House Committee Approves IPAWS
Bill |
5/20. The House Homeland Security Committee (HHSC)
approved HR 1738 [LOC |
WW], the "Integrated
Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2015".
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL)
introduced this bill on April 13, 2015. However, other versions of this bill
were considered by prior Congresses. For the 112th Congress, see HR 2904
[LOC
| WW],
the "Integrated Public Alert Warning System Modernization Act of 2011", and
HR 3563 [LOC
| WW], the
"Integrated Public Alert Warning System Modernization Act of 2012". For the 113th
Congress, see HR 3283 [LOC
| WW], the
"Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2013".
This bill would amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to add a new section
titled "National integrated public alert and warning system modernization".
The HHSC approved by voice vote an
amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Rep.
Martha McSally (R-AZ). The HHSC also approved a minor
amendment offered by Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ). The
HHSC then approved the bill as amended by voice vote.
|
|
|
More House Homeland Security Committee
Bills |
5/20. The House Homeland Security Committee (HHSC)
approved HR 1646 [LOC |
WW], the
"Homeland Security Drone Assessment and Analysis Act".
Rep. Bonnie Coleman (D-NJ) introduced this bill
on March 26, 2015. This bill would merely require the DHS to conduct a study of the threats to
homeland security posed by "commercially available small and medium sized unmanned
aircraft". The HHSC approved by voice vote an
amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by
Rep. Coleman. The HHSC then approved the bill by voice vote.
5/20. The House Homeland Security Committee (HHSC)
approved HR 1637
[LOC |
WW], the
"Federally Funded Research and Development Sunshine Act of 2015".
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) introduced this bill on March 25, 2015. The DHS
conducts research on, among other topics, communications and interoperability
and cyber security. This bill would merely require the DHS to annually provide
Congressional Committees with a list of its federally funded research projects.
The HHSC approved this bill by voice vote, without amendment.
5/20. The House Homeland Security Committee (HHSC)
approved HR 1626 [LOC |
WW], the "DHS
IT Duplication Reduction Act of 2015". Rep. Will
Hurd (R-TX) introduced this bill on March 25, 2015. This bill would merely require the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to write a report for Congressional Committees. The HHSC
approved by voice vote an
amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Rep. Hurd. The HHSC also approved by voice
vote an
amendment offered by Rep. Sheila Lee (D-TX). The
HHSC then approved the bill by voice vote.
|
|
|
Senate Banking Committee Approves Financial
Regulatory Improvement Act |
5/21. The Senate Banking Committee (SBC) approved
S __, a yet to be introduced bill titled the "Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of
2015". This bill would provide post-Dodd Frank regulatory relief to financial institutions. See,
discussion draft [215 pages in PDF] and SBC
summary.
See also, the SBC Democrats'
amendment in
the nature of a substitute [17 pages in PDF] and
summary
[2 pages in PDF].
The SBC rejected the Democrats' substitute, and then approved the Republicans' draft bill,
on straight party line votes.
Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), the Chairman of the
SBC, wrote in his
opening
statement that "I view this as just one step in a very long process. Even if we report
this bill on a partisan vote, I do not in any way see this as the end of the road. In fact, I
believe it presents another opportunity to explore areas of potential agreement before this bill
goes to the Senate floor which I fully expect that it will."
The Democrats' substitute is titled the "Community Financial Institution Regulatory
Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2015".
Both bills would, among other things, amend Section 503 of the Gramm Leach Bliley Act
(15 U.S.C. § 6803) to create an
exception to the annual written privacy notice requirement for financial institutions that have
not changed their privacy policy.
|
|
|
Sen. Leahy Again Introduces Bill to Provide
for Alienable USPTO Acceleration Certificates |
5/20. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)
introduced S 1402 [LOC |
WW], the "Patents
for Humanity Program Improvement Act".
This bill would provide statutory authority for the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) Patents for
Humanity Program. It would also allow the recipients of the USPTO's "acceleration
certificates" to sell these, and thereby create a market for preferential treatment
at the USPTO.
