Sen. Breaux Introduces Broadband Regulatory Parity Act
4/30. Sen. John Breaux (D-LA) and others
introduced the Broadband
Regulatory Parity Act of 2002, a bill that would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to pass
regulations subjecting all providers of broadband services, and broadband access
services, to the same regulatory requirements.
Moreover, the bill would require that the FCC do so without increasing the
regulatory requirements of any service provider. The immediate effect of the
bill would be to remove regulatory requirements that are imposed upon the
incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) in the provision of DSL service, but
that are not imposed upon cable companies in the provision of cable modem
service. Like HR 1542,
the Tauzin Dingell bill, this bill is supported by ILECs.
FCC Promulgation of Regulatory Parity Regulations. The bill would add a
new Section 262 to Title 47. It would require that the FCC, within 120 after
passage, "prescribe regulations to ensure that (1) all broadband services,
and all broadband access services, are subject to the same regulatory
requirements, or no regulatory requirements; (2) all providers of broadband
services, and all providers of broadband access services, are subject to the
same regulatory requirements, or no regulatory requirements, with respect to the
provision of such services and the facilities and equipment used to provide such
services in the provision of such services; and (3) paragraphs (1) and (2) are
implemented without increasing the regulatory requirements applicable to any
provider of broadband services, or broadband access services, on any such
service or on any facilities or equipment used to provide any such service in
the provision of such service."
No State Jurisidiction Over Broadband. Furthermore, the bill provides
that "broadband services and broadband access services, and the facilities
and equipment used to provide such services in the provision of such services,
shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of any State."
Obligations of ILECS to ISPs. The bill also provides that "each
incumbent local exchange carrier has the duty to provide all Internet service
providers with the telecommunications necessary for such provider to provide
broadband access service to its subscribers. Such telecommunications shall be
offered on rates, terms, and conditions that are just and reasonable."
The bill also states that "Nothing in this section affects the requirements
of section 271",
"Nothing in this section affects the obligations of incumbent local
exchange carriers under section 251(c) to provide
requesting telecommunications carriers with services and access to facilities
and equipment necessary for the provision of switched band voice
telecommunications service" and "Nothing in this section affects
section 251(f)."
256 kpbs. The bill defines broadband as "256 kilobits per second in
at least one direction".
The bill's original cosponsors are Sen. Don
Nickles (R-OK), Sen. Max Cleland
(D-GA), Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS), Sen. Zell Miller (D-GA), and Sen. Kay Hutchison (R-TX).
Sen. Breaux stated in a release
that "To ensure and encourage the widespread deployment of broadband
networks in this country, Congress must level the regulatory playing field in
the broadband market ... Unfortunately, different rules for competing high speed
Internet companies are stifling competition. This bill aims to make regulations
more simple and more fair, insisting that all broadband service providers play
by the same rules."
Walter McCormick, P/CEO of the U.S. Telecom
Association (USTA), a group that represents ILECs, stated in a release that
"We commend Senators Breaux and Nickles for their introduction of this
important legislation that will spur the deployment of broadband infrastructure,
unleash vigorous head to head competition for broadband service providers,
increase consumer choice, and stimulate the nation's economy."
BellSouth's Herschel Abbott stated that
"this is a reasonable approach that deserves wide and immediate support in
Congress. Passage will encourage broadband providers to compete for consumers
who will be offered improved service, better access and more choices in internet
service providers."
SBC issued a release
in which it stated that "While the Breaux Nickles bill takes a different
approach than that of the House passed Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment
Act (H.R. 1542), both recognize the fundamental need for all providers of
broadband services to compete under the same rules and regulations."
In contrast, Russell Frisby, President of CompTel,
a group that represents competitive local exchange carriers, stated in a release that
"Members of the Senate should not be fooled; Breaux's bill is the Tauzin
Dingell bill. It was a bad bill in the House and will continue to be a bad bill
in the Senate."
CTIA Files Petition with FCC to Eliminate Rules
4/30. The Cellular Telecommunications and
Internet Association (CTIA) filed a Petition for Rulemaking
[incomplete copy, in PDF] with the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) asking that it eliminate unnecessary
regulations pertaining to Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI),
E-911, local number portability, tower citing, and other topics.
The CTIA's petition relies on the February 19, 2002, opinion
in U.S.
Court of Appeals (DCCir) in Fox v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027, which applies a plain
meaning construction to Section 202(h) of the Telecom Act of 1996. This section
requires that the FCC "shall review its rules adopted pursuant to this
section and all of its ownership rules biennially as part of its regulatory
reform review under section 11 of the Communications Act of 1934 and shall
determine whether any of such rules are necessary in the public interest as the
result of competition. The Commission shall repeal or modify any regulation it
determines to be no longer in the public interest."
Tom Wheeler, P/CEO of CTIA, stated in a release
that "The Fox decision gave clear direction to the FCC: prove a regulation
is vital and indispensable or get rid of it ... We want to help the Commission
meet this standard by jump starting the 2002 Biennial Review Process."
On April 19 the FCC filed a Petition for Rehearing En
Banc [40 pages in PDF] in the Fox case with the Court of Appeals. The FCC
argues for less literal construction of Section 202(h). It wants "A less
stringent interpretation of the term ``necessary´´ ". It argues that the
Court should construe this word in its "statutory context" rather than
"in its most literal sense".
CPNI. The CTIA stated in its release that "The FCC should eliminate
its CPNI rules that were recently vacated by the 10th Circuit Court and adopt
modified rules based on the Federal Trade Commission's Fair Information
Practices."
