More DOJ Personnel Named |
5/22. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and White House news office
announced several more DOJ personnel. The San Francisco area, and the law firm of
Morrison & Foerster (MoFo), are well represented.
On May 22, Ann Ravel (at right) was named
Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) for the Department of Justice's (DOJ)
Civil Division's Torts Branch and the Office of Consumer Litigation (OCL). See,
DOJ release.
The Torts Branch represents the federal government in lawsuits for money judgments
for alleged negligent or wrongful acts. The OCL represents the federal
government in civil and criminal litigation arising under certain statutes,
including the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Ravel was previously County Counsel
of Santa Clara County, California. Santa Clara County is home to many leading
information technology companies. The county contains the towns of Cupertino,
Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, and Sunnyvale, among others. The
selection of Ravel does not require Senate confirmation.
Also on May 22, Brian Martinez was named Chief of Staff to Tony West,
the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the
DOJ's Civil Division. See, DOJ
release.
Martinez was an associate in the San Francisco office of MoFo. His MoFo
bio states that
he has worked on intellectual property and antitrust cases. West was a partner
in the San Francisco office of MoFo until his appointment to the DOJ.
Also on May 22, Geoffrey Graber was named Counsel to Tony West. See, DOJ
release.
Martinez was an associate in the San Francisco office of MoFo. See, MoFo
bio.
Also, Beth
Brinkmann, from Washington DC office of MoFo, was named DAAG for the Civil
Appellate Division in April.
On May 21, President Obama announced his intent to nominate
Christopher Schroeder to be
Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ's
Office of Legal Policy (OLP). He is a law
professor at Duke University and Of Counsel at the law firm of
O'Melveny &
Myers. See, White House news office
release.
He has written extensively on environmental and administrative law.
The OLP has historically been involved in the judicial selection and
confirmation process.
|
|
|
More People and Appointments |
5/21. Xerox announced in a
release that Anne Mulcahy will retire as CEO, effective July 1, 2009,
but will remain as Chairman of the Board. Also, Ursula Burns, the current
President, will become CEO.
5/20. Caroline Fredrickson, the American Civil Liberties Union's
(ACLU) head lobbyist, will join the American Constitution Society (ACS) as its
Executive Director. See, ACLU
release.
5.11. TechAmerica announced its new Board of Directors and Executive
Committee. Henry Steininger will be the new Chairman of the Board.
Peter Boni will be Vice Chair. Phil Bond remains President. See,
release.
|
|
|
PFF Argues Against COPPA 2.0 and Age Verification Mandates |
5/21. The Progress & Freedom Foundation (PFF) released a
paper [36 pages in PDF] titled "COPPA 2.0: The New Battle over Privacy, Age Verification,
Online Safety & Free Speech". The authors are the PFF's Berin Szoka and Adam Thierer.
This paper is a response to various proposals, some of which are manifested
state legislative bills, to expand COPPA like regulatory regimes. The paper
argues that such proposals are backdoor age verification mandates, and would
raise First Amendment concerns, reduce online privacy, and conflict with the
dormant commerce clause.
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a narrowly targeted
law that requires that operators
of web sites directed at children under the age of 13 obtain parental consent
before collecting personal information (PI) from children under 13. It does not
affect children aged 13 or over. Few web sites are directed at children under 13.
The COPPA was S 2326 in the 105th Congress. It was enacted into law as part
of a large omnibus appropriations bill in October of 1998. It is now codified at
15 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6506. See,
TLJ web
page titled "Children's Online Privacy Protection Act", last updated in 1998.
The COPPA required the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to promulgate
regulations that "require that the operator of any website or online service
that collects personal information from children or the operator of a website or
online service that has actual knowledge that it is collecting personal
information from a child --- (i) provide notice on the website of what
information is collected from children by the operator, how the operator uses
such information, and the operator's disclosure practice for such information;
and (ii) to obtain verifiable parental consent for the collection, use, or
disclosure of personal information from children".
The FTC subsequently promulgated its Children's Online Privacy Protection
Rule (COPPR), broadly construing this statute.
Social networking websites, such as MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn and others,
did not exist when the Congress drafted the COPPA over a decade ago.
The paper argues that if COPPA style regulation were expanded, from web sites directed at children,
to all web sites, this would be tantamount to imposing an age verification
requirement on adults. It argues that imposing such requirements on adults would
infringe their First Amendment rights.
This PFF paper also points out at the outset that the technology does not exist to
reliably establish and verify the age of internet users. Moreover, judges have
written this into their opinions.
