Secretary Chertoff Addresses Integrated
Public Alert and Warning System |
5/20. Secretary of Homeland Security
Michael Chertoff gave a
speech in
Washington DC regarding hurricane preparedness. He discussed the
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS).
Chertoff (at left) stated that "This goes beyond the typical radio and
TV-based alert system to one that allows Internet-based warning and cell
phone-based, text message based, warning with an opt-in feature."
He continued that "We piloted this system last year in the Gulf. It worked
very well. It is not terribly expensive. We are going to be encouraging the
governors of the states in the hurricane areas to sign up for this system. I
think it's only a few million dollars, and there's even some of our grant money.
If they want to use some of that, they can do it. But we're providing them with
a tool that will enhance their ability to reach out to the members of their
community - particularly people who may be hearing-impaired - and give them
notice if there's any kind of an event. And they need to step up to the plate
and accept this invitation; and we're going to be encouraging them to do that."
He also said in response to a question that the DHS will "build into the
plans alternative language capabilities for warning, and we did that with the
IPAWS system last year. Warning capability for the hearing-impaired. People can
sign up if they want a text message."
"And so we built this system. It's out there", said Chertoff.
Most of the facilities that carry these warnings were built by, and are owned
by broadcasters, carriers, and other private sector entities. Much of the
rulemaking and enforcement activities have been conducted by the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Moreover, Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO)
addresses IPAWS as a future program that is being developed, and should be
expanded into more communications technologies. See, related story in this issue
titled "Rep. Graves Introduces
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Bill".
Chertoff continued that "It can be contracted for. What we want to do is urge
the states. Ultimately we'd like every state to do this."
Finally, Chertoff said that "We're saying we got this. The system works. We've tested
it. It's available. I think depending on the nature of the state and exactly how fully
configured the system you buy is, it's 2 to $3 million per year. It's not a lot of money.
And warning, anybody will tell you is the key. If you get - the more people who are warned
and take steps in advance the better off you are in response. I can't see a reason why a
governor wouldn't sign up for this to be honest with you."
David Paulison,
Administrator of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS)
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) also spoke. He added that "I don't know
why a governor would not want to be able to warn everybody in the state if there was
something bad happening. Just last week we had a tornado that went through Pitcher, Oklahoma
and into Seneca, Missouri."
He added there were people in cars who did not receive warning, but that "if
there was a warning system out there that could access your Blackberry, your
cell phone, or your car radio, or satellite radio which everybody listens to
now. So somebody could have activated that and said there's a tornado; get out
of your car."
|
|
|
Rep. Graves Introduces
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Bill |
5/13. Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO) introduced
HR 6038 [LOC |
WW], the
"Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2008".
Rep.
Graves (at right) issued a
release
that states that this bill would "modernize the nation’s public warning and
alert system in order to allow officials to more effectively warn those
threatened by disasters".
Introduction. The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), which is a part of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), has a web page
titled "Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS)". The FEMA states that
it conceives that this IPAWS will be the "next generation public communications and
warning capability".
HR 6038 is a vaguely worded bill that would provide the FEMA further statutory authority
and guidance for expanding and integrating this IPAWS. In particular, it would expand
the methods and "technologies" used by the government to send communications to the
public regarding hurricanes, tornadoes, disasters, and other unspecified things.
The bill does not list these "technologies".
Most of the entities that would create alerts, warnings, and forecasts, such as the
National Weather Service (NWS), are governmental.
However, most of the entities that make and operate the equipment, devices, networks, software
and technologies that would carry or publish these communications are private sector entities.
The bill is vague as to what authority the FEMA, or other government agencies, would have to
write regulations and impose mandates upon these private sector entities.
The bill is vague as to whether or not the FEMA would have authority to mandate the design
of networks, equipment, consumer devices, software, protocols and procedures to accommodate
this IPAWS. It is also vague as to how much authority the FEMA would have to compel service
providers to publish or carry these IPAWS communications.