The current USPTO program, and especially this bill's proposal to enable well capitalized
patent applicants to receive preferential treatment, are fundamentally inconsistent with the
mission of the USPTO.
Also, it is highly unlikely that this bill will be enacted into law.
Patent applications and other proceedings take time. The USPTO created a program in February
of 2012 under which it grants "acceleration certificates" to patent applicants, owners
and licensees, based upon value judgments regarding USPTO policy goals, who have used patented
technologies to "address humanitarian needs".
The USPTO began the process of creating this program early in President Obama's first
term. The USPTO is not implementing a statute. Rather, this program is an invention of the
Obama administration.
It was created by a USPTO
notice
in the Federal Register (FR), Vol. 77, No. 26, February 8, 2012, at Pages 6544-6548.
This bill references this 2012 FR notice, provides statutory authority for the program
created by this FR notice, and makes these certificates alienable, including by sale.
Legislative History. This bill was referred to the
Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC). Sen. Leahy and
Sen. Grassley are the ranking Democrat and Chairman, respectively.
Sen. Leahy has long been introducing this bill. In the 112th Congress he introduced S 3652
[LOC |
WW], the "Patents
for Humanity Program Improvement Act of 2012". See, story titled "Sen. Leahy Introduces
a Bill to Make USPTO Acceleration Certificates Alienable" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 2,487,
December 10, 2012.
Neither the Senate, nor the SJC, took any action on that bill. Although, Sen. Leahy did not
introduce that bill until the closing days of the 112th Congress.
However, he introduced S 712
[LOC |
WW], the "Patents
for Humanity Program Improvement Act of 2013", early in the 113th Congress. See, story titled
"Sen. Leahy Again Introduces Bill to Make USPTO Acceleration Certificates Alienable" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 2,551,
April 17, 2013.
But, neither the Senate, nor the SJC, took any action on that bill either.
Sen. Leahy's Explanation of the Bill. Sen. Leahy explained this bill. See,
Congressional Record, May 20, 2015, at Pages 3187-8. Actually, this statement is mostly
cut and pasted from his statement on the introduction of the bill in the 113th Congress. See,
Congressional Record, April 11, 2013, at Page S2592.
He wrote that "A healthy patent system should do more than drive economic development; it
should incentivize research and discoveries that advance humanitarian needs."
He said that this bill "strengthens" the program created by the USPTO in 2012, which
"provides rewards to selected patent holders who use their invention to address a humanitarian
issue that significantly affects the public health or quality of life of an impoverished population.
Those who receive the award are given a certificate to accelerate certain PTO processes".
Sen. Leahy continued that "The innovations that have been recognized by this program help
underserved people throughout the world. Award winners have worked to improve the treatment and
diagnosis of devastating diseases, improve nutrition and the environment, and combat the spread
of dangerous counterfeit drugs."
He also related that President Obama's first head of the USPTO, David Kappos, stated at a
SJC hearing in 2012 that the program would be more effective, and more attractive to innovators,
if the acceleration certificates awarded were transferable to a third party.
And, said Sen. Leahy, "Since that time, other small start-ups and global health groups
have emphasized that making the certificates transferable would improve their usability and increase
the incentives of the Patents for Humanity Award. The Patents for Humanity Program Improvement Act
makes this enhancement to the program. It is a straightforward, cost-neutral bill that will
strengthen this award and encourage innovations to be used for humanitarian goods."
|
|
|
Commentary: Preferential Treatment in the
Patent Process |
5/20. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) introduced S 1402
[LOC |
WW], the "Patents
for Humanity Program Improvement Act".
This bill would provide statutory authority for the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office's (USPTO) recently created Patents for Humanity Program. Currently, this
program is a creature of the Obama administration, not Congressional statute. This bill would also
allow the recipients of the USPTO's policy based "acceleration certificates" to sell these.
