3rd Circuit Holds Interconnection
Actions Must First Be Brought in the State PUC |
5/9. The U.S. Court of Appeals (3rdCir) issued
its opinion [29 pages in PDF]
in Core Communications v. Verizon, a case regarding the proper procedure
of adjudicating disputes regarding interconnection agreements between carriers. The Court
of Appeals held that the state public utility commissions that approve these interconnection
agreements "are given the first crack at interpreting and enforcing" these
agreements.
Verizon Pennsylvania is an incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) in the
state of Pennsylvania. Core
Communications is a competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC).
The interconnection provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 are codified at
47 U.S.C. § 251 and
47 U.S.C. § 252.
Subsection 251(a) provides that "Each telecommunications carrier has the duty ...
to interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other
telecommunications carriers".
Moreover, subsection 251(c)(1) provides that "each incumbent local exchange
carrier has ... The duty to negotiate in good faith in accordance with section
252 of this title the particular terms and conditions of agreements ..." In
addition, "The requesting telecommunications carrier also has the duty to
negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of such agreements".
Subsection 252(a) provides that "Upon receiving a request for
interconnection, services, or network elements pursuant to section 251 of this
title, an incumbent local exchange carrier may negotiate and enter into a
binding agreement with the requesting telecommunications carrier or carriers".
Also, Subsection 252(b) provides that any "party to the negotiation may petition
a State commission to arbitrate any open issues".
Subsection 252(i) provides that "A local exchange carrier shall make
available any interconnection, service, or network element provided under an
agreement approved under this section to which it is a party to any other
requesting telecommunications carrier upon the same terms and conditions as
those provided in the agreement."
Core entered into an interconnection agreement with Verizon (actually, its
predecessor in interest, Bell Atlantic Pennsylvania) by opting into an existing
interconnection agreement between MCI and Verizon (Bell Atlantic).
The Court of Appeals wrote that Core asserts that when it requested
interconnection to various markets in Pennsylvania, "Verizon deliberately and
unjustifiably refused to interconnect with Core at technically feasible points
in a timely manner. Rather than using existing facilities with spare capacity to
interconnect, Verizon cited its internal policy of requiring the construction of
new, dedicated facilities to interconnect with Core. No technical or business
justification was given explaining the need for this requirement. Core claims
that Verizon intentionally took these steps in order to maintain its competitive
advantage in Pennsylvania markets and to intimidate and financially harm Core."
Without first exhausting remedies before the
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PPUC),
Core filed a complaint in U.S. District Court
(EDPa) against Verizon. Count I alleged violation of 47 U.S.C. §§ 201 and 202. Count
II alleged violation of 47 U.S.C. § 251. Count III
alleged a material breach of an interconnection agreement. Count IV alleged intentional
non-disclosure and fraudulent concealment under Pennsylvania common law.
The District Court dismissed all four counts of Core's complaint
without prejudice. It held that interconnection related claims must first be
brought in the relevant state PUC, before bringing an action in U.S. District Court.
The District Court relied upon the Federal Communications
Commission's (FCC) 2000 ruling in In re Starpower Communications, LLC, for the
principle that the complaining carrier must first go to the state PUC. The District Court
relied upon the Supreme Court of the U.S.'s 1984 opinion in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v.
Natural Resources Defense Council for the appropriate degree of deference to accord to
the FCC.
Core brought the present appeal.
The Court of Appeals, reviewed the statute and FCC rulings, applied
Chevron deference, and concluded that "the
most sensible harmonization of the Act's structure and the FCC's declarations is a solution
under which the bodies that are responsible for overseeing the formation of interconnection
agreements are given the first crack at interpreting and enforcing them."
It concluded that "we will affirm the judgment of the District Court dismissing
Count III of Core’s complaint without prejudice, vacate the dismissal of the remaining
counts, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
This case is Core Communications, Inc. v. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc., U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, App. Ct. No. 06-2419, an appeal from the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, D.C. No.
04-cv-04513, Judge Timothy Savage presiding. Judge Fisher wrote the opinion of
the Court of Appeals, in which Judges Smith and Gustave Diamond joined.
|
|
|
Bush Reiterates Support for Doha
Round, Free Trade Agreements, and Open Investment Policies |
5/9. The White House press office released a
statement of President Bush. He said that "We will work aggressively to
conclude the World Trade Organization's Doha Development Agenda negotiations and
to secure congressional approval of the free trade agreements with Colombia,
Panama, Peru, and South Korea."
