SEC Settles with KPMG Partners in Suit
Regarding Xerox Audits |
2/22. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
announced that it settled with the four remaining individual defendants in SEC v.
KPMG, et al.
The SEC filed its original
complaint
in the U.S. District Court (SDNY) on
January 29, 2003, alleging securities fraud in connection with the defendants' auditing of
Xerox's accounting from 1997 through 2000.
See also, story titled "SEC Files Complaint Against KPMG and Partners Re Xerox
Audits" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 594, January 30, 2003.
The SEC stated in one
release that
"Three partners agreed to permanent injunctions, payment of record civil
penalties and suspensions from practice before the Commission with rights to
reapply in from one to three years. The fourth partner agreed to be censured by
the Commission."
The SEC added that "The defendants whose settlements were announced today are
Ronald Safran, the KPMG engagement partner on the Xerox audit for 1998 and 1999;
Michael Conway, the senior engagement partner on the Xerox audit for 2000;
Anthony Dolanski, the engagement partner on the Xerox audit for 1997; and Thomas
Yoho, the SEC concurring review partner for KPMG on the Xerox engagement from
1997-2000. Safran, Conway and Dolanski each consented to the entry of final
judgments against them by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
New York. Yoho agreed to the entry of a Commission order imposing a censure
pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the SEC's Rules of Practice. Each defendant entered
into his settlement without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations or
findings."
See also, second SEC
release. This case is
SEC v. KPMG, LLC, et al., U.S. District Court (SDNY),
D.C. No. 03 CV 0671 (DLC), Judge Denise Cote presiding.
The SEC also filed separate lawsuits against Xerox and former Xerox officers.
See, story titled "SEC Sues Xerox for Financial Fraud" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 409, April 12, 2002, and story titled "SEC Files Civil Fraud
Complaint Against Former Xerox Officers" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 676, June 9, 2003.
|
|
|
EPIC Argues Attorneys Who Hire Phone Data
Pretexters Violate State Bar Rules |
2/21. The Electronic Privacy
Information Center (EPIC) sent a
letter to the ethics
committees of the state bar associations urging them to take action to ensure that
licensed attorneys do not engage in, or pay others to engage in, pretexting to acquire
consumers' confidential phone records or other private information.
The EPIC wrote that "In the course of investigating pretexting, it has become
increasingly clear that attorneys are major consumers of pretexting services."
The EPIC letter requests "that appropriate action be taken to ensure that attorneys
in your state are not employing investigators or other companies to engage in pretexting or
other fraud. We believe that pretexting is incompatible with ABA Model Rules
1.2, 3.4, 4.1, 4.4, and 8.4."
The letter adds that "issuing an advisory opinion or highlighting this issue
in communications to members of the Bar may be appropriate action to addressing
use of pretexting".
The EPIC letter was signed by Chris
Hoofnagle.
Hoofnagle (at right) also filed the
petition for a rulemaking with
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that caused
the FCC to adopt, on February 10, 2006, its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding
the practice of pretexting to obtain consumers' confidential phone records.
This NPRM is FCC 06-10 in Docket No. 96-115 and RM-11277. See,
text [34
pages in PDF] of the FCC's NPRM. See also, story titled "FCC Adopts NPRM Regarding
Privacy of Consumer Phone Records" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,308, February 13,
2006, and story
titled "FCC Rulemaking Proceeding on CPNI May Extend to Internet Protocol Services" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,310, February 15, 2006.
The EPIC letter does not enumerate attorneys or law firms that purchase confidential
phone records, or other confidential information, that has been acquired through the
practice of pretexting. However, the EPIC has previously identified web based businesses
that sell the confidential information.
The House Commerce Committee, in its
letters of
February 15, 2006, to thirteen web based data brokers, requested that they
disclose their top twenty customers, by annual revenue, for every year since
2000. If the HCC obtains and makes public the responses that it
receives to these or other requests, subpoenas, or testimony, then this
would provide the EPIC and others with the names of attorneys and law firms against
whom they could file ethics complaints with the various state bar associations.
