Rep. Smith Releases Revised Version of SOPA
to Be Marked Up on December 15 |
12/12. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the sponsor of
HR 3261 [LOC |
WW], the
"Stop Online Piracy Act" or "SOPA", released a revised version of his
bill on Monday, December 12, 2011. See,
amendment
in the nature of a substitute [71 pages in PDF].
The House Judiciary Committee (HJC), which he
chairs, is scheduled to mark up this bill on Thursday, December 15, 2011, at 10:00 AM.
This bill is the only item on the
agenda.
Rep. Smith also released a
summary of this amendment.
The related bill in the Senate is S 968
[LOC |
WW], the "Preventing
Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011"
or "PROTECT IP Act". The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) amended and approved this bill on May 26, 2011.
|
|
|
Rep. Issa and Others Propose USITC Based
Approach to Web Sites Dedicated to Infringing Activity |
12/14. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA),
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA),
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), and others have
announced, but not yet introduced, a competing bill to be titled "Online
Protection & Enforcement of Digital Trade Act". This title provides a near
acronym -- "OPEN Act". See,
draft [18 pages in PDF].
Their
summary of the draft states that their proposal would give new authority to the
U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) to deal with
rogue foreign web sites.
The summary states that the USITC is already "an arbiter of
whether imports violate U.S. intellectual property rights and should or should
not be allowed into the U.S. Under current law, rightsholders can petition the
ITC to investigate whether certain imports violate U.S. trademarks and
copyrights. The ITC is authorized to not only investigate these issues but to
initiate actions to prevent the imports in question from entering into the U.S."
It elaborates that "Under our proposal, the ITC would be
authorized to initiate an investigation at a rightsholder's request and issue a
cease-and-desist order against foreign websites that provide illegal digital
imports and/ or facilitate the importation of counterfeit goods. In order to
issue such an order, the ITC would need to find that the foreign website is
``primarily´´ and ``willfully´´ engaging in infringement of U.S. copyrights or
willfully enabling imports of counterfeit merchandise. This standard comports
with existing copyright and trademark law. An ITC cease-and-desist order would,
under this proposal, compel financial transaction providers and Internet
advertising services to cease providing financial and advertising services to
the foreign website."
It also states that "respondents would have a right to be heard", but that
the USITC could issue emergency ex parte orders.
It also proposes "immunity for those entities that are complying
with the ITC orders, including financial transaction providers and Internet
advertising services that voluntarily refuse to provide services to foreign
websites that endanger public health by supplying illicit prescription
drugs."
The draft bill provides that "It shall be unlawful to operate or maintain an
Internet site dedicated to infringing activity."
Then, if the USITC "determines ... that an Internet site
dedicated to infringing activity is operated or maintained in violation" of this
prohibition, the USITC may "issue an order to cease and desist the infringing
activity of the Internet site against the Internet site and to the owner and the
operator of the Internet site".
The draft also provides that a "financial transaction provider
shall take reasonable measures, as expeditiously as reasonable, designed to
prevent or prohibit the completion of payment transactions by the provider that
involve customers located in the United States and the Internet site associated
with the domain name subject to the order ..."
Also, "an Internet advertising service shall, as expeditiously
as reasonable, take technically feasible measures intended to cease serving
advertisements to the domain name subject to the order ... in situations in
which the service would directly share revenues generated by the advertisements
with the operator of the Internet site associated with that domain name."
The draft contains numerous immunity provisions for
intermediaries. For example, "No cause of action shall lie in any court against
a financial transaction provider or an Internet advertising service on which a
copy of an order is served ... or against any director, officer, employee, or
agent thereof, other than in an action ... for‚ (i) any act reasonably designed
to comply with this subsection or reasonably arising from the order; or (ii) any
act, failure, or inability to meet the obligations under this subsection of the
provider or service if the provider or service, as the case may be, makes a good
faith effort to comply with such obligations."
|
|
|
Critics and Proponents Dispute Merits of
SOPA |
12/14. Proponents and critics of the SOPA have been waging intensified
lobbying and advertising campaigns in the run up to mark up of HR 3261
[LOC |
WW], the
"Stop Online Piracy Act" or "SOPA"
A large group of individuals, who describe themselves as the people who
"designed the Internet the first time", sent a
letter to members of Congress on December 15 opposing the SOPA. The group
includes Vint Cerf,
who has worked for Google since 2005.
