Tech Law Journal

Capitol Dome
News, records, and analysis of legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer, internet, communications and information technology sectors

TLJ Links: Home | Calendar | Subscribe | Back Issues | Reference
Other: Thomas | USC | CFR | FR | FCC | USPTO | CO | NTIA | EDGAR


Appeal Brief of Intel (Part I - Title Page and Certificate of Interest).
Re: Intel v. Intergraph.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 98-1308.
Date filed: June 8, 1998.
Source: Chuck Mulloy, Intel Corp.

This document is split into four parts:

This document was created by Tech Law Journal by converting a MS Word 8.0 version into HTML.  Several features were eliminated in the conversion, including double spacing, and paragraph indentations.   Footnotes were converted into sidenotes. Copyright 1998 Tech Law Journal.  All rights reserved.


BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT INTEL CORPORATION

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit

_________________________________

Appeal No. 98-1308

_________

INTERGRAPH CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-N-3023-NE

Judge Edwin L. Nelson

OF COUNSEL:
Peter N. Detkin
Thomas C. Reynolds
INTEL CORPORATION
2200 Mission College Boulevard
Santa Clara, California 95052-8119
(408) 765-8080

 

June 8, 1998

Joel M. Freed
Marc G. Schildkraut
HOWREY & SIMON
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
(202) 783-0800

Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant
Intel Corporation

[begin page i]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

INTERGRAPH CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.


No. 98-1308

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST

Counsel for the appellant, Intel Corporation, certifies the following:

1.  The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is Intel Corporation.

2.  The name of the real party in interest represented by me is Intel Corporation.

3.  There are no other parent companies, subsidiaries (except wholly-owned subsidiaries), or affiliates of Intel Corporation that have issued shares to the public represented by me in this appeal.

4.  The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared for Intel Corporation now represented by me in the trial court or are expected to appear in this court are:

Joel M. Freed and Marc G. Schildkraut, HOWREY & SIMON;

Gary C. Huckaby and Thad G. Long, BRADLEY, ARANT, ROSE & WHITE, L.L.P.

Go to Part II, Table of Contents

 

Subscriptions | FAQ | Notices & Disclaimers | Privacy Policy
Copyright 1998-2008 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved.
Phone: 202-364-8882. P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.