This bill only addresses communications that go from the government to the public. It
does not address public to the government communications, such as the existing 911 and E911
systems and regulatory regimes.
Nor does the bill address what categories of information should be included
in alerts and warnings, what persons or entities would be able to send alerts or
warnings, or what entity would serve as a gateway for the origination of alerts.
The bill was referred to the House
Transportation Committee (HTC), but not the
House Commerce Committee (HCC). Rep. Graves
is a member of the HTC, but not the HCC. The bill provides that it does not affect
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or NWS authority.
If it did, the HCC would also have jurisdiction.
Bill Summary. The bill recites in its findings that "numerous technologies
exist to enable the Federal Government to vastly enhance its public alert and warning
system". However, it does not identify any of these "technologies".
The bill also finds that "the Federal Government should modernize its alert
and warning system to improve its ability to alert the residents of the United
States of all potential hazards under all conditions".
The bill would amend
42 U.S.C. § 5132, which pertains to "Disaster Warnings". This statute currently
requires federal agencies to issue warnings.
Moreover, the statute currently provides that "The President is authorized to enter
into agreements with the officers or agents of any private or commercial communications
systems who volunteer the use of their systems on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis
for the purpose of providing warning to governmental authorities and the civilian population
endangered by disasters."
However, nothing in Section 5132 mandates that any broadcaster, carrier or other entity
that might send or publish warnings must participate in any federal program.
The bill would add a new subsection 5132(e) titled "Integrated Public Alert and
Warning System Modernization". It would provide that the FEMA "shall ...
modernize the integrated public alert and warning system ... to ensure that the President
under all conditions can alert and warn governmental authorities and the civilian population
in areas endangered by disasters " and "implement the public alert and warning
system ".
It would require the FEMA to "establish or adopt, as appropriate, common alerting
and warning protocols, standards, terminology, and operating procedures for the public alert
and warning system".
It would also require the FEMA to "include in the public alert and warning system
the capability to alert and warn individuals with disabilities and individuals with limited
English proficiency".
This bill provides that this IPAWS "shall ... incorporate multiple communications
technologies" and "be designed to adapt to, and incorporate, future technologies
for communicating directly with the public".
The bill does not elaborate on what types communications would be carried or
published by the IPAWS, and what entity would make determinations regarding
specific communications, or what entity would act as a gateway.
Rep. Graves also stated that his proposal would "enable officials at all levels of
government to target their warnings to the right people". Notably, he did not use the
phrase "public safety officials".
The bill would authorize appropriations -- "$37,000,000 for fiscal year
2009 and such sums as may be necessary for each fiscal
year thereafter". There is nothing in the bill about
compensating affected companies or consumers.
The bill adds that "Nothing in this Act (including the amendment made
by this Act) shall be construed to affect the authority of the Department of
Commerce or the Federal Communications Commission." (Parentheses in
original.) Both the NWS, which issues weather alerts, and the
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA), which has spectrum management authority, are a part
of the Department of Commerce.
What Technologies? There is no mention in the bill of terrestrial broadcasters,
satellite radio, internet radio, cell phone service, multichannel video programming
distributors (MVPDs), telecommunications services, voice over internet protocol services,
internet access services, e-mail services, online social networking services, IP based news
products or services, or anything else.
However, Rep. Graves
stated in his
release that
his bill would cover "modern technologies like cell phones, reverse 911, email, text
messages, and satellite radio and television". He did not elaborate on the meaning of
"reverse 911".
Also, the FEMA states its understanding in its web site. It states that IPAWS alerts and
warnings will "flow through multiple devices, such as cell phones, pagers, satellite
television/radio, landline phones, desktop computers, personal digital assistants, and road
signs. These live or pre-recorded messages may be sent via audio, video or text in multiple
languages, including American Sign Language and Braille."
TLJ asked an HTC aide if the bill would cover interactive computer services,
or social networking web sites, with e-mail functions. He stated that there is no effort at the
FEMA to include it, and "at this point, I would have to say no". However, he
added that future inclusion of these technologies in IPAWS is not precluded.
