House Passes Limited
Analog Broadcast Extension Bill |
12/10. The House passed by unanimous consent, without discussion or
debate, S 3663
[LOC |
WW], the "Short-term Analog Flash and Emergency Readiness Act".
This bill provides an extension of authority to make analog television
broadcasts for 30 days beyond the transition date of February 17, 2009, for
"public safety information and digital transition information".
The Senate passed this bill on November 20, 2008. See, story titled "Senate Passes Bill to Allow Select
Analog Broadcasts for 30 Days After DTV Transition" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert
No. 1,862, November 24, 2008.
This bill is now ready for President Bush's signature.
|
|
|
House Passes Auto
Maker Bail Out Bill |
12/10. The House passed HR 7321
[LOC |
WW], the "The Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act",
by a vote of 237-170. See,
Roll Call
No. 690.
This is a bill to bail out three mismanaged U.S. auto makers (GM, Ford
and Chrysler) and impose further environmental constraints on them.
It was a largely partisan vote. Democrats voted 205-20. Republicans
voted 32-150.
Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD), the House Majority Leader, spoke in the House.
He asserted in his
statement that this is not a "bridge
loan to nowhere". He also said that this bill will make these three
companies "greener".
|
|
|
Rep. Gordon Will
Seek Passage of Nanotech Bill |
12/10. The
National Research Council (NRC) has put on sale a report titled
"Review of the Federal Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related
Environmental, Health, and Safety Research".
The NRC wrote in a
release that there are "serious weaknesses in the government's plan for
research on the potential health and environmental risks posed by nanomaterials,
which are increasingly being used in consumer goods and industry."
Rep. Bart Gordon (D-TN), Chairman of
the House Science Committee (HSC),
responded in a release that "I share many of these concerns". He wrote that he
supports legislation that would require the development of an environmental,
health and safety (EHS) research plan for the federal government's
nanotechnology initiative.
Rep. Gordon and others introduced HR 5940
[LOC |
WW], the "National Nanotechnology Initiative Amendments Act of
2008", on May 1, 2008. The HSC approved this bill on June 4, 2008. The
full House approved it on June 5, 2008. The Senate has not passed it.
Rep. Gordon, who has been re-elected HSC Chairman for the 111th Congress,
added that he will seek passage of similar legislation in
the next Congress, which starts in January.
He concluded that "The enormous promise of nanotechnology will not
be achieved unless any potential risks of the technology are well understood
through a thorough, transparent research process that will both protect the
public health and allay any safety concerns."
|
|
|
Intel Challenges
Korea FTC Order |
12/10. Intel filed a complaint with a court in Korea seeking to set aside
the June antitrust order of the Korea Fair
Trade Commission (KFTC).
The KFTC imposed a corrective order on June 4, 2008. The KFTC released an
English language document titled "Corrective measures against Intel's
abuse of market dominance" on August 8, 2008. It states that "Intel leveraged
its dominant market position in the CPU market to exclude its competitor AMD by
providing various rebates to Samsung Electronics and Sambo Computer, No. 1 and
No. 2 players of the local PC market respectively, conditional on them not
buying CPUs from AMD."
The KFTC applied Article 3-2(5) of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.
Ed Black, head of the Computer &
Communications Industry Association (CCIA), stated in a release that "After
losing on the merits of the case, Intel is now attacking legitimate government
agencies which carefully weighed the balance of the evidence before finding this
business practice violated antitrust laws. It is disappointing they are
criticizing the investigators, rather than taking responsibility for the actions
that have led to investigations around the world."
|
|
|
Whole Foods Files
Complaint Against FTC |
12/8. Whole Foods Markets filed a
complaint [PDF] in U.S. District
Court (DC) against the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) seeking an injunction of the FTC's administrative
proceeding against Whole Foods. The FTC seeks to undo Whole Foods 2007 acquisition of Wild
Oats Markets.
This matter does not involve technology. Whole Foods sells pricey fruits,
vegetables and other groceries. However, this may be significant to technology
companies.
This matter also goes to the procedures used by the FTC to block,
or undo, mergers. These procedures apply to all mergers, including those
involving technology related companies. If Whole Foods prevails, and obtains a precedential opinion that the FTC is not permitted to pursue that procedure that
it now pursues, then this would limit the options available to the FTC.
What is at stake here is whether, and if so, under what circumstances, and pursuant to
what procedure, the FTC can block mergers of technology companies (as well as
other companies) by administrative orders, without having to obtain an order of the District Court.