See also, story titled "House Commerce Committee Seeks Information from Phone
Data Brokers" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,312, February 17, 2006.
In addition, some of the pending legislative proposals would not only ban pretexting to
obtain confidential phone records, but would also ban purchasing this data, knowing how it
was obtained.
For example, HR 4709,
the "Law Enforcement and Phone Privacy Protection Act of 2006", which is the
House Judiciary Committee (HJC) bill,
provides that "any person who purchases confidential phone records information
of a covered entity, knowing such information was obtained fraudulently or
without prior authorization from the customer to whom such confidential records
information relates, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both".
The violation of a federal criminal statute itself can serve as the basis for
attorney disbarment or other discipline.
See also, story
titled "Rep. Smith Introduces Bill to Criminalize Pretexting to Obtain Consumer Phone or
VOIP Records" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,308, February 13, 2006.
|
|
|
Portman and Mandelson Discuss Doha, IPR and
PR China |
2/22. Robert
Portman, head of the Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative (USTR), and
Peter
Mandelson, the EU Trade Commissioner, held a joint news conference in Washington DC. See,
transcript [9 pages in PDF].
Portman stated, among other things, that "in services the United States has
consistently advocated the biggest possible package of service openings including in such
key areas as financial services, telecommunications, computer related services, and express
delivery".
He also said that "On a variety of issues outside of Doha we have common and
ongoing interests and the potential for collaboration with the European Union.
Examples include protection of intellectual property, regulatory cooperation,
and other bilateral issues."
Mandelson (at right) was asked,
"Did you talk about China with Mr Portman? Will EU take any action with the United
States against China on China issues such as IPR and auto parts?"
He responded that "We did touch on China. Partly because we have some shared
concerns about some market access issues in China and WTO compliance issues
which affect both our business communities and so we discussed those. We also
touched on the wider issue of IPR enforcement. Not just in relation to China but
as a wider issue which is a very great concern to us indeed. I would put it
amongst the top two or three priorities in our work together. We discussed it
last year at the US-EU Summit where President Bush put it very firmly in the
center of our radar screen and we’ve continued work on that. We’ve had a number
of follow-up meetings. We are collaborating and we will strengthen and intensify
our cooperation on these issues."
He added that "We also remain pretty committed to the integration of China in the
world's trading system. We welcome China and embrace China as part of the world trading
system. But as part of that system China has responsibilities of its own to
discharge. It can contribute to that process of integration into the global
economy better than anyone. We are prepared to assist with that but we must do
so in a way that respects WTO rules and international law, and certainly
respects other people’s property, intellectual property rights."
Portman then added, "Let me just say I want to wholeheartedly agree with what
Commissioner Mandelson just said."
Also, on February 21, 2006, Pierre Amilhat, an EU Trade Director, gave a
speech to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly titled "The European View of the
Transatlantic Trade Relationship and an Update of the Doha Agenda".
He stated that "the EU and US are both talking to each
other increasingly about third country compliance with WTO rules. As I have
already mentioned, we are together tackling the issue of IPR enforcement in
third countries. We are also looking at individual cases where both our
industries feel that market access opportunities are being denied to them and
where coordinated moves from both the EU and US may get things moving."
|
|
|
WTO DG Lamy Discusses Status of Doha
Round |
2/17. Pascal Lamy, the Director General of the
World Trade Organization (WTO), gave a
speech in
Washington DC on February 17, 2006, titled "The Doha Development Agenda: Sweet
Dreams or Slip Slidin' Away?"
He asked rhetorically, "Are we on the verge of a collapse of the multilateral
trading system as many academics have written recently? are we witnessing the
end of and era and taking a sharp bend into bilateralism? Are we moving closer
to a ``cheap round´´? Or are we just witnessing the normal positioning that
takes place prior to the last lap in the race?"
