SEC Commissioner Defends Section
404 |
8/15. Raul Campos, a member
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), gave a
speech in Boston,
Massachusetts, titled "How to be an Effective Board Member". One of the topics that
he addressed was the internal control burdens imposed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
Campos (at left) said that the
"benefits of Section 404 have been enormous" and that the SEC is committed to a
strong "tone at the top" culture. He also said that "the need for strong
internal controls and a strong culture of compliance absolutely justify keeping
Section 404 around".
Other Commissioners have discussed Section 404 regulation with less
enthusiasm. See for example, story titled "Atkins Says SEC Seeks More Rational
Approach to Section 404" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,395, June 20, 2006.
The "Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002" was
HR 3763 in
the 107th Congress. It is now Public Law No. 107-204. Its main sponsors were
Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) and
Rep. Mike Oxley (R-OH).
Section 404 is titled "Management assessment of internal controls". It
provides, in full, as follows:
(a) RULES REQUIRED- The Commission shall prescribe rules requiring each
annual report required by section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) to contain an internal control report,
which shall--
(1) state the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining
an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting;
and
(2) contain an assessment, as of the end of the most recent fiscal year of
the issuer, of the effectiveness of the internal control structure and
procedures of the issuer for financial reporting.
(b) INTERNAL CONTROL EVALUATION AND REPORTING- With respect to the internal
control assessment required by subsection (a), each registered public
accounting firm that prepares or issues the audit report for the issuer shall
attest to, and report on, the assessment made by the management of the issuer.
An attestation made under this subsection shall be made in accordance with
standards for attestation engagements issued or adopted by the Board. Any such
attestation shall not be the subject of a separate engagement.
Small public technologies companies have argued that
Section 404, and the SEC's implementation of it, is imposing huge burdens on
them, with little benefit to investors. These arguments are supported by the May
8, 2006, Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report [93 pages in
PDF] titled "Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Consideration of Key Principles Needed in
Addressing Implementation for Smaller Public Companies". See also, story titled
"GAO Reports that Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley Burdens Small Public Companies"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,366, May 9, 2006.
In addition, legislators have begun to introduce bills on
this subject. On May 17, 2006, Sen. Jim
DeMint (R-SC) and other Senators introduced
S 2824, the
"Competitive and Open Markets that Protect and Enhance the Treatment of
Entrepreneurs Act", or COMPETE Act, which would add a "Smaller Public Company
Exemption" to Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. See also,
HR 5404,
the companion bill in the House, introduced by
Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) and others on
May 17. However, most legislators are likely waiting until after Sen. Sarbanes
and Rep. Oxley retire at the end of the current Congress before introducing
their bills.
Campos stated that the SEC "has been immersed in trying to find a workable
implementation plan for Section 404. For the past several months, we have been hearing
everywhere -- the press, meetings, and in public forums -- about the extensive
costs of Section 404. This has been an extraordinarily complex and difficult
policy issue for the Commission since it is quite clear that both the costs and
benefits of Section 404 have been enormous."
He continued that "after a series of meetings and a public roundtable on this thorny
issue, we issued a ``roadmap´´ last May which outlined the steps that would be taken by the
SEC and PCAOB to ease implementation burdens and reduce compliance costs. Much work has
already been done -- we recently issued a concept release to solicit comment for forthcoming
practical management guidance. And just a few days ago, we issued two releases that extended
compliance dates for the auditor attestation portion of Section 404 compliance for foreign
private issuers that are accelerated filers (but not large accelerated filers), and proposed
to extend compliance dates for Section 404 compliance for all non-accelerated filers. We
also proposed to give newly public companies a transition period to comply with the internal
control requirements of Section 404." (Parentheses in original.)