The paper argues that "COPPA 2.0's greatest threat is
that large numbers of PI-collecting Site operators would be -- or would
feel -- compelled to require age-verification of large numbers of adults as users.
There is currently no age verification requirement other than COPPA, which
affects adults only to the extent that parents need to establish their parental
relationship to their kids. But COPPA affects few other adults because few
adults want to use child-oriented PI-collecting sites like Disney's Club
Penguin. COPPA 2.0 proposals would either directly require age verification of all adults
who wanted to use ``social networking sites´´ (as proposed in Illinois) or
indirectly require much the same thing by mandating age verification for
``adolescent-oriented sites´´ (as proposed in New Jersey). Indeed, this may be
precisely what some COPPA 2.0 advocates want, since they may envision it as the
only way to make the Internet truly ``safe´´ for adolescents." (Parentheses and
emphases in original.)
The paper adds, "But few proponents would make such a goal explicit, for they
know that such a ``scaled-up´´ COPPA would essentially converge with COPA as a broad age
verification mandate."
COPA is the Child
Online Protection Act. It bans sending to minors over the web material that is
harmful to minors. The COPA also allows web site operators to distribute
pornography, but requires those web sites which distribute material that is
harmful to children to verify adult status through the use of credit cards,
adult access codes, adult PIN numbers, or other technologies.
The COPA was HR 3783 in the 105th Congress. It is codified at
47 U.S.C. § 231.
It has not fared well in the courts. On July 22, 2008, the
U.S. Court of Appeals (3rdCir) issued
its opinion [57
pages in PDF] in ACLU v. Mukasey, a long running challenge to the
constitutionality of the COPA. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the
District Court, which held that the COPA facially violates the First and Fifth
Amendments of the Constitution, and permanently enjoined enforcement of the COPA.
See, story
titled "3rd Circuit Holds COPA Unconstitutional" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert
No. 1,798, July 23, 2008. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on January 21, 2009. See,
docket.
The PFF paper then argues that the COPPA 2.0 regulatory regime would violate the
rights of adults to speak anonymously, violate the First Amendment rights of web
site operators, violate the speech rights of adolescents, as well as suffer from
other Constitutional infirmities.
To the extent that COPPA 2.0 proposals are advanced through state based
regulation, the PFF paper argues that this would violate the commerce clause of
the Constitution. However, this argument would not apply to the next round of rulemaking
by the FTC.
This paper also offers numerous non-Constitutional arguments against COPPA
2.0 regulation. For example, such regulation would not reach web sites outside
of the U.S. Such regulation would raise web site costs, increase industry
consolidation, and inhibit innovation.
Finally, since web sites would collect vast amounts of personal information
for the purpose of establishing and verifying age, this would diminish privacy.
This information might also be used for other commercial or governmental purposes.
The paper concludes that "The future of age verification battles -- at least on the social
networking front -- will likely be fundamentally tied up with COPPA and the
question of how well parental consent-based forms of age verification might work
on a scale larger than COPPA's very limited scale. It is unlikely, however, that
such a framework could be easily applied on ``Internet scale.´´ There is a world
of difference between a site like Disney's Club Penguin, for example, and sites
like MySpace or Facebook."
"Moreover, as social networking capabilities become increasingly
ubiquitous, integrated into every site and service", including government web
sites, "the costs and hassles of
compliance with COPPA 2.0 age verification mandates will increase dramatically.
Are parents really going to be forced to authenticate themselves and then their
kids for every website their kids want to participate in that requires so much
as an e-mail address?"
|
|
|
About Tech Law
Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
a subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for a single
recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple
recipients.
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also,
free subscriptions are available for journalists, federal
elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However,
copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not published in the
web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
credit
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
David
Carney
Contact: 202-364-8882.
carney at techlawjournal dot com
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2009 David Carney. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
In This
Issue |
This issue contains the following items:
• More DOJ Personnel Named
• PFF Argues Against COPPA 2.0 and Age Verification Mandates
|
|
|
Friday, May 22 |
The House will not meet. It will next meet on June 2, 2009.
The Senate will meet at 2:00 PM. It will resume consideration
of S 149, the "Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act".
|
|
|
Monday, May 25 |
Memorial Day. See, Office of Personnel Management's (OPM)
list
of 2009 federal holidays.
The House will not meet the week of May 25-29.
The Senate will not meet the week of May 25-29. See, Senate
calendar.
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 26 |
9:00 AM - 3:45 PM. The
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) will
host an event titled "China Since Tiananmen: Power, Party, and Society".
There will be five panels, including one on competition, and another on the
economy. See, notice. Location:
AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW.
