Rep. McDermott Introduces Bill to License
and Tax Internet Gambling |
6/7. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA)
introduced HR 2607 [LOC |
WW]
the "Internet Gambling Regulation and Tax Enforcement Act of 2007", a bill to
amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide for the licensing of internet gambling
operators that pay state and federal taxes.
This bill was referred to the House
Ways and Means Committee. Rep. McDermott is a member. The bill has no
original cosponsors.
This bill would give the Director of the Department of the Treasury's (DOT)
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) authority
to license any "Internet gambling operator". It further provides that "The
Director shall grant licenses under this subchapter if, in the Director's sole discretion,
the applicant meets the criteria set by the Director and is generally fit to engage in the
business of Internet gambling."
The bill does not elaborate on the meaning of "fit to engage". Rather, it
focuses on collection of taxes.
The bill provides that "No person shall receive a license ... unless the person
implements the following requirements with respect to any Internet bet or
wager -- (A) appropriate mechanisms to ensure that all taxes relating to Internet
gambling due to Federal and State governments from individuals engaged in
Internet gambling are collected at the time of any payment of any proceeds of
Internet gambling; (B) appropriate mechanisms to ensure that all taxes relating to Internet
gambling due to Federal and State governments from any persons licensed under
this Act are collected as required by law ..."
See also, story titled "En Banc Panel of DC Circuit Affirms Judgment that Rep.
McDermott Violated the Wiretap Act" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,573, May 2, 2007.
|
|
|
House Financial Services Committee
Holds Hearing on Internet Gambling |
6/8. The House Financial Services
Committee (HFSC) held a hearing titled "Can Internet Gambling Be Effectively
Regulated to Protect Consumers and the Payments System?" Witnesses disputed whether
or not the age and location of internet gamblers can be verified.
Rep. Frank's Bill. Rep. Barney Frank
(D-MA), the Chairman of the HFSC, is the sponsor of HR 2046
[LOC |
WW],
the "Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act of 2007".
HR 2046 would not repeal the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA),
the recently enacted law that targets the financial transactions associated with
internet gambling. Rather, the bill would exempt from the provisions of the
UIGEA financial transactions with licensed operators of internet gambling
facilities.
Also, the bill does not expressly repeal or amend the federal Wire Act, or
preempt any state laws banning any types of gambling or internet gambling.
However, the bill provides that "It shall be a defense against any prosecution
or enforcement action under any Federal or State law against any person
possessing a valid license under this subchapter that the activity is authorized
under and has been carried out lawfully under the terms of this subchapter".
See, story
titled "Rep. Frank Introduces Bill to Facilitate Licensed Internet Gambling"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,574, May 3, 2007.
Witness Testimony. Jon Prideaux (Asterion Payments) previously worked for Visa
in Europe, and is now a consultant. He wrote in his
prepared testimony [10 pages in PDF] that "Gambling is a legal, regulated
business in the UK and in a number of other European countries."
In addition, he wrote that "The UK Government has an explicit strategy to try
to make the UK a jurisdiction of choice for Internet gambling companies", and
that "Gaming operators are some of the largest companies in the country."
He continued that internet gambling is "regulated and taxed by
the UK Government".
He argued that "at all stages of the process, precisely because
the Internet gambling environment takes place in the electronic environment, the
degree of control that can be applied far exceeds that which can be applied in
the face to face environment where cash is the normal currency. Internet
gamblers cannot be anonymous and all the activity that they undertake can be
regulated and controlled through a variety of different processes."
Gerald Kitchen, CEO of SecureTrading
Ltd., a UK company that operates a financial payments business that
specializes in the processing and settlement of internet payments, wrote in his
prepared testimony [12 pages in PDF] that his company supports HR 2046.
He wrote that "From the text of the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement
Act of 2007 certain financial transactions are likely to be permitted. To the extent that
this is the case, I respectfully offer to the Committee that there is, today, the
technological and process capability in place to permit those legal transactions to occur
-- with protections in place to prohibit underage or compulsive gambling, organized crime,
money laundering and fraud."