There are two other federal agencies that exercise antitrust merger review
authority in technology related transactions -- the Department of Justice's
(DOJ) Antitrust Division, and the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The
DOJ, pursuant to its statutory authority, files actions in the District Court to
block or condition mergers. The FCC acts administratively. It has no statutory
authority to conduct antitrust merger reviews, and has slight regard for due
process, but selects and conducts its proceedings in a manner that evades
judicial review.
Whole Foods announced its plans to acquire Wild Oats almost two years ago.
The FTC sought to block the merger. It filed a complaint in District Court
seeking an injunction. The District Court refused to issue an injunction.
The District Court held that there is no distinct PNOS market. Rather, these
are just two grocery store chains out of many competitors in the grocery store
market. In August of 2007 the District Court issued an
order [2 pages in PDF] and a redacted copy of its
Memorandum Opinion [95 page PDF scan; 3.5 MB] denying the FTC's request for
a preliminary injunction. The FTC sought an injunction pending appeal, which the
Court of Appeals denied.
The two chains consummated their merger in August of 2007. Nevertheless, the FTC
persisted.
On July 29, 2008, the U.S. Court of
Appeals (DCCir) issued its redacted and divided
opinion reversing the District Court. See, story titled "DC Circuit Reverses
in FTC v. Whole Foods" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,802, July 29, 2008. On November 21, 2008, the Court of Appeals
issued a
revised opinion [65 pages in PDF].
The FTC now seeks to undo the merger by administrative hearing and order. The
FTC filed an
amended
complaint [11 pages in PDF] on September 8, 2008. It issued a
scheduling order [14 pages in PDF] on September 10 that schedules the
hearing in this matter for February 16, 2009.
In the just filed District Court complaint, Whole Foods has gone back to the
court
to assert that this administrative procedure violates both due process of law and the
Administrative Procedure Act.
This is an new court case. However, it is brought in the same District Court as
the FTC's earlier action. Also, it has been assigned to the same Judge, Paul
Friedman, who rejected the FTC's theory
and denied its injunction request in 2007.
Now, Whole Foods argues that the FTC has already prejudged Whole Foods,
and cannot give it a fair hearing.
The complaint begins with a quote from the
book
[Amazon] titled "Alice in Wonderland":
" `Now for the evidence´, said the King, `and then the sentence.´
`No! said the Queen. `First the sentence, and then the evidence.´ "
The complaint states that the FTC already failed once to obtain an injunction
from the District Court, and now, 18 months later, is "attempting to get a
second bite at the apple by challenging this merger in administrative
proceedings" conducted by the FTC.
The complaint continues that "To the extent this end-run around the
independent federal courts is constitutionally sound at all, it is undeniable
that Whole Foods is entitled to a fair and impartial proceeding that gives Whole
Foods the ability to reasonably and adequately defend itself at trial."
The complaint enumerates numerous deficiencies with the process being
afforded by the FTC. It alleges that the FTC has already prejudged the outcome
before the administrative hearing, that the FTC is not allowing Whole Foods
adequate pre-hearing discovery, that the FTC is not allowing Whole Foods
adequate time to prepare for the hearing.
Whole Foods asks the District Court to terminate the FTC's administrative
proceeding, and order the FTC to proceed with an action against Whole Foods in
the District Court pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTC Act.
Count I pleads violation of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment of
the Constitution based on the FTC's prejudgment and bias. Count II pleads
violation of due process based on an unreasonable scheduling order. Count III
pleads violation of due process based on the FTC's failure to disqualify itself.
Count IV pleads violation of due process based upon all of the above. Count V
pleads violation of the Administrative Procedure Act based upon arbitrary and
capricious conduct. Count VI seeks injunctive relief.
In November, after the Court of Appeals issued its revised opinion, David
Wales, the acting Director of the FTC's
Bureau of Competition, stated in
an FTC release that
opinion "reaffirms that the proper role of the district court in
considering whether to grant the Commission's request for a preliminary
injunction is limited to whether the case raises sufficiently serious and
substantial issues so as to make them fair ground for litigation during the full
trial on the merits in the administrative proceedings."
He continued that "Now that the appellate court has denied Whole Foods’
request for further review, we look forward to presenting our evidence as to why
this merger is unlawful and should be undone at the plenary trial in a few
months. We are also ready to address the public equities in further proceedings
before the district court with the goal of preserving competition in the interim
and ensuring that a meaningful remedy can be obtained."