Campos concluded that "What all of this means is that we at the SEC are committed
to a strong ``tone at the top´´ culture throughout Corporate America. Notwithstanding the
extensive costs of Section 404, we have made the policy determination that the need for
strong internal controls and a strong culture of compliance absolutely justify keeping
Section 404 around. As a result, you -- as directors -- should also commit yourself to
encouraging and implementing a pro-active and responsible board culture. You are at the
front-line -- therefore, we will look to you to set and implement the proper tone and
compliance environment at your respective companies."
|
|
|
Dennis Carlton Named Head of Economic
Analysis in Antitrust Division |
8/18.
Dennis Carlton was named Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Economic
Analysis in the Department of Justice's (DOJ)
Antitrust Division. He will start in October of 2006. See, DOJ
release.
He is currently a professor of business economics at the University of
Chicago's Graduate School of Business. He is also a member of the
Antitrust Modernization Commission (AMC). And,
he is the senior managing director Lexecon,
an economic consulting firm. See, Lexecon
bio.
He is a co-author, with Jeffrey Perloff, of
Modern Industrial Organization [Amazon], an 800 page textbook last revised
for the fourth edition in 2004.
He has also authored or co-authored numerous articles and papers on a wide
range of antitrust and competition topics. The following is a listing of some of
his works that are relevant to technology that are published in the Social
Sciences Research Network (SSRN). Access to the text requires registration.
Access to some also requires payment. See also, all SSRN
listings
for Carlton.
- "Competition, Monopoly and Aftermarkets", 2006. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
- "Theories of Tying and Implications for Antitrust", 2005. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
- "Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Strategic Behavior", 2002. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
- "A General Analysis of Exclusionary Conduct and Refusal to Deal -- Why
Aspen and Kodak are Misguided", 2001. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
- "Free Riding and Sales Strategies for the Internet", 2001. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
- "The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in
Evolving Industries", 1999. See, SSRN
abstract
and download page.
|
|
|
Michelle Connolly Named Chief
Economist at FCC |
8/21. Michelle Connolly was named Chief
Economist at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
See, FCC
release [PDF]. She began work on August 21. She replaces Leslie Marx, who
worked in this position for only one year.
Connolly is a thirty-something junior professor at Duke University whose
curriculum vitae
[PDF] lists no papers or other works related to telecommunications, the
internet, networked industries, or competition analysis. Nothing in her
curriculum vitae or web site indicates that she has any expertise regarding the
business practices, technologies, or participants in the communications,
internet or technology sectors.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin
stated in the FCC's release only that "I am pleased Michelle has agreed to serve
in the critical role of Chief Economist. Her talent and expertise will be a
great asset for the Commission and will strengthen our policy-making."
Connolly has written about international trade, including intellectual
property rights (IPR) in the context of trade. See for example,
paper [12 pages
in PDF] titled "Implications of Intellectual Property Rights for Dynamic Gains
from Trade", co-authored with Diego Valderrama, and published in the American
Economic Review, May 2005.
However, her work regarding IPR focuses on technological innovation and
patents. In contrast, the FCC deals with IPR mostly in the context of
entertainment industry copyrights in songs, movies, and programming, as for
example, in the FCC's ill fated broadcast flag proceeding.
A major responsibility of the Chief Economist is to assist in the review of
mergers. The Chief Economist may also be asked to provide economic analysis of
the network neutrality issue, and a la carte programming. Connolly's curriculum
vitae reflects no experience in any of these areas.
The Chief Economist is a short term position traditionally held by an
outsider. Some former Chief Economists, such as
Gerald Falhauber,
had considerable experience in communications economics, policy and business
practices at the time of their appointment to the FCC.
Chairman Martin's selection of Connolly suggests that he intends to continue
to relegate independent economic analysis to a minimal and ineffective role in
the FCC's decisions and policy making.