Jeff Schmidt, CEO Authis, a provider of identity
and security-related products and services to the financial industry, wrote in his
prepared testimony [3 pages in PDF] that verifying the age and geographic
location of internet gamblers is difficult.
He wrote that "When considering the proposed legislation, it is critical to consider
that Internet age verification can not be done reliably and as such one must conclude that
motivated minors will in fact easily and regularly circumvent the system."
He also wrote that "reliable determination of the geographic location of
individuals/devices on The Internet is simply not possible."
Greg Hogan Sr., a Baptist pastor, wrote in his
prepared testimony [PDF] that his son is "in prison for a robbery he
committed to feed his online gambling addiction".
Radley Balko (Reason Magazine) wrote in his
prepared
testimony [PDF] that "What Americans do in their own homes with their own money on
their own time is none of the federal government's business."
See also,
prepared testimony [4 pages in PDF] of Michael Colopy (Aristotle, Inc.).
|
|
|
5th Circuit Rules in Speech
Case |
6/7. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(5thCir) issued its
opinion [16 pages in PDF] in Pruett v. Harris County, a first
amendment freedom of speech case. The Court of Appeals accepted most parts of a
constitutional challenge to a Texas statute that prevented bail bondsmen from
notifying persons of arrest warrant information that Texas publishes on the internet.
However, the Court upheld the statute's ban on communications after 9:00 PM.
Carl Pruett and Scott Martin are bail bondsmen. Harris County is a political
subdivision of the state of Texas. Houston is in Harris County. It maintains and
publishes the Harris County Justice Information Management System (JIMS), which
is accessible via the internet. It contains, among other things, names and
addresses of persons arrested and subjects of arrest warrants. Although, Harris
County delays publication of arrest warrant information information for 48 after
issuance of the warrant. Pruett and Martin use this JIMS data to notify persons
of their bail bond services.
The state of Texas enacted a statute that limits the legality of this
practice. The statute provides that "A bail bond surety,
an agent of a corporate surety or an employee of the surety or agent may not
make, cause to be made, or benefit from unsolicited contact:
(1) through any means, including in person, by telephone, by electronic
methods, or in writing, to solicit bonding business related to an individual
with an outstanding arrest warrant that has not been executed, unless the bail
bond surety or agent for a corporate surety has an existing bail bond on the
individual; or
(2) in person or by telephone to solicit bonding business: (A) that
occurs between the hours of 9 p.m. and 9 a.m.; or (B) within 24 hours after: (i)
the execution of an arrest warrant on the individual; or (ii) an arrest without
a warrant on the individual."
The rationale of the legislature is primarily public safety. That is, if
persons are notified by bail bondsmen that there are outstanding warrants, they
become flight risks, they are more likely to physically harm officers or others,
and they are more likely to destroy evidence.
Yet, the statute restricts communications regarding information that the
state has already made publicly available on the internet; it restricts
communications after arrest; it also restricts communications in situations
where the state has sent notice to a person that there is an arrest warrant.
The other rationale is protection of privacy of the persons contacted
by bail bondsmen.
Pruett and Martin filed a complaint in
U.S. District Court (SDTex) against
Harris County and the Harris County Bail Bond Board alleging, among other
things, violation of the First Amendment free speech clause.
The District Court granted summary judgment to the Pruetts and enjoined
enforcement of the statute.
The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part.
The Supreme Court has created classes of speech, including commercial speech.
See, Central Hudson Gas &
Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980), in which
the Supreme Court described a four prong test to be applied to commercial speech.
The Supreme Court wrote, "In commercial speech cases, then, a four-part
analysis has developed. At the outset, we must determine whether the expression
is protected by the First Amendment. For commercial speech to come within that
provision, it at least must concern lawful activity and not be misleading. Next,
we ask whether the asserted governmental interest is substantial. If both
inquiries yield positive answers, we must determine whether the regulation
directly advances the governmental interest asserted, and whether it is not more
extensive than is necessary to serve that interest."