He also said that "The United States unequivocally supports international
investment in this country and is equally committed to securing fair, equitable,
and nondiscriminatory treatment for U.S. investors abroad. Both inbound and
outbound investment benefit our country by stimulating growth, creating jobs,
enhancing productivity, and fostering competitiveness that allows our companies
and their workers to prosper at home and in international markets."
Bush said that "open economies that empower individuals, generate economic
opportunity and prosperity for all, and provide the foundation for a free
society".
See also, second
statement titled "Open Economies Policy Statement". Neither statement
references intellectual property related trade issues.
On May 8, 2007, U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab gave a
speech [14 pages in PDF] in Washington DC to the Business Council regarding
trade and Doha negotiations.
She said that "President Bush has made it clear the United States is ready to
do its part -- whether on market access or on trade-distorting subsidies." She
added that "market access is the key to success".
She also said that "we have a perception problem. Demagogues and protectionists can
take isolated points of data and selected anecdotes about job losses to stoke fear and
anxiety. Three centuries ago Thomas Hobbes proclaimed life ``nasty, brutish and short.´´
Today, we have Lou Dobbs presenting life as unfair, isolationist, and doomed." She said
that "The protectionists are wrong."
|
|
|
Martin Addresses Cable
Convention |
5/8. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman
Kevin Martin gave a
speech [PDF] at the National Cable &
Telecommunications Association (NCTA) convention in Las Vegas, Nevada, on
May 7, 2007.
He joked about recent criticism of him in the cable industry, and praised the cable
industry's infrastructure investment, and expansion into broadband and voice services.
He then discussed voice competition, video competition, a la carte, multicasting, the DTV
transition, the set top box integration ban, and network neutrality regulation.
Martin (at right) said that "your entry
into the phone market benefits consumers, and I will support regulatory action to promote
that entry and the competition it enables."
He continued that "cable operators are not always the new entrants. So consistent
with my commitment to fostering a competitive marketplace and consumer choice, I have and
will continue to side with the new entrants trying to break into the market where you are the
traditional incumbent. My push to streamline the franchise reform process for new entrants
was not intended as an attack on cable. Rather, it was promoting new entry in the video
market in the same manner as I supported your entry into the phone market."
He also said that he is in agreement with the cable industry on "net neutrality". He said that "Lots of
people would like the Commission to impose regulation in this area. I have consistently
resisted." He said that "regulation in this area would be premature",
"network providers need to be able to recoup the costs for upgrading their
infrastructure", and that net neutrality regulation could slow down broadband
deployment and adoption.
Martin discussed the July 1, 2007, deadline of the set top box integration ban.
He also reiterated his support for a la carte regime for cable. And, he argued that there
is no First Amendment violation in mandating an a la carte regime.
He then defended the FCC's multicasting rules. He said that "Broadcasters said
they could not sustain a business based on advertiser-supported multicasted channels unless
they knew the channels would be carried on the cable and satellite systems. Your industry
opposed mandatory carriage, saying consumers should be able to pick and choose the channels
they want, not have programming forced upon them. But if that is really your belief, then
it should hold true whether we are talking about broadcast channels or your own cable
programming channels. You can't have it both ways."
Martin concluded that "if you
advocate subjecting broadcast channels to consumer choice then why shouldn't
cable channels be similarly subject to free market choices as well."
Kyle McSlarrow (at left), head of
the NCTA, responded in a speech
on May 8. He said that "If one assumes that the video marketplace is one of intense
competition, then the only sensible policy outcome is one where the government gets out of
the way and let’s the free market flourish. I think that marketplace is competitive ... and
every cable operator knows that they are in a competitive fire fight with satellite
distributors and now telephone companies."
"So", said McSlarrow, "it is puzzling that Chairman Martin does
not take the same approach to the video marketplace. I was struck by his
discussion of mandated a la carte and mandated multicast carriage. There are
many reasons why neither of those ideas benefits consumers."
He continued, "But just as a matter of logical consistency, think about what
those ideas represent: A la carte is a form of government enforced unbundling of what
is known as the expanded basic tier. Mandated multicast carriage produces
exactly the opposite result. It forces the bundling of broadcast programming that apparently
couldn't gain carriage in a free market."