The Chief Economist serves in the Office of Strategic
Planning and Policy Analysis (OSP). The head of the OSP is Cathy Bohigian, an attorney
who was previously a legal advisor to Martin. Both Martin and Bohigian previously worked for
the law firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding.
|
|
|
|
|
More News |
8/18. The U.S. Court of Appeals (1stCir) issued
its opinion
in T-Peg v. Vermont Timber Works, a case regarding copyright in architectural
works. The Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment of the District Court for the
Defendant, and remanded for trial. This case is T-Peg, Inc. and Timberpeg East, Inc. v.
Vermont Timber Works, Inc. and Douglas Friant, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit,
App. Ct. No. 05-2866, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts.
8/18. The U.S. Court of Appeals (8thCir) issued
its opinion [8 pages in
PDF] in Schwan's IP v. Kraft Pizza Company, a trademark case. The Court
of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the alleged infringer (Kraft) on
the basis that the mark "brick oven" is generic. This case is Schwan's IP, LLC
and Schwan's Consumer Brands North America, Inc. v. Kraft Pizza Company, U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 8th Circuit, App. Ct. No. 05-3463, an appeal from the U.S. District Court
for the District of Minnesota.
8/9. A grand jury of the U.S. District Court
(SDCal) returned an indictment of Joshua Edward Eveloff and Michael Steven Twombly that
charges fraud in sending e-mail, in violation of
18 U.S.C. §§ 1037 (a)(3) and (a)(4), and conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, in
connection with their sending bulk commercial e-mail with falsified header information. That
is, the is a case brought under the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. The U.S. Attorneys Office
stated in a release [PDF]
the "the defendants then transmitted as many as 1,000,000 spam messages in a
single day".
|
|
|
|
Georgelas Sentenced in Islamic Cyber Crime
Case |
8/15. The U.S. District Court (NDTex)
sentenced John Georgelas to 34 months of imprisonment, and ordered him to pay
$44,808.00 in restitution, following his plea of guilty to one count of knowingly
and intentionally accessing a protected computer without authorization, and
recklessly causing damage to that computer, in violation of
18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 (a)(5)(A)(ii) and (a)(5)(B)(i).
The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Northern District of Texas added in a
release
that Georgelas "has been in custody since his arrest on April 14, 2006 on related
charges outlined in a sealed complaint". The USAO release does not identify what those
other charges are.
TLJ spoke with a spokesman for the USAO who said that that complaint remains sealed, and
the USAO will not disclose its contents.
The USAO release states that Georgelas was a Datacenter Operations Technician at
Rackspace
Managed Hosting at the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) Datacenter facility in Grapevine, Texas, near
the airport. The charge to which he plead guilty is based upon his accessing,
without authorization, Rackspace servers to obtain the password of a customer,
American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
The USAO release also states that
"Georgelas's unauthorized access of Rackspace was motivated by his desire to
deface the website of AIPAC.org due to his fundamentalist Muslim beliefs. The
government was able to recover chat logs in which Georgelas communicated with a
Canadian woman concerning his desire to support Al Qaeda, and he provided
technical support to a pro-jihad website, jihadunspun.com, which was used as a
propaganda vehicle to promote Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda."
The Assistant U.S. Attorney
assigned to this case is Linda Groves. Georgelas is represented by the
Dallas County Public Defender.
The Rackspace web site states that it offers "Fanatical Support". In
addition, Rackspace holds U.S. Trademark No. 78754570 for this term.
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Monday, August 21 |
The House will next meet at 2:00 PM on Wednesday, September 6. See,
Republican Whip Notice.
The Senate will next meet at 11:00 AM on Tuesday, September 5.
12:00 NOON - 1:00 PM. The
U.S. Chamber of Commerce will host a
lunch briefing for reporters to discuss its "Global Anti-Counterfeiting and
Piracy Initiative". The speakers will be Caroline Joiner, Brad Huther,
Michael Considine, and Jennifer Osika. For more information, or to register,
e-mail press at uschamber dot com or call 202 463-5682. Location: U.S.
Chamber, 1615 H St., NW.