The letter states that "If enacted, either of these bills will create an
environment of tremendous fear and uncertainty for technological innovation, and
seriously harm the credibility of the United States in its role as a steward of
key Internet infrastructure. Regardless of recent amendments to SOPA, both bills
will risk fragmenting the Internet's global domain name system (DNS) and have
other capricious technical consequences. In exchange for this, such legislation
would engender censorship that will simultaneously be circumvented by deliberate
infringers while hampering innocent parties' right and ability to communicate
and express themselves online."
The Tech Freedom (TF), Competitive Enterprise
Institute (CEI), Americans for Job Security (AJS), and Americans for Limited Government (ALG)
sent a letter
on December 14 to Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) in which they wrote that
"While we applaud the manager's amendment proposed by Chairman Smith, there simply has not
been time to properly evaluate its real-world consequences. Although the proposed changes would
indeed improve the bill, they leave several legitimate objections unaddressed."
They wrote that there is a "massive grassroots campaign" against "Internet
censorship", and "profound public skepticism". Hence, "If SOPA is ultimately
enacted, any public perception that Congress failed to carefully balance the
competing interests of copyright enforcement, free speech, due process, and
Internet freedom will further erode public support not only for Congress, but
also for copyright itself. The erosion of public respect for copyright is a
primary factor behind the dramatic increase in infringement in recent years."
They urged the HJC to postpone the mark up, hold additional hearings, and
allow sufficient time for preparation of proposed amendments.
The Internet Society (IS) announced on
December 12 that its Board of Trustees "has expressed concern with a number of
U.S. legislative proposals that would mandate DNS blocking and filtering by ISPs
to protect the interests of copyright holders."
The IS wrote in a release
that it is "concerned with provisions in both bills regarding Domain Name System
(DNS) filtering. DNS filtering is often proposed as a way to block illegal
content consumption by end users. Yet policies to mandate DNS filtering will be
ineffective for that purpose and will interfere with cross-border data flows and
services undermining innovation and social development across the globe."
The IS continued that "Filtering DNS or blocking domain names does not remove the illegal
content -- it simply makes the content harder to find. Those who are determined to
download filtered content can easily use a number of widely available,
legitimately-purposed tools to circumvent DNS filtering regimes. As a result,
DNS filtering encourages the creation of alternative, non-standard DNS systems."
"From a security perspective, DNS filtering is incompatible with an important
security technology called DNSSEC. In fact, DNSSEC would be weakened by these
proposals. This means that the DNS filtering proposals in SOPA and PIPA could
ultimately reduce global Internet security, introduce new vulnerabilities, and
put individual users at risk."
"Most worrisome", the IS concluded, "DNS filtering and blocking raises human
rights and freedom of expression concerns, and often curtails international principles of rule of
law and due process. Some countries have used DNS filtering and blocking as a
way to restrict access to the global Internet and to curb free expression."
The Computer & Communications Industry
Association (CCIA) stated in a
release
on December 14 that "All who value the economic and political freedom of the
Internet need to join in opposing the overly broad Internet censorship and
regulatory regime, which SOPA and PIPA would create. The fact that some in the
House Judiciary Committee are so dismissive of the concerns of so many diverse
stakeholders from cybersecurity experts and venture capitalists to human rights
groups and tech industry leaders is perplexing."
Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google, spoke at an event in Washington
DC on December 12. The moderator of the program asked him why he opposes this
bill. He responded, "mostly because it criminalizes the intermediaries".
He stated that it provides that "we are going to criminalize the linking and structure of
the internet itself". He said that this is "censorship of the internet links".
Moreover, governments will also use this to censor speech. And, as a result,
"the internet is going to get balkanized". See,
video of event.
Rep. Smith responded to some of his critics, including Google. He wrote in a
December 14
release that "It's disappointing that some critics of the Stop Online Piracy
Act do not understand what the bill actually does. The manager's amendment
introduced earlier this week narrows the scope of the bill to ensure that it
only applies to foreign rogue websites. The bill defines rogue sites as foreign
websites primarily dedicated to the sale and distribution of illegal or
infringing material or foreign websites that market themselves as websites
primarily dedicated to illegal or infringing activity. Lawful companies and
websites like Google, Twitter, Yahoo and Facebook have nothing to worry about
under this bill."