"You can't have it both ways. You can’t insist that every
channel must be sold separately, and then require that other programming must be
added to the expanded basic tier", said McSlarrow.
|
|
|
4th Circuit Rules in ECPA and CFAA
Case |
5/9. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(4thCir) issued its
opinion
[PDF] in Expert Business Systems v. BI4CE, a civil action brought
under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which is codified at
18
U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which is codified at
18
U.S.C. § 1030.
However, this appeal involves no significant ECPA or CFAA issues. The District Court
ruled against the plaintiffs on summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Expert Business Systems, Inc. (EBS) and BI4CE, Inc., are two small information technology
businesses. They entered into an agreement to develop a web enabled version of EBS's
proprietary software. The business relationship later deteriorated, and EBS filed a
complaint against BI4CE in U.S. District Court (DMd) alleging violation of the ECPA and CFAA
and various state law claims.
EBS alleged that BI4CE intercepted and disclosed two e-mail communications of EBS in
violation of the ECPA, and remotely accessed EBS's computers without
authorization, and caused damage, in violation of the CFAA. The Court of Appeals
concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact with respect to
either federal claim. The evidence showed that a program was installed, at EBS's
request, that enabled EBS to remotely access BI4CE's server, and not vice versa.
It similarly found no interception of e-mail.
The Court of Appeals opinion does not state whether or not the plaintiffs
added the federal ECPA and CFAA claims to what was essentially a state law
commercial dispute in order to obtain federal jurisdiction over the state law
claims. The tactic exists. Whatever the case, after ruling for BI4CE on the
federal claims, the District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the
remaining state law claims, which it dismissed.
EBS brought the present appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed in full in
an "unpublished per curiam opinion" of Judges Michael, Motz, and King.
This case is Expert Business Systems LLC and David Esau v. BI4CE, Inc. and
Christopher Chodnicki, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, App. Ct.
No. 06-1265, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore, D.C. No. 1:04-cv-00600-AMD, Judge Andre Davis presiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Thursday, May 10 |
The House will meet at 9:00 AM and recess
immediately for the Former Members' Association annual meeting. It will meet again at
10:00 AM for legislative business. The House may consider
HR 2082, the
intelligence authorization bill, subject to a rule. See, House Majority Leader Hoyer's
weekly
calendar [PDF].
The Senate will meet at 10:00 AM. It will resume consideration of
HR 1495,
the "Water Resources Development Act of 2007".
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM. The Information
Technology Association of America (ITAA) will host a conference titled "The
New New Internet: IPv6 conference". See,
notice.
For more information, contact Trey Hodgkins at thodgkins at itaa dot org.
Location: Hyatt Regency, Arlington, VA.
9:00 AM. The House
Financial Services Committee's (HFSC) Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
will hold a hearing: titled "Suspicious Activity and Currency Transaction Reports:
Balancing Law Enforcement Utility and Regulatory Requirements". The witnesses
will be Charles Frahm (Deputy Assistant Director,
FBI Counterrorism
Division), William Baity (Deputy Director of the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), Steve Bartlett
(Financial Services Roundtable), Megan Davis Hodge
(Director, Anti-Money Laundering, RBC Centura Bank), Carolyn Mroz (P/CEO of the
Bay-Vanguard Savings Bank), and Scott McClain (Winne Banta Hetherington
Basralian & Kahn). See,
notice. Location: Room 2128, Rayburn Building.
9:15 AM. The
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host a briefing to
release a report titled "Internet Radio and Copyright Royalties: Reforming a Broken
System". The speakers will be Rob Atkinson and Daniel Castro of the ITIF. For
more information, contact the ITIF at 202-449-1351 or at mail at itif dot org Location:
Room 2226, Rayburn Building.
9:30 AM. The House
Commerce Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet will
hold a hearing titled "Digital Future of the United States: Part V: The Future of
Video". The witnesses will be Thomas Rogers (P/CEO of TiVo), Chad Hurley (CEO of
YouTube), Benjamin Pyne (Disney and ESPN Networks), Gina Lombardi (MediaFLO USA), Phil
Rosenthal (Writers Guild of America West and the Screen Actors Guild), Blake Krikorian
(Ch/CEO of Sling Media), Mark Cuban (Co-Founder of HDNet). Press contact: Jodi Seth or
Carrie Annand at 202-225-5735. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
9:30 AM. The
House Judiciary Committee (HJC) will hold a hearing titled "Oversight
Hearing on the Department of Justice". The witness will be Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales. See,
notice.
Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) may hold a hearing titled "Judicial Nominations".
This hearing pertains to the nominations of Leslie Southwick (to be a Judge of
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit), Janet Neff (U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Michigan), and Liam O’Grady (U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Virginia).
See, notice. Press contact:
Tracy Schmaler (Leahy) at Tracy_Schmaler at judiciary dot senate dot gov
or 202-224-2154. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The House Homeland
Security Committee's (HHSC) Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing and
Terrorism Risk Assessment will hold a hearing titled "Fixing the Homeland Security
Information Network: Finding the Way Forward For Better Information Sharing". See,
notice. This
hearing will not be webcast by the HHSC. For more information, contact Dena
Graziano or Adam Comis at 202-225-9978. Location: Room 311, Canon Building.
10:00 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(FedCir) will hear oral argument in Furnace Brook v. Overstock.com, a
patent infringement case, in which the District Court granted summary judgment
of non-infringement of
U.S. Patent No. 5,721,832, titled "Method and apparatus for an interactive
computerized catalog system", to Overstock. This case is App. Ct. No. 2007-1064, an
appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Location:
Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. The Department of State's (DOS)
International
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will hold the second of a series of
three meeting to prepare advice for the next meetings of the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development Working Parties on the Information Economy (WPIE) and
Communications and Infrastructure Services Policy (CISP). See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 5, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 65, at Page
16868. Location: Room 2533a, Harry Truman Building, 2201 C St., NW.
? 2:00 PM. The Department of State's (DOS)
International
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will hold the second of a series of
three teleconferences to prepare advice for the next meeting of the International
Telecommunication Union's Study Group 9 (Integrated broadband cable networks
and television and sound transmission). See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 5, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 65, at Page 16868.
2:30 PM. The House Commerce Committee will meet to
mark up HR
964, the "Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act" or
"SPY ACT", and
HR 948,
the "Social Security Number Protection Act of 2007". See also, stories
titled "House Subcommittee Approves SPY ACT" and "Summary of HR 964, the SPY
ACT" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,568, April 23, 2007.
Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
2:30 PM. The Senate Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (SHSGAC) will hold a hearing titled
"Violent Islamist Extremism: Government Efforts to Defeat It".
Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT), the Chairman of the
SHSGAC, has advocated disrupting terrorist web sites. See, story titled "Sen.
Lieberman Advocates Disrupting Terrorist Web Sites" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
1,575, May 4, 2007. See,
notice. Location: Room 342, Dirksen Building.
3:00 PM. The
Senate Banking Committee (SBC) will hold a hearing on numerous nominees,
including Mario Mancuso (to Under Secretary of Commerce for Export
Administration). Location: Room 538, Dirksen Building.
6:00 - 8:30 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Enforcement Committee will host a
continuing legal education (CLE) seminar titled "What to do When the FCC Comes a'
Calling: A Practitioner's Guide to FCC Enforcement". The price to attend ranges
from $50 to $125. See,
registration form [PDF]. Location: Arnold & Porter, 10th floor, 555 12th
Street, NW.
|
|
|
Friday, May 11 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business. The House may
consider HR 1684,
the "Department of Homeland Security Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008", subject to a rule, and
HR 2082, the
intelligence authorization bill, subject to a rule. See, House Majority Leader Hoyer's
weekly
calendar [PDF].
The Information Technology Association
of America (ITAA) will host a seminar titled "Overview of Final Section 409A
Rules". See, notice.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its
Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [53 pages in PDF] in its proceeding titled "In the
Matter of Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2007". This
NPRM is FCC 07-55 in MD Docket No. 07-81.
|
|
|
Monday, May 14 |
11:00 AM. The U.S. Chamber of
Commerce will host an event titled "Intellectual Property Enforcement: An
Update from the Administration". The speakers will be Carlos Gutierrez (Secretary
of Commerce) and Alberto Gonzales (Attorney General). For
more information, contact Katie Wilson at 202-463-5500 or email ncfevents at uschamber dot
com. See, notice and
registration page. Location: U.S. Chamber, 1615 H St., NW.
TIME? The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a mock auction for
Auction
71, the broadband PCS spectrum auction to be held on May 16, 2007. See,
DA 07-30
[69 pages in PDF].