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 22 |
8:30 AM - 4:30 PM. The U.S.-China Economic and Security
Review Commission. will hold a hearing titled "China's Financial System and Monetary
Policies: The Impact on U.S. Exchange Rates, Capital Markets, and Interest Rates''. See,
notice in the Federal Register,
August 15, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 157, at Pages 46978-46979. Location: Room 385,
Russell Senate Office Building, Capitol Hill.
9:00 PM EDT and 7:00 PM MDT. Sumner
Redstone (Viacom and CBS) will speak at the Progress and
Freedom Foundation's (PFF) conference titled "Aspen Summit"
in Aspen, Colorado. His speech will be webcast.
See also, agenda for the three day conference in the
Calendar of Events Outside of the
Washington DC Area.
Deadline to submit comments to the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
regarding its "modified plan to remove the paper search collection of marks
that include design elements from the USPTO's Trademark Search Facility and
replace them with electronic documents. The USPTO has determined that the
paper search collection is no longer necessary due to the availability and
reliability of the USPTO's electronic search system." See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 23, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 121, at Pages
36065-36068.
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 23 |
8:30 AM - 2:30 PM. The
American Electronics Association (AeA) will host an
event titled "AeA Annual Government - Industry Executive Interchange". See,
notice.
Prices to attend range from $195-$295. Location: The Spy Museum, 800 F St., NW.
9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. Day one of a two day
meeting of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to
consider drafts of material for the 2006 Annual Report. The
agenda includes discussion of export controls and China's WTO compliance. See,
notice in the Federal Register, August 16, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 158, at Page 47328.
Location: Conference Room 381, Hall of The States, 444 North Capitol St., NW.
12:00 NOON - 3:00 PM. The
DC Bar Association will host a panel discussion titled
"DR-CAFTA: The United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement
A Roundtable with the Ambassadors". The speakers will include ambassadors to the
U.S. from Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Costa Rica.
The price to attend ranges from $15-40. For more information, call 202-626-3488. See,
notice.
Location: Arnold & Porter, 555 12th St., NW.
1:30 - 3:30 PM. The Department of State will host a meeting to hear
public views on issues related to the possible expansion of the mandate of the
International Mobile Satellite Organization (IMSO) to
include new oversight and regulatory responsibilities that may affect U.S. and non-U.S.
mobile satellite services providers. See,
notice in the Federal Register, August 10, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 154, at
Pages 45897-45898. Location: Harry S. Truman building, 2201 C St., NW.
CANCELLED. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Auction
67 is scheduled to begin. This is the 400 MHz Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service
auction. See, FCC
notice of cancellation [PDF] and
notice of cancellation in the Federal Register, May 17, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 95, at
Page 28695.
|
|
|
Thursday, August 24 |
9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. Day two of a two day
meeting of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to consider drafts
of material for the 2006 Annual Report. The agenda includes discussion of export controls
and China's WTO compliance. See,
notice in the Federal Register, August 16, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 158, at Page 47328.
Location: Conference Room 381, Hall of The States, 444 North Capitol St., NW.
|
|
|
Friday, August 25 |
Deadline to submit comments to the National Institute of Standards and
Technology's (NIST) Computer Security Division
regarding its
draft [159 pages in PDF] of Special Publication 800-53, Revision 1 (Second
Public Draft), titled "Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information
Systems".
|
|
|
Monday, August 28 |
Deadline to submit comments to the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
regarding its proposed rule changes that would amend its
United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) rules to extend US-VISIT
requirements to all aliens with the exception of aliens who are specifically
exempted and Canadian citizens applying for admission as B1/B2 visitors for
business or pleasure. See, notice in the Federal Register, July 27, 2006, Vol.
71, No. 144, at Pages 42605-42611.
Deadline to submit nominations of individuals for appointment to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology's
(NIST) Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (VCAT). See,
notice in the Federal Register, August 11, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 155, at
Pages 46199-46200.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998 - 2006 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
rights reserved. |
|
|