What Authority Would FEMA Have? The bill would require that the FEMA
"shall ... modernize" the IPAWS, and this means that it shall "establish or
adopt" protocols and procedures, and it "shall ... incorporate multiple
communications technologies".
But, the bill does not specify whether this means that the FEMA can write
regulations. The language in the bill stating that FCC authority is unaffected
by this bill suggests that the FCC could not write implementing regulations.
Nor does the bill state whether or not the FEMA can enforce those regulations
against any particular company, industry sector, or the developer, or producer
or user of any technology.
TLJ asked the HTC aide about new FEMA authority under this bill. He said that "there
are systems in place today, and there are legal authorities in place." He elaborated on
the EAS, NAWS, and CMAS. See, related story in this issue titled "Summary of Public
Alert and Warning Systems".
But, he said that this bill would create no new mandates.
Compensation? There is nothing in the bill about compensating affected
companies or consumers for converting to new equipment, or redesigning and
rebuilding, to come into compliance with the IPAWS.
TLJ asked the HTC aide if the bill contemplates compensation to private
sector entities for the costs of coming into compliance with IPAWS requirements.
He said that the authorization for appropriations in the bill is only for the
FEMA, and not for private sector compensation.
However, he added that in the past some IPAWS pilot programs have provided
public funding for hardening repeater sites.
He concluded that although equipment conversions may be needed, since there
are no mandates under this bill, there will not likely be any public funding for
private sector conversions.
Congressional Jurisdiction. There are multiple committees in the House and Senate
with jurisdiction over legislation and oversight related to alerts and warnings.
For example, in the House, the House
Transportation Committee (HTC) has jurisdiction
over national disasters. This derives from the historic role of the federal
government in rebuilding damaged bridges, roads and other things.
The House Commerce Committee (HCC)
has jurisdiction over communications, carriers, commercial spectrum, the FCC,
NTIA, and much of the Department of Commerce.
However, the House Science Committee
(HSC)
has jurisdiction over the NOAA and its NWS.
The House Judiciary Committee (HJC) has
jurisdiction over crime issues, including bills that create crime related public
alert programs, such as Amber Alerts. This program was created by the
"Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children
Today Act ", or "PROTECT Act" in 2003. See,
story
titled "House and Senate Pass Conference Report on Child Protection Bill" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 642, April 11, 2003.
The House Appropriations Committee
has jurisdiction over funding for all of these activities.
|
|
|
Summary of Public Alert and
Warning Systems |
5/20. This article offers an overview of various federal warning programs and
systems, and their acronyms, including the EAS, CMAS, NAWS, and IPAWS.
The US has long had an
Emergency Alert System (EAS). It is an old system based upon broadcasting. Until 1994, it
was named the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS). The Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS)
is a new system, required by the WARN Act in 2006. It is currently being developed for cell
phones and other mobile devices. The National Alert and Warnings System (NAWS) is the term
for all alert and warning systems used in an Executive Order in 2006. The Integrated Public
Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) is a term used to describe all alert and warning
systems.
The Federal Communications Commission's
(FCC) web site states that the Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a "national
public warning system that requires broadcasters, cable television systems, wireless cable
systems, satellite digital audio radio service (SDARS) providers and, direct broadcast
satellite (DBS) service providers to provide the communications capability to the President
to address the American public during a National emergency. The system also may be used by
state and local authorities to deliver important emergency information such as AMBER alerts
and weather information targeted to a specific area." See, FCC's Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau's web page
titled "Emergency Alert System".
The EAS is created by statute, and implemented by the FCC,
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and National
Weather Service (NWS).
TLJ spoke with a House Transportation
Committee (HTC) aide who elaborated that certain broadcasters and others are required to
have certain equipment. Moreover, carrying a Presidential message is mandatory.