However, while the speech in the present case relates to bail, and the 8th
Amendment provides that "Excessive bail shall not be required ...", the Court of
Appeals held that the speech at issue is commercial speech. Hence, it accorded
it a lower level of protection, pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion in
Central Hudson.
The Court of Appeals also determined that the restraint at issue is not
content based.
The Court of Appeals held that the first part of the statute, which restricts
communications to only those persons with whom the bondsmen already does
business, fails to satisfy the Central Hudson test.
The Court of Appeals also held that the second part of the statute's 24 hour
communications ban also fails to satisfy the Central Hudson test.
However, it held that the second part of the statute's ban on communications
after 9:00 PM survives Central Hudson scrutiny.
This case is Carl Pruett and Scott Martin v. Harris County Bail Bond Board
and Harris County, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, D.C. No. No.
05-20714, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Texas. Judge Higginbotham wrote the opinion of Court of Appeals, in
which Judges Wiener and Clement joined.
|
|
|
DC Circuit Rules in Challenge to FCC
Imposition of US Taxes on Interconnected VOIP |
6/1. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(DCCir) issued its
opinion
[22 pages in PDF] in Vonage v. FCC, vacating part of the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) June 21, 2006
text [151
pages in PDF] imposing universal service taxes on interconnected voice over internet
protocol (VOIP) providers. The Court of Appeals held that the FCC has statutory authority
to tax VOIP service providers. However, it granted the petition for review, and vacated in
part, because it found the FCC's "explanation wanting as to the pre-approval of traffic
studies and the suspension of the carrier's carrier rule".
FCC Order Under Review. On June 21, 2006, the FCC adopted its
Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. It provided, among other
things, that the FCC will tax interconnected VOIP providers. This expands
the entities taxed to pay for the FCC's universal service subsidy program. This
item also raises taxes on wireless service provides. However, it does not
address the subsidy side of the program.
This order requires "interconnected VoIP services" to pay universal service
taxes. It further states that the FCC has defined "interconnected VoIP services"
as "those VoIP services that: (1) enable real-time, two-way voice communications; (2)
require a broadband connection from the user’s location; (3) require IP-compatible customer
premises equipment; and (4) permit users to receive calls from and terminate calls to the
PSTN." The FCC's order also sets the percentage of revenues subject to taxation, and
raises the rate at which wireless providers are taxed.
See, story
titled "FCC to Tax Interconnected VOIP Service Providers" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,397, June 22, 2006. The FCC released the text of this order on June 28, 2006.
See, story titled "FCC Releases Order and NPRM Regarding VOIP and Universal Service
Taxes" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,403, June 30, 2006. This order is FCC 06-94
in Docket Nos. 06-122, 04-36, 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170.
The Court of Appeals held that the FCC "has statutory authority to require VoIP
providers to make USF contributions". The Court also wrote that the FCC "acted
reasonably in analogizing VoIP to wireline toll service for purposes of setting the
presumptive percentage of VoIP revenues generated interstate and internationally".
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin stated
in a release that "I am pleased that the Court has affirmed the Commission's action
which ensures that USF contribution obligations are administered in a competitively and
technologically neutral manner on all phone providers, including interconnected Voice over
Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers."
Walter McCormick, head of the US Telecom, stated
in a
release that this opinion "is a victory for the
FCC and universal service. While the court had questions with some of the minor
mechanical parts of the order, this ruling reaffirms that VoIP providers must
continue to contribute to universal service. The decision is great news for
consumers and will help secure the future for universal service."
|
|
|
People and Appointments |
6/7. Johnnie Frazier, Inspector General of the
Department of Commerce (DOC), resigned. See, Frazier's
letter [PDF] to President Bush. See also, story titled "House Commerce Committee
Leaders Write Gutierrez about Alleged Misconduct in Department of Commerce OIG" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,572, May 1, 2007. Rep. Bart
Stupak (D-MI), Chairman of the House Commerce
Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, stated in a
release
that "Johnnie Frazier's resignation merely confirms our worst fears that the
fraud and misconduct at the office runs from the top on down throughout the
ranks of the office ... Our investigation has already confirmed some of the
allegations beyond this first one dealing with whistleblower retaliation that
caused his forced resignation. For example, we have confirmed the trip by
Johnnie Frazier and five of his subordinates to Atlantic City to gamble while on
government time and per diem. Instead of attending a government sponsored
conference, apparently the Inspector General and his staff thought their time
would be better spent on slots and roulette. We are not done with this allegation nor the
myriad other complaints we continue to receive about him and his office."