47 U.S.C. § 222 provides, in part: "Except as required by law or with the
approval of the customer, a telecommunications carrier that receives or obtains
customer proprietary network information by virtue of its provision of a
telecommunications service shall only use, disclose, or permit access to
individually identifiable customer proprietary network information in its
provision of (A) the telecommunication service from which such information is
derived, or (B) services necessary to, or used in, the provision of such
telecommunications service, including the publishing of directories."
The FCC adopted rules pursuant to § 222 in its CPNI Order on February 26, 1998.
US West and other telecommunications carriers challenged the constitutionality
of the order on First Amendment free speech grounds. The 10th Circuit agreed,
and vacated that part of the order pertaining to opt in requirements. See, opinion
of the U.S. Court of Appeals (10thCir) in U S WEST v. FCC, 182 F.3d 1224 (10th
Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 2215 (Jun. 5, 2000).
On September 7, the FCC released a document
[32 pages in PDF] titled "Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking."
The CTIA wrote in its petition that "While the Commission takes the
position that the Tenth Circuit's vacatur applied only to a single provision of
the CPNI rules, 47 C.F.R. 64.2007(c), the court vacated the entire Section
64.2007 rulemaking as constitutionally inadequate. ... the Commission must
eliminate all of its rules on the use of CPNI that were vacated by the Tenth
Circuit. Furthermore, in light of the Tenth Circuit.s vacatur Order, the
Commission should abandon its prior approach to CPNI rules, and adopt modified
rules based on the Federal Trade Commission's Fair Information Practices."
(Footnotes omitted.)
Biden Bill Would Ban Illicit Authentication Features
4/30. Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) and others
introduced S 2395, the Anticounterfeiting Amendments of 2002. The bill
would amend 18 U.S.C.
§ 2318, regarding trafficking in counterfeit labels and documentation for
software, movies, and records. The bill would criminalize "illicit
authentication features", and create a private right of action for
copyright owners.
Sen. Biden said "The criminal code has not kept up with the counterfeiting
operations of today's high-tech pirates, and it's time to make sure that it
does. The Anticounterfeiting Amendments of 2002 update and strengthen the
Federal criminal code, which currently makes it a crime to traffic in
counterfeit labels or copies of certain forms of intellectual property, but not
authentication features. For example, we can currently prosecute someone for
trafficking in fake labels for a computer program, but we cannot go after them
for faking the hologram that the software maker uses to ensure that copies of
the software are genuine."
He added that "many actions that violate current law go unprosecuted in
this day and age when priorities, such as the fight against terrorism and life
threatening crimes, necessarily take priority over crimes of property, be they
intellectual or physical. Moreover, the victims of this theft often do not have
a way to recover their losses from this crime. For this reason, the
Anticounterfeiting Amendments of 2002 also provide a private cause of action, to
permit the victims of these crimes to pursue the criminals themselves and
recover damages in federal court." See, Cong. Rec., April 30, 2002, at
S3561.
Section 2318(a) currently provides, in part, that "Whoever ... knowingly
traffics in a counterfeit label affixed or designed to be affixed to a
phonorecord, or a copy of a computer program or documentation or packaging for a
computer program, or a copy of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, and
whoever ... knowingly traffics in counterfeit documentation or packaging for a
computer program, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more
than five years, or both."
The current law applies to "counterfeit labels" and "counterfeit
documentation". The bill would extend the prohibition to "an illicit
authentication feature affixed to or embedded in, or designed to be affixed to
or embedded in" phonorecords, computer programs, and copies of motion
pictures or other audiovisual works.
The bill defines the term "authentication feature" as "any
hologram, watermark, certification, symbol, code, image, sequence of numbers or
letters, or other physical feature that either individually or in combination
with another feature is used by the respective copyright owner to verify that a
phonorecord, a copy of a computer program, a copy of a motion picture or other
audiovisual work, or documentation or packaging is not counterfeit or otherwise
infringing of any copyright".
The bill defines the term "illicit authentication feature" as "an
authentication feature, that (A) without the authorization of the respective
copyright owner has been tampered with or altered so as to facilitate the
reproduction or distribution of (i) a phonorecord; (ii) a copy of a computer
program; (iii) a copy of a motion picture or other audiovisual work; or (iv)
documentation or packaging; in violation of the rights of the copyright owner
under title 17."
The bill would also create a private right of action. It provides that "Any
copyright owner who is injured by a violation of this section or is threatened
with injury, may bring a civil action in an appropriate United States district
court."
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
of which Sen. Biden is the Chairman, held a hearing on the theft of American
intellectual property on February 12, 2002. See, "Senate Committee Holds
Hearing on IP Theft Abroad", TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert
No. 367, Feb. 13, 2002.
Microsoft's Jeff Raikes praised the Biden bill in a release.
He said that "Microsoft commends Senator Biden for taking action to close a
significant gap in the federal protection of copyrighted works".
The original cosponsors of the bill are Sen.
George Allen (R-VA), Sen. Ernest
Hollings (D-SC), Sen. Barbara Boxer
(D-CA), Sen. Patti Murray (D-WA), Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR), Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), and Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND).
Powell Addresses U.S. Chamber on Broadband Policy
4/30. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Chairman Michael Powell
gave a speech
on broadband policy to the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce in Washington DC.
He stated that four principles will guide the FCC's actions in the broadband
space. "First, we will promote the ubiquitous availability of broadband
capable infrastructure to al Americans."
"Second, the Commission will conceptualize broadband broadly to include any
platform that is capable of fusing communications power with computing power to
provide high bandwidth intensive content to meet the broad needs and demands of
consumers. That is, we recognize that broadband is not merely cable modem
service or DSL."
"Third, at this stage in the development, any broadband regulatory
environment must serve to promote investment and innovation." And
"Fourth, sound regulatory policy should, where appropriate, harmonize
regulatory rights and obligations that are attached to the provision of
similarly situated services across different technological platform."
