Obama Nominates Pai and Rosenworcel to Be
FCC Commissioners |
11/1. President Obama nominated
Ajit Pai and Jessica Rosenworcel to be
members of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). See, White House news office
release.
The President announced his intent to nominate Pai and Rosenworcel on October
31. See,
release and
release.
Pai is nominated for a term of five years from July 1, 2011. This is the
Republican position previously held by Meredith Baker.
Rosenworcel is nominated for a term of five years from July 1, 2010. This is
the Democratic position held by Michael Copps.
Pai is a partner in the Washington DC office of the law firm of
Jenner & Block. He previously worked in the FCC's
Office of General Counsel, which handles antitrust merger
reviews, at the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust
Division's Telecommunications Task Force, and for the
Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC). He has also worked for Verizon Communications.
Rosenworcel (at right)
has been Democratic communications counsel to the Senate
Commerce Committee (SCC) since 2007. Before that she was a legal advisor to FCC Commissioner
Michael Copps. Before that she held other positions at the FCC. And before that, she worked in
the Washington DC office of the law firm of Drinker
Biddle & Reath.
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) announced in a
statement
in the Congressional Record that he will place holds on both nominations. Sen. Grassley
has a history of placing holds on nominees for reasons unrelated to the nominees'
qualifications for holding office.
Sen. Grassley wrote that "I will object to proceeding to the nomination because the
FCC continues to stonewall a document request I submitted to the FCC over six months ago on April
27, 2011, regarding their actions related to LightSquared and Harbinger Capital. Since then, I
have repeated my request to the FCC through letters I sent on July 5th and September 8th and the
FCC continues to deny my request for documents."
He continued that "During the course of my correspondence with the FCC, the FCC has made
it clear that it will not voluntarily turn over documents to the 99.6 percent of the
Members of Congress and Senators who do not chair a committee with direct
jurisdiction over the FCC. As I said in my September 8, 2011, letter, their
actions are misguided and unsupportable."
"It not only sets a dangerous precedent for a federal agency to unilaterally set the
rules on how it engages with Congress -- it also prevents any meaningful ability for the vast
majority of Congress to inform themselves of how an agency works", wrote Sen.
Grassley.
Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV), Chairman of the
Senate Commerce Committee (SCC), Rosenworcel's boss,
praised her in a
release. He said that she "will be an effective advocate by working to close
the digital divide and bring expanded access". Michael Copps, her former boss,
praised both Rosenworcel and Pai in a
statement.
Julius Genachowski, Chairman of the FCC, said that the two are "outstanding
choices". See,
statement. See also,
praise from FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell and
praise from FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn.
Gary Shapiro, head of the Consumer Electronics
Association (CEA), stated in a
release that
the two nominees "have a deep understanding of technology issues and will be valuable assets
to the Commission, the industry and the public". Gordon Smith, head of the
National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), stated in a
release
that they are "two talented individuals with a commitment to public service".
Michael Powell, head of the National Cable &
Telecommunications Association (NCTA), stated in a
release
that they "share extensive telecommunications policy experience, a deep
understanding of the agency that is informed by their prior service, and a
profound appreciation for the continuing investment needed to promote innovation
and sustain today’s dynamic and competitive telecommunications marketplace."
Walter McCormick, head of the US Telecom, stated in a
release
that "Their breadth of knowledge of the evolving communications industry, its legal
challenges and rapid technological changes will help inform the already seasoned leadership at
the commission."
Berin Szoka, head of the Tech Freedom, stated in a
release that his group looks forward to working with the two "to ensure that FCC
regulations serve consumers by advancing competition and innovation while respecting free speech
rights".
|
|
|
Congressional Leaders Write USTR Regarding
Russia Joining WTO |
10/29. Leaders of the House and Senate Committees with jurisdiction over trade sent a
letter to Ron Kirk, the US Trade Representative, about ongoing negotiations
regarding Russia's accession to the World Trade
Organization (WTO).
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) and
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), the Chairman and ranking
Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, and
Rep. Dave Camp (D-MI) and Rep.
Sander Levin (D-MI), the Chairman and ranking Democrat on the
House Ways and Means Committee, expressed concerns
about Russia's protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), and Russia's commitment to join
the WTO's 1996 Information
Technology Agreement (ITA).