2:00 - 3:30 PM. The Department of Justice's (DOJ)
Antitrust Division will host a seminar
conducted by Stefan Buehler (University of St. Gallen) on his
paper
titled "Making Sense of Non-Binding Retail-Price Recommendations". To
request permission to attend, contact Patrick Greenlee at 202-307-3745 or atr
dot eag at usdoj dot gov. Location: Bicentennial Building, 600 E St., NW.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Copyright Royalty Judges (CRJ)
in response to its Notice of Inquiry (NOI) regarding "the costs of census
versus sample reporting to assist the Judges in the revision of the interim
regulations for filing notices of use and the delivery of records of use of
sound recordings under two statutory licenses of the Copyright Act". See,
notice in the
Federal Register, April 8, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 66, at Pages 15901-15904. See
also, the CRJ's
notice in the Federal Register regarding its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM), Federal Register, December 30, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 250, at Pages
79727-79734, and the CRJ's
web page with
hyperlinks to the comments submitted in response to the NPRM.
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 27 |
No events listed.
|
|
|
Thursday, May 28 |
2:30 PM. The Federal Trade Commission's
(FTC) Bureau of Economics (BOE) will host an untitled seminar by
Chris Knittel (UC
Davis) He is an economist who has written about electricity and energy.
Location: FTC Conference Center, 601 New Jersey Ave., NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal Communications
Bar Association (FCBA) will host an event titled "Market Definitions at
the FCC -- Theory and Practice". The first panel is titled "How the FCC
Defines Markets". The speakers may be John Nakahata (Harris Wiltshire &
Grannis), David Lawson (Sidley Austin), and Don Stockdale (Deputy Chief of the
FCC's WCB). The second panel is titled "Market Analysis in Practice". The
speakers may be David Reitman (CRA International) and Gregory Sidak (Criterion
Economics). The price to attend ranges from $25 to $150. Location: Arnold &
Porter, 555 12th St., NW.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) regarding the petition for extension of waiver filed by AT&T
and Sprint Nextel requesting a one year extension of the current waiver of the
FCC's rules to the extent that provision requires TRS providers providing
relay service via the PSTN or a TTY to automatically and immediately call an
appropriate PSAP when receiving an emergency 711-dialed call placed by an
interconnected VOIP user. See, FCC Public Notice of April 1, 2009 (DA 09-749),
and notice in
the Federal Register, May 7, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 87, at Pages 21364-21366. This
relates to WC Docket No. 04-36, CG Docket No. 03-123, WT Docket No. 96-198 and
CC Docket No. 92-105
|
|
|
Friday, May 29 |
Deadline to submit to the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) nominations for its National Medal of Technology
and Innovation (NMTI) program awards. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, January 8, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 5, at Pages 801-802. See also,
USPTO
release.
Extended deadline to submit comments to the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
regarding deferral of examination for patent applications. See,
notice of
extension in the Federal Register, March 9, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 44, at Page
10036. The original deadline was February 27, 2009. See, original
notice in the
Federal Register, January 28, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 17, at Pages 4946-4947.
Deadline to submit comments to the National
Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST)
Computer Security Division (CSD) regarding its
SP 800-118 [38 pages in PDF] titled "Guide to Enterprise Password
Management (Draft)".
Deadline to submit reply comments to the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) in response to its request for comments regarding competitive bidding
procedures for
Auction 86, the broadband radio service (BRS) auction. This item is DA
09-843 in AU Docket No. 09-56. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, May 12, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 90, at Pages 22166-22170.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) regarding the
petition for rulemaking [60 pages in PDF] filed by the
American Bird Conservancy (ABC),
Defenders of Wildlife and National Audubon Society. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, May 8, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 88, at Pages 21613-21614. See, FCC
Public Notice of April 29, 2009 (DA 09-904), February 19, 2008
opinion [PDF] of the U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir) in ABC v. FCC,
and story titled "DC Circuit Vacates FCC Order Regarding Birds and Towers" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,724, February 27, 2008. This relates to WT Docket Nos. 08-61
and 03-187.
|
|
|
Monday, June 1 |
The House will not meet.
Day one of a four day conference titled "Computers, Freedom, and
Privacy 2009". See, conference web site.
Location?
Deadline to submit comments to numerous financial regulatory agencies
regarding their information collection programs, including Suspicious Activity
Reports. The agencies are the Department of the Treasury's (DOT) Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), DOT's Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC), DOT's Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), Federal Reserve
Board (FRB), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and National Credit
Union Administration (NCUA). See,
notice in the
Federal Register, April 1, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 61, at Pages 14863-14865.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Privacy Office in advance of its
two day public workshop on June 22 and 23, 2009, titled "Government 2.0:
Privacy and Best Practices". This workshop will address operational,
privacy, security, and legal issues associated with government use of
social media. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, April 17, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 73, at Pages 17876-17877. See
also, story titled "DHS Privacy Office Seeks Comments on Government Use of
Social Media" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,928, April 16, 2009.