The complaint was signed by
Lanny Davis of the
Washington DC office of the law firm of Orrick
Herrington & Sutcliffe.
This case is Whole Foods Markets, Inc. v. FTC, U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia, D.C. No. 1:08-cv-02121, Judge Paul
Friedman presiding.
|
|
|
FTC Shuts Down
Scareware Sellers |
12/2. The Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) filed a civil
complaint [21 pages in PDF; 7 MB] in U.S. District Court (DMd) against
numerous defendants alleging violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act in
connection with their fraudulent sale of scareware products.
Also on December 2, the District Court issued an ex parte
temporary restraining order (TRO) [21 pages in PDF].
The defendants are Innovative Marketing, Inc., ByteHosting
Internet Services, LLC, James Reno, Sam Jain, Daniel Sundin, Marc D'Souza, and
Kristy Ross.
Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, which is codified at
15 U.S.C. § 45, provides in part that "Unfair methods of competition in or
affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting
commerce, are hereby declared unlawful."
The complaint alleges that the defendants "operate a massive, Internet-based
scheme that tricks consumers into purchasing computer security software. Known
in Internet parlance as ``scareware,´´ Defendants' software -- and the misleading
Internet advertising used to promote it -- exploits consumers' legitimate concerns
about Internet-based threats like spyware and viruses by issuing false security
or privacy warnings to consumers for the sole purpose of selling software to fix
the imagined problem."
The complaint states that "The Defendants' scareware scheme relies on elaborate and technologically
sophisticated Internet advertisements that Defendants place with advertising
networks and many popular commercial websites. These exploitive ads display to
consumers a ``system scan´´ that invariably detects on consumers' computers a host
of malicious or otherwise dangerous files and programs, including viruses,
spyware, or ``illegal´´ pornography."
"Once the scan is complete, the Defendants urge consumers to download and
install their software to resolve the security or privacy problems detected by
the scanner." Then, this "second, software-based, scan repeats many of the same warnings from the
initial scan and urges consumers to purchase the Defendants' software at a cost
of $39.95 or more to resolve the security or privacy issues found by the
scanner."
But, the complaint alleges, "the scans displayed in the Defendants' Internet advertisements
and by the Defendants' software are an elaborate ruse created to dupe consumers
into purchasing the Defendants' security software products. Although the
Defendants go to great lengths to make the scans appear legitimate, no actual
computer scans take place and the purported virus, spyware, or illegal
pornography purportedly detected by the Defendants' scanners does not exist on
consumers' computers."
The complaint states that over one million consumers have purchased the
defendants' software products.
This case is FTC v. Innovative Marketing, Inc. et al., U.S. District
Court for the District of Maryland.
|
|
|
People and
Appointments |
12/10. President elect Obama's transition office announced that former
Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) would be nominated to be Secretary of Health and
Human Services, and would be named Director of a new White House Office on
Health Reform. This would give Daschle responsibility for several technology
related topics, include digitization of medical records, and maintaining the
privacy of personally identifiable health information. See,
release.
12/10. President Bush announced his intent to nominate Matthew Friedrich to
be Assistant Attorney General (AAG) in charge of the
Department of Justice's (DOJ) Criminal
Division. He is currently the acting AAG. The position requires Senate
confirmation. He has worked for the DOJ since 1995. See,
release.
12/10. Charles Boucher was named Chief Information Officer (CIO) and
Director of the Office of Information Technology at the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). See,
SEC release.
12/8. The Senate confirmed Neil Barofsky to be Special Inspector
General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. See, Congressional Record,
December 8, 2008, at Page S10819
|
|
|
|
In This
Issue |
This issue contains the following items:
• House Passes Limited Analog Broadcast Extension Bill
• House Passes Auto Maker Bail Out Bill
• Rep. Gordon Will Seek Passage of Nanotech Bill
• Intel Challenges Korea FTC Order
• Whole Foods Files Complaint Against FTC
• FTC Shuts Down Scareware Sellers
|
|
|
Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red. |
|
|
Thursday,
December 11 |
The House will not meet. The
House has adjourned until January 3, 2009, subject to recall by the
Speaker of the House. See,
HConRes 440.
The Senate will meet at
10:00 AM. It will consider HR 7005
[LOC |
WW], the "Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of
2008".
8:30 AM - 3:00 PM. The Department of Commerce's (DOC)
National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) Malcolm
Baldrige National Quality Award Board of Overseers will meet. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, November 28, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 230, at Page 72451.
Location: NIST, Administration Building, Lecture Room B,
Gaithersburg, MD.