Hence, this bill would create a market for preferential treatment at the USPTO.
The mission of the USPTO is set by the patent system is set by the Constitution. It is to secure
for limited times to inventors the exclusive right to their discoveries. Until a few years ago,
the USPTO did not judge the value or merits of an invention. It merely determined whether the claim
is an invention. Until a few years ago, the USPTO did not provide any compensation or reward to
inventors. The incentives to inventors was the potential revenue that derives from exclusive
practice of an invention, or the sale or licensing of that invention.
The USPTO reviews and acts upon patent applications. It grants patents to inventors, who have
disclosed something new, useful, novel and non-obvious. Impartial patent examiners apply technical
and objective criteria. Rewards to the inventor, if any, come only through the operation of a free
market, and not from financially valuable transferable grants from the USPTO. This new USPTO
program, in contrast, puts the USPTO into the new position of giving rewards. These rewards will
be financially valuable if Sen. Leahy's bill is enacted.
The government does many things to try to bring about invention and
innovation, including many that involve giving out rewards. The government gives
research grants. It gives National Medals of Science, and National Medals of
Technology. It gives tax breaks to businesses that spend on research.
But, giving out policy based financial awards is not the function of the
patent system. Moreover, under this program, and Sen. Leahy's proposal, the
patent system itself is involved in the rewards program.
Under this new USPTO program, those who further the USPTO's enumerated policy goals are
awarded acceleration certificates. These can be of value to the awardee. Sen. Leahy proposes
to make these certificates alienable. That is, the awardee would be allowed to sell a certificate
to another participant in the patent process.
Patent processes take a long time. There are many things that the Congress does that slows
done the process, and things that it could do to reduce delays. The Congress has a history of
diverting USPTO user fees to subsidize other government programs. The Congress could provide
stable funding for more examiners.
Applicants usually have an interest in faster processing, and hence, would be willing to
pay for quicker determinations. But, by accelerating some, the USPTO is delaying and thereby
harming others. Moreover, some would be able to afford to pay for acceleration certificates,
while most others would not. Well capitalized businesses would benefit from this, while small
businesses and individual inventors would be harmed.
In short, this program, and Sen. Leahy's proposal, not only put the USPTO in the new
role of granting policy based rewards, but also depart from the principle that
all applicants are treated alike.
|
|
|
|
In This
Issue |
This issue contains the following items:
• House Committee Approves IPAWS Bill
• More House Homeland Security Committee Bills
• Senate Banking Committee Approves Financial Regulatory Improvement Act
• Sen. Leahy Again Introduces Bill to Provide for Alienable USPTO Acceleration
Certificates
• Commentary: Preferential Treatment in the Patent Process
• More Legislative News
|
|
|
Washington Tech
Calendar
New items are highlighted in
red. |
|
|
More Legislative News |
5/22. The Senate amended and passed HR 1314
[LOC |
WW], a bill that would
give the President trade promotion authority (TPA), by a vote of 62-37. See,
Roll Call No. 193. The House has yet to pass this or another TPA bill.
5/21. The House passed HR 2262
[LOC |
WW], the
"Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship Act of 2015"
or "SPACE Act", by a vote of 284-133. See, Roll Call No. 262.
Republicans voted 236-3. Democrats voted 48-130.
5/20. The Senate Commerce Committee (SCC) amended
and approved S 1297 [LOC |
WW], the
"Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act".
5/21. The House Foreign Affairs Committee
(HFAC) unanimously approved HR 2323
[LOC |
WW], the "United States
International Communications Reform Act of 2015". Rep. Ed
Royce (R-CA) and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) introduced this
bill on May 14. This is a reintroduction of a bill passed by the House last year by voice vote.
See, HR 4490 [LOC
| WW], the "United
States International Communications Reform Act of 2014", and story titled "House to
Consider International Communications Reform Act" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 2,681,
July 28, 2014.
5/21. The House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC)
approved HR 1853 [LOC |
WW], a bill to direct
the President to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan in the International
Criminal Police Organization, aka INTERPOL.