Deadline to submit applications to the
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to be
members of the Department of Commerce's Spectrum Management Advisory Committee
(CSMAC). See, notice
in the Federal Register, May 6, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 86, at Pages 20922-20923.
|
|
|
More News |
5/20. The Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) adopted, but did not release, a notice of proposed rule making (NPRM)
regarding shareholder nominations for corporate boards of directors. See, SEC
release.
5/18. The Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) filed a civil
complaint
[24 pages in PDF] in the U.S. District
Court (SDNY) against Monster Worldwide, an employment search provider,
alleging violation of federal securities laws in connection with alleged stock
option backdating. This case is SEC v. Monster Worldwide, Inc., U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, D.C. No. 09 CV 4641. See
also, SEC release.
5/15. Tim Pawlenty, the Governor of the state of Minnesota, signed into law
House File 988, a bill to prohibit implementation of the federal READ ID Act. See,
list of signed bills. The federal government relies upon the states for
implementation. The ACLU stated in a
release that
Minnesota is the twenty-third state to reject the REAL ID Act. For background on
the REAL ID Act, see stories titled "DHS Releases REAL ID Regulations"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,699, January 14, 2008; "DHS Proposes Rules Implementing
REAL ID Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,546, March 5, 2007; "Maine Rejects REAL ID Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,528, January 29, 2007; and "DHS Announces Minimal REAL ID Act Grants" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,708, January 31, 2008.
5/15. The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a
Competitive Impact
Statement on May 8, 2009, with the U.S. District Court (DSCar) in US
v. CMLS, an antitrust action involving real estate brokers, in which one
issue is restrictions on out of area brokers that block internet and
technology based competition. See also,
notice in the
Federal Register, May 15, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 93, at Pages 22965-22976. This case
is USA v. Consolidated Multiple Listing Service, U.S. District Court for
the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, D.C. No. 3:08-CV-01786-SB.
5/14. Various financial regulatory agencies published a lengthy
notice in the
Federal Register that announces, describes and recites numerous changes to the
2007 final rules that implement the affiliate marketing provisions and the
identity theft red flags provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003 (FACT Act). See, Federal Register, May 14, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 92, at
Pages 22639-22646.
5/14. The Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) filed a civil complaint in U.S. District Court (DNJ) against Paul G.
Bultmeyer, Arthur J. Piacentini, and others alleging violation of federal
securities laws in connection with the sale of unregistered securities via
Craigslist, other internet sites, and print publications. See, SEC
release.
5/13. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) published a
notice in the
Federal Register that sets comment deadlines for its
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding additional spectrum for the
Medical Device Radiocommunication Service. The FCC adopted this NPRM on
March 17, 2009, and released the text on March 20, 2009. It is FCC 09-20 in ET
Docket No. 09-36 and RM-11404. The deadline to submit initial comments is August
11, 2009. The deadline to submit reply comments is September 10, 2009. See,
Federal Register, May 13, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 91, at Pages 22491-22498.
5/13. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) published a
notice in the
Federal Register that sets comment deadlines for its
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) [33 pages in PDF] regarding
procedures for allocating new FM channels and AM frequency assignments. The
FCC adopted this item on April 7, 2009, and released the text on April 20, 2009.
It is FCC 09-30 in MB Docket No. 09-52. See, Federal Register, May 13, 2009,
Vol. 74, No. 91, at Pages 22498-22507.
5/12. The Department of the Treasury's (DOT) Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a
notice in the
Federal Register that announces, describes, recites, and sets the comment
deadline (September 9, 2009) for its proposed rules changes regarding expanding
the definitions of money services businesses and money transmission services.
The proposed rules provide that a money services business includes businesses
located outside of the U.S. The proposed rules also provide that a money
transmitter "shall not include a person that only ... Provides the delivery,
communication, or network access services used by a money transmitter to support
money transmission services". See, Federal Register, May 12, 2009, Vol. 74, No.
90, at Pages 22129-22142.
5/12. The National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) published a
notice in the Federal Register
that announces the availability of grant funding under its Low-Power Television
and Translator Upgrade Program. This notice also announces that July 13, 2009 is
the deadline to submit applications for Priority Round funding. See,
Federal Register, May 12, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 90, at Pages 22401-22415.
|
|
|