He continued that "Unfortunately, that has not stopped some of the bill's
critics from spreading lies about the legislation in an attempt to stall efforts
by Congress to combat foreign rogue websites. Companies like Google have made
billions by working with and promoting foreign rogue websites so they have a
vested interest in preventing Congress from stopping rogue sites."
Rep. Smith also raised the subject of Google's own illegal activities. "In
August, Google paid half a billion dollars to settle a criminal case because of
the search engine giant's active promotion of foreign rogue pharmacies that sold
counterfeit and illegal drugs to U.S. patients. Their opposition to this
legislation is self-serving since they profit from doing business with rogue
sites that steal and sell America's intellectual property."
See also, story
titled "Google to Pay $500 Million for Allowing Its AdWords Program to be Used
to Promote Illegal Online Drug Sales" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 2,292, August 24, 2011.
Michael O'Leary of the Motion Picture
Association of America (MPAA), stated in a
release that "Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt
again engaged in sky is falling rhetoric in attacking important legislation that
targets criminals who profit from online piracy and counterfeiting."
O'Leary wrote that "Schmidt's comment that the legislation ``criminalizes the
intermediaries´´ is a new weapon in their arsenal of hyperbole.
There is broad recognition that all companies in the Internet ecosystem have a
serious responsibility to target criminal activity. This type of rhetoric only
serves as a distraction and I hope it is not a delaying tactic."
Chris Dodd, head of the MPAA, gave a
speech in Washington DC on December 13 in which he stated that "Hollywood
is pro-Internet. We stand with those who strongly oppose foreign governments
that would unilaterally block websites, and thus deny the free flow of
information and speech. So I want to make it clear right at the outset that our
fight against content theft is not a fight against technology. It is a fight
against criminals. Nor is it a fight to protect a stagnant and outmoded business
model. Indeed, it is fundamentally a fight to protect jobs."
Former Senator Dodd continued that "Contrary to piracy apologists, the operators of
these fraudulent sites aren't overzealous film buffs or political activists making a statement
about freedom of information. They are criminals, plain and simple: they don't innovate, they
don’t adhere to manufacturing standards, and they certainly don't pay taxes on
the proceeds from their scams. They dupe honest consumers into accepting stolen
-- and in many cases counterfeit and dangerous -- goods."
"Therefore", Dodd concluded, "I find absolutely reprehensible the comparisons
some have made between efforts to shut down foreign rogue sites and the policies of repressive
governments. We have not proposed, nor would we ever support, any efforts to
block political websites, censor social media, or silence artists because of
what they want to say. It's an outrageous false comparison."
A large collection of movie, record, book publishing and other
content companies, as well as related unions, stated in an
ad run in New York based newspapers that "illegal foreign websites are
destroying American jobs and causing billions in lost revenue. They threaten the
jobs of some of the best-known creative talent in the world, many of whom belong
to New York guilds and unions. And they threaten the jobs of hundreds of
thousands of musicians, songwriters, artists and professionals in entertainment
companies, worldwide sports organizations and telecasters -- in New York and
across America. That's why we all strongly urge you to protect the jobs and intellectual
property of American citizens by supporting" the SOPA and PROTECT IP Act.
Maria Pallante, the Register
of Copyright, stated at an event in Washington DC on December 12 that passage of this legislation
is one of the two top priorities of the Copyright Office.
The other is passage of orphan works legislation.
|
|
|
|
In This
Issue |
This issue contains the following items:
• Rep. Smith Releases Revised Version of SOPA to Be Marked Up on December 15
• Rep. Issa and Others Propose USITC Based
Approach to Web Sites Dedicated to Infringing Activity
• Critics and Proponents Dispute Merits of SOPA
|
|
|
Washington Tech
Calendar
New items are highlighted in
red. |
|
|
Monday, December 12 |
The House will meet at 12:00 NOON for morning hour, and at 2:00 PM
for legislative business. The House will consider numerous non-technology related items under
suspension of the rules. Votes will be postponed until 6:30 PM. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
11:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The Copyright Clearance
Center (CCC) will host a panel discussion titled "Copyright & Commerce: Orphan
Works and Fair Use in a Digital Age". The speakers will be
Maria Pallante (Register of
Copyright), Victor Perlman (American Society of Media Photographers),
and Cecilia Kang (Washington Post). This is an invitation only event. For more information,
contact Craig Sender at csender at copyright dot com or 978-646-2502. See,
notice. Location: Newseum, 555 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 13 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at
12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
10:30 AM. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will hold an event
titled "open meeting". Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room, 445 12th St., SW.