5/20. The Senate Commerce Committee (SCC)
approved without amendment HR 1020
[LOC |
WW], the "STEM
Education Act of 2015". Rep. Lamar Smith
(R-TX) introduced this bill on February 20, 2015. The full House passed it on February 25 by a
vote of 412-8. The bill is now ready for consideration by the full Senate. This bill expands the
definition of STEM for the federal science agencies to include not only science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics, but also computer science.
|
|
|
Monday, May 25 |
Memorial Day. This is a federal holiday. See, Office of Personnel
Management's (OPM) 2015
calendar of
federal holidays.
The House will not meet the week of May 25-29.
The Senate will not meet the week of May 25-29. See,
2015 Senate
Schedule.
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 26 |
11:45 AM - 1:15 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a presentation titled "Social Media, E-Discovery and
Ethics". The speaker will be
Robert Keeling (Sidley Austin). Free. No CLE credits. No reporters. No webcast.
Registration required. Send e-mail to Kevin Clark at kclark at complianceds dot com. See,
notice.
Location: Sidley Austin, 1501 K St., NW.
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Mobile Payments Committee will host a panel
discussion regarding potential regulation by the FTC, FCC, and CFPB of the security of
mobile payments data. The speakers will be Rick Hindman (Chief of the FCC's Enforcement
Bureau's Telecommunications Consumers Division), Katherine McCarron (FTC Bureau of Consumer
Protection's Division of Privacy and Identity Protection), and Scott Talbott (ETA). Free. No
CLE credits. No webcast. Bring your own lunch. See,
notice.
Location: Harris Wiltshire & Grannis, 8th floor, 1919
M St., NW.
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 27 |
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will
host an event titled "Meet the FCC Enforcement Bureau Front Office". The
speakers will be Travis LeBlanc (Chief of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau), William Davenport
(Deputy Chief), Paula Blizzard (Deputy Chief), and Phillip Rosario (Deputy Chief). The
Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) asserts that
this is event of its Enforcement Committee. No webcast. No CLE credits. Bring your own lunch.
Free. See, notice.
Location: Wiley Rein, 1776 K St., NW.
12:30 - 2:00 PM. The American Bar
Association (ABA) will host a panel discussion titled "Trade Legislation and Policy
Update". The speakers will be Angela Ellard (Republican Chief International Trade
Counsel, House Ways and Means Committee), Jason Kearns (Democratic Chief Trade Counsel, HWMC),
Everett Eissenstat (Republican Chief International Trade Counsel, Senate Finance Committee), and
Jayme White (Democratic Chief Adviser for International Competitiveness and Innovation, SFC). The
price to attend ranges from $15 to $25. No CLE credits. No webcast. Lunch will be served. See,
notice. Location: Barnes & Thornburg, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
|
|
|
Thursday, May 28 |
Supreme Court conference day. See,
2014-2015
calendar. Closed to the public.
10:30 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Brookings
Institution (BI) will host a panel discussion titled "The Digital Single Market:
Implications for the Transatlantic Relationship ". The speakers will be Andrus Ansip
(European Commission), Miriam Sapiro (BI), and Cameron Kerry (BI). See,
notice.
Location: JHU School of Advanced International Studies, 1740 Massachusetts Ave., NW.
12:00 NOON. The Cato Institute
will host a panel discussion titled "Removing Barriers to Online Medical Care".
The speakers will be Rene Quashie (Epstein Becker & Green), Jeff Rowes (Institute for
Justice), Josh Sharfstein (Johns Hopkins University), and Simon Lester (Cato). Free. Open
to the public. Webcast. See,
notice.
Location: Cato, 1000 Massachusetts Ave., NW.
12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a presentation titled "Hot Apps and Tech for the Modern
Lawyer". The price to attend ranges from free to $30. No CLE credits. For more
information, call 202-626-3463. The DC Bar has a history of barring reporters from its events.
