USTR, regarding trade negotiations
with Thailand. She stated that "we could be in the position of concluding this
agreement by the spring", but that "We have a significant amount of work
remaining to conclude this agreement within the timeframe we have set". She said
that this free trade agreement (FTA) would "eliminate tariffs on trade between
the United States and Thailand". She added that this FTA would also "liberalize
the Thai services sector, including telecommunications, financial services, distribution,
and other sectors, and strengthen the protection of intellectual property".
1/13. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) released the
agenda [PDF] for its event on January 20 titled "Open Meeting". Consistent
with January meetings in prior years, the Commission will not vote on the
adoption of any items. Rather, the Commissioner will hear reports from various
of the bureaus and offices of the FCC. The meeting is scheduled for 9:30 AM on
Friday, January 20, 2006, in the Commission Meeting Room, 445 12th Street, SW.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2005 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Monday, January 16 |
The House will not meet. It will convene for the 2nd Session of the 109th
Congress on Tuesday, January 31, 2006. See, Majority Whip's
calendar.
The Senate will not meet. It will convene for the 2nd Session of the 109th
Congress on Wednesday, January 18, 2006. See,
2006 Senate calendar.
Martin Luther King's birthday.
The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and other federal offices will be closed. See, Office of Personnel Management's
(OPM) list of federal holidays.
12:00 NOON. Former Vice President Al Gore will
give a speech regarding the National Security Agency's (NSA) domestic electronic surveillance
program. See,
notice. Location: DAR Constitution Hall, 1776 D St., NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the Executive Office of the President's
(EOP) Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
regarding its "Proposed Principles for Federal Support of Graduate and
Postdoctoral Education and Training in Science and Engineering". See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 16, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 220, at
Pages 69563 - 69565.
|
|
|
Tuesday, January 17 |
10:30 AM. Michael Chertoff (Secretary of Homeland
Security) and Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State) will announce a "Joint Vision: Secure
Borders and Open Doors in the Information Age". The DHS notice states that
"Media should enter from the 23rd Street Entrance. ... Final access time for all
media is 9:45 a.m. ... For more information please contact the DHS Press Office at
202-282-8010 or Department of State Public Affairs at 202-647-0001. Location: Dean Acheson
Auditorium, Department of State’s Truman Building, 2201 C St., NW.
11:00 AM. The Senate
Judiciary Committee (SJC) has scheduled an executive business meeting. The
sole item on the agenda is consideration of the nomination of Judge Sam Alito
to be a Justice of the Supreme Court. See,
notice.
Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
12:15 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Cable Practice Committee will host a brown
bag lunch titled "The Top Ten Technological Trends Everybody Should Know About".
The speakers will be John Wong and the staff of the Federal Communications Commission's
(FCC) Media Bureau's Engineering Division. RSVP to Ben Golant at ben dot golant at fcc
dot gov. Location: Willkie Farr & Gallagher,
1875 K St., NW.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) portion of its Report and Order (R&O)
and NPRM of August 5, 2005 regarding regulation of information services. The
R&O classified wireline broadband internet access services as information services.
The NPRM proposes to impose new regulatory burdens on information services. This item
is FCC 05-150 in WC Docket No. 05-271, CC Docket No. 02-33, CC Docket No. 01-337, CC
Docket Nos. 95-20 and 98-10, and WC Docket No. 04-242. See,
story
titled "FCC Classifies DSL as Information Service" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,190, August 8, 2005. The FCC released the
text
[133 pages in PDF] of this item on September 23, 2005. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 17, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 199, at Pages
60259 - 60271.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its notice of proposed rulemaking regarding its rules affecting Wireless Radio
Services. This item is FCC 05-144 in WT Docket Nos. 03-264. The FCC adopted this
item on July 22, 2005. It released the
text [67 pages in PDF] on August 9, 2005. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 19, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 201, at
Pages 60770 - 60781.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding a petition for
rulemaking of 13 hearing impairment related entities. Their petition requests
that the FCC initiate a rulemaking proceeding to mandate captioned telephone relay
service and to approve internet protocol captioned telephone relay service. The FCC's
Public Notice [PDF] states that "Captioned telephone service is a form of
telecommunications relay service (TRS) that permits persons to simultaneously both
listen to what the other party is saying and read captions of what the other party is
saying on the same device. Presently the service is eligible for compensation from the
Interstate TRS Fund (Fund), but is not mandatory. The petition asks the Commission to
initiate a rulemaking for the purpose of making captioned telephone service a
mandatory form of TRS and approving Internet Protocol (IP) captioned telephone
service as eligible for compensation from the Fund." (Footnotes omitted). This
notice is DA 05-2961 in CG Docket No. 03-123. See also,
notice in the November 30, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 229, at Pages 71849 - 71850.