1:00 - 2:30 PM. The Information
Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host an panel discussion titled
"Benefits and Limitations of Self-Regulation for Online Behavioral
Advertising". The speakers
will be Daniel Castro (ITIF),
Fernando LaGuarda (Time Warner Cable), and Morgan Reed (Association for
Competitive Technology). See,
notice. Location:
Microsoft, 11th floor, 901 K St., NW.
2:30 PM. The Senate Intelligence
Committee (SIC) will hold a closed meeting. See,
notice. Location: Room 219, Hart Building.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal Communications
Bar Association (FCBA) will host an event titled "Litigating Appeals in the
D.C. Circuit". Prices vary. CLE credits. Registrations and cancellations
are due by 12:00 NOON on December 12. See,
registration form.
Location: Dow Lohnes, 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW.
6:00 - 9:15 PM. The DC Bar Association
will host an event titled "IP Year In Review Series 2011:The New Patent Law and
More". The speakers will be Bradley Wright (Banner & Witcoff) and Eric Wright
(Stites & Harbison). See,
notice. The price to attend ranges from $89 to $129. CLE credits. For more
information, call 202-626-3488. Location: DC Bar Conference Center, 1101 K St., NW.
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 14 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at
12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
9:00 AM. The House Commerce Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on
Communications and Technology will hold a hearing titled "ICANN’s
Top-Level Domain Name Program". The witnesses will be Fiona Alexander
(NTIA),
Joshua Bourne (Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse), Thomas Embrescia (Employ
Media), Anjali Hansen (Council of Better Business Bureaus), Daniel Jaffe
(Association of National Advertisers), and Kurt Pritz (ICANN).
See,
notice. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building.
9:30 - 11:30 AM. The Senate Banking
Committee's (SBC) Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment will hold a
hearing titled "Examining Investor Risks in Capital Raising". See,
notice. Location: Room 538, Dirksen Building.
10:00 AM. The House Ways and
Means Committee (HWMC) will hold a hearing on the status of negotiations
for a Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). See,
notice.
Location: Room 1101, Longworth Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce
Committee (SCC) will meet to mark up numerous bills, including S 1953
[LOC |
WW], the
"Research and Innovative Technology Administration Reauthorization Act of 2011". See,
notice. Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) will hold a hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation". The only witness will be Robert Mueller (FBI Director). See,
notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
|
|
|
Thursday, December 15 |
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at
12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
The Senate will meet at 9:30 AM. It will consider the
nomination of Morgan Kristen to be a Judge of the
U.S. Court of Appeals
(9thCir).
9:00 -10:30 AM. The American Enterprise
Institute (AEI) will host a panel discussion by proponents of giving green cards to
foreign students who graduate from U.S. universities with advanced degrees in STEM fields.
The speakers will be Rep. Tim Griffin (R-AR), Madeline
Zavodny (Agnes Scott College), and Sudhakar Shenoy (IMC). See,
notice. For more information, contact Matt McKillip at matthew dot mckillip at aei dot
org or 202-862-7197. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW.
9:30 AM - 5:00 PM. The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
North American Numbering Council
will meet. Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room (Room TW-C305), 445 12th St., SW.
9:30 AM. The House Financial
Services Committee's (HFSC) Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government
Sponsored Enterprises will hold a hearing on HR 3606, the “Reopening American
Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2011". See,
notice. Location: Room HVC-210, Capitol Visitor Center.
10:00 AM. The House Judiciary
Committee (HJC) will meet to mark up HR 3261
[LOC |
WW], the
"Stop Online Piracy Act". See,
notice. See also,
amendment in the nature of a substitute [71 pages in PDF] to be offered by
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX). Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) will hold an executive business meeting. The agenda
includes consideration of no technology related bills. The agenda includes
consideration of the nomination of Brian Wimes to be a Judge of the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri. See,
notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
|
|
|
Friday, December 16 |
The House may meet at 9:00 AM for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
schedule for the week.
|
|
|
Monday, December 19 |
No events listed.
|
|
|
About Tech Law
Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and a subscription e-mail alert.
The basic rate for a subscription to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for
a single recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients.
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free subscriptions are
available for federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert are not published in the web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
credit
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
David
Carney
Contact: 202-364-8882.
carney at techlawjournal dot com
3034 Newark St. NW, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2011 David Carney. All rights reserved.
|
|
|