He then offered his predictions and analysis. First, he said that a cheap
round "is not an option". He elaborated that "Even if we were just to keep what
we have on the table today we would have gone beyond what was done in the
Uruguay Round 10 years ago, well beyond, in fact. In agriculture alone the
elimination of export subsidies and the reductions in domestic subsidies already
on the table go much further than any previous round. The technology to cut
tariffs on industrial or agricultural products would yield results higher than
in previous rounds and the commitments on trade facilitation have the potential
to boost trade more than any previous administrative commitments. And these are
just a few examples of what is on the table already. And I am not saying that we
should settle for this. We should aim higher and maintain the ambition that took
us where we are today.
Second, he said that "even if the round would not yield everything we want,
the WTO is much more than the Round; it comprises a vast body of laws and
regulations which we will have to continue to apply. And it has a
dispute settlement which will continue to ensure that the rules of the game are
respected." He added that "the WTO
will continue to act as custodian of the multilateral trade laws."
Third, he said that "very few of the so-called free trade agreements are
really about freeing trade or creating new trading opportunities. And I still
have to see a bilateral agreement that disciplines agricultural or fishery
subsidies. Nor is business very encouraged by the proliferation of spaghetti
bowls of rules of origin, certificates or standards."
|
|
|
Court Opinions |
2/22. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(2ndCir) issued its revised
opinion [32 pages in PDF] in Heerwagen v. Clear Channel, an
action alleging violation of antitrust laws in connection with Clear Channel's
practices in the national ticket market for live rock concerts. The revised
opinion affirms that District Court's denial of class certification. The Court
of Appeals issued its original opinion on January 10, 2006. This case is
Malinda Heerwagen v. Clear Channel Communications, et al., U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, App. Ct. No. 04-0699-cv, an appeal from the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2/21. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(7thCir) issued its opinion
[15 pages in PDF] in Mattenson v. Baxter Healthcare, an action alleging
violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). What may be notable about
this case is that the plaintiff was an in house patent attorney for
Baxter Healthcare. The attorney prevailed in the
District Court, winning about one million dollars in damages. The employer appealed, and
the attorney cross appealed, seeking a larger award of damages. The Court of Appeals
reversed and remanded with directions that the District Court retry the case. This case
and opinion may provide some guidance to companies that are contemplating firing their
in house patent counsel two weeks before their retirement benefits vest. This case is
Charles Mattenson v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, U.S. Court of Appeals for the
7th Circuit, App. Ct. Nos.04-4270 and 04-4331, appeals from the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, D.C. No. 02 C 3283, Judge John Darrah
presiding. Judge Richard Posner wrote the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
|
|
|
More News |
2/22. The Government Accountability Office (GAO)
released a report [44 pages in PDF]
titled "Business Systems Modernization: Internal Revenue Service's Fiscal
Year 2006 Expenditure Plan". This report addresses, among other topics,
the Internal Revenue Service's
(IRS) new taxpayer information database, the IRS's new web portal and electronic
services for tax practitioners, and the IRS's new electronic filing system.
2/16. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
released a report
[31 pages in PDF] titled "Reforms to the Merger Review Process". FTC Chairman
Deborah Majoras stated in a
release that
"Over the past decade, the growth in the number of electronic documents and the
greater use of economic tools to analyze mergers have increased the costs
involved in second requests ... The reforms that we are implementing today
should improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the FTC’s review of mergers
and reduce the burdens of the second request process, to the benefit of the
parties and consumers."
2/15. The House Homeland Security Committee
held a hearing titled "The State of Interoperable Communications: Perspectives from
the Field". See, prepared
testimony [PDF] of Casey Perry (National Troopers Coalition),
prepared testimony [PDF]
of Tim Bradley (National Volunteer Fire Council),
prepared testimony
[PDF] of Diane Linderman (American Public Works Association),
prepared testimony
[PDF] of William Moroney (United Telecom Council), and
prepared testimony
[PDF] of William Pinsky (American Hospital Association).