See, notice.
Location: DC Bar Conference Center, 1101 K St., NW.
12:15 - 1:30 PM. The Federal
Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) International Telecommunications Committee will
host a panel discussion titled "Celebrating the ITU’s 150th Anniversary and the 50th
Anniversary of the Creation of INTELSAT". The speakers will be Henry Goldberg (Goldberg
Godles Weiner & Wright), Brian Fontes (National Emergency Numbering Association), David
Leive, and Jennifer Manner (EchoStar). No webcast. No CLE credits. Bring your own lunch.
Free. See,
notice. Location: Wiley Rein, 1776 K
St., NW.
1:00 PM. The US Telecom will
host a webcast presentation titled "Telecom Cyber Frameworks, Policies and Business
Processes". The speakers will be Jeff Goldtrop (FCC/PSHSB Associate Chief for
Cybersecurity and Communications Reliability) and Adam Sedgewick (DOC/NIST Senior Information
Technology Policy Advisor). See,
notice.
1:00 - 2:30 PM.The American Bar
Association (ABA) will host a webcast panel discussion titled "Online
Privacy & Data Security Soup to Nuts: A Primer and Update on Important Developments for
the Business Lawyer". The speakers will be Lisa Lifshitz, Richard Balough, Theodore
Claypoole, and Jonathan Rubens. Prices vary. Prices vary. CLE credits. See,
notice.
1:00 - 2:30 PM. The American Bar
Association (ABA) will host a webcast panel discussion titled "The
New EU Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court: Strategic Considerations for US
Applicants/Patentees". The speakers will be Bernd Aechter, Brad Hattenbach, Charles
Larsen, Willard Jones, and Margaret Welsh. Prices vary. CLE credits. See,
notice.
1:00 - 2:30 PM. The American Bar
Association (ABA) will host a webcast panel discussion titled "Dealing
With Cybersecurity Threats & Breaches". The speakers will be Henry Talavera
(Polsinelli PC), Brian Johnston (Polsinelli PC), Lisa Sotto (Hunton & Williams), Lisa Van
Fleet (Bryan Cave). Prices vary. CLE credits. See,
notice.
|
|
|
Friday, May 29 |
9:00 - 10:30 AM. The Information
Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host a panel discussion titled
"Uncle Sam’s Broadband Plan: Which Way Forward for the New Interagency Broadband
Council?". The speakers will be Doug Brake (ITIF), Blair Levin (Brookings Institute),
and Thomas Power (CTIA Wireless Association). Free. Open to the public. Live and archived
webcast. See,
notice. Location: ITIF/ITIC, Suite 610, 1101 K St., NW.
Deadline to submit comments to the Executive Office of the President's
(EOP) Office of Science and Technology Policy's (OSTP) National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC) regarding the
draft [15 pages in PDF] titled "2015 National Space Weather Strategy".
This draft addresses, among other things, the effect of solar flares, solar energetic particles,
and coronal mass ejections upon telecommunications. See,
notice in the
Federal Register, Vol. 80, No. 83, April 30, 2015, at Pages 24296-24297.
|
|
|
Sunday, May 31 |
The Senate will return from it Memorial Day recess
to consider legislation to extend and/or revise three provisions of surveillance law
(Section 215, lone wolf FISA authority, and roving wiretap).
12:00 MIDNIGHT. Three provisions of surveillance law
(Section 215, lone wolf FISA authority, and roving wiretap)
sunset.
|
|
|
|
|
About Tech Law
Journal |
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and a subscription e-mail alert.
The basic rate for a subscription to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for
a single recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients.
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free subscriptions are
available for federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert are not published in the web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
credit
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
David
Carney
Contact: 202-364-8882.
carney at techlawjournal dot com
3034 Newark St. NW, Washington DC, 20008.
Privacy
Policy
Notices
& Disclaimers
Copyright 1998-2015 David Carney. All rights reserved.
|
|
|