9:00 - 10:30 AM. The
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host an
event to release and discuss a report titled "A Policymaker's
Guide to Network Management". The speakers will be Robert
Atkinson (ITIF), David Sohn (Center for
Democracy and Technology), and George Ou (ITIF). A light breakfast
will be served. Location: ITIF, Suite 200, 1250 Eye St., NW.
9:00 AM. The
American Antitrust Institute
(AAI) will host an event titled "Private Antitrust Enforcement Symposium".
For more information, contact Sarah Frey at 202-408-7442. Location: Holeman
Lounge, National Press Club,13th Floor,
529 14th St. NW.
9:30 AM. The
Park City Center for Public
Policy will hold a news conference titled "Defending
Cyberspace: Recommendations for Action". For more information,
contact Jim Souby at 435-649-6980 x100 or jsouby at parkcitycenter dot
org. Location: Lisagor Room, National
Press Club,13th Floor, 529 14th St. NW.
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association's
(FCBA) Engineering and Technical Practice Committee will host a brown bag
lunch titled "The Harmful Interference Standard". The
speakers will be Michael Marcus (Marcus Spectrum Solutions), Mitchell
Lazarus (Fletcher Heald & Hildreth), Rick Engelman (Sprint Nextel),
and Dean Brenner (Qualcomm). RSVP to Tami Smith at tsmith07 at sidley dot
com or 202-736-8257. Location: Sidley
Austin, 1501 K St., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The
DC Bar Association (DCBA) will host
part two of a two part event titled "2008 IP Law Year in Review
Series". The speakers will be
Bradley Wright (Banner & Witcoff) and
Eric
Wright (Morgan & Finnegan). The price to attend ranges from $80
to $115. For more information, contact 202-626-3488. See,
notice. The DCBA has a record of excluding persons from its events.
The event qualifies for continuing legal education credits. Location:
DC Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
Deadline for the Office
of the U.S. Trade Representative (OUSTR) to submit its annual report
to the Congress on the People's Republic of China's compliance with the
commitments made in connection with its accession to the
World Trade Organization (WTO). This
annual report is required by
22 U.S.C. § 6951.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (OUSTR)
regarding the operation, effectiveness, and implementation of and compliance
with trade agreements regarding telecommunications products and services,
including the World Trade Organization (WTO) General Agreement on Trade in
Services, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), free trade
agreements (FTAs) with Australia, Bahrain, Chile, Morocco, and Singapore, the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States FTAs. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, November 25, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 228, at Page 71707-71708.
|
|
|
Friday,
December 12 |
The House will not meet.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (OUSTR)
regarding the People's Republic of China's (PRC) complaint to the
World Trade
Organization (WTO) regarding Department of Commerce (DOC) anti-dumping and
countervailing duty determinations and orders affecting imports from the PRC
of steel pipe, tires, and other products. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, November 13, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 220, at Pages 67214-67215.
In other WTO proceedings, the U.S., Japan, Taiwan, and other nations
have complained to the WTO about the PRC's failure to protect intellectual
property rights. See,
story
titled "US to Complain to WTO Regarding PR China's Failure to Protect IPR" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,562, April 9, 2007, and
story
titled "US Requests WTO Dispute Settlement Panel Re PRC Failure to Protect IPR"
in TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert No. 1,623, August 15, 2008. See also, the WTO's
web
page for DS362 and
web
page for DS363.
Deadline to submit comments to the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology's (NIST) Computer
Security Division (CSD) regarding
draft FIPS-186-3 [125 pages in PDF] titled "Digital Signature
Standard (DSS)". See also,
notice in
the Federal Register, November 12, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 219, at Pages
66842-66844.
Deadline to submit nominations to the
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) for members of the NTIA's Online Safety and
Technology Working Group (OSTWG) for a fifteen month term to commence in
January of 2009. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, November 21, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 226, at Pages 70624-70625.
See also, story titled "NTIA Seeks Members for Online Safety and Technology
Working Group" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,863, November 25, 2008.
|
|
|
Monday,
December 15 |
9:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office's (USPTO) National Medal of Technology and Innovation Nomination
Evaluation Committee will hold a closed meeting. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, November 28, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 230, at Page 72453.
Location: USPTO, 600 Dulany St., Alexandria, VA.
2:00 - 3:15 PM. The National Governors
Association (NGA) and Alliance for
Public Technology (APT) will webcast an event titled "State
Efforts to Expand Broadband Access". The speakers will be
Michael Ramage (Connected Tennessee) and Karen Jackson (state of
Virginia). See,
notice.