6/7. William Archey, head of the AeA,
will retire. The AeA has not yet named a replacement. AeA is an acronym for
American Electronics Association, a name no longer used by the group.
6/7. The Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC)
approved the nomination of
Robert James Jonker to be a
Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Michigan. See, Congressional Record, June 7, 2007, at Page S7332.
6/5. The Senate confirmed James Glassman to be a member of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors for a term
expiring on August 13, 2007, and to be its Chairman. See, Congressional
Record, June 5, 2007, at Page S7096.
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Monday, June 11 |
The Senate will meet at 2:00 PM for morning business.
The House will meet at 12:30 PM for
morning hour, and at 2:00 PM for legislative business. It will consider
several non-technology related items under suspension of the rules. Votes will
be postponed until 6:30 PM. See, Rep. Hoyer's
weekly calendar [PDF]. 1:00 PM. The
Fiber to the Home Council (FTTH) will host a web seminar titled "Presenting
on Next-Generation: FTTH Architectures and Enabling Technologies". See,
notice, with registration and
call in information.
5:30 PM. The
House Appropriations Committee's
Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, and Science will meet to mark up its
FY 2008 appropriations bill. The meeting will begin after the conclusion of an
unrelated full committee markup scheduled for 5:30 PM. Location: Room 2358,
Rayburn Building.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to
its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding installation of smaller antennas by
Fixed Service (FS) operators. This NPRM is FCC 07-38 in WT Docket No. 07-54. See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 25, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 79, at Pages
20494-20499.
|
|
|
Tuesday, June 12 |
The House will meet at 9:00 AM for morning
hour, and at 10:00 AM for legislative business. It will consider HRes 455
[LOC], a resolution
regarding "National Internet Safety Month", under suspension of the rules, and
HR __, the FY 2008 appropriations bill for the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), subject to a rule.
See, Rep. Hoyer's
weekly calendar [PDF].
10:00 AM. The Senate Finance
Committee (SFC) will hold a hearing titled "Trade
Enforcement for a 21st Century Economy". The witnesses will be Dan
Glickman (Motion Picture Association of America),
Jennifer Hillman (Georgetown Law School),
Robert Lighthizer
(Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom), and Erik Autor (National
Retail Federation). See,
notice.
Location: Room 215, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "Universal Service Fund: Assessing
the Recommendations of the Federal-State Joint Board".
The witnesses will be
Deborah Tate (Federal
Communications Commission), John Rooney (P/CEO of U.S. Cellular), Roger Nishi
(Chairman of OPASTCO), Jonathan Foxman (P/CEO of Chinook Wireless), Joel Lubin
(AT&T), and Everett Flannery (Kennebec County Sheriff's Office). See,
notice. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Department of State's (DOS)
International
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet regarding U.S. positions for a
meeting of the Organization of American States Inter American Telecommunication Commission
(CITEL) Permanent Consultative Committee II (Radiocommunication) which will prepare for
the International Telecommunication Union World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC07). See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 30, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 103, at Page
30045. Location: undisclosed.
12:15 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Mass Media Committee will host a brown bag
lunch titled "DTV Transition: 88 Weeks and Counting". The speakers will
be Andrew Long (Associate Chief of the FCC's Media Bureau), Eloise Gore (Assistant Chief
of the FCC's Media Bureau's Policy Division), Evan Baranoff (Attorney Advisor in
the FCC's Media Bureau's Policy Division), Gordon Godfrey (FCC's Media
Bureau's Engineering Division), Nazifa Sawez (FCC's Media Bureau's Video
Division), and Alan Stillwell (Senior Associate Chief of the FCC's Office of
Engineering and Technology). For more information contact David O'Connor at
david dot oconnor at hklaw dot com or 202-828-1889 or Erin Dozier at edozier
at sheppardmullin dot com or 202-772-5312. Location: Holland & Knight, lower
level, 2099 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
1:00 - 3:00 PM. The
House Science Committee (HSC) will hold a hearing
titled "The Globalization of R&D and Innovation". See,
notice. Location: Room 2318, Rayburn Building.