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Thursday, February 23 |
The House will not meet on Monday, February 20, through Friday, February 24.
It will next meet on Tuesday, February 28. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will not meet on Monday, February 20, through Friday, February 24. See,
2006 Senate calendar.
8:00 AM - 2:00 PM. The Board of Directors of the
National Cable & Telecommunications Association
(NCTA) will meet. For more information, contact: Barbara York or Kawania
Wooten at 202 775-3669. Location: St. Regis Hotel.
1:00 PM. Representatives of registrars
and businesses who are interested in the
Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
agreement with VeriSign
will hold a conference call and media availability to discuss
the agreement and internet governance issues. To participate,
call 1 803-477-2001. The participant code is: 302-981. For more
information, contact Marilyn Cade at mscade at cox at net.
6:00 - 8:00 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host an event at which Kenneth Wainstein, U.S.Attorney
for the District of Columbia, will speak. The price to attend ranges from $0-$15.
For more information, call 202 626-3463. See,
notice.
Location: Hogan & Hartson, 555 13th St., NW.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the rules for expanding the scope of the
Emergency Alert System (EAS) to cover certain digital services. The FCC
adopted a report and order (R&O) and further NPRM on November 3, 2005. The R&O
expanded the categories of service providers that are subject to the FCC's EAS
mandates to include providers of digital broadcast and cable TV, digital audio
broadcasting, satellite radio, and direct broadcast satellite (DBS) services.
The NPRM asks for comments how the FCC should plan this "next-generation alert
and warning system". See, story titled "FCC Requires DBS, Satellite Radio,
Digital Broadcasters, and Others to Carry AES Communications" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,247, November 4, 2005. The R&O and NPRM is FCC 05-191 in EB
Docket No. 04-296. It was released on November 10, 2005. See,
notice in the November 25, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 226, at Pages 71072 - 71077.
|
|
|
Friday, February 24 |
11:45 AM - 2:00 PM. The
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) will host a
program titled "The Google Copyright Controversy: Implications of Digitizing
the World's Libraries". The speakers will be Robert Hahn (AEI-Brookings Joint
Center), Douglas Lichtman
(University of Chicago), and Hal Varian
(University of California at Berkeley). See,
notice. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW.
|
|
|
Monday, February 27 |
The Senate will return from its Presidents' Day recess. See,
2006 Senate calendar.
POSTPONED. 12:30 PM. New York Governor George Pataki
will give a speech. See,
notice. Location: Ballroom, National Press Club,
529 14th St. NW, 13th floor.
|
|
|
Tuesday, February 28 |
The House will return from its President's Day
District Work Period at 2:00 PM. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
8:30 AM - 4:45 PM. Day one of a two day conference hosted by the
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) titled "Improving Spectrum Management through Economic
or Other Incentives". See,
notice. Deputy
Secretary of Commerce Anthony Sampson will give opening remarks. Location: National
Academy of Sciences, Lecture Room, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW. The entrance at
2100 C St.
9:30 - 11:30 AM. The American
Enterprise Institute (AEI) will host a panel discussion titled "Former SEC
Division Directors Give Their Views on Regulatory Reform". The speakers will be
Barry Barbash, Kathryn McGrath, Paul Roye, and Marianne Smythe. See,
notice. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th
St., NW.
9:30 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC)
will hold another hearing "to examine issues relating to wartime executive
power and the NSA's surveillance authority". Press contact: Blain Rethmeier
(Specter) at 202 224-5225 or Tracy Schmaler (Leahy) at 202 224-2154. Location: Room 226,
Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "USF Contributions". See,
notice. Press
contact: Melanie Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens) at 202 224-3991,
or Andy Davis (Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast by the SCC.
Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building.
12:00 NOON - 1:15 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a panel discussion titled "Patent Law Update: Impact
Of Recent Federal Circuit Decisions On Crafting Patent Applications". The speaker
will be Dale Lazar (DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary). The price to attend ranges from $10-$30.
For more information, call 202 626-3463. See,
notice.
Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level.
1:00 - 6:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) will host a continuing legal education
(CLE) seminar titled "Communications Law 101". Location:
Wiley Rein & Fielding, 1776 K St., NW.
2:30 PM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "USF Distribution". See,
notice. Press
contact: Melanie Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens) at 202 224-3991,
or Andy Davis (Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast by the SCC.
Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building.
5:00 PM. Deadline to submit comments to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
(NIST) Computer Security Division regarding its Draft Special Publication 800-73-1, titled
"Interfaces for Personal Identity Verification". See also,
summary [3 pages in PDF] titled "Proposed Changes to SP 800-73".
6:30 - 8:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Young Lawyers Committee will host an event
titled "Happy Hour". For more information, contact Jason Friedrich at
jason dot friedrich at dbr dot com or Natalie Roisman at natalie dot roisman at fcc dot
gov. Location: Restaurant Kolumbia, 1801 K Street, NW.
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 1 |
8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Day two of a two day conference hosted by the
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) titled "Improving Spectrum Management through Economic
or Other Incentives". See,
notice.
Location: National Academy of Sciences, Lecture Room, 2101 Constitution Ave.,
NW. The entrance at 2100 C St.
8:30 AM - 1:00 PM. The
Information Technology Association of America
(ITAA) will host an event titled "Enterprise VoIP: From Communication to
Collaboration". For more information, contact Eerik Kreek at ekreek at
itaa dot org. See,
notice. Location: Ritz Carlton Pentagon City, Arlington, VA.
10:30 AM. The Senate
Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch will hold a
hearing on the FY 2007 budget for the Library of
Congress (LOC), Government Accountability
Office (GAO), and other entities. Location: Room 138, Dirksen Building.
2:00 PM. The
House Appropriations Committee's
Subcommittee on Science, the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce, and
Related Agencies will hold a hearing on the FY 2007 budget for the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Location: Room H-309, Capitol Building.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) portion of its Report and
Order (R&O) and NPRM of August 5, 2005 regarding regulation of information
services. The R&O classified wireline broadband internet access services as
information services. The NPRM proposes to impose new regulatory burdens on
information services. This item is FCC 05-150 in WC Docket No. 05-271, CC Docket No.
02-33, CC Docket No. 01-337, CC Docket Nos. 95-20 and 98-10, and WC Docket No. 04-242.
See, story
titled "FCC Classifies DSL as Information Service" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,190, August 8, 2005. The FCC released the
text
[133 pages in PDF] of this item on September 23, 2005. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 17, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 199, at Pages
60259 - 60271.
|
|
|
Thursday, March 2 |
10:00 AM. The
House Appropriations Committee's
Subcommittee on Science, the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce, and
Related Agencies will hold a hearing on the FY 2007 budget for the
National Science Foundation (NSF).
Location: Room H-309, Capitol Building.
10:00 AM. The
House Appropriations Committee's
Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related
Agencies will hold a hearing on the FY 2007 budget for President Bush's
American Competitiveness Agenda.
Location: Room 2358, Rayburn Building.
MOVED TO MARCH 14. 10:00 AM. The
Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Wireless Issues / Spectrum
Reform". See,
notice. Press contact: Melanie Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens)
at 202 224-3991, or Andy Davis (Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast
by the SCC. Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Voice over Internet
Protocol". See,
notice.
Press contact: Melanie Alvord (Stevens) at 202 224-8456, Aaron Saunders (Stevens) at
202 224-3991, or Andy Davis (Inouye) at 202 224-4546. The hearing will be webcast by
the SCC. Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2005 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|