|
This document is split into four parts:
This document was created by Tech Law Journal by converting a MS Word 8.0 version into HTML. Several features were eliminated in the conversion, including double spacing, and paragraph indentations. Footnotes were converted into sidenotes. Copyright 1998 Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved. BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT INTEL CORPORATION United States Court of Appeals _________________________________ Appeal No. 98-1308 _________ INTERGRAPH CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Judge Edwin L. Nelson
[begin page i] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS INTERGRAPH CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST Counsel for the appellant, Intel Corporation, certifies the following: 1. The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is Intel Corporation. 2. The name of the real party in interest represented by me is Intel Corporation. 3. There are no other parent companies, subsidiaries (except wholly-owned subsidiaries), or affiliates of Intel Corporation that have issued shares to the public represented by me in this appeal. 4. The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared for Intel Corporation now represented by me in the trial court or are expected to appear in this court are: Joel M. Freed and Marc G. Schildkraut, HOWREY & SIMON; Gary C. Huckaby and Thad G. Long, BRADLEY, ARANT, ROSE & WHITE, L.L.P. |
|