|
|
|
Wednesday, January 18 |
The Senate will convene for the 2nd Session of the 109th Congress. See,
2006 Senate calendar.
8:30 AM - 5:30 PM. The Cyber
Security Industry Alliance (CSIA) will host a conference titled "The Legal
Implications of Data Integrity". See,
agenda. The price to attend ranges from $95 to $195. Location: Jack Morton
Auditorium, Media and Public Affairs Building, George Washington University,
805 21st St., NW.
12:00 NOON - 1:15 PM. The DC
Bar Association's Intellectual Property Law Section and Patent Section will host
a panel discussion titled "Current Topics in Patent Law: Patent Pools and
Standards Bodies". The speakers will include James Kulbaski (Oblon Spivak).
The price to attend ranges from $10-$30. For more information, call 202 626-3463. See,
notice.
Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. The Department of State's
International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee (ITAC) will hold the second in a series of weekly meetings to
prepare for the International Telecommunications Union's (ITU)
2006 ITU Plenipotentiary Conference,
to be held November 6-24, 2006, in Antalya, Turkey. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 21, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 244, at Page 75854.
This notice incorrectly states that these meetings will be held on Tuesdays; they are
on Wednesdays. For more information, contact Julian Minard at 202 647-2593 or minardje
at state dot gov. Location: AT&T, 1120 20th St., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a continuing legal education (CLE) seminar titled
"50 Tips For Ethical and Effective Web Sites for Lawyers and Law Firms".
The speakers will include Walter Effross (American University law school).
The price to attend ranges from $70-$125. For more information, call 202 626-3488. See,
notice.
Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [24 pages in PDF] regarding amendments to its
unsolicited facsimile advertising rules and the established business relationship
(EBR) exception to the rules. This NPRM was adopted by the FCC on December 9, 2005, and
released on December 9, 2005. It is FCC 05-206 in CG Docket No. 02-278. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 19, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 242, at
Pages 75102 - 75110.
|
|
|
Thursday, January 19 |
8:00 - 9:30 AM. The
U.S. Chamber of Commerce will host an
event titled "Policy Insiders with FBI Director Robert Mueller". See,
notice.
The price to attend ranges from $55 to $75. For more information, contact Matt
Haller at mhaller at uschamber dot com or 202 463-3176. Location: U.S. Chamber
1615 H St., NW.
TIME CHANGE. 8:00 AM - 2:45 PM. The
Information
Technology Association of America (ITAA) will host an event titled "Base
Realignment and Closure: Moving Forward with Information Technology". The speakers
will include Linton Wells (Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Networks and
Information Integration), Anthony Principi (Chairman 2005 BRAC Commission), Philip Grone
(Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, Installations and Environment), Robert Carey (Deputy
CIO Officer for Policy and Integration, Department of the Navy), and Gary Winkler
(Director, Governance, Acquisition and Chief Knowledge Center, G-6/Department of the Army).
See, notice. Press
contact: Bob Cohen at 703 284-5301 or Charlie Greenwald at 703 284-5305. Location: Ritz
Carlton, Pentagon City, VA.
10:00 AM. The Senate
Commerce Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Decency".