2:30 PM. The Senate Commerce
Committee's (SCC) Subcommittee on Interstate Commerce, Trade, and Tourism will hold
a hearing titled "U.S. Trade Relations with China". See,
notice. Location: Room 256, Russell Building.
2:30 PM. The
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's Subcommittee
on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District
of Columbia will hold a hearing titled "Assessing Telework Policies and
Initiatives in the Federal Government". See,
notice. Location: __.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal Communications
Bar Association's (FCBA) State and Local Practice Committee will host a
continuing legal education (CLE) seminar titled "State Legislative Update".
The price to attend ranges from $50 to $125. See,
registration form
[PDF]. Registrations are due by 5:00 PM on June 8. Location:
undisclosed.
|
|
|
Wednesday, June 13 |
10:00 AM. The
House Foreign Affairs
Committee's Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade
will hold a hearing titled "The United States-South Korea FTA: The Foreign
Policy". The witnesses will be Karan Bhatia (Deputy U.S. Trade
Representative) and Christopher Hill (Department of State). See,
notice. Location: Room 2237, Rayburn Building.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its request for comments
regarding Google's proposals regarding service rules for the 700 MHz band. The FCC
states that "Google requests that the Commission clarify the service rules governing
the 700 MHz bands and declare that the rules allow the use of ``dynamic auction
mechanisms´´ such as real-time auctions and per-device registration fees. Google also
requests that the Commission posit at least whether it would be in the public interest to
mandate the use of such mechanisms for some, or even all, of the commercial spectrum to be
auctioned in the 700 MHz bands. The document also seeks comment on Google's proposal
that the unpaired 6 megahertz E Block (722-728 MHz) in the current Lower 700 MHz band plan
should be designated primarily or exclusively to be used for deployment of broadband
communications platforms.". This item is DA 07-2197 in WT Docket No. 06-150, WT Docket
No. 06-169, PS Docket No. 06-229, and WT Docket No. 96-86. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 30, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 103, at Pages
29930-29933.
|
|
|
Thursday, June 14 |
8:30 AM - 4:00 PM. Day one of a two day hearing of
the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. This hearing will
focus on the consequences of China's energy consumption. See,
notice in the Federal Register: May 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 99, at Page
29042. Location: Room 385, Russell Building, Capitol Hill.
The 10:00 AM. The Senate
Judiciary Committee (SJC) may hold an executive business meeting. The agenda includes
consideration of an "Authorization of Subpoenas in Connection with Investigation
of Legal Basis for Warrantless Wiretap Program", consideration of S 1145
[PDF
| LOC |
WW],
the "Patent Reform Act of 2007", and consideration of the nomination of
Leslie Southwick to be a Judge of the U.S.
Court of Appeals (5thCir). The SJC rarely follows its published agenda. See,
notice.
Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The
Senate Commerce Committee (SCC) will hold a hearing titled "The 700 MHz
Auction: Public Safety and Competition". See,
notice. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
10:00 AM. The
House Ways and Means Committee
will hold a hearing on the Trade Adjustment Assistance program. See,
notice. Location: Room 1100, Longworth Building.
2:00 - 3:00 PM. The President's
National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) will meet by
teleconference. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 29, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 250, at
Page 78451.
|
|
|
Friday, June 15 |
9:00 - 10:30 AM. The
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host a debate
titled "Is the United States Falling Behind in Broadband? If so, What
Should We Do About It?" The speakers will be Robert Atkinson (ITIF) and
Scott Wallsten (Progress and Freedom Foundation). Breakfast will be served.
Location: Lisagor Room, National Press Club, 529 14th St., NW.