Powell was the keynote luncheon speaker at a Chamber event titled Beyond
Broadband: Policy and Business Strategies for Next Generation Applications and
Services.
FRB Governor Addresses Impact of Technology on the Financial
Services Industry
4/30. Federal Reserve Board
Governor Mark Olson
gave a speech
titled "Risk Management in a Changing Economic Environment" to the
Bank Administration Institute, in Phoenix, Arizona.
He said that there are four "environmental factors that have changed in the
financial services industry ... industry consolidation, increased competition,
technological changes, and management focus on shareholder value." He then
elaborated on technological changes.
"First, technological advances from the past decade have allowed real time
access to credit information and public records. This ability to mine data
allows providers of financial products to identify target markets with minimal
geographic restraint. It has fostered development of monoline credit card and
mortgage lenders that have become major market participants in a very short
time. Second, technology has allowed organizations to separate the various
business functions, such as product marketing, credit review and administration,
and asset funding, and to locate each of these functions based on separate
criteria, such as the availability of labor or the tax environment. Third,
technology has helped institutions monitor and manage risk by hedging exposure
to credit risk and interest rate risk or by selling certain assets in secondary
markets."
However, he added that use of new technologies "also has potential
negatives ... Sophisticated technology can at times be its own risk as a system
failure or software error can have extremely negative consequences."
USTR Releases Annual Special 301 Report
4/30. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
(USTR) released its annual "Special 301"
report identifying foreign countries that fail to protect intellectual
property rights.
The Trade Act of 1974 requires the USTR to identify annually foreign countries
that deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or
fair and equitable market access for U.S. persons that rely on intellectual
property protection.
The sole priority foreign country is the Ukraine. The report states that it
retains this categorization "due to its persistent failure to take
effective action against significant levels of optical media piracy and to
implement intellectual property laws that provide adequate and effective
protection."
The report states that "In this year's review, USTR devoted special
attention to the growing issue of Internet piracy, as well as the ongoing
campaign to reduce production of unauthorized copies of ``optical media´´
products such as CDs, VCDs, DVDs, and CD-ROMs. Optical disk piracy is an
increasing problem in many countries, in particular, Ukraine, Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Russia, Thailand and Taiwan. In addition, USTR
continued to focus on other critically important issues including proper
implementation of the TRIPS Agreement by developing country WTO Members and full
implementation of TRIPS standards by new WTO Members at the time of their
accession. USTR also continued to encourage countries to ensure that government
ministries use only authorized software."
"Strong IPR protection should also be a priority for other countries
because it will help them attract investment and technology," said USTR Robert Zoellick in a release. "This
report reflects the Administration's continued commitment to ensure effective
intellectual property protection around the world. We will continue to work with
Congress to identify our priorities in this area."
Robert Holleyman, President of the Business
Software Alliance (BSA), stated in a release
that "Piracy is the largest trade barrier for the software industry. While
we have made great progress in our efforts to get foreign governments to
establish effective legal protections for intellectual property, piracy costs
the software industry more than $11 billion a year. To combat this growing
trend, it is important that we have the government's help in identifying
countries and regions that continue to allow software piracy and theft in
violation of their international treaty obligations".
International Intellectual Property Alliance
(IIPA) President Eric Smith stated in a release
that "The U.S. copyright industries are one of the most productive and
fastest growing sectors of the U.S. economy, accounting for over 5% of the U.S.
GDP and creating new U.S. jobs at over three times the rate of the remainder of
the economy. Reducing copyright piracy in overseas markets is vital to
this sector’s continued health and growth. IIPA and its members are
particularly gratified with the U.S. government’s attention on the ever
growing scourge of optical media piracy and its new initiatives against Internet
piracy."
Hillary Rosen of the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA) stated that "Today's announcement by
Ambassador Zoellick reflects the importance that he and this Administration
place in ensuring that our trading partners live up to their international
obligations in the protection of these critical US assets. On behalf of the
creators of today and tomorrow, I thank Ambassador Zoellick and his dedicated
team for their essential support."
Hollings to Hold Hearing On Muris James Merger Review Deal
4/30. The Senate Commerce Committee
will hold a hearing on the Memorandum
of Agreement between the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust Division regarding division of
responsibility for merger reviews. The hearing is set for Tuesday, May 7 at 9:30
AM. The witness list has not yet been set.
Sen. Hollings is the Chairman of the Committee, and an opponent of the deal,
which was negotiated by FTC Chairman Timothy Muris and Assistant Attorney
General Charles James.
This agreement defines, by market, which transactions will be reviewed by which
agency. For example, the FTC will have responsibility for transactions involving
companies that provide computer hardware, professional services, and satellite
manufacturing and launch, and launch vehicles. The DOJ will have responsibility
for transactions involving media and entertainment, telecommunications services
and equipment, and financial services.
Back on January 22, the Consumers Union
and the Consumer Federation of America
wrote a letter
to Sen. Hollings, regarding "the Bush administration's plans to transfer
the oversight of media industry mergers" from the FTC to the DOJ. They
wrote that "this jurisdictional gerrymandering seems to have been motivated
more by politics and ideology than a desire to better serve the public. Such a
move would be extremely detrimental to the public interest and to media
consumers. We urge you to continue to do your utmost to persuade the
administration to abandon its plans."
State Department in Cyber Security Talks in India
4/30. Lincoln Bloomfield, Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military
Affairs, held a press conference in New Delhi, India, at which he addressed
cyber security. Bloomfield traveled to New Delhi for the inaugural session of
the Indo US Cyber Security Forum. See, transcript.