This would include such things as a warning of a nuclear attack. However, he
said that this has never been activated.
In contrast, the HTC aide explained, carrying local communications, such as
tornado and hurricane warnings, is voluntary.
The FCC promulgates, and enforces, rules implementing the EAS. In 2005, it
expanded the EAS from analog television and radio to include participation by
digital television broadcasters, digital cable television providers, digital
broadcast radio, Digital Audio Radio Service (DARS), and Direct Broadcast
Satellite (DBS) systems.
On May 31, 2007, the FCC
adopted a Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the
existing EAS, and a "next-generation national EAS". It released the
text [75
pages in PDF] on July 12, 2007. This item is FCC 07-109 in EB Docket No. 04-296.
The FCC also hosted a meeting on April 10, 2008, regarding the current and future EAS.
See, FCC
notice.
The Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS) was created by the WARN Act in 2006, and
is still being implemented by the FCC. This expands government alerts to cell phones and
other mobile devices. The FCC is setting technical requirements. It is a voluntary program
in which carriers can choose whether or not to participate.
The Congress enacted the "Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act", or
"WARN Act", as part of
HR 4954 (109th
Congress), the port security bill, which is now Public Law No. 109-347. The WARN Act begins
at Section 601 of the bill.
The WARN Act requires the FCC to promulgate Commercial Mobile Service Alert (CMSA)
regulations. The FCC adopted and released its
Report and Order [62 pages in PDF] on April 9, 2008, that announces, recites, and
explains its Commercial Mobile Alert Service (CMAS) regulations.
FCC Commissioner
Michael Copps (at left) wrote in a
statement [PDF] associated with this R&O that there remains an unresolved
problem. There is no agency in place to originate the alerts. He wrote that
"there is one final issue that remains unresolved by today’s Order -- an issue
that, if left uncorrected, threatens to vitiate it entirely. So far, no federal
agency has stepped up to fulfill the unified aggregator/gateway role that
virtually all stakeholders agree is necessary for our mobile alert system to
work properly."
The National Alert and Warnings System (NAWS) is a term used in
Executive Order No.
13407, issued by President Bush on June 26, 2006. This order was published
in the Federal Register, June 28, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 124, at Pages 36975-36977.
This executive order states that "It
is the policy of the United States to have an effective, reliable, integrated,
flexible, and comprehensive system to alert and warn the American people in
situations of war, terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other hazards to
public safety and well-being (public alert and warning system), taking
appropriate account of the functions, capabilities, and needs of the private
sector and of all levels of government in our Federal system, and to ensure that
under all conditions the President can communicate with the American people."
(Parentheses in original.)
This order, among other things, directs the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to "establish or adopt, as
appropriate, common alerting and warning protocols, standards, terminology, and
operating procedures for the public alert and warning system to enable
interoperability and the secure delivery of coordinated messages to the American
people through as many communication pathways as practicable, taking account of
Federal Communications Commission rules as provided by law".
The Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) is a term used
by the DHS, FEMA, and others to refer to the collection and integration of
current and future alert and warning systems.
The HTC aide with whom TLJ spoke explained that the EAS,
NAWS, and CMAS are all part of the IPAWS.
Also, it should be noted that information that might be included in alerts
and warning could come from a variety of agencies other than the FEMA and other
components of the DHS. The
Department of Commerce's (DOC) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's
(NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS)
provides, among other things, weather forecasts and warnings. The Department of
Defense (DOD) provides defense information.
AMBER Alert information comes from a variety of sources.
|
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Tuesday, May 20 |
The House will meet at 9:00 AM for morning hour
debate, and at 10:00 AM for legislative business. See, Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week of May 19.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee's (SJC) Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law will hold a hearing titled
"Global Internet Freedom: Corporate Responsibility and the Rule of Law".
The witnesses will Nicole Wong (Deputy General Counsel of Google), Michael Samway (Deputy
General Counsel of Yahoo), Mark Chandler (General Counsel of Cisco Systems), Arvind Ganesan
(Human Rights Watch), and Shiyu Zhou
(Global Internet Freedom Consortium).