Deadline to submit comments to the
National Science Foundation's (NSF)
National Coordination Office for Networking Information Technology
Research and Development in response to its Request for Information (RFI)
regarding "promising game-changing ideas with the potential to
reduce vulnerabilities to cyber exploitations by altering the
cybersecurity landscape". See,
notice in
the Federal Register, October 14, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 199, at Pages
60724-60726.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its Notice of Inquiry (NOI)
regarding management and oversight of the Universal Service Fund
(USF). The FCC adopted this NOI on August 15, 2008 and released the
text [17 pages in PDF] on September 12, 2008. It is FCC 08-189 in WC
Docket No. 05-195. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, October 14, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 199, at Pages
60689-60695.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) portion of its Memorandum Opinion and Order
(MO&O) and NPRM regarding collecting and reporting of carrier
service quality, customer satisfaction, and infrastructure and operating
data. The FCC adopted and released this
MO&O and NPRM [57 pages in PDF] on September 6, 2008. It is FCC
08-203 in WC Docket No. 08-190. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, October 15, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 200, at Pages
60997-61006. See also, story titled "FCC Grants Carriers Forbearance
From ARMIS Reporting Rules" in
TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert No. 1,822, September 8, 2008.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration's (NTIA)
petition for rulemaking
[16 pages in PDF]
requesting amendments to Part 87 of the FCC's Rules to allow use of the
frequency 1090 MHz for runway vehicle identification and collision
avoidance. See,
Public Notice [3 pages in PDF]. This item is DA 08-2502 in RM
11503.
|
|
|
Tuesday,
December 16 |
10:00 AM - 5:00 PM. The
National Science Foundation's (NSF)
Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure will meet. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, November 13, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 220, at Page 67212.
Location: NSF, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
12:00 - 1:30 PM. The DC
Bar Association (DCBA) will host a panel discussion titled
"CFIUS and FINSA: Comparisons With Other Countries' Investment
Review Mechanisms". The speakers will be Johann Leaman
(Department of Treasury),
Michael Snarr (Baker Hostetler), Stephen Canner
(U.S. Council for International
Business), Matthew Edwards (
Department of Commerce). The price to attend ranges from $10 to $30.
For more information, contact 202-626-3463. See,
notice. The DCBA has a record of excluding persons from its events.
Location: DC Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
12:30 - 2:00 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar
Association's (FCBA) International Telecommunications Practice
Committee will host a brown bag lunch titled "Results of the
2008 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in India and End of the
Presidential Administration Telecoms Issues". The speaker will
be David
Gross (Department of State). For more information, contact
Susan O'Connell at susan dot o'connell at fcc dot gov or Troy Tanner at
troy dot tanner at bingham dot com. RSVP by December 12 to Jennifer
Ullman at Jennifer dot ullman at verizon dot com. Location: Verizon,
5th floor, Suite 400 West, 1300 I St., NW.
Deadline to submit to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) oppositions to the
petition for reconsideration [PDF] filed on November 17, 2008, by the
National Association of Broadcasters
(NAB) and the Association for Maximum Service Television in the FCC's
proceeding titled "In the Matter of Carriage of Digital Television
Broadcast Signals: Amendment to Part 76 of the Commission's Rules"
and numbered CS Docket No. 98-120. See,
notice in
the Federal Register, December 2, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 232, at Page
73327.
|
|
|
Wednesday,
December 17 |
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association's
(FCBA) Young Lawyers Committee will host a brown bag lunch for planning
purposes. For more information, contact Tarah Grant at tsgrant hhlaw dot
com or 703-610-6155 or Cathy Hilke at chilke at wileyrein dot com or
202-719-7418. RSVP to Christy Hammond at chammond at wileyrein dot com.
Location: Wiley Rein, 10 East
Conference Center, 1750 K St., NW.
Effective date of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) new rules governing the
conduct of individuals registered to practice before the USPTO. These
new rules include an annual patent practitioner maintenance fee.
See, notice
in the Federal Register, November 17, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 222, at Pages
67750-67759.
|
|
|
|
|
About Tech Law
Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
a subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for a single
recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple
recipients.
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also,
free subscriptions are available for journalists, federal
elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However,
copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not published in the
web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
credit
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
David
Carney
Contact: 202-364-8882.
carney at techlawjournal dot com
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2008 David Carney. All rights reserved.
|
|
|