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 15 |
8:30 AM - 3:00 PM. The American Enterprise
Institute (AEI) will host an event titled "The Role of Competition Analysis
in Regulatory Decisions". See,
notice. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW.
8:30 AM - 3:00 PM. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) Advanced Technology Program Advisory Committee will hold a partially
closed meeting. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 13, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 71, at Page
18632. Location: NIST, Administration Building, Employees' Lounge,
Gaithersburg, MD.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The
House Science Committee's (HSC) Subcommittee
on Research & Science Education will hold a hearing titled "Federal
STEM Education Programs: Educators' Perspectives". The witnesses will be
Linda Froschauer (National Science Teachers Association), Michael Lach
(Chicago Public Schools), George Nelson (Western Washington University), Van
Reiner (Maryland Science Center), and Iris Weiss (Horizon Research, Inc.).
Location: Room 2318, Rayburn Building.
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 16 |
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will begin
Auction
71, the broadband PCS spectrum auction. See,
DA 07-30
[69 pages in PDF].
10:00 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC) may hold a hearing titled "Rogue
Online Pharmacies: The Growing Problem of Internet Drug Trafficking".
The witnesses will be Francine Haight (founder of Ryan's
Cause), Joseph Rannazzisi (Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration),
Joseph Califano (National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University),
Philip Heymann (Harvard Law School), and Thomas McClellan (Treatment Research
Institute). Press contact: Tracy Schmaler (Leahy) at Tracy_Schmaler at judiciary
dot senate dot gov or 202-224-2154. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The
Senate Finance Committee (SFC) will hold a hearing titled "U.S.
Preference Programs: How well do they work?". The witnesses will include
Meredith Broadbent (Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Industry, Market
Access and Telecommunications). See,
notice.
Location: Room 215, Dirksen Building.
12:30 PM. The Federal Communications
Bar Association's (FCBA) Young Lawyers Committee will host a brown bag lunch to elect
Co-Chairs and plan. Send nominations and self-nominations to Natalie Roisman at nroisman
at akingump dot com and Chris Fedeli chrisfedeli at dwt dot com by May 9. Location:
Davis Wright Tremaine, 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., 2nd
Floor.
3:15 - 5:00 PM. The American Enterprise
Institute (AEI) will host a book forum on the book "Antitrust Consent Decrees
in Theory and Practice" by
Richard Epstein
(University of Chicago law school). The book examines the 1982 consent decree
that broke up the Bell system, the 1994 Microsoft consent decree, and the 2002
Microsoft final judgment. The speakers will be Epstein,
Douglas Melamed
(Wilmer Hale) and Michael Greve (AEI). See,
notice. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Engineering and Technical Practice Committee
will host a continuing legal education (CLE) seminar titled "Regulating
for Innovation". See,
registration form [PDF].
The price to attend ranges from $50-$125. The deadline to register is 5:00 PM on
May 14. Location:
Skadden Arps, 700 14th St., NW.
|
|
|
Thursday, May 17 |
10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Media Violence". See,
notice. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. The Department of State's (DOS)
International
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will hold the third of a series of
three meeting to prepare advice for the next meetings of the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development Working Parties on the Information Economy (WPIE) and
Communications and Infrastructure Services Policy (CISP). See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 5, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 65, at Page
16868. Location: Room 2533a, Harry Truman Building, 2201 C St., NW.
? 2:00 PM. The Department of State's (DOS)
International
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will hold the third of a series of
three teleconferences to prepare advice for the next meeting of the International
Telecommunication Union's Study Group 9 (Integrated broadband cable networks
and television and sound transmission). See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 5, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 65, at Page 16868.
2:00 PM. The
House Commerce Committee's (HCC)
Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet will hold a hearing on a
discussion draft of a yet to be introduced bill that addresses broadband
mapping and data collection. Location: Room 2322, Rayburn Building.
6:00 - 8:00 PM. The law firm of Tobin
O'Connor and Alteritech will host a
seminar titled "Technology for Law Firms: Electronic Document Management".
See, notice. RSVP
by May 7, 2007 to RSVP at alteritech dot com. The event is open to attorneys.
Location: Maggiano's Little Italy, 5333 Wisconsin Ave., NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Copyright Royalty Board in response to its proposed
rules setting certain royalty rates. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 17, 2007, Vol.
72, No. 73, at Pages 19138-19144.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2007
David Carney,
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved. |
|
|