He stated that "These talks marked the start of what will be a regular
relationship between India and the US on cyber security." He said that the
U.S. is also engaged in cyber security "dialogues with a number of our
closest friends and partners in the economic sphere. It is quite appropriate
that we should come to New Delhi insofar as India's presence in the
international cyber environment and in the global market is significant and is
destined to grow quite substantially."
In addition, Bloomfield addressed the U.S. response to cyber threats generally.
"Cyber security is a relative newcomer to the bureaucratic environment in
Washington and it is clearly an outgrowth of the phenomenal proliferation of
computers and information technology and the Internet. The organizations
represented on the US delegation in the last two days in the main did not exist
very few years ago. Now we find that our own government bureaucracy, our defense
and intelligence establishments must guard its information infrastructure
against all manner of cyber threats. In addition, most of the critical
infrastructure in the United States is not government owned or government
operated. It belongs to the private sector, the financial markets in particular,
and the entire range of corporations and small businesses. So, in the United
States, the government needs to enlist the cooperation of the private sector to
work collegially for their own mutual benefit."
House Subcommittee to Mark Up Federal Courts Improvement Act
4/30. The House Judiciary Committee's
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Internet and Intellectual Property will
meet to mark up HR 4125,
the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 2002, on Thursday, May 2. The bill
includes various provisions, but only one that relates to technology and
communications. Section 104 of the bill would affect the timing of reports
regarding the expiration of wiretap orders, and the denial of requests for
wiretap orders.
Section 2519 of the Criminal Code pertains to reports concerning intercepted
wire, oral, or electronic communications. Currently, this section begins,
"(1) Within thirty days after the expiration of an order (or each extension
thereof) entered under section 2518, or the denial of an order approving
an interception, the issuing or denying judge shall report to the Administrative
Office of the United States Courts--". The statute then lists the
information that must be reported. See, 18 U.S.C. § 2519.
HR 4125 would change this language to read as follows: "(1) In January of
each year, any judge who has issued an order (or extension thereof) under
section 2518 which expired during the preceding year or who has denied approval
of an interception during that year, shall report to the Administrative Office
of the United States Courts--". HR 4125 would not affect the
information that must be reported.
Section 104 of HR 4125 affects when judges must be report. In most cases, it
would delay the reporting of information about the expiration of wiretap orders,
and the denial of requests for wiretap orders.
People and Appointments
4/30. WorldCom announced that Bernie
Ebbers resigned his position as P/CEO/Director of WorldCom. John Sidgmore,
who was previously Vice Chairman, is now the P/CEO. Bert Roberts remains
as Chairman of the Board. See, WC
release.
4/30. Louis Reigel was named deputy chief financial officer for the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). See, FBI release.
4/30. The Senate confirmed the nominations of Michael Baylson and Cynthia
Rufe to be a Judges of the U.S.
District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. See, Cong. Rec.,
April 30, 2002, at S3578.
More News
4/30. Delaware Chancery Court dismissed the lawsuit of Walter Hewlett seeking to
block the merger of HP and Compaq.
4/30. The Copyright Office (CO)
published a notice
in the Federal Register that it is waiving its regulation regarding mail
delivery. It stated that "Due to the continued disruption in the delivery
of mail, the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is announcing
alternative methods for the filing of claims to the cable and satellite royalty
funds for the year 2001. In order to ensure that their claims are timely
received, claimants are encouraged to file their cable and satellite claims
electronically, utilizing the special procedures described in this
document." See, Federal Register, April 30, 2002, Vol. 67, No. 83, at Page
21176 - 21178.
FCC Receives Comments on AT&T Comcast Merger
4/29. April 29 was the deadline to file original comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in its
AT&T Comcast merger review proceeding. This proceeding is titled "In
the Matter of Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses,
Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp., Transferors, To AT&T Comcast
Corporation, Transferee". This is MB Docket No. 02-70. Oppositions and
responses are due by May 14. See, FCC
notice.
The Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF)
submitted a comment
[PDF] in which it stated that "in the context of today's rapidly changing
and converging digital environment, the Commission should view the proposed
merger as procompetitive, efficiency enhancing, and consistent with the public
interest. And it should not allow the indeterminate nature of the public
interest standard to serve as an opportunity for opening a ``regulation by
condition´´ bazaar, as has often been the case in the past with respect to the
Commission’s handling of merger proposals."
CapNet submitted a comment
[5 pages in PDF] expressing its "enthusiastic support for the merger".
It stated that "Comcast's commitment to the widespread deployment of
broadband services has been abundantly demonstrated in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area, as well as elsewhere, and the merger will accelerate the
upgrading of AT&T's cable systems to speed broadband deployment in
communities across the country. The merger will also spur much needed,
facilities based competition for telephone services. The merger therefore should
be approved." CapNet is a technology group whose members includes
Microsoft, Oracle, Computer Associates, Gateway, IBM, HP, and StorageTek.
AT&T is also a member.
BellSouth submitted a comment
[PDF] which focused more on FCC regulation of its DSL service, than the FCC's
review of the AT&T Comcast merger. It wrote that "Cable modem service
is an interstate information service and currently is not regulated by the
Commission. It is the dominant technology serving the mass market for high speed
Internet access. Digital subscriber line (``DSL´´) service provided by
incumbent local exchange carriers (``ILECs´´) is the only significant
competitor to cable modem service. Thus, absent competition from ILEC DSL
services, AT&T Comcast unquestionably would have an increased ability to
raise prices for their cable modem services."
It continued that "Current Commission rules regulate ILEC delivery of DSL
service far more heavily than they regulate cable modem service. These
regulatory disparities already hamper the effectiveness of DSL service as
competition for cable modem service. They 1) create significant disincentives to
ILEC investment in DSL and other new broadband equipment, 2) delay the rollout
of DSL and other broadband services, and 3) raise the costs of those services.