The WTO issued a
release
regarding the ITA on October 24, 2011. It stated, among other things, that "The
Russian Federation said that as part of its accession to the WTO, it was
committed to duty-free treatment for products covered by the ITA. To encourage
the IT industry in Russia, it intends to fully join the ITA".
The four Congressional leaders wrote that "Intellectual property is critical to U.S.
industry and jobs. We believe it is vitally important for potential members of the WTO to
demonstrate that they are not only willing to agree to strong protection of intellectual property,
but that they also possess the will and the ability to enforce these rights. Unfortunately,
Russia's standard of IPR protection has fallen short of these standards."
They also stated that they are "deeply concerned about recent reports questioning
Russia's commitment to join the Information Technology Agreement (ITA), a commitment the United
States negotiated with Russia as part of the bilateral agreement we reached in 2006."
They explained that "The ITA is one of the most successful WTO agreements, providing
duty free treatment to a vast array of information and communications technology (ICT) products,
with tremendous benefits to the innovative U.S. high tech sector as well as the many U.S.
industries that use ICT to enhance their productivity and competitiveness at home and abroad.
The United States has consistently pursued a policy of requiring both new WTO candidates and
free trade agreement partners to join the ITA."
The four also reminded USTR Kirk that both the House and Senate "must vote to
remove Russia from Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 before the United States
can expect to enjoy the full benefits of Russian membership in the WTO. A high
standard accession package will be essential to ensuring support for granting
Russia permanent normal trade relations by removing it from Title IV."
|
|
|
Senate Judiciary Committee Approves
Bill to Undo Leegin RPM Decision |
11/3. Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC) approved
S 75 [LOC |
WW], the "Discount
Pricing Consumer Protection Act", a bill to undo the Supreme Court's 2007
opinion in Leegin
Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, regarding resale price maintenance (RPM).
Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI) introduced this
bill on January 25, 2011. There are eight cosponsors -- all Democrats.
This bill states that its purpose is to "correct the Supreme Court's mistaken
interpretation of the Sherman Act in the Leegin decision".
It would add one sentence to the end of Section 1 of the Sherman Act: "Any contract,
combination, conspiracy or agreement setting a minimum price below which a product or service
cannot be sold by a retailer, wholesaler, or distributor shall violate this Act."
Leegin and RPM. RPM exists when a manufacturer agrees with its distributor(s) to set
the minimum price that the distributor(s) can charge for the manufacturer's goods. RPM is
employed in the tech sector for consumer electronic devices and other products.
The relevant statute, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which is codified at
15
U.S.C. § 1, provides little guidance. It merely states that "Every contract, combination
in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the
several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal." Section 1 also contains
a criminal prohibition. The rest of the law exists in judicial interpretation and agency
enforcement.
Prior to 2007, RPM was subject to the antitrust per se rule, rather than the lighter rule of
reason standard. Then the Supreme Court held in Leegin that all vertical price restrains
are to be judged by the rule of reason, and that the Supreme Court's 1911
opinion in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., which is
reported at 220 U.S. 373, is overturned.
See also, story
titled "SCUS Holds That All Vertical Price Restraints Are Subject to Rule of
Reason" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,603, June 28, 2007.
The Leegin opinion changed the law for vertical RPM. Under the lighter
rule of reason standard, plaintiffs must show actual or potential harm to
competition. After Leegin, horizontal agreements among competitors to fix
prices remain per se violations of the Sherman Act. Group boycotts, and
horizontal market division are other examples of per se violations.
Arguments For and Against the Bill. Senators briefly debated this
bill. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the Chairman of the SJC,
stated at the meeting that the Leegin opinion is "harmful to consumers".
Sen. Kohl, the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition and
Consumer Rights, referenced the importance
of discount pricing of electronics. He also said that the Supreme Court "incorrectly
interpreted the Sherman Act". He argued that minimum retail pricing "threatens
the very existence of discounting and discount stores".
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), the ranking Republican on the
Subcommittee, spoke in opposition to the bill. He referenced economic analysis in support of
applying the rule of reason to RPM, and added that rule of reason analysis does not
sanction anticompetitive behavior.