The scheduled witnesses are Jack Valenti (MPAA),
Charles Ergen (EchoStar), David Cohen (Comcast),
Bruce Reese (National Association of Broadcasters),
Brent Bozell (Parents Television Council),
Martin Franks (CBS), Alan Rosenberg (Screen Actors Guild), and Jeff McIntyre (American Psychological Association). See,
notice. Press
contact: Melanie Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens) at
202 224-3991, or Andy Davis (Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast by
the SCC. Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), members of the
House Democratic Caucus, and others will
host a panel discussion titled "House Democrats' New Innovation Agenda".
For more information, contact Brendan Daly or Jennifer Crider at 202 226-7616.
Location: Room 345, Cannon Building.
12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The DC
Bar Association's Intellectual Property Law Section and Trademark Committee will
host a panel discussion titled "Trademark Policing And Enforcement".
The speakers will include Melise Blakeslee (McDermott Will & Emery) and Alan Cooper
(Howery & Simon). The price to attend ranges from $20-$40. For more information,
call 202 626-3463. See,
notice.
Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level.
1:00 - 4:00 PM. The Antitrust Modernization
Commission (AMC) will hold a hearing titled "Economists' Roundtable on
U.S. Merger Enforcement". See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 29, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 249, at
Page 77121. Location: Federal Trade Commission,
Conference Center, 601 New Jersey Ave., NW.
2:30 PM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Internet Pornography".
See,
notice. Press contact: Melanie
Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens) at 202 224-3991, or Andy Davis
(Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast by the SCC. Location: Room 562,
Dirksen Building.
7:30 - 10:30 AM. The
National Venture Capital Association (NVCA)
will host an event titled "Personal Liability of Private Company Directors
& Officers: How to Protect Yourself in Today's Environment". The NVCA
notice states that
"Attendance at this event is by invitation only". Location: Ritz
Carlton, 1700 Tysons Blvd., McLean, VA.
Deadline to submit oppositions to the U.S. Telecom Association's
petition [PDF] seeking reconsideration and clarification of the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) CALEA
order. This is the FCC's order that provides that facilities based broadband service
providers and interconnected VOIP providers are subject to requirements under the 1994
Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The FCC adopted, but did not release, this
item at its August 5, 2005, meeting. See, story titled "FCC Amends CALEA Statute"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,191, August 9, 2005. The FCC released the
text
[59 pages in PDF] of this item on September 23, 2005. It is FCC 05-153 in ET Docket No.
04-295 and RM-10865. The USTelecom argues that the FCC "should reconsider its decision
to start the 18-month CALEA compliance clock on November 14, 2005, and instead should start
that clock on the effective date of its forthcoming order on CALEA capability requirements
for broadband and VoIP providers". It also argues that the FCC should "clarify
and delineate the specific broadband access services that qualify as ``newly
covered services´´ under the CALEA Applicability Order." See,
notice
in the Federal Register.January 4, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 2, at Pages 345 - 346.
|
|
|
Friday, January 20 |
9:30 AM. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a meeting. The event will be webcast by the FCC.
Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
9:30 - 11:00 AM. The
Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
will host an event titled "Investing in Innovation -- The UK Model".
The speaker will be Jonathan Kestenbaum, CEO of the U.K.'s
National Endowment for Science, Technology
and the Arts (NESTA). For more information, contact Austin Bonner at 202
547-0001 or abonner at dlc dot org. Location: PPI, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
SE, Suite 400.
12:00 NOON. The Federal Communications
Bar Association (FCBA) will host an luncheon titled "70th Anniversary
Luncheon: Looking Forward, Looking Back". The speakers will be former Chairmen of
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), including William Kennard, Michael Powell,
James Quello, Alfred Sikes, and Richard Wiley. Location: J.W. Marriott Hotel.
Advanced effective date of the Federal
Communications Commission's (FCC) rule requiring certain new television receivers
and other TV receiving devices such as VCRs and digital video recorders to be capable
of receiving digital television signals. See, FCC's Second Report and Order adopted on
November 3, 2005, and released on November 8, 2005. It is FCC 05-190 in ET Docket No.
05-24. See also,
notice in the Federal Register, December 21, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 244, at
Pages 75739 - 75743.
|
|
|