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) will preside. See,
notice.
Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM - 4:15 PM. The U.S.-China
Economic and Security Review Commission will hold a hearing titled "China's
Proliferation Practices and the Development of its Cyber and Space Warfare
Capabilities". See,
notice in the Federal Register, April 28, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 82, at Pages 23005-23006.
Location: Room 562, Dirksen Building, Capitol Hill.
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Wireline and International Practice Committees
will host a brown bag lunch titled "Functional Separation proposals under the
European Commission review of the European Union’s Framework Directive". The
speakers may include Sheba Chacko (BT), Wolfgang Jakubek (Deutsche Telecom),
Scott Harris (Harris Wiltshire
& Grannis), and Don Stockdale (FCC). For more information, contact Nick Alexander at
Nicholas dot Alexander at fcc dot gov. Location: Akin
Gump, 1333 New Hampshire Ave, NW.
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 21 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative
business. See, Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week of May 19.
10:00 AM. The
House Education and Labor Committee will hold a hearing titled "The
National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Foundations for Success".
Location: Room 2175, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) will meet. The
agenda states that
the SEC "will consider whether to propose amendments to provide for mutual fund
risk/return summary information to be filed with the Commission in interactive data
format". Location: SEC, Room L-002, 100 F St., NE.
11:00 AM. The
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a
business meeting to consider the nomination of Paul Schneider to be
Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). See,
notice. Location: Room S-216, Capitol Building.
12:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Young Lawyers Committee will hold a brown bag
lunch to elect officers and plan. E-mail nominations to Chris Fedeli at chrisfedeli at dwt
dot com and Tarah Grant at tsgrant at hhlaw dot com by Friday, May 9, 2008. See,
notice online registration page. Location: Hogan &
Hartson, 1st floor litigation center, 555 13th St., NW.
1:30 PM. The
House Judiciary Committee's (HJC) Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and
Homeland Security will hold a hearing titled "The FBI Whistleblowers: Exposing
Corruption and Retaliation Inside the Bureau - FBI Counterterrorism Agent". This
hearing will be webcast by the HJC. See,
notice. Location: Room 2141,
Rayburn Building.
? 3:00 PM. The
House Judiciary Committee (HJC) may hold a closed
meeting regarding HR 5889
[LOC |
WW], the
"Orphan Works Act of 2008". Location: Room 2226, Rayburn
Building.
Day one of a two day closed meeting of the Department of Defense's
(DOD) Defense Science Board regarding undisclosed topics. See,
notice in the Federal Register,
April 23, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 79, at Pages 21919-21920. Location: Pentagon,
Arlington, VA.
|
|
|
Thursday, May 22 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative
business. See, Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week of May 19.
9:00 - 10:30 AM. The New
America Foundation (NAF) will host an event titled "Google Unwired: Expanding
Broadband Access and Allocating Spectrum More Efficiently". The speakers will be Larry
Page (Google) and Michael Calabrese (NAF). See,
notice and registration
page. Breakfast will be provided. Location: Ronald Reagan Building, Atrium Ballroom,
1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
10:00 AM. The
Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC) may hold an
executive business meeting. The agenda includes consideration of the nomination of
Elisebeth Cook (to be Assistant Attorney General in charge of the
Office of Legal Policy), William Lawrence (U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana), and Murray Snow (U.S.D.C., District
of Arizona). See,
notice. The SJC rarely follows its published agendas. Location: Room 226, Dirksen
Building.
10:00 AM - 12:00 PM. The House
Science Committee's (HSC) Subcommittee on Investigation and Oversight will hold a
hearing titled "American Decline or Renewal? -- Globalizing Jobs and
Technology". The witnesses will be Ralph Gomory (NYU Stern School of Business),
Margaret Blair (Vanderbilt University Law School), Bruce Scott (Harvard Business School),
James Copland (Copland Fabrics), Joseph Fehsenfeld (Midwest Printed Circuit Service), and
Wes Jurey (Arlington Chamber of Commerce, Arlington, Texas). Location: Room 2318, Rayburn
Building.