Providing AT&T Comcast with additional competitive advantages while
retaining regulatory disparities that already make DSL service providers less
effective competitors in the marketplace would exacerbate AT&T Comcast's
ability to dominate the mass market for broadband services."
BellSouth concluded that the FCC should "condition its approval of the
instant Applications of AT&T Corporation, Comcast Corporation and AT&T
Comcast Corporation on the elimination of the disparities in regulation between
ILEC DSL services and cable modem services."
American Cable Association (ACA)
submitted a comment
[19 pages in PDF] in which it stated that the merger would "combine in one
entity control of the essential digital programming distribution service for
small systems -- Headend In The Sky, along with substantial satellite and
terrestrially delivered programming. Access to these services is essential for
smaller market cable systems to: (i) deliver diverse programming; (ii) deploy
broadband services over cable; and (iii) compete with the two national DBS
providers EchoStar and DirecTV, both of which will not distribute satellite
programming to small cable operators."
It concluded that "AT&T Comcast will control HITS digital distribution
services as well as substantial satellite and terrestrially delivered
programming. ACA members will have no choice but to transact with the combined
company. AT&T Comcast will have ultimate leverage over many smaller cable
businesses and smaller market consumers. The question then becomes: How will
AT&T Comcast use this leverage?"
The ACA stated that it represents "more than 930 independent cable
companies serving about 7.5 million customers predominantly in smaller markets
and rural areas."
The Media Access Project (MAP) and
other groups submitted a comment [88 pages
in PDF] in which in which they requested that the FCC deny the request. They
complained about rising cable TV rates and market concentration. They asserted
that cable and satellite service providers do not compete with each other. They
also stated that the merger would create a huge purchaser for set top boxes, and
"allow AT&T/ Comcast to dictate standards.
Microsoft's relationship with AT&T and Comcast is also a matter of
significant concern. AT&T/ Comcast have given Microsoft preferential
treatment for MSN Internet services and for operating software on set top
boxes."
Groups Write Commerce Committees About .us Domain Names Sale
4/29. Jerry Berman (Center for Democracy and
Technology), Scott Harshbarger (Common Cause), and Andrew Schwartzman (Media Access Project) wrote a letter to the Chairman and
ranking members of the House and Senate Commerce Committees, and their telecom
subcommittees, regarding the .us Internet domain.
They wrote that "Last week, unbeknownst to most Americans, a major sell-off
was held for domain names in .us, such as churches.us. Thousands of names --
many of which are of significant public interest -- were sold off based on
flawed policies developed with almost no public input or public accountability.
We urge you, as part of your oversight responsibilities, to hold hearings
investigating this matter."
GAO Reports on International E-Commerce
4/29. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [100
pages in PDF] titled "International Electronic Commerce: Definitions and
Policy Implications". This is a wide ranging report that covers the meaning
of international electronic commerce, the available data on growth of
e-commerce, barriers to e-commerce, the legal framework affecting e-commerce,
and international trade agreements and negotiations.
GAO Reports on Building Security Technologies
4/29. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report
[72 pages in PDF] titled "National Preparedness: Technologies to Secure
Federal Buildings". The report reviews commercially available security
technologies, such as magnetic swipe cards, proximity cards, smart cards, keypad
entry devices, and biometric systems, metal detectors, x-ray scanners, explosive
detection, and video surveillance.
GAO Reports on Desktop Outsourcing by Federal Agencies
4/29. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [PDF]
titled "Desktop Outsourcing: Positive Results Reported, but Analyses Could
Be Strengthened".
The report addresses six "federal agencies' efforts to engage in an
information technology (IT) outsourcing alternative for acquiring distributed
computing services (typically those pertaining to desktop management) known as
``seat management.´´" With seat management, the contractor owns the
desktop, and other computing hardware, software and services are bundled and
provided on a per seat basis.
The report found that "No single overarching reason emerged regarding why
agencies decided to adopt seat management to address their distributed computing
needs."
The report also found that "we could not determine whether any of the
agencies were achieving expected costs and benefits because they did not (1)
perform sufficient up-front analyses of their baseline and projected costs and
benefits and (2) routinely monitor all actual seat management costs and
benefits." Hence, it recommended that the six agencies "monitor all
actual seat management costs and benefits."
The report was prepared for Rep. Tom
Davis (R-VA), the Chairman of the House
Government Reform Committee's Subcommittee on Technology and and Procurement
Policy. The GAO is an arm of the Congress.
Federal Circuit Rules in Genentech v. Amgen
4/29. The U.S. Court of Appeals (FedCir)
issued its opinion in Genentech
v. Amgen, a patent infringement case.
Genentech is the owner of U.S. Patent
Nos. 4,704,362
(titled "Recombinant cloning vehicle microbial polypeptide
expression"), 5,221,619
(titled "Method and means for microbial polypeptide expression"), and 5,583,013
(titled "Method and means for microbial polypeptide expression").
These patents disclose methods and cloning vehicles for the introduction and
expression of genetic information -- deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or genes -- in
unicellular organisms that do not naturally contain or express that genetic
information. The patents thus enable introduction of a DNA sequence, such as a
synthetic gene that expresses a usable protein, into cells via a cloning
vehicle.
Genentech filed a complaint in U.S.
District Court (NDCal) against Amgen
alleging patent infringement. The District Court held that Amgen did not
literally infringe Genentech's patents. It also barred Genentech from proceeding
on a theory of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
The Court of Appeals affirmed as to the doctrine of equivalents, but vacated and
remanded the judgment of noninfringement because the District Court erred on a
matter of claim construction.