9:30 AM - 4:00 PM. Day two of a two day hearing of
the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. This hearing will
focus on the consequences of China's energy consumption. See,
notice in the Federal Register: May 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 99, at Page
29042. Location: Room 385, Russell Building, Capitol Hill.
9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. The
Copyright Office (CO) will hold a
public roundtable regarding
17
U.S.C. § 115 and "the use of the statutory license to make and distribute digital
phonorecords, including for a limited period, and to make phonorecords that facilitate
streaming". See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 30, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 103, at Pages
30039-30042. Location: Copyright Office Hearing Room, Library of Congress,
Room LM-408, 4th Floor, Madison Building, 101 Independence Ave., SE.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding its collection of data on broadband deployment.
This NPRM is FCC 07-17 in WC Docket No. 07-38. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 16, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 94, at Pages
27519-27535.
Deadline to submit to the the
Copyright Office (CO) written or e-mail
notifications of intent to testify at the CO's hearings on July 23 through July 26
regarding the operation of, and continued necessity for, the cable and satellite
statutory licenses under the Copyright Act. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 99, at Pages
28998-29000.
|
|
|
Monday, June 18 |
12:00 NOON. The Cato
Institute will host a panel discussion titled "Trade
Promotion Authority, R.I.P.?". The speakers will be former Rep. Cal Dooley
(D-CA) and Dan Griswold (Cato). Lunch will be served. See,
notice and registration
page. Location: Room B-339, Rayburn Building.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. The American
Enterprise Institute (AEI) will host a panel discussion titled "Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Impairing Corporate Risk-Taking?". The speakers will be Kenneth Lehn,
Leonce Bargeron and Chad Zutter (all from the University of Pittsburgh's Katz
Graduate School of Business), Charles Calomiris (AEI), Allen Ferrell (Harvard
Law School), Kate Litvak (University of Texas at Austin School of Law), and
Peter Wallison (AEI). See,
notice. Location: AEI ____.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) regarding FCC regulation of exclusive contracts for the provision of video
services to multiple dwelling units (MDUs) and other real estate developments. The FCC
adopted this NPRM on March 22, 2007, and released the
text
[19 pages in PDF] on March 27. See, stories titled "FCC Adopts MDU Forced Access
NPRM" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,556, March 26, 2007, and "FCC Releases
MDU NPRM" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,557, March 27, 2007. See also,
notice in the Federal Register, April 18, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 74, at Pages
19448-19453. This NPRM is FCC 07-33 in Docket 07-51.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to
its request for comments updating its record on the Center for the Study of Commercialism's
(CSC) Petition for Reconsideration regarding stations that air home shopping programming
and their status. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 17, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 95, at Pages
27811-27813.
|
|
|
More News |
6/7. The U.S. District Court (DC) issued a
Memorandum
Opinion [10 pages in PDF] in Worldwide Network Services v.
DynCorp International, a case arising out of contracts to provide
communications and information technology services in Iraq and Afghanistan. This
opinion only addresses the effect of forum selection clauses. The District Court
(DC) transferred this case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia. This case is Worldwide Network Services, LLC v. DynCorp
International, et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia,
D.C. No. 06-1717-RJL, Judge Richard Leon presiding.
6/7. The House Judiciary Committee's
(HJC) Subcommittee on Crime approved HR 660 [LOC |
WW],
the "Court Security Improvement Act of 2007". This bill contains one notable
provision that is unrelated to court security. It would amend
28 U.S.C. § 296, by a adding the following: "However, a judge who has
retired from regular active service under section 371(b) of this title, when
designated and assigned to the court to which such judge was appointed, shall
have all the powers of a judge of that court, including participation in
appointment of court officers and magistrates, rulemaking, governance, and
administrative matters." In addition, this bill would amend
28 U.S.C. § 631 to also allow retired judges to participate in the selection
of Magistrate Judges. The full Committee is scheduled to mark up this bill on
June 13, 2007. The companion bill in the Senate is S 378 [LOC |
WW]. The
Senate approved this bill on April 19, 2007 by a vote of 97-0. See,
Roll Call No. 135.
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2007
David Carney,
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved. |
|
|