The rationale for not having a per se rule against RPM was not discussed. However, for
electronic and IT devices, it is this. Manufacturers of these devices sometimes offer products
that include numerous new and complicated features and services. But, many consumers do not
know what the features are, or how to use them. In order to promote adoption of new technologies,
and sales of their products, manufacturers have an interest in distributors disseminating
information about the new devices through advertising, in store demonstrations, training of
employees, and customer support. But, these services impose costs on the distributors who
provide them. This can create a free riding situation, when some distributors go to the trouble
to provide such information and support, but others do not. The presence of free riders,
offering the products at lower prices, disincents other distributors from educating consumers.
This, in turn, disincents manufacturers from offering complex devices that require consumer
education. And this inhibits innovation in the IT sector, and the benefits that flow to consumers
from such innovation.
The SJC approved the bill by voice vote. Sen. Leahy noted that Sen. Lee voted no. In addition,
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and
Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) asked to be recorded as no votes.
Legislative History. There were similar bills in the 110th and 111th Congress. There
is support for these bills among Democrats who sit on the Judiciary Committees. However,
none of these bills have been approved by the full House or Senate.
In the 111th Congress, see HR 3190
[LOC
| WW],
the "Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act". It was approved by the
House Judiciary Committee (HJC), but not by the
full House. See also, story titled "House Judiciary Committee to Mark Up Bill to Undo
Leegin" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 2,020, December 3, 2009.
See also, S 148 [LOC
| WW],
also titled the "Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act". It was approved by
the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC),
but not by the full Senate. See, story titled "Senate Judiciary Committee
Approves Antitrust Bill to Undo Leegin" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 2,060, March 20, 2010.
In the 110th, see S 2261, also titled the "Discount Pricing Consumer Protection
Act". Neither the SJC nor the full Senate took any action on that bill.
|
|
|
|
In This
Issue |
This issue contains the following items:
• Obama Nominates Pai and Rosenworcel to Be FCC Commissioners
• Congressional Leaders Write USTR Regarding Russia Joining WTO
• Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Bill to Undo Leegin RPM Decision
• More Antitrust News
|
|
|
Washington Tech
Calendar
New items are highlighted in
red. |
|
|
Thursday, November 3 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at
12:00 NOON legislative business. The schedule includes consideration of
HR 2940 [LOC |
WW], the "Access
to Capital for Job Creators Act", and HR 2930
[LOC |
WW], the
"Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act". See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
10:00 AM. The House Judiciary
Committee (HJC) will meet to mark up several bills, including HR 3010
[LOC
| WW], the
"Regulatory Accountability Act". Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The House
Science Committee's (HSC) Subcommittee on Research and Science Education
will hold a hearing titled "STEM In Action: Transferring Knowledge from the
Workplace to the Classroom". See,
notice. Location: Room 2318, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The House
Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) will hold a hearing titled "Congressional
Executive Commission on China: 2011 Annual Report". See,
notice. Location: Room 2172, Rayburn Building.
4:45 PM. There will be a conference committee meeting of the
House Appropriations Committee (HAC) and
Senate Appropriations Committee (SAC) on the
FY 2012 Commerce Justice Science (CJS) appropriations bill. Location: Room HC-5, Capitol
Building.
|
|
|
Friday, November 4 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at
12:00 NOON legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
Supreme Court conference day. See,
calendar.
Closed.
9:00 AM. The House Commerce
Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on Communications and Technology will hold a hearing on
HR 3035 [LOC |
WW], the
"Mobile Informational Call Act of 2011". The witnesses will
be Faith Schwartz (Hope Now), Stephen Alterman (Cargo Airline Association),
Delicia Hand (National Association of Consumer Advocates), Greg Zoeller
(Attorney General of the state of Indiana), and Michael Altschul (CTIA). See,
notice. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
9:00 AM - 4:00 PM. The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Consumer
Advisory Committee will meet. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 205, Monday, October 24, 2011, at Page 65726. Location: FCC,
Commission Meeting Room, Room TW-C305, 445 12th St., SW.
9:30 - 11:30 AM. The House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee (HOGRC) will hold a hearing titled "Identity
Theft and Tax Fraud: Growing Problems for the Internal Revenue Service".
See,
notice. The HOGRC will webcast this event. Location: Room 2154, Rayburn
Building.
12:15 - 1:15 PM. The American Bar Association (ABA) will host an on
site and telecast event titled "Meet Alison Oldale, Deputy Director for Antitrust,
BE". See,
notice. No CLE credits. Free. Location: Arnold & Porter, 555 12th St., NW.