People and Appointments
4/29. The National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) published a notice that it has
extended its deadline for applications for the position of Associate
Administrator for Spectrum Management to to May 28.
4/29. Verizon announced that Vice Chairman
and CFO Frederic Salerno will retire later this year. Verizon did not
name a successor.
4/29. Nokia announced that JT Bergqvist,
SVP for IP Mobility, and Pertti Korhonen, SVP for Mobile Software, have
been appointed to the Group Executive Board, effective July 1, 2002. See, Nokia release.
4/29. Sen. John Warner (R-VA) spoke in
the Senate about Henry Hudson, President Bush's nominee for a seat on the
U.S. District Court (EDVa). Sen. Warner praised him as "highly qualified
for this judgeship". See, Cong. Rec., April 29, 2002, at S3499.
More News 4/29. President Bush gave a speech
at a campaign event in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM). Wilson is a
member of the House Commerce Committee,
and its Telecom and Internet Subcommittee. She is the sponsor of HR 718, the
Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2001, an anti spam bill. She was
also one of the leading opponents of the Tauzin Dingell bill in the House
Commerce Committee. However, President Bush did not address these issues at the
event.
4/29. The House Ways and Means
Committee's Subcommittee on Social Security held a field hearing in the
state of Florida titled "Protecting the Privacy of Social Security Numbers
and Prevent Identity Theft". See, hearing advisory.
The General Accounting Office (GAO) submitted
a report titled
"Social Security Numbers: SSNs Are Widely Used by Government and Could Be
Better Protected".
4/29. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) announced that it adopted a Report and Order pertaining to the ability of
public safety answering points (PSAPs) to call back a 911 caller who is
disconnected when that caller is using a non initialized wireless telephone. The
FCC stated in a release
that the Report and Order concludes that "it is still technically
infeasible to require carriers, and manufacturers of 911-only phones, to develop
and implement technical solutions that would provide PSAPs with a call back
number for calls from non-initialized phones". This is WT Docket No.
94-102.
Bush Asks Senate to Pass TPA Bill
4/27. President Bush gave a radio
address in which he advocated passage of trade promotion authority (TPA)
legislation. He stated that "The Senate should pass the pending trade
legislation without delay. Trade promotion authority would give me the
flexibility to negotiate with other countries to open their markets and get the
best deals for American producers and workers. Congress would still have the
final up or down vote on any trade agreement."
Bush also stated that "I recognize that some American workers may face
adjustment challenges as a result of trade. I support helping these workers by
reauthorizing and improving trade adjustment assistance programs that will give
workers impacted by trade new skills, help them find new jobs quickly, and
provide them with financial assistance."
The House passed its TPA bill, HR 3005,
on December 6. The Senate Finance
Committee approved its version of the bill later in December. Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD), the Senate
Majority Leader, has yet to schedule the bill for consideration by the full
Senate.
7th Circuit Affirms Convictions of ELF Antenna Saboteurs
4/26. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (7thCir) issued its opinion
in USA
v. Urfer, affirming the convictions of two people who sawed down
poles that support an antenna for the U.S. Navy's Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
system for transmitting signals to its submerged ballistic missile submarines.
ELF. The U.S. Navy's ELF
Communication System enables communications with submerged submarines. Radio
signals attenuate rapidly when they pass through water. Submarines on patrol
tend to be deep under the water, because traveling at or near the surface are
more likely to be located by hostile parties. However, the rate of attenuation
varies with radio frequency, with low frequency signals attenuating more slowly.
The U.S. Navy sends messages to submerged submarines around the world using the
frequency of 76 Hz. Generating a radio signal requires an antenna, the necessary
length of which is inversely proportional to its frequency. Extremely low
frequency transmissions require extremely long antennas. The U.S. Navy has
strung several of these transmitting antennas to wooden poles located on federal
land in the states of Wisconsin and Michigan. The antenna at issue in this case
is 28 miles long and resembles a power line.
The defendants in this case, seeking to disable the U.S. Navy's nuclear missile
submarine capability, sawed down a series of poles supporting an ELF antenna.
District Court. Defendants were prosecuted in U.S.
District Court (EDWisc) for willfully injuring federal property in violation
of 18 U.S.C. § 1361
and § 1362. They
asserted in defense, among other things, that they had been advised by an
attorney -- one Anabel Dwyer
-- that sawing down these antenna poles would be legal. The District Court
allowed this attorney to testify. It also instructed the jury on a "defense
of counsel" defense; it instructed the jury that it could not convict the
defendants if they "honestly believed their attorney's advice and acted in
honest ignorance of their legal duties". The jury nevertheless returned
verdicts of guilty. Defendants appealed on the grounds that they were not
permitted to present evidence on "dangers to world peace".
Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that "The only error
committed at trial was in the defendants' favor. No advice of counsel
instruction should have been given. There is no such thing as an ``advice of
counsel´´ defense."
Judge Richard Posner,
who wrote the opinion of the Court, noted that "There are almost a million
lawyers in the United States. Not all of them are competent; not all are
honest." He added that "the lawyer's advice to these defendants was
indeed unreasonable".
Posner also concluded that "It would be especially bizarre to suppose that
antiwar activists have a right to disable the United States from using nuclear
weapons when many other nations, not plagued by such activists, possess these
weapons."
AT&T Fined for Antenna Violations
4/26. On April 25 the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) released two Notices of Apparent Liability (NAL), finding AT&T and SpectraSite Communications liable for
forfeitures in the amounts of $153,000 and $111,000, respectively, for violation
of 47 U.S.C. § 303(q),
and FCCs rules, relating to antenna structure construction, marking, and
lighting.