10:00 AM. The
Senate Finance Committee (SFC) will hold a hearing on S 1919
[LOC |
WW], the
"Trade Enforcement Act of 2007", a bill to amend the Trade Act of 1974. It would
require the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to report to the Congress on trade
enforcement priorities and actions. It would also create a "WTO Dispute Settlement
Review Commission". It also contains provisions specific to the People's Republic of
China. See, notice. Location: Room 215, Dirksen Building.
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) will hold an event titled "FCC Wireless Legal
Advisors Discuss Recent and Upcoming Matters". The speakers may include Aaron
Goldberger (FCC Chairman Kevin Martin
assistant), Bruce Gottlieb (FCC Commissioner
Michael Copps assistant), Renée
Crittendon (FCC Commissioner Jonathan
Adelstein assistant), Wayne Leighton (FCC Commissioner
Deborah Tate assistant), and Angela
Giancarlo (FCC Commissioner Robert
McDowell assistant). Lunch will be served. The price to attend is $15. See,
notice and registration page. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) web site states that this is an event of the
FCBA's Wireless Practice Committee. Location: Sidley
Austin, 6th floor, 1501 K St., NW.
Day two of a two day closed meeting of the Department of Defense's (DOD)
Defense Science Board regarding undisclosed topics. See,
notice in the Federal Register,
April 23, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 79, at Pages 21919-21920. Location: Pentagon,
Arlington, VA.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications
Commission's (FCC) Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau in response to its Public Notice regarding the request for clarification filed
by Hawk Relay that internet protocol speech to speech (IPSTS) is a form of Telecommunications
Relay Service (TRS). This item is DA 08-292 in CG Docket No. 08-15. See,
notice in the Federal Register,
April 7, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 67, at Page 18796.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) in response to the Media Bureau's public notice (DA 08-752) regarding
changes to its annual reporting forms that request certain employee data from multichannel
video programming distributors (FCC Form 395-A) and broadcasters (FCC Form 395-B). See,
notice in the
Federal Register, April 21, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 77, at Pages 21346-21347.
Extended deadline for voting equipment manufacturers to submit requests
and executed letters of understanding to the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). See,
notice in the Federal Register,
April 22, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 78, at Pages 21590-21591.
|
|
|
Friday, May 23 |
Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week of May 19 states that "no votes are expected in the
House".
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGAB) regarding the National
Exchange Carriers Association's (NECA) proposed compensation rates for interstate
traditional TRS, interstate speech-to-speech (STS), interstate captioned telephone service
(CTS) and interstate and intrastate internet protocol captioned telephone service (IP CTS),
interstate and intrastate IP relay; and interstate and intrastate video relay service (VRS).
See, notice in the
Federal Register, May 12, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 92, at Page 26992-26993. This
proceeding is CG Docket No. 03-123.
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, May 26 |
Memorial Day. See, Office of Personnel Management's (OPM)
list of 2008 federal holidays.
Day one of the House Memorial Day recess. See, Rep. Hoyer's
2008 calendar
[4.25 MB PDF].
The Senate will begin its Memorial Day recess. See, Senate
2008 calendar.
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 27 |
The House will not meet.
The Senate will not meet.