5:00 PM. Deadline to submit comments to the
Department of Commerce (DOC) and
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in response to their
notice in the
Federal Register (FR) that requests comments regarding creating a "voluntary" code
for internet access service providers to follow regarding the detection, notification and
mitigation of botnets. See, FR, Vol. 76, No. 183, Wednesday, September 21, 2011, at Pages
58466-58469. See also, story titled "NIST, NTIA and DHS Propose Botnet Mitigation Regime
for Internet Access Service Providers" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
2,303, September 22, 2011.
Deadline to submit comments to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST)
Computer Security Division (CSD) regarding its draft
SP
800-30 Rev. 1 [85 pages in PDF], titled "Guide for Conducting Risk
Assessments", released on September 19, 2011.
|
|
|
Monday, November 7 |
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Information
Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host an panel discussion titled "UK
and U.S. IP Enforcement: Views from the Top". The speakers will be David Kappos
(head of the USPTO), John Alty (head of the UK Intellectual Property Office), and Stephen
Ezell (ITIF). See,
notice. Location:
Finnegan, Suite 1150, 901 New York Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 8 |
10:00 AM. The Supreme Court
will hear oral argument in US v. Antoine Jones, Sup. Ct. No. 10-1259, a
petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Court
of Appeals (DCCir) in a criminal case involving the issue of whether the government's
warrantless use of a global positioning system (GPS) device to track defendant's car
violated his rights under the 4th Amendment. See, November 19, 2010 divided
order of the Court of Appeals denying rehearing en banc.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) will hold a hearing
titled "Oversight of the Department of Justice". The witness
will be Attorney General Eric Holder. The SJC will webcast this event. See,
notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
2:30 PM. The Senate
Intelligence Committee (SIC) will hold a closed meeting.
See,
notice. Location: Room 219, Hart Building.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 9 |
12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a panel discussion titled "The America Invents Act --
Perspectives from the PTO and the Bar". The speakers will be Robert Stoll
(Commissioner for Patents, USPTO), Stephen Kunin (Oblon Spivak), Harold Wegner (Foley &
Lardner), and Mark Williamson (Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto). See,
notice. The price to attend ranges from $30 to $40. No CLE credits. For more information,
call 202-626-3463. Location: DC Bar Conference Center, 1101 K St., NW.
12:00 NOON - 1:00 PM. The American Bar Association (ABA) will host a
teleconferenced event titled "October Antitrust Update for In-House Counsel".
See,
notice. No CLE credits. Free.
2:00 PM. There will be a test of the Emergency Alert System
(EAS). See, Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
Public Notice of June 9, 2011, and
Public
Notice of August 23, 2011.
2:30 PM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee's (SJC) Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law will hold a hearing
titled "Your Health and Your Privacy: Protecting Health Information in a Digital
World". The SJC will webcast this event. Sen.
Al Franken (D-MN) will preside. See,
notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
|
|
|
|
|
More Antitrust News |
10/26. The Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust
Division published a notice
in the Federal Register (FR) that announces that the Advanced
Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed a notification of a change in its membership, pursuant
to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, which pertains to limiting
antitrust liability of standard setting consortia. See, Federal Register,
Vol. 76, No. 207, Wednesday, October 26, 2011, at Page 66324.
10/24. The Department of Justice's
(DOJ) Antitrust Division published a
notice in the
Federal Register (FR) that announces that the DVD Copy Control
Association filed a notification of a change in its membership, pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, which pertains to limiting
antitrust liability of standard setting consortia. See, Federal Register,
Vol. 76, No. 205, Monday, October 24, 2011, at Page 65749.
10/14. The US Department of Justice's (DOJ)
Antitrust Division, the US
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the European Commission
(EC) released a
document [7 pages
in PDF] titled "Best Practices on Cooperation in Merger Investigations". See
also, DOJ
release.
|
|
|
About Tech Law
Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and a subscription e-mail alert.
The basic rate for a subscription to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for
a single recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients.
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free subscriptions are
available for federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert are not published in the web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
credit
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
David
Carney
Contact: 202-364-8882.
carney at techlawjournal dot com
3034 Newark St. NW, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2011 David Carney. All rights reserved.
|
|
|