Section 303(q) provides that the FCC shall "Have authority to require the
painting and/or illumination of radio towers if and when in its judgment such
towers constitute, or there is a reasonable possibility that they may
constitute, a menace to air navigation." The NALs were adopted by the FCC
on April 18, and released on April 25. See, AT&T NAL, SpectraSite NAL,
and FCC release.
Urfer and Sprong (see preceding story) sawed down poles supporting ELF antennas,
in an attempt to shut down the U.S. Navy's ability to send messages to its
submerged submarines, and compromise national security. They received light
sentences and were ordered to "pay restitution of several thousand
dollars". In contrast, AT&T and SpectraSite were fined $264,000 for
failure to "paint antenna structures, and failure to replace lights"
on antennas.
FCC Commissioner Copps Addresses Regulation of Communications
4/26. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Commissioner Michael Copps
gave a speech
[PDF] to the U.S. Conference of Catholic
Bishops in Dallas, Texas. He addressed universal service subsidies, the
FCC's public interest standard, media consolidation, regulation of broadcast
speech, and other issues.
Copps stated that "Communications technologies can enlighten minds, convey
powerful ideas, educate, enable, and lay a solid foundation for economic growth
and human development. Or, they can twist minds, dumb down the exchange of
ideas, coarsen the national dialogue and unbalance both economic and human
development. The decisions we will make in the next years immediately before us
will have much to do with which path is taken."
He praised Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS), and the FCC's e-rate
program.
Broadband Internet Access as Universal Service. Copps also addressed
other FCC run universal service subsidies. He said that "Each and every
citizen of this great country should have access to the marvels of
communications." He characterized this as "a civil right". He
said that "Today, that means broadband".
Public Interest Standard. Copps also defended the public interest
standard. "Not only do I find the concept attractive personally, but
Congress made it the foundation of our communications statutes. In fact, the
term ``public interest´´ appears 112 times in the Telecommunications
Act". He did not, however, offer an explanation of its meaning.
Media Consolidation. Copps also discussed media consolidation at length.
He said that "We have experienced a great wave of mergers and acquisitions
over the past half dozen years. Many formerly independent broadcast stations are
now parts of huge ownership groups comprising hundreds of outlets. This
consolidation has no doubt created efficiencies ... But this consolidation also
presents us with serious questions of public policy."
He continued that "our people have always harbored a deep suspicion of
excessive industrial consolidation, and they have always wanted sentinels at the
gate to guard against it. Each proposed industry combination needs to be looked
at on its merits -- some are good, some are not -- but the public interest test
must be rigorously applied to every one of them. This is exactly what I have
attempted to do in my first year at the Commission."
He concluded that "One of our most important jobs at the FCC must be the
preservation of a bustling marketplace of ideas, a diversity in sources of
content in each community, and a multiplicity of voices to stir discussion and
debate throughout the land. This is what nurtures our democracy."
Regulation of Speech. Copps also stated that media have a
"responsibility to act in the public interest".
"Broadcast and cable programming, in addition to being entertaining, should
enhance our democratic discourse and educate our children", said Copps.
"It is incumbent upon us at the FCC ... to ensure that that the bottom line
does not displace the public interest as broadcasters' driving force."
"It is up to us at the FCC to make sure that there continue to be outlets
for independent programming. We need to ensure that local broadcast stations
continue to carry programming that serves the needs of the local community,
covering local public affairs and serving the needs of all aspects of the
community. In order to ensure that local communities are adequately served,
there must be diverse sources of programming in each community -- not just a
variety of programming formats but true diversity, providing a variety of voices
and viewpoints."
Program Related Entities? Commissioner Copps also discussed the
obligations of "program related entities". He said that "Right
now broadcasters' only affirmative programming obligations are to serve their
communities and to provide some programming that serves the educational needs of
children. They need to do more. So do other program related entities. In the
area of Public Service Announcements, cable programmers, local cable system
operators and satellite providers -- not subject to the same public interest
obligations as broadcasters -- nonetheless have obligations to be good corporate
citizens. These programming providers, like broadcasters, have the ability to
deliver targeted messages to specific audiences, and thereby to serve the
public."
Copps also addressed efforts to regulate indecency.
Evans Responds to House Commerce Committee Re ICANN
4/26. Commerce Secretary Donald Evans
wrote a letter
to Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-LA), the
Chairman of the House Commerce
Committee, and others, regarding the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).
On March 13, Rep. Billy Tauzin
(R-LA), Rep. John Dingell (D-MI), Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), and Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) wrote a letter
to Secretary Evans in which they stated that "According to the Memorandum of
Understanding between ICANN and the Department for implementing a transition
for ICANN's technical management of Internet names and addresses, ICANN was to
be founded upon the principles of ``stability, competition, bottom-up
coordination, and representation.´´ Since its inception, however, ICANN has
increasingly departed from that limited role. Its unchecked growth into general
Internet policymaking and regulation of commercial rights and interests is very
disturbing."
They also offered several recommendations. For example, "The Department
should ensure that ICANN's Board of Directors is fully representative of all
stakeholders, including corporate stakeholders and members of the general
Internet community".
They also recommended that "ICANN should limit its activities to its
initial scope of jurisdiction, i.e., coordinating core Internet functions and
the technical aspects of naming and address allocation issues". They also
suggested that "There should be clear, written procedures for approving new
gTLDs, as well as any future technical issues, including an impartial appeals
process for those who have process or substantive complaints."
Finally, the group stated that "we want to strongly reiterate our support
for continued Department of Commerce control over the so-called ``A-root´´
server. We believe that any assumption of control over that asset by any outside
entity would be contrary to the economic and national security interests of the
United States."