12:15 - 1:45 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) FCC Enforcement Practice Committee will host
a brown bag lunch titled "FCC Indecency Enforcement: Reviewing the Current
Landscape". See,
notice and registration page. Location: Wilmer
Hale, 1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
2:00 - 4:00 PM. The
Department of State's (DOS) Advisory Committee on
International Economic Policy (ACIEP) will meet. See,
notice in the Federal
Register, May 9, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 91, at Pages 26463-26464. Location: Room 1107, DOS,
2201 C St., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Cable Practice and Intellectual Property
Committees will host an event titled "Legal and Regulatory Issues Related to
Internet Video Services". Prices vary. This event qualifies for continuing legal
education (CLE) credits. See,
notice and registration page. Location: Dow Lohnes, 1200 New Hampshire
Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Rep. Lofgren Introduces Bill to Allow
Aliens with Advanced STEM Degrees to Work in US |
5/13. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and others introduce
HR 6039 [LOC |
WW], an untitled
bill to amend the immigration statute to provide that any alien who obtains a masters or Ph.D.
degree from a U.S. university in a STEM field, and has a job offer related to that degree,
shall be admitted for permanent residence.
Rep. Lofgren (at right) stated
in a release that "More
than 50% of the graduates from U.S. universities in masters and Ph.D. programs in science
and engineering are foreign born ... If we want our economy to continue competing in the
global market, we have to retain these foreign students so they compete with us instead
of against us in other countries."
She continued that "These men and women are the innovators of tomorrow, and we
aren’t the only ones looking to retain their talents. Increasingly, employers from Europe,
Australia, Canada, and even China and India, are beating U.S. employers for valuable talent.
In 2000, for example, 75% of the world’s engineers were hired by U.S. employers -- just six
years later in 2006, that percentage dropped to 63%."
She concluded that her bill "will
give U.S. employers another tool to recruit the world’s best and brightest."
The bill was referred to the House
Judiciary Committee (HJC). She is a member.
The original cosponsors of the bill are
Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT), Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA), Rep. Chris Carter (R-TX), Rep.
John Conyers (D-MI), Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA), Rep. Anna Eshoo
(D-CA), Rep. Wayne Gilchrist (R-MD), Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA), Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI),
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), Rep. George Miller (D-CA), Rep.
David Reichert (R-WA), Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), Rep. John
Shadegg (R-AZ), Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), and Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA).
Most of these cosponsors represent districts that are home to technology companies,
including those located in the Silicon Valley, Seattle, southern California, and northern
Virginia and Maryland areas.
The bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
It would add to
8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1), which enumerates categories of aliens no subject to
numerical limitations, the following: "Aliens who have earned a master's or
higher degree from a United States institution of higher education (as defined
in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) in a
field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics and who have an offer
of employment from a United States employer in a field related to such degree."
The INA does provide for visas for highly skilled workers, known as H1B
visas. These enable tech companies to employ in the US many aliens who would also be
affected by HR 6039. However, there are annual caps on the number of H1B visas,
which the Congress has varied in recent years. Currently, tech companies report
that they cannot employ all the alien graduates of US universities that they
want, because of the annual limitation.
|
|
|
|
|
More News |
5/20. The U.S. District Court (DC) issued an
order [PDF]
in Covad v. Revonet, denying Revonet's motion for judgment on the pleadings.
This is a breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets action involving customer
lead information. This case is Covad Communications Company v. Revonet, Inc.,
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, D.C. No. 06-1892 (CKK).
5/19. The Supreme Court issue an
Orders
List [8 pages in PDF].
5/15. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a notice in
the Federal Register that announces, describes, and sets the effective date (July 14, 2008)
of, its Report and Order (R&O) regarding regulating of the terms of contracts between
telecommunications carriers and residential multiunit premises owners. The FCC adopted
this R&O on March 19, 2008, and released the
text [30
pages in PDF] on March 21, 2008. This R&O is FCC 08-87 in WT Docket No. 99-217. See,
Federal Register, May 15, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 95, at Pages 28049-28057.
5/13. Rep. Adolphus Towns (D-NY) and
Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY) introduced HR 6044
[LOC |
WW], an untitled
bill to amend the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) to authorize the appropriation of $10
Million per year for fiscal years 2009 through 2015 for "international technical
assistance with respect to foreign consumer protection and competition regimes".
|
|
|
About Tech Law Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
information page.
Contact: 202-364-8882.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2008
David Carney,
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved. |
|
|