Evans wrote back that "we support efforts to reform the organization in a
manner that takes into account the views of Internet stakeholders." He also
stated that "We view the proposal tabled by ICANN President Stuart Lynn as
a starting point, not an ending point, for reform discussions. In this regard,
we are pleased that at its recent meeting the ICANN Board of Directors took
action to establish a process and a Committee on Evolution and Reform through
which these important matters can be further considered and discussed by all
stakeholders and the Internet community at large."
Reps. Tauzin and Dingell are the Chairman and ranking Democrat of the House
Commerce Committee. Reps. Upton and Markey are the Chairman and ranking Democrat
of the Telecom and Internet Subcommittee.
FTC Commissioners Comment on Hollings' Online Privacy Bill
4/26. All five Commissioners of the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) wrote letters to Sen.
John McCain (R-AZ) in response to his request to them for comments on S 2201,
the Online Personal Privacy Act (OPPA), a bill to regulate the information
collection and dissemination practices of web site operators and ISPs. Three
Commissioners offered criticism of online privacy legislation. Two supported
legislation.
Sen. McCain is the ranking Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee. Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-SC) is the
sponsor of S 2201 and the Chairman of the Committee.
FTC Chairman Timothy Muris wrote in his letter that he has five
concerns about the bill. First, he wrote that as attempts to implement the
financial privacy provisions of the Gramm Leach Bliley bill have demonstrated,
"Drafting workable legislative and regulatory standards is extraordinarily
difficult." Second, "Whatever the potential of the Internet, most
observers recognize that information collection today is also widespread
offline. Legislation subjecting one set of competitors to different rules,
simply based on the medium used to collect the information, appears
discriminatory." Third, "We have insufficient information about costs
and benefits." Fourth, "the online industry is continuing to evolve
rapidly." He cited recent progress in privacy related practices identified
in a report
[PDF] prepared for the Progress and Freedom
Foundation titled "Privacy Online: A Report on the Information
Practices and Policies of Commercial Web Sites". And fifth, Muris wrote
that "there is a great deal the FTC and others can do under existing laws
to protect consumer privacy".
Commissioner Orson Swindle wrote in his letter that
"there has been no market failure that would justify the passage of
legislation regulating privacy practices concerning most types of information.
Even if such a market failure exists, I am not persuaded that the benefits of
such legislation, including the proposed Online Personal Privacy Act, exceed its
costs." He added that "the best means of protecting consumer privacy
without unduly burdening the New Economy is through a combination of industry
self regulation and aggressive enforcement of existing laws that are relevant to
privacy by the FTC and other appropriate regulatory agencies."
Commission Thomas Leary wrote in his letter that "I do
not believe it is my place to advise Congress on the bottom line issue of
whether it is or is not a good idea to legislate on privacy issues."
Nevertheless, he went on to criticize the bill at length.
In contrast, Commissioner Mozell Thompson wrote in his letter that
"Online privacy legislation is needed". He wrote that S 2201
"addresses many of the most delicate problems associated with a legislative
privacy framework. First, it contains the fair information principles and allows
for flexibility and change. The OPPA avoids a "one size fits all"
approach to the notice requirements and provides a reasonableness test for
access. The OPPA is also more reflective of a "real world" consumer
environment because it employs a sliding scale that affords more protection to
more sensitive information."
"Second, by preempting state law, the OPPA will prevent the possibility of
multiple standards that could "Balkanize" e-commerce and prove overly
burdensome to business and too confusing for consumers. Finally, in granting the
FTC rulemaking authority, the OPPA will permit strong enforcement, with special
sensitivity to industry and consumer needs, while also providing a means for
state participation."
Commissioner Sheila Anthony wrote in her letter that the
Hollings bill "provides long awaited, strong protection measures for
consumers in the online world. My only concern with this proposed legislation is
its limited reach. In my view, federal legislation is necessary to protect the
privacy of personally identifiable consumer information in the offline as well
as online commercial realms."
GAO Reports on DTV Deadline
4/26. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [PDF]
titled "Telecommunications: Many Broadcasters Will Not Meet May 2002
Digital Television Deadline".
The report concluded that "at least 24 percent of all commercial television
stations are broadcasting a digital signal. At least 113 of the 119 broadcast
stations that were mandated to be broadcasting a digital signal by 1999 are
doing so. In addition, at least 185 of the remaining 1,121 commercial television
stations that are to be broadcasting in digital by May 1, 2002, are on the air
with a digital signal."
The report also found that "Once on the air, 74 percent of current DTV
stations reported providing some amount of high definition content -- an average
of 23 hours per week for those stations showing some high definition content.
However, current DTV stations reported that they perceive little interest in DTV
among consumers in their viewing areas at the present time."
The report also referenced DTV and the Internet. It stated that "Another
advantage of digital television is that ``digital compression´´ technologies
allow for more efficient use of the radiofrequency spectrum than analog
technologies. Using digital compression, broadcasters will have the opportunity
to use the 6 megahertz of spectrum required to broadcast one analog television
show to transmit four or five different digital ``standard definition´´
television shows simultaneously." The reported noted that "The idea of
broadcasters as ``multichannel´´ operators could make broadcast television
more competitive with cable and satellite television providers. A transition to
digital technology also opens doors to future links between television sets and
computers and the Internet, possibly making television viewing more of an
interactive experience."
The report was prepared at the request of Rep.
Ed Markey (D-MA), the ranking Democrat on the House Commerce Committee's
Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet.
More News
4/26. The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York charged Richard
Eitelberg by complaint with the unauthorized intrusion of the computer network.
He is accused of remotely accessing the computers of his former employer and
deleting